Method and apparatus for custodial monitoring, filtering, and approving of content

• US 9,300,675 B2
• Filed: 09/15/2014
• Issued: 03/29/2016
• Est. Priority Date: 03/03/2008
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: LeapFrog Enterprises, Inc. (VTech Holdings Ltd.)
• Original Assignee: LeapFrog Enterprises, Inc. (VTech Holdings Ltd.)
• Inventors: Vignisson, Vidar, Von Reis, Will
• Primary Examiner(s): NANO, SARGON N
• Application Number:
  US14/486,873
• Publication Number:
  US 20150089599A1
• Time in Patent Office: 561 Days
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/9535 Search customisation based on user profiles and personalisation
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 21/552 involving long-term monitoring or reporting
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 21/604 Tools and structures for managing or administering access control systems
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 21/6218 to a system of files or objects, e.g. local or distributed file system or database
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 2221/2101 Auditing as a secondary aspect
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 2221/2119 Authenticating web pages, e.g. with suspicious links
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 2221/2137 Time limited access, e.g. to a computer or data
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 2221/2149 Restricted operating environment
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 2221/2153 Using hardware token as a secondary aspect
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/0227 Filtering policies mail message filtering H04L51/212
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/08 for authentication of entities cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for entity authentication H04L9/32
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/101 Access control lists [ACL]
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/102 Entity profiles

Abstract

The system provides a method and apparatus for a parent or other custodian or guardian to monitor, filter, and approve of content to be accessed by a child or children on a network. In one embodiment, the system logs all activity on a network by a child and sends regular historical reports to the parent for review. The parent can set certain triggers that will provide more immediate feedback when certain events occur or when certain types of data are accessed, or an attempt is made by the child for such access. The system allows the parent to control the filters and options from a variety of sources, including via the child'"'"'s computer, texting, instant messaging, cell phone, other web enabled computers, PDA'"'"'s, etc.

Claims

1. A server computer comprising a processor configured to:

receive a request from a first user for content from an unauthorized web page that was not previously approved on a computing device;

compare the request to a parental filter;

ban the request when the request is in the parental filter of banned requests;

grant the request when the request is not banned by the parental filter and transmit the content to the first user in response to the request;

monitor usage history of the first user;

rank interests of the first user based on the usage history; and

notify a second user of at least one interest of the first user,

wherein before the request from the first user, the processor is configured to present to the second user categories to choose for content to be banned by the parental filter.

2. The server computer of claim 1, wherein the parental filter includes at least one category of content that is banned.

3. The server computer of claim 1, the processor further configured to receive at least one category of content that is banned for the parental filter.

4. The server computer of claim 1, wherein the parental filter includes filtering based on whether the content from the unauthorized web page is part of a category considered unapproved for the first user by the parental filter.

5. The server computer of claim 1 wherein the parental filter includes a white list of content that is approved.

6. The server computer of claim 1 wherein the parental filter includes a black list of content that is not approved.

7. The server computer of claim 1, wherein the processor is further configured to determine that a predetermined time limit has been reached and to automatically log off the first user based on determining that the predetermined time limit has been reached.

8. The server computer of claim 1, wherein the processor is further configured to determine that a predetermined time limit is approaching and notify the first user that the predetermined time limit is approaching.

9. The server computer of claim 1, wherein the processor is further configured to:

collect history information of the first user; and

analyze the history information to provide a report to the second user of websites visited by the first user.

10. The server computer of claim 1, wherein the processor is further configured to notify the second user that the first user requested content that is banned by the parental filter.

11. The server computer of claim 1 wherein the parental filter includes a condition that must be satisfied by the user before the request for content can be granted.

12. A method comprising:

receiving, at a server computer, a request from a first user for content from an unauthorized web page that was not previously approved on a computing device;

comparing, by the server computer, the request to a parental filter;

banning, by the server computer, the request when the request is in the parental filter of banned requests;

granting, by the server computer, the request when the request is not banned by the parental filter and transmitting the content to the first user in response to the request;

monitoring usage history of the first user;

ranking interests of the first user based on the usage history; and

notifying a second user of at least one interest of the first user,

wherein before the request from the first user, the processor is configured to present to the second user categories to choose for content to be banned by the parental filter.

13. The method of claim 12, wherein comparing the request to a parental filter includes determining whether the content from the unauthorized web page is part of a category considered unapproved for the user by the parental filter.

14. The method of claim 12, further comprising notifying the second user that the first user requested content that is banned by the parental filter.

15. A computing device comprising a processor configured to:

transmit a request from a first user for content from an unauthorized web page that was not previously approved on the computing device, wherein a server computer receives the request for content, compares the request to a parental filter, bans the request when the request is in the parental filter of banned requests, grants the request when the request is not banned by the parental filter and transmits the content to the user in response to the request, and wherein before the request from the first user, the server computer presents to a second user categories to choose for content to be banned by the parental filter;

receive a notification when the request for content is banned by the server computer;

receive the content when the request for content is granted by the server computer; and

receive at least one interest of the user based on a ranking of interests of the user derived from the usage history of the user.