Techniques for behavioral pairing in a contact center system

• US 9,300,802 B1
• Filed: 09/30/2015
• Issued: 03/29/2016
• Est. Priority Date: 01/28/2008
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Afiniti Ltd
• Original Assignee: Satmap International Holdings, Ltd.
• Inventors: Chishti, Zia
• Primary Examiner(s): Nguyen, Quynh
• Application Number:
  US14/871,658
• Publication Number:
  US 20160080573A1
• Time in Patent Office: 181 Days
• Field of Search: 379/265.01, 379/266.01, 379/309, 705/7.13
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: H04M 2201/18 Comparators
• CPC Class Codes: H04M 2201/36 Memories
• CPC Class Codes: H04M 3/5183 Call or contact centers with computer-telephony arrangements
• CPC Class Codes: H04M 3/5232 Call distribution algorithms
• CPC Class Codes: H04M 3/5233 Operator skill based call distribution
• CPC Class Codes: H04M 3/5235 Dependent on call type or called number [DNIS]

Abstract

Techniques for behavioral pairing in a contact center system are disclosed. In one particular embodiment, the techniques may be realized as a method for pairing in a contact center including ordering one or more contacts, ordering one or more agents, comparing a first difference in ordering between a first contact and a first agent in a first pair with a second difference in ordering between a second contact and a second agent in a second pair, and selecting the first pair or the second pair for connection based on the comparing, wherein the first contact and the second contact are different or the first agent and the second agent are different.

Claims

1. A method for pairing in a contact center comprising:

ordering one or more contacts;

ordering one or more agents;

comparing, by at least one processor, a first difference in ordering between a first contact and a first agent in a first pair with a second difference in ordering between a second contact and a second agent in a second pair; and

selecting, by the at least one processor, the first pair or the second pair for connection based on the comparing,

wherein the first contact and the second contact are different or the first agent and the second agent are different, and

wherein a higher-ordered agent or a higher-ordered contact remains available for subsequent assignment.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein selecting the first pair or the second pair based on the comparing further comprises applying, by the at least one processor, a diagonal strategy to the orderings.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the ordering of one or more contacts or the ordering of one or more agents can be expressed as percentiles.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the ordering of one or more contacts or the ordering of one or more agents can be expressed as percentile ranges.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein each of the one or more contacts or each of the one or more agents is assigned a percentile within each contact or agent'"'"'s respective percentile range.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein an assigned percentile is a midpoint of a percentile range.

7. The method of claim 5, wherein an assigned percentile is a random percentile of a percentile range.

8. The method of claim 1, further comprising determining, by the at least one processor, a bandwidth for each contact type of the first and second contacts proportionate to a frequency at which contacts of the each contact type become available for assignment.

9. The method of claim 1, further comprising targeting, by the at least one processor, a balanced agent utilization.

10. The method of claim 9, wherein targeting the balanced agent utilization further comprises determining, by the at least one processor, proportional bandwidth for each of the one or more agents.

11. The method of claim 1, wherein a selected agent of the selected pair is not any of:

an agent lagging in a fairness metric,

an agent rated highest in a performance metric,

an agent rated highest in a performance metric for a particular contact type,

an agent previously assigned to a contact of the selected pair,

a sequentially labeled agent, or

a randomly selected agent.

12. The method of claim 1, wherein a selected contact of the selected pairing is not any of:

a contact at a head of a queue in the contact center,

a longest-waiting contact,

a highest-priority contact, or

a randomly selected contact.

13. The method of claim 1, wherein the selected one of the first pair and the second pair comprises a worse expected instant outcome than the other of the first pair and the second pair.

14. The method of claim 1, wherein the selected one of the first pair and the second pair comprises a smaller absolute difference in ordering than the other of the first pair and the second pair.

15. A system for pairing in a contact center system comprising:

at least one processor, wherein the at least one processor is configured to;

order one or more contacts;

order one or more agents;

compare a first difference in ordering between a first contact and a first agent in a first pair with a second difference in ordering between a second contact and a second agent in a second pair; and

select the first pair or the second pair for connection based on the comparing,

wherein the first contact and the second contact are different or the first agent and the second agent are different, and

wherein a higher-ordered agent or a higher-ordered contact remains available for subsequent assignment.

16. The system of claim 15, wherein the selected one of the first pair and the second pair comprises a worse expected instant outcome than the other of the first pair and the second pair.

17. The system of claim 15, wherein the selected one of the first pair and the second pair comprises a smaller absolute difference in ordering than the other of the first pair and the second pair.

18. An article of manufacture for pairing in a contact center system comprising:

a non-transitory processor readable medium; and

instructions stored on the medium;

wherein the instructions are configured to be readable from the medium by at least one processor and thereby cause the at least one processor to operate so as to;

order one or more contacts;

order one or more agents;

compare a first difference in ordering between a first contact and a first agent in a first pair with a second difference in ordering between a second contact and a second agent in a second pair; and

select the first pair or the second pair for connection based on the comparing,

wherein the first contact and the second contact are different or the first agent and the second agent are different, and

wherein a higher-ordered agent or a higher-ordered contact remains available for subsequent assignment.

19. The article of manufacture of claim 18, wherein the selected one of the first pair and the second pair comprises a worse expected instant outcome than the other of the first pair and the second pair.

20. The article of manufacture of claim 18, wherein the selected one of the first pair and the second pair comprises a smaller absolute difference in ordering than the other of the first pair and the second pair.