Method and apparatus for efficiently coordinating data center cooling units

• US 9,317,045 B2
• Filed: 01/08/2014
• Issued: 04/19/2016
• Est. Priority Date: 08/21/2009
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Vigilent Corporation
• Original Assignee: Vigilent Corporation
• Inventors: Federspiel, Kurt, Chin, Jerry, Federspiel, Clifford C.
• Primary Examiner(s): Shectman, Sean
• Application Number:
  US14/150,195
• Publication Number:
  US 20140121843A1
• Time in Patent Office: 832 Days
• Field of Search: None
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: G05D 22/02 characterised by the use of electric means
• CPC Class Codes: G05D 23/1928 sensing the temperature of one space
• CPC Class Codes: H05K 7/20745 within rooms for removing heat from cabinets, e.g. by air conditioning device
• CPC Class Codes: H05K 7/20836 Thermal management, e.g. server temperature control

Abstract

Methods and systems for controlling environmental maintenance modules (e.g. HVAC units) using sensors are provided. Values measured by the sensors can be used to determine a change in operation levels of the modules to keep the sensor values within a desired range. For example, a stopped module can be increased or started for more cooling when a sensor temperature is too hot. The module predicted to have the greatest effect on the temperature of hot sensor can be started. As another example, a module can be stopped (or otherwise have an operation level decreased), if the sensor temperatures are within range, and the decrease in operation level is predicted not to cause an out-of-range condition.

Claims

1. A method of controlling an environmental maintenance system including a plurality of environmental maintenance modules currently running and a plurality of sensors that measure a value of a physical condition of an environment, the method comprising:

for at least one of the plurality of the modules currently running;

estimating sensor values of the sensors resulting if an operation level of the module were decreased by at least a predetermined amount;

determining a first set of one or more of the plurality of the modules currently running that have none of the estimated sensor values outside of a first range; and

decreasing an operation level of at least one module of the first set in response to the determination that one or more of the plurality of the modules currently running have none of the estimated sensor values outside of the first range.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein decreasing an operation level of at least one module of the first set includes stopping a module.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein estimating sensor values of the sensors resulting if an operation level of a first module were decreased by at least a predetermined amount includes:

estimating resulting sensor values for a change in operation level of each of a plurality of actuators corresponding to the first module, and wherein decreasing an operation level corresponds to decreasing the operation level for the actuator that does not cause estimated sensor values to be outside of the first range.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein the first range includes a threshold that is a combination of a target threshold minus a deadband value.

5. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

identifying one or more modules of the first set whose efficiency is less than an efficiency threshold; and

for one of the identified running modules;

estimating a percent capacity of each module that would remain on if the identified module were shut off, the percent capacity being a measure of the percentage of the designed capacity at which the identified module is operating;

determining a load from the percent capacities;

determining whether the load does not exceed a first threshold;

decreasing the operation level the identified module in response to a determination that the load does not exceed the first threshold and none of the estimated sensor values are outside of the first range.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein the one of the identified modules is the identified module with the lowest efficiency.

7. The method of claim 5, wherein the load is determined from the percent capacity of each module and a design capacity of the module.

8. The method of claim 5 wherein the estimated percent capacity % Cap of module C_indx is % Cap(Cindx)=% Cap (Cindx)+LOAD(Cindx, Sindx)*% Cap(Sindx), for a load matrix LOAD, wherein the load matrix provides a measure of the effect of stopping a module on the capacity of use of the remaining modules that remain on, wherein the load matrix element LOAD (C_indx, S_indx) provides a measure of the effect of stopping module S_indx on the capacity of module C_indx.

9. The method of claim 5, wherein the efficiency η

for module C_indx is computed as the percent capacity divided by the percentage of operation of a fan speed relative to a maximum fan speed setting.

10. A computer program product comprising a non-transitory computer-readable medium storing a plurality of instructions that when executed cause a processor to perform a method of controlling an environmental maintenance system that includes a plurality of environmental maintenance modules currently running and a plurality of sensors that measure a value of a physical condition of an environment, the method comprising:

for at least one of the plurality of the modules currently running;

estimating sensor values of the sensors resulting if an operation level of the module were decreased by at least a predetermined amount;

determining a first set of one or more of the plurality of the modules currently running that have none of the estimated sensor values outside of a first range; and

decreasing an operation level of at least one module of the first set in response to the determination that one or more of the plurality of the modules currently running have none of the estimated sensor values outside of the first range.

11. The computer program product of claim 10, wherein decreasing an operation level of at least one module of the first set includes stopping a module.

12. The computer program product of claim 10, wherein estimating sensor values of the sensors resulting if an operation level of a first module were decreased by at least a predetermined amount includes:

estimating resulting sensor values for a change in operation level of each of a plurality of actuators corresponding to the first module, and wherein decreasing an operation level corresponds to decreasing the operation level for the actuator that does not cause estimated sensor values to be outside of the first range.

13. The computer program product of claim 10, wherein the first range includes a threshold that is a combination of a target threshold minus a deadband value.

14. The computer program product of claim 10, wherein the method further comprises:

identifying one or more modules of the first set whose efficiency is less than an efficiency threshold; and

for one of the identified running modules;

estimating a percent capacity of each module that would remain on if the identified module were shut off, the percent capacity being a measure of the percentage of the designed capacity at which the identified module is operating;

determining a load from the percent capacities;

determining whether the load does not exceed a first threshold;

decreasing the operation level the identified module in response to a determination that the load does not exceed the first threshold and none of the estimated sensor values are outside of the first range.

15. The computer program product of claim 14, wherein the one of the identified modules is the identified module with the lowest efficiency.

16. The computer program product of claim 14, wherein the load is determined from the percent capacity of each module and a design capacity of the module.

17. The computer program product of claim 14 wherein the estimated percent capacity % Cap of module C_indx is

% Cap(Cindx)=% Cap(Cindx)+LOAD(Cindx,Sindx)*%Cap(Sindx)₅

for a load matrix LOAD, wherein the load matrix provides a measure of the effect of stopping a module on the capacity of use of the remaining modules that remain on, wherein the load matrix element LOAD (C_indx, S_indx) provides a measure of the effect of stopping module S_indx on the capacity of module C_indx.

18. The computer program product of claim 14, wherein the efficiency 77 for module C_indx is computed as the percent capacity divided by the percentage of operation of a fan speed relative to a maximum fan speed setting.

19. An environmental maintenance system comprising:

a plurality of environmental maintenance modules;

a supervisory controller communicatively linked to the environmental maintenance modules;

a plurality of sensors that measure a value of a physical condition of an environment and that are communicatively linked with the supervisory controller;

a memory comprising instructions which when executed cause the supervisory controller to;

determine which environmental maintenance modules are currently running;

for at least one of the plurality of the modules currently running;

estimate sensor values of the sensors resulting if an operation level of the module were decreased by at least a predetermined amount;

determine a first set of one or more of the plurality of the modules currently running that have none of the estimated sensor values outside of a first range; and

decrease an operation level of at least one module of the first set in response to the determination that one or more of the plurality of the modules currently running have none of the estimated sensor values outside of the first range.

20. The environmental maintenance system of claim 19, further comprising instructions that cause the supervisory controller to:

identify one or more modules of the first set whose efficiency is less than an efficiency threshold; and

for one of the identified running modules;

estimate a percent capacity of each module that would remain on if the identified module were shut off, the percent capacity being a measure of the percentage of the designed capacity at which the identified module is operating;

determine a load from the percent capacities;

determine whether the load does not exceed a first threshold;

decrease the operation level the identified module in response to a determination that the load does not exceed the first threshold and none of the estimated sensor values are outside of the first range;

wherein the estimated percent capacity % Cap of module C_indx is

% Cap(Cindx)=% Cap(Cindx)+LOAD(Cindx,Sindx)*% Cap(Sindx),

for a load matrix LOAD, wherein the load matrix provides a measure of the effect of stopping a module on the capacity of use of the remaining modules that remain on, wherein the load matrix element LOAD (C_indx, S_indx) provides a measure of the effect of stopping module S_indx on the capacity of module C_indx.