Control system and method for a prosthetic knee
-
0Associated
Cases -
0Associated
Defendants -
0Accused
Products -
12Forward
Citations -
0
Petitions -
0
Assignments
First Claim
1. A mobile computing device (MCD) configured to receive data from a prosthetic or orthotic device (P/O), the P/O having one or more moveable joints, a damper configured to control a resistance at the one or more moveable joints, an actuator associated with the damper to control movement or resistance at the one or more moveable joints, and a controller configured to operate the damper, the MCD comprising:
- a network interface configured to establish a wireless communication link directly with the P/O at least while the P/O is attached to a limb of a user and to receive from the P/O a first configuration parameter value associated with an adjustable configuration parameter of the P/O; and
a processor communicatively coupled to the network interface and configured to;
cause a display associated with the MCD to display an indicia of the first configuration parameter value;
receive a second configuration parameter value based at least in part on a user interaction with the MCD; and
cause the network interface to communicate the second configuration parameter value to the P/O, wherein the controller adjusts the adjustable configuration parameter based at least in part on the second configuration parameter value.
0 Assignments
0 Petitions

Accused Products

Abstract
A prosthetic or orthotic system including a magnetorheological (MR) damper. The MR damper may be configured to operate in shear mode. In one embodiment, the MR damper includes a rotary MR damper. A controller is configured to operate the damper. A mobile computing device may be adapted to intermittently communicate configuration parameters to the controller. A method of configuring a prosthetic or orthotic system is also disclosed.
261 Citations
Prosthetic foot with enhanced stability and elastic energy return | ||
Patent #
US 9,561,118 B2
Filed 02/24/2014
|
Current Assignee
ssur hf
|
Sponsoring Entity
ssur hf
|
Prosthetic ankle and method of controlling same based on adaptation to speed | ||
Patent #
US 9,707,104 B2
Filed 03/12/2014
|
Current Assignee
Ossur hf
|
Sponsoring Entity
Ossur hf
|
Reactive layer control system for prosthetic and orthotic devices | ||
Patent #
US 9,808,357 B2
Filed 01/21/2008
|
Current Assignee
Victhom Laboratory Inc
|
Sponsoring Entity
Victhom Laboratory Inc
|
Powered prosthetic hip joint | ||
Patent #
US 9,895,240 B2
Filed 04/21/2015
|
Current Assignee
ssur hf
|
Sponsoring Entity
ssur hf
|
Transfemoral prosthetic systems and methods for operating the same | ||
Patent #
US 10,195,057 B2
Filed 09/23/2011
|
Current Assignee
Ossur hf
|
Sponsoring Entity
Ossur hf
|
Impedance simulating motion controller for orthotic and prosthetic applications | ||
Patent #
US 10,251,762 B2
Filed 05/27/2015
|
Current Assignee
Ossur hf
|
Sponsoring Entity
Ossur hf
|
Rehabilitation using a prosthetic device | ||
Patent #
US 10,290,235 B2
Filed 10/10/2014
|
Current Assignee
Ossur hf
|
Sponsoring Entity
Ossur hf
|
Transfemoral prosthetic systems and methods for operating the same | ||
Patent #
US 10,299,943 B2
Filed 01/30/2013
|
Current Assignee
Ossur hf
|
Sponsoring Entity
Ossur hf
|
Prosthetic foot with enhanced stability and elastic energy return | ||
Patent #
US 10,369,019 B2
Filed 12/21/2016
|
Current Assignee
Ossur hf
|
Sponsoring Entity
Ossur hf
|
Sensing systems and methods for monitoring gait dynamics | ||
Patent #
US 10,369,025 B2
Filed 10/06/2016
|
Current Assignee
Ossur Iceland ehf
|
Sponsoring Entity
Ossur Iceland ehf
|
Prosthetic foot with removable flexible members | ||
Patent #
US 10,390,974 B2
Filed 05/05/2015
|
Current Assignee
Ossur hf
|
Sponsoring Entity
Ossur hf
|
Reactive layer control system for prosthetic and orthotic devices | ||
Patent #
US 10,405,996 B2
Filed 11/03/2017
|
Current Assignee
Victhom Laboratory Inc
|
Sponsoring Entity
Victhom Laboratory Inc
|
Sensing systems and methods for monitoring gait dynamics | ||
Patent #
US 7,867,285 B2
Filed 02/02/2006
|
Current Assignee
Ossur hf
|
Sponsoring Entity
Arion Banki Hf
|
Control device and system for controlling an actuated prosthesis | ||
Patent #
US 7,867,284 B2
Filed 11/09/2005
|
Current Assignee
Victhom Human Bionics Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Victhom Human Bionics Inc.
|
Systems and methods for actuating a prosthetic ankle based on a relaxed position | ||
Patent #
US 7,896,927 B2
Filed 03/01/2006
|
Current Assignee
Ossur hf
|
Sponsoring Entity
Ossur hf
|
Instrumented prosthetic foot | ||
Patent #
US 7,955,398 B2
Filed 08/09/2007
|
Current Assignee
Victhom Laboratory Inc
|
Sponsoring Entity
Victhom Human Bionics Inc.
|
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MOTION-CONTROLLED FOOT UNIT | ||
Patent #
US 20110106274A1
Filed 09/27/2010
|
Current Assignee
Ossur hf
|
Sponsoring Entity
Ossur hf
|
Device and system for prosthetic knees and ankles | ||
Patent #
US 7,942,935 B2
Filed 03/29/2006
|
Current Assignee
Motion Control
|
Sponsoring Entity
Motion Control
|
Assistive clothing | ||
Patent #
US 7,918,808 B2
Filed 07/22/2002
|
Current Assignee
John C. Simmons
|
Sponsoring Entity
John C. Simmons
|
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ACTUATING A PROSTHETIC ANKLE | ||
Patent #
US 20110224804A1
Filed 02/28/2011
|
Current Assignee
Ossur hf
|
Sponsoring Entity
Ossur hf
|
Transfemoral prosthetic systems and methods for operating the same | ||
Patent #
US 8,057,550 B2
Filed 03/23/2009
|
Current Assignee
Ossur hf
|
Sponsoring Entity
Ossur hf
|
Prosthetic and orthotic systems usable for rehabilitation | ||
Patent #
US 8,048,007 B2
Filed 02/02/2006
|
Current Assignee
Ossur hf
|
Sponsoring Entity
Arion Banki Hf
|
Actuator assembly for prosthetic or orthotic joint | ||
Patent #
US 8,048,172 B2
Filed 09/01/2005
|
Current Assignee
Ossur hf
|
Sponsoring Entity
Arion Banki Hf
|
Joint device for artificial leg, method of controlling the joint device, and control unit | ||
Patent #
US 7,641,700 B2
Filed 08/26/2003
|
Current Assignee
Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha
|
Sponsoring Entity
Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha
|
Computer controlled prosthetic knee device | ||
Patent #
US 7,655,050 B2
Filed 07/28/2006
|
Current Assignee
Freedom Innovations LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Freedom Innovations LLC
|
Control system for prosthetic knee | ||
Patent #
US 7,799,091 B2
Filed 10/08/2007
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Sponsoring Entity
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Actuated prosthesis for amputees | ||
Patent #
US 7,736,394 B2
Filed 11/25/2003
|
Current Assignee
Victhom Human Bionics Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Victhom Human Bionics Inc.
|
Signal Modulator for Visual Indicator | ||
Patent #
US 20100131101A1
Filed 11/20/2009
|
Current Assignee
University of Utah Research Foundation
|
Sponsoring Entity
University of Utah Research Foundation
|
System and method for motion-controlled foot unit | ||
Patent #
US 7,811,334 B2
Filed 02/11/2005
|
Current Assignee
Ossur hf
|
Sponsoring Entity
Ossur hf
|
Instrumented prosthetic foot | ||
Patent #
US 7,815,689 B2
Filed 10/29/2008
|
Current Assignee
Victhom Human Bionics Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Victhom Human Bionics Inc.
|
ACTUATED PROSTHESIS FOR AMPUTESS | ||
Patent #
US 20100262260A1
Filed 06/14/2010
|
Current Assignee
Victhom Human Bionics Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Victhom Human Bionics Inc.
|
Kinematic quantification of gait asymmetry based on bilateral cyclograms | ||
Patent #
US 7,503,900 B2
Filed 07/03/2003
|
Current Assignee
Honda Motor Company
|
Sponsoring Entity
Honda Motor Company
|
Prosthetic foot with an adjustable ankle and method | ||
Patent #
US 7,520,904 B2
Filed 10/19/2005
|
Current Assignee
Freedom Innovations LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Freedom Innovations LLC
|
Sensing system and method for motion-controlled foot unit | ||
Patent #
US 7,531,006 B2
Filed 09/01/2005
|
Current Assignee
Ossur hf
|
Sponsoring Entity
Ossur hf
|
Prosthetic leg with knee braking function | ||
Patent #
US 7,588,604 B2
Filed 11/19/2003
|
Current Assignee
Nabco Ltd.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Nabco Ltd.
|
Systems and methods for adjusting the angle of a prosthetic ankle based on a measured surface angle | ||
Patent #
US 7,637,959 B2
Filed 03/01/2006
|
Current Assignee
Ossur hf
|
Sponsoring Entity
Arion Banki Hf
|
System and method for motion-controlled foot unit | ||
Patent #
US 7,637,957 B2
Filed 05/08/2008
|
Current Assignee
Ossur Hf
|
Sponsoring Entity
Ossur Hf
|
Actuated leg prosthesis for above-knee amputees | ||
Patent #
US 7,314,490 B2
Filed 06/17/2003
|
Current Assignee
Victhom Laboratory Inc
|
Sponsoring Entity
VICTHOM CORPORATION
|
Instrumented prosthetic foot | ||
Patent #
US 20080046096A1
Filed 07/31/2007
|
Current Assignee
Victhom Human Bionics Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Victhom Human Bionics Inc.
|
System and method for motion-controlled foot unit | ||
Patent #
US 7,431,737 B2
Filed 02/11/2005
|
Current Assignee
Ossur hf
|
Sponsoring Entity
Ossur hf
|
Dynamic seals for a prosthetic knee | ||
Patent #
US 7,455,696 B2
Filed 05/06/2005
|
Current Assignee
Ossur hf
|
Sponsoring Entity
Ossur hf
|
Biomorphic rhythmic movement controller | ||
Patent #
US 7,164,967 B2
Filed 05/02/2001
|
Current Assignee
IGUANA ROBOTICS INC.
|
Sponsoring Entity
IGUANA ROBOTICS INC.
|
Artificial ankle-foot system with spring, variable-damping, and series-elastic actuator components | ||
Patent #
US 20070043449A1
Filed 07/29/2006
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Sponsoring Entity
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
System and method for determining terrain transitions | ||
Patent #
US 20070050047A1
Filed 08/30/2006
|
Current Assignee
Ossur hf
|
Sponsoring Entity
Arion Banki Hf
|
Systems and methods of loading fluid in a prosthetic knee | ||
Patent #
US 7,198,071 B2
Filed 05/06/2005
|
Current Assignee
Ossur hf
|
Sponsoring Entity
Ossur hf
|
Exoskeletons for running and walking | ||
Patent #
US 20070123997A1
Filed 11/15/2006
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Sponsoring Entity
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Artificial joints using agonist-antagonist actuators | ||
Patent #
US 20070162152A1
Filed 12/19/2006
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Sponsoring Entity
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Speed-adaptive and patient-adaptive prosthetic knee | ||
Patent #
US 7,279,009 B2
Filed 08/22/2003
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Sponsoring Entity
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Biomimetic motion and balance controllers for use in prosthetics, orthotics and robotics | ||
Patent #
US 7,313,463 B2
Filed 08/04/2006
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Sponsoring Entity
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Personalized incoming call signal for communication devices | ||
Patent #
US 6,704,582 B2
Filed 12/11/2000
|
Current Assignee
Texas Instruments Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Texas Instruments Inc.
|
Electrical power supply circuit, in particular for portable appliances | ||
Patent #
US 6,061,577 A
Filed 12/19/1995
|
Current Assignee
Alcatel-Lucent SA
|
Sponsoring Entity
Alcatel-Lucent SA
|
Foot force sensor | ||
Patent #
US 5,408,873 A
Filed 07/25/1994
|
Current Assignee
Cleveland Medical Devices Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Cleveland Medical Devices Inc.
|
Control circuit | ||
Patent #
US 7,042,197 B2
Filed 12/23/2002
|
Current Assignee
Cap-Xx Ltd.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Cap-Xx Ltd.
|
Vacuum-assisted prosthetic device | ||
Patent #
US 7,025,792 B2
Filed 10/25/2004
|
Current Assignee
Collier Milo S.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Collier Milo S.
|
Electronically controlled prosthetic system | ||
Patent #
US 7,029,500 B2
Filed 04/09/2003
|
Current Assignee
James Jay Martin
|
Sponsoring Entity
James Jay Martin
|
Foot prosthesis having cushioned ankle | ||
Patent #
US 7,063,727 B2
Filed 12/17/2002
|
Current Assignee
Ossur hf
|
Sponsoring Entity
Ossur hf
|
Magnetorheologically actuated prosthetic knee | ||
Patent #
US 20060136072A1
Filed 05/06/2005
|
Current Assignee
Ossur hf
|
Sponsoring Entity
Ossur hf
|
System and method of synchronizing mechatronic devices | ||
Patent #
US 20060184280A1
Filed 02/15/2006
|
Current Assignee
Ossur hf
|
Sponsoring Entity
Arion Banki Hf
|
System and method for data communication with a mechatronic device | ||
Patent #
US 20060184252A1
Filed 02/15/2006
|
Current Assignee
Ossur hf
|
Sponsoring Entity
Arion Banki Hf
|
Magnetorheological fluid compositions and prosthetic knees utilizing same | ||
Patent #
US 7,101,487 B2
Filed 11/25/2003
|
Current Assignee
Ossur hf
|
Sponsoring Entity
OSSUR ENGINEERING INC.
|
Parallel linkage and artificial joint device using the same | ||
Patent #
US 7,118,601 B2
Filed 02/28/2003
|
Current Assignee
Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha
|
Sponsoring Entity
Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha
|
Artificial human limbs and joints employing actuators, springs, and variable-damper elements | ||
Patent #
US 20060249315A1
Filed 03/31/2006
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Sponsoring Entity
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Positioning of lower extremities artificial proprioceptors | ||
Patent #
US 7,137,998 B2
Filed 07/25/2003
|
Current Assignee
Victhom Laboratory Inc
|
Sponsoring Entity
Victhom Human Bionics Inc.
|
Device for measuring the relative angular position of two bodies with respect to a point, and articular prosthesis provided therewith | ||
Patent #
US 7,131,998 B2
Filed 04/15/2004
|
Current Assignee
Stmicroelectronics SRL
|
Sponsoring Entity
Stmicroelectronics SRL
|
Control system and method for controlling an actuated prosthesis | ||
Patent #
US 7,147,667 B2
Filed 06/20/2003
|
Current Assignee
Victhom Laboratory Inc
|
Sponsoring Entity
VICTHOM CORPORATION
|
Device in a leg prosthesis | ||
Patent #
US 6,855,170 B2
Filed 08/22/2001
|
Current Assignee
GRAMTEC INNOVATION AB
|
Sponsoring Entity
GRAMTEC INNOVATION AB
|
Variable resistance cell | ||
Patent #
US 6,875,241 B2
Filed 02/05/2003
|
Current Assignee
Freedom Innovations LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
CHRISTENSEN ROLAND J. OPERATING MANAGER OF RJC DEVELOPMENT LC GENERAL PARTNER OF ROLAND J. CHRISTENSEN FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
Master/slave electroactive polymer systems | ||
Patent #
US 6,876,135 B2
Filed 05/31/2002
|
Current Assignee
SRI International Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
SRI International Inc.
|
Instrumented prosthetic foot | ||
Patent #
US 20050107889A1
Filed 11/18/2003
|
Current Assignee
Victhom Laboratory Inc
|
Sponsoring Entity
Victhom Laboratory Inc
|
Support device replacing the existence or function of a limb | ||
Patent #
US 6,908,488 B2
Filed 12/18/2000
|
Current Assignee
OTTO BOCK HEALTHCARE IP GMBH CO. KG
|
Sponsoring Entity
RESPECTA OY
|
Sensor device, in particular for a prosthesis, and prosthesis having such a sensor device | ||
Patent #
US 6,918,308 B2
Filed 08/06/2002
|
Current Assignee
OTTO BOCK HEALTHCARE IP GMBH CO. KG
|
Sponsoring Entity
Biedermann Motech GmbH
|
Leg prosthesis | ||
Patent #
US 6,955,692 B2
Filed 02/13/2004
|
Current Assignee
Osseo-PL GmbH
|
Sponsoring Entity
ESKA IMPLANTS GMBH CO.
|
Prosthetic foot with an adjustable ankle and method | ||
Patent #
US 6,966,933 B2
Filed 10/21/2003
|
Current Assignee
Freedom Innovations LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
CHRISTENSEN ROLAND J. AS OPERATING MANAGER OF RJC DEVELOPMENT LC GENERAL PARTNER OF THE ROLAND J. CHRISTENSEN FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
Active muscle assistance device and method | ||
Patent #
US 6,966,882 B2
Filed 11/06/2003
|
Current Assignee
AlterG Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Tibion Corporation
|
Control system and method for a prosthetic knee | ||
Patent #
US 20050283257A1
Filed 03/09/2005
|
Current Assignee
Ossur hf
|
Sponsoring Entity
Ossur hf
|
Device and method for remote maintenance of an electronically controllable prosthesis | ||
Patent #
US 6,679,920 B2
Filed 09/11/2001
|
Current Assignee
OTTO BOCK HEALTHCARE IP GMBH CO. KG
|
Sponsoring Entity
Biedermann Motech GmbH
|
Method and apparatus for coupling an implantable stimulator/sensor to a prosthetic device | ||
Patent #
US 6,695,885 B2
Filed 11/15/2001
|
Current Assignee
Alfred E. Mann Foundation For Scientific Research
|
Sponsoring Entity
Alfred E. Mann Foundation For Scientific Research
|
Visual content browsing using rasterized representations | ||
Patent #
US 6,704,024 B2
Filed 11/29/2000
|
Current Assignee
Intellectual Ventures Assets 142 LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
ZFRAME INC.
|
Portable color and style analysis, match and management system | ||
Patent #
US 20040078299A1
Filed 01/30/2003
|
Current Assignee
X-Rite Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
X-Rite Incorporated
|
Lower limb prosthesis and control unit | ||
Patent #
US 6,719,806 B1
Filed 10/26/2000
|
Current Assignee
Blatchford Products Limited
|
Sponsoring Entity
CHARLES A. BLATCHFORD SONS
|
Variable-mechanical-impedance artificial legs | ||
Patent #
US 20040064195A1
Filed 07/03/2003
|
Current Assignee
iWalk Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
iWalk Incorporated
|
System for the control and monitoring of functional device for the disabled with energy from outside the body and a method for the remote control thereof | ||
Patent #
US 6,740,123 B2
Filed 12/31/2001
|
Current Assignee
I.N.A.I.L. CENTRO PER LA SPERIMENTAZIONE ED APPLICAZIONE DI
|
Sponsoring Entity
I.N.A.I.L. CENTRO PER LA SPERIMENTAZIONE ED APPLICAZIONE DI
|
Leg prosthesis with an artificial knee joint and method for controlling a leg prosthesis | ||
Patent #
US 6,755,870 B1
Filed 08/21/2000
|
Current Assignee
OTTO BOCK HEALTHCARE IP GMBH CO. KG
|
Sponsoring Entity
Biedermann Motech GmbH
|
Prosthetic foot | ||
Patent #
US 6,743,260 B2
Filed 07/31/2001
|
Current Assignee
BIOQUEST PROSTHETICS LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Townsend Barry W., Claudino Byron Kent
|
Electronically controlled prosthetic knee | ||
Patent #
US 6,764,520 B2
Filed 01/22/2001
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Sponsoring Entity
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Fixed-point filter and method | ||
Patent #
US 20040153484A1
Filed 01/31/2003
|
Current Assignee
Texas Instruments Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
-
|
Stably dispersed magnetic viscous fluid | ||
Patent #
US 6,780,343 B2
Filed 05/01/2002
|
Current Assignee
KAO Corporation
|
Sponsoring Entity
KAO Corporation, Bando Chemical Industries Limited
|
Magnetorheological fluid compositions and prosthetic knees utilizing same | ||
Patent #
US 20040217324A1
Filed 11/25/2003
|
Current Assignee
Ossur hf
|
Sponsoring Entity
-
|
Magnetorheological fluid damper | ||
Patent #
US 20030019700A1
Filed 07/25/2002
|
Current Assignee
Wittig Michael
|
Sponsoring Entity
Wittig Michael
|
Lower limb prosthesis | ||
Patent #
US 6,517,585 B1
Filed 05/03/2000
|
Current Assignee
Blatchford Products Limited
|
Sponsoring Entity
CHAS A Blatchford Sons Limited
|
Motion analysis system | ||
Patent #
US 6,513,381 B2
Filed 07/26/2001
|
Current Assignee
Garmin Limited
|
Sponsoring Entity
Dynastream Innovations Incorporated
|
Prosthetic foot assembly having improved resilient cushions and components | ||
Patent #
US 6,537,322 B1
Filed 03/27/2000
|
Current Assignee
Christopher Lyle Johnson, Eric Lloyd Robinson
|
Sponsoring Entity
Christopher Lyle Johnson, Eric Lloyd Robinson
|
Systems and methods for performing prosthetic or therapeutic neuromuscular stimulation using an external, battery powered controller with power conservation features | ||
Patent #
US 6,587,728 B2
Filed 03/30/2001
|
Current Assignee
NEUROCONTROL CORPORATION
|
Sponsoring Entity
NEUROCONTROL CORPORATION
|
Speed-adaptive and patient-adaptive prosthetic knee | ||
Patent #
US 6,610,101 B2
Filed 03/29/2001
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Sponsoring Entity
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Prosthetic foot having shock absorption | ||
Patent #
US 6,602,295 B1
Filed 02/11/2000
|
Current Assignee
Willowood Global LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Ohio Willow Wood Company
|
Sensor wrap including foldable applicator | ||
Patent #
US 6,671,531 B2
Filed 12/11/2001
|
Current Assignee
Masimo Corporation
|
Sponsoring Entity
Masimo Corporation
|
Prosthetic foot with energy transfer medium including variable viscosity fluid | ||
Patent #
US 6,663,673 B2
Filed 05/03/2002
|
Current Assignee
Freedom Innovations LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
CHRISTENSEN ROLAND J. AS OPERATING MANAGER OF RJC DEVELOPMENT LC GENERAL PARTNER OF THE ROLAND J. CHRISTENSEN FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
Prosthetic ankle and walking system | ||
Patent #
US 6,350,286 B1
Filed 08/05/1999
|
Current Assignee
Seattle Orthopedic Group Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Seattle Orthopedic Group Inc.
|
Upper limb prosthesis | ||
Patent #
US 6,361,570 B1
Filed 04/24/2000
|
Current Assignee
Touch Bionics Limited
|
Sponsoring Entity
LOTHIAN PRIMARY CARE NHS TRUST
|
Flow-control valve and damper | ||
Patent #
US 6,352,144 B1
Filed 05/12/1999
|
Current Assignee
ADVANCED FLUID SYSTEMS LIMITED
|
Sponsoring Entity
ADVANCED FLUID SYSTEMS LIMITED
|
Electrical energy storage device | ||
Patent #
US 6,373,152 B1
Filed 02/09/2000
|
Current Assignee
SYNERGY SCIENTECH CORP
|
Sponsoring Entity
SYNERGY SCIENTECH CORP
|
Magnetorheological compositions | ||
Patent #
US 6,395,193 B1
Filed 05/03/2000
|
Current Assignee
Lord Corporation
|
Sponsoring Entity
Lord Corporation
|
Ankle-foot orthotic | ||
Patent #
US 6,409,695 B1
Filed 07/27/1999
|
Current Assignee
John D. Connelly
|
Sponsoring Entity
John D. Connelly
|
Leg prosthesis with an artificial knee joint provided with an adjustment device | ||
Patent #
US 6,423,098 B1
Filed 08/09/1999
|
Current Assignee
OTTO BOCK HEALTHCARE IP GMBH CO. KG
|
Sponsoring Entity
Biedermann Motech GmbH
|
Prosthetic walking system | ||
Patent #
US 20020087216A1
Filed 02/25/2002
|
Current Assignee
UNITED STATES MANUFACTURING COMPANY
|
Sponsoring Entity
UNITED STATES MANUFACTURING COMPANY
|
Leg exoprosthesis for adaptation to a thigh stump | ||
Patent #
US 6,425,925 B1
Filed 10/01/1999
|
Current Assignee
SCHUTT GRUNDEI ORTHOPADIETECHNIK GMBH
|
Sponsoring Entity
SCHUTT GRUNDEI ORTHOPADIETECHNIK GMBH
|
Artificial ankle joint and prosthetic devices formed therewith | ||
Patent #
US 6,436,149 B1
Filed 08/27/1996
|
Current Assignee
Richard G. Rincoe
|
Sponsoring Entity
Richard G. Rincoe
|
Drive unit for prosthetic limb | ||
Patent #
US 20020103543A1
Filed 01/25/2002
|
Current Assignee
Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha
|
Sponsoring Entity
Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha
|
Dynamically-controlled cushioning system for an article of footwear | ||
Patent #
US 6,430,843 B1
Filed 04/18/2000
|
Current Assignee
Nike Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Nike Inc.
|
Prosthetic foot | ||
Patent #
US 6,443,995 B1
Filed 12/22/2000
|
Current Assignee
BIOQUEST PROSTHETICS LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Townsend Barry W., Claudino Byron Kent
|
Lithium polymer battery | ||
Patent #
US 6,451,481 B1
Filed 03/06/2000
|
Current Assignee
Samsung SDI Company Limited
|
Sponsoring Entity
Samsung SDI Company Limited
|
Self-adjusting prosthetic ankle apparatus | ||
Patent #
US 6,443,993 B1
Filed 03/23/2001
|
Current Assignee
HOSMER DORRANCE CORPORATION
|
Sponsoring Entity
Globespan Virata Inc.
|
Device and method for remote maintenance of an electronically controllable prosthesis | ||
Patent #
US 20020161451A1
Filed 09/11/2001
|
Current Assignee
OTTO BOCK HEALTHCARE IP GMBH CO. KG
|
Sponsoring Entity
OTTO BOCK HEALTHCARE IP GMBH CO. KG
|
Force-controlled hydro-elastic actuator | ||
Patent #
US 6,494,039 B2
Filed 02/28/2001
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Sponsoring Entity
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Hydraulically energized magnetorheological replicant muscle tissue and a system and a method for using and controlling same | ||
Patent #
US 6,168,634 B1
Filed 03/25/1999
|
Current Assignee
Schmitz Geoffrey W.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Schmitz Geoffrey W.
|
Pivot device between parts of an orthopedic aid | ||
Patent #
US 6,187,051 B1
Filed 09/08/1998
|
Current Assignee
Otto Bock Orthopadische Industrie Besitz-und Duderstadt DE, Otto Bock Orthopadische Industrie Besitz-und Verwaltungs-Kommanditgesesllschaft
|
Sponsoring Entity
Otto Bock Orthopadische Industrie Besitz-und Duderstadt DE, Otto Bock Orthopadische Industrie Besitz-und Verwaltungs-Kommanditgesesllschaft
|
Method and apparatus for monitoring of daily activity in terms of ground reaction forces | ||
Patent #
US 6,183,425 B1
Filed 10/13/1995
|
Current Assignee
ADMINISTRATOR OF THE NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
|
Sponsoring Entity
ADMINISTRATOR OF THE NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
|
Ankle block with spring inserts | ||
Patent #
US 6,206,934 B1
Filed 08/21/1998
|
Current Assignee
Flex-Foot Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Flex-Foot Inc.
|
Virtual intelligence shoe with a podiatric analysis system | ||
Patent #
US 6,195,921 B1
Filed 09/28/1999
|
Current Assignee
Vinncente Hoa Gia Truong
|
Sponsoring Entity
Vinncente Hoa Gia Truong
|
Alignment device for a prosthetic limb | ||
Patent #
US 6,206,932 B1
Filed 11/24/1998
|
Current Assignee
Timothy Johnson
|
Sponsoring Entity
Timothy Johnson
|
Specification of an artificial limb | ||
Patent #
US 6,241,775 B1
Filed 05/25/1999
|
Current Assignee
CHAS A Blatchford Sons Limited
|
Sponsoring Entity
CHAS A Blatchford Sons Limited
|
Motion analysis system | ||
Patent #
US 6,301,964 B1
Filed 07/06/1999
|
Current Assignee
Garmin Limited
|
Sponsoring Entity
Dynastream Innovations Incorporated
|
Connecting part between leg prosthesis components | ||
Patent #
RE36521E
Filed 10/15/1996
|
Current Assignee
Otto Bock Orthopaedische Industrie Besitz - und Verwaltungs KG
|
Sponsoring Entity
Otto Bock Orthopaedische Industrie Besitz - und Verwaltungs KG
|
Method and magnetorheological fluid formulations for increasing the output of a magnetorheological fluid | ||
Patent #
US 6,027,664 A
Filed 08/12/1998
|
Current Assignee
United Microelectronics Corporation
|
Sponsoring Entity
United Microelectronics Corporation
|
Orthotic joint with radial hydraulic force transfer | ||
Patent #
US 6,080,123 A
Filed 09/14/1998
|
Current Assignee
Fillauer Companies Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Pansiera Timothy Thomas
|
Prosthetic leg with extension auxiliary mechanism | ||
Patent #
US 6,086,616 A
Filed 03/18/1999
|
Current Assignee
Nabco Ltd.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Nabco Ltd.
|
Sensor | ||
Patent #
US 6,091,977 A
Filed 10/05/1998
|
Current Assignee
Miami University
|
Sponsoring Entity
Miami University
|
Two-way magnetorheological fluid valve assembly and devices utilizing same | ||
Patent #
US 6,095,486 A
Filed 03/05/1997
|
Current Assignee
Lord Corporation
|
Sponsoring Entity
Lord Corporation
|
Computer controlled hydraulic resistance device for a prosthesis and other apparatus | ||
Patent #
US 6,113,642 A
Filed 11/10/1998
|
Current Assignee
Ossur hf
|
Sponsoring Entity
MAUCH INC.
|
Artificial knee joint having a swing phase control member | ||
Patent #
US 6,117,177 A
Filed 03/12/1999
|
Current Assignee
TEH LIN PROSTHETIC ORTHOPAEDIC INC.
|
Sponsoring Entity
TEH LIN PROSTHETIC ORTHOPAEDIC INC.
|
Prosthetic foot assembly having improved resilient cushions and components | ||
Patent #
US 6,129,766 A
Filed 05/29/1998
|
Current Assignee
COLLEGE PARK INDUSTRIES INC.
|
Sponsoring Entity
COLLEGE PARK INDUSTRIES INC.
|
Prosthesis brake joint | ||
Patent #
US 6,139,586 A
Filed 03/11/1999
|
Current Assignee
OTTO BOCK ORTHOPAEDISCHE INDUSTRIE BESITZ-UND VERWALTUNGS-KOMMANDITGESELLSCHAFT
|
Sponsoring Entity
OTTO BOCK ORTHOPAEDISCHE INDUSTRIE BESITZ-UND VERWALTUNGS-KOMMANDITGESELLSCHAFT
|
Orthosis joint | ||
Patent #
US 6,165,226 A
Filed 04/26/1999
|
Current Assignee
OTTO BOCK ORTHOPAEDISCHE INDUSTRIE BESITZ-UND VERWALTUNGS-KOMMANDITGESELLSCHAFT
|
Sponsoring Entity
OTTO BOCK ORTHOPAEDISCHE INDUSTRIE BESITZ-UND VERWALTUNGS-KOMMANDITGESELLSCHAFT
|
Controllable vibration apparatus | ||
Patent #
US 5,878,851 A
Filed 07/02/1996
|
Current Assignee
Lord Corporation
|
Sponsoring Entity
-
|
Method and apparatus for controlling an externally powered prosthesis | ||
Patent #
US 5,888,213 A
Filed 06/06/1997
|
Current Assignee
MOTION CONTROL INC.
|
Sponsoring Entity
MOTION CONTROL INC.
|
Computer controlled hydraulic resistance device for a prosthesis and other apparatus | ||
Patent #
US 5,888,212 A
Filed 06/26/1997
|
Current Assignee
Ossur hf
|
Sponsoring Entity
-
|
Pivot device between parts of an orthopedic aid | ||
Patent #
US 5,888,236 A
Filed 01/22/1997
|
Current Assignee
Otto Bock Orthopadische Industrie Besitz und Verwaltungs Duderstadt DE, Otto Bock Orthopadische Industrie Besitz und Verwaltungs Kommanditgesellschaft
|
Sponsoring Entity
Otto Bock Orthopadische Industrie Besitz und Verwaltungs Kommanditgesellschaft
|
Motor drive system and linkage for hand prosthesis | ||
Patent #
US 5,888,246 A
Filed 09/06/1996
|
Current Assignee
Touch Emas Limited
|
Sponsoring Entity
-
|
Prosthesis control system | ||
Patent #
US 5,893,891 A
Filed 07/14/1997
|
Current Assignee
Blatchford Products Limited
|
Sponsoring Entity
CHAS A Blatchford Sons Limited
|
Prosthesis for long femur and knee disarticulation amputation | ||
Patent #
US 5,895,430 A
Filed 02/06/1998
|
Current Assignee
Roderick S OConnor
|
Sponsoring Entity
-
|
Method and magnetorheological fluid formulations for increasing the output of a magnetorheological fluid device | ||
Patent #
US 5,900,184 A
Filed 10/18/1995
|
Current Assignee
Lord Corporation
|
Sponsoring Entity
-
|
Magnetorheological fluid | ||
Patent #
US 5,906,767 A
Filed 10/28/1997
|
Current Assignee
R. T. Vanderbilt Company Inc., Lord Corporation
|
Sponsoring Entity
R. T. Vanderbilt Company Inc.
|
Method and apparatus for angular position and velocity based determination of body sway for the diagnosis and rehabilitation of balance and gait disorders | ||
Patent #
US 5,919,149 A
Filed 03/14/1997
|
Current Assignee
BALANCE INTERNATIONAL INNOVATIONS GMBH
|
Sponsoring Entity
Allum John H.
|
Motion analysis system | ||
Patent #
US 5,955,667 A
Filed 10/14/1997
|
Current Assignee
Garmin Limited
|
Sponsoring Entity
-
|
Adjustable prosthesis joint | ||
Patent #
US 5,957,981 A
Filed 10/15/1997
|
Current Assignee
GRAMTEC INNOVATION AB
|
Sponsoring Entity
-
|
Hydraulic cylinders for limb gait control | ||
Patent #
US 5,948,021 A
Filed 02/24/1998
|
Current Assignee
HOSMER-DORRANCE CORPORATION
|
Sponsoring Entity
-
|
Passive magnetorheological fluid device with excursion dependent characteristic | ||
Patent #
US 5,947,238 A
Filed 03/05/1997
|
Current Assignee
Lord Corporation
|
Sponsoring Entity
Lord Corporation
|
Magneto-rheological fluid coupling | ||
Patent #
US 5,967,273 A
Filed 10/17/1997
|
Current Assignee
Borg-Warner Automotive Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Borg-Warner Automotive Incorporated
|
Specification of an artificial limb | ||
Patent #
US 5,972,035 A
Filed 04/15/1997
|
Current Assignee
CHAS A Blatchford Sons Limited
|
Sponsoring Entity
CHAS A Blatchford Sons Limited
|
Viscous clutch assembly | ||
Patent #
US 5,960,918 A
Filed 03/27/1998
|
Current Assignee
Behr America Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
-
|
Feed-forward control of aircraft bus dc boost converter | ||
Patent #
US 5,982,156 A
Filed 04/15/1997
|
Current Assignee
United States Air Force
|
Sponsoring Entity
United States Air Force
|
Prosthetic foot with means for energy storage and release | ||
Patent #
US 6,007,582 A
Filed 07/25/1997
|
Current Assignee
ORTHO EUROPE LIMITED
|
Sponsoring Entity
ORTHO EUROPE LIMITED
|
Electronic ballast with two-step boost converter and method | ||
Patent #
US 5,998,930 A
Filed 10/24/1996
|
Current Assignee
OSRAM SYLVANIA Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
OSRAM SYLVANIA Inc.
|
Portable controllable fluid rehabilitation devices | ||
Patent #
US 5,711,746 A
Filed 03/11/1996
|
Current Assignee
Lord Corporation
|
Sponsoring Entity
Lord Corporation
|
Multi-purpose prosthetic knee component | ||
Patent #
US 5,704,946 A
Filed 03/13/1996
|
Current Assignee
UNITED STATES MANUFACTURING COMPANY LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
UNITED STATES MANUFACTURING COMPANY
|
Brake-action knee joint | ||
Patent #
US 5,704,945 A
Filed 02/23/1996
|
Current Assignee
OTTO BOCK ORTHOPAEDISCHE INDUSTRIE BESITZ-UND VERWALTUNGS-KOMMANDITGESELLSCHAFT
|
Sponsoring Entity
OTTO BOCK ORTHOPAEDISCHE INDUSTRIE BESITZ-UND VERWALTUNGS-KOMMANDITGESELLSCHAFT
|
Swing phase control for an artificial knee joint | ||
Patent #
US 5,728,174 A
Filed 10/03/1995
|
Current Assignee
OTTO BOCK HEALTHCARE IP GMBH CO. KG
|
Sponsoring Entity
Biedermann Motech GmbH
|
Below-knee prosthesis | ||
Patent #
US 5,728,170 A
Filed 09/06/1996
|
Current Assignee
OTTO BOCK ORTHOPAEDISCHE INDUSTRIE BESITZ-UND VERWALTUNGS-KOMMANDITGESELLSCHAFT
|
Sponsoring Entity
OTTO BOCK ORTHOPAEDISCHE INDUSTRIE BESITZ-UND VERWALTUNGS-KOMMANDITGESELLSCHAFT
|
Knee joint mechanism for knee disarticulation prosthesis | ||
Patent #
US 5,746,774 A
Filed 01/16/1996
|
Current Assignee
University of Toledo
|
Sponsoring Entity
University of Toledo
|
Prosthetic brake joint | ||
Patent #
US 5,755,813 A
Filed 03/28/1996
|
Current Assignee
OTTO BOCK ORTHOPAEDISCHE INDUSTRIE BESITZ- UND VERWALTUNGS-KOMMANDITGESELLSCHAFT
|
Sponsoring Entity
OTTO BOCK ORTHOPAEDISCHE INDUSTRIE BESITZ- UND VERWALTUNGS-KOMMANDITGESELLSCHAFT
|
Fishing reel with electronically variable brake for preventing backlash | ||
Patent #
US 5,749,533 A
Filed 08/03/1995
|
Current Assignee
John J Daniels
|
Sponsoring Entity
John J Daniels
|
Knee unit for above-knee prosthetic leg | ||
Patent #
US 5,779,735 A
Filed 05/17/1996
|
Current Assignee
Molino Joseph L.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Molino Joseph L.
|
Prosthetic ankle and walking system | ||
Patent #
US 5,800,568 A
Filed 02/16/1996
|
Current Assignee
Seattle Orthopedic Group Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Seattle Orthopedic Group Inc.
|
Magnetorheological transmission clutch | ||
Patent #
US 5,823,309 A
Filed 05/23/1997
|
Current Assignee
Delphi Technologies Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
General Motors Corporation
|
Controllable brake | ||
Patent #
US 5,842,547 A
Filed 07/02/1996
|
Current Assignee
Lord Corporation
|
Sponsoring Entity
Lord Corporation
|
Knee joint orthosis | ||
Patent #
US 5,624,389 A
Filed 05/11/1995
|
Current Assignee
OTTO BOCK ORTHOPADISCHE INDUSTRIE BESITZ-UND VERWALTUNGS-KOMMANDITGESELLSCHAFT
|
Sponsoring Entity
OTTO BOCK ORTHOPADISCHE INDUSTRIE BESITZ-UND VERWALTUNGS-KOMMANDITGESELLSCHAFT
|
Elastic actuator for precise force control | ||
Patent #
US 5,650,704 A
Filed 06/29/1995
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Sponsoring Entity
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Thixotropic magnetorheological materials | ||
Patent #
US 5,645,752 A
Filed 12/20/1995
|
Current Assignee
Lord Corporation
|
Sponsoring Entity
Lord Corporation
|
Pivot device between parts of an orthopedic aid | ||
Patent #
US 5,645,590 A
Filed 05/31/1995
|
Current Assignee
OTTO BOCK ORTHOPADISCHE INDUSTRIE BESITZ UND VERWALTUNGS-KOMMANDITGESESLLSCHAFT
|
Sponsoring Entity
OTTO BOCK ORTHOPADISCHE INDUSTRIE BESITZ UND VERWALTUNGS-KOMMANDITGESESLLSCHAFT
|
Multicell battery pack bilateral power distribution unit with individual cell monitoring and control | ||
Patent #
US 5,656,915 A
Filed 08/28/1995
|
Current Assignee
ENERSYS ENERGY PRODUCTS INC.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Stephen S. Eaves
|
Mobility assist for the paralyzed, amputeed and spastic person | ||
Patent #
US 5,662,693 A
Filed 06/05/1995
|
Current Assignee
United States Air Force
|
Sponsoring Entity
United States Air Force
|
Aqueous magnetorheological materials | ||
Patent #
US 5,670,077 A
Filed 10/18/1995
|
Current Assignee
Lord Corporation
|
Sponsoring Entity
Lord Corporation
|
Magnetorheological fluid | ||
Patent #
US 5,683,615 A
Filed 06/13/1996
|
Current Assignee
Lord Corporation
|
Sponsoring Entity
Lord Corporation
|
Coil prosthetic foot | ||
Patent #
US 5,695,527 A
Filed 12/12/1995
|
Current Assignee
MEDONICS L.L.C.
|
Sponsoring Entity
MEDONICS L.L.C.
|
Instrumented orthopedic restraining device and method of use | ||
Patent #
US 5,484,389 A
Filed 08/31/1994
|
Current Assignee
IZEX TECHNOLOGIES INC.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Stark John G.
|
Control system for prosthetic devices | ||
Patent #
US 5,480,454 A
Filed 07/26/1994
|
Current Assignee
United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration, United States Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration, United States Incorporated
|
Method and apparatus for automatic equalization of series-connected batteries | ||
Patent #
US 5,504,415 A
Filed 12/03/1993
|
Current Assignee
ADVANCED CHARGER TECHNOLOGY INC.
|
Sponsoring Entity
ADVANCED CHARGER TECHNOLOGY INC.
|
Device for mutual pivoting connection of parts of an orthopaedic apparatus | ||
Patent #
US 5,545,232 A
Filed 02/21/1995
|
Current Assignee
OTTO BOCK ORTHOPADISCHE INDUSTRIE BESITZ-UND VERWALTUNGS- KOMMANDITGESESLLACHAFT
|
Sponsoring Entity
OTTO BOCK ORTHOPADISCHE INDUSTRIE BESITZ-UND VERWALTUNGS- KOMMANDITGESESLLACHAFT
|
Swing phase control device | ||
Patent #
US 5,545,233 A
Filed 05/24/1994
|
Current Assignee
OTTO BOCK HEALTHCARE IP GMBH CO. KG
|
Sponsoring Entity
Biedermann Motech GmbH
|
System for controlling artificial knee joint action in an above knee prosthesis | ||
Patent #
US 5,571,205 A
Filed 11/18/1994
|
Current Assignee
Otto Bock HealthCare GmbH
|
Sponsoring Entity
James Kelvin B.
|
Prosthetic foot | ||
Patent #
US 5,571,213 A
Filed 08/19/1994
|
Current Assignee
MEDONICS L.L.C.
|
Sponsoring Entity
MEDONICS L.L.C.
|
Prosthetic ankle joint for pivotally connecting a residual limb to a prosthetic foot | ||
Patent #
US 5,571,212 A
Filed 01/10/1995
|
Current Assignee
Seattle Orthopedic Group Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
MIND MODEL INSTRUMENT DEVELOPMENT
|
Functional ambulation performance scoring device | ||
Patent #
US 5,586,557 A
Filed 05/31/1994
|
Current Assignee
BCAM INTERNATIONAL INC.
|
Sponsoring Entity
BCAM INTERNATIONAL INC.
|
Magnetorheological materials based on alloy particles | ||
Patent #
US 5,382,373 A
Filed 10/30/1992
|
Current Assignee
Lord Corporation
|
Sponsoring Entity
Lord Corporation
|
System for controlling artificial knee joint action in an above knee prosthesis | ||
Patent #
US 5,383,939 A
Filed 12/05/1991
|
Current Assignee
Otto Bock HealthCare GmbH
|
Sponsoring Entity
BIOMECH DESIGNS LTD.
|
Muscle exercising device | ||
Patent #
US 5,397,287 A
Filed 08/04/1993
|
Current Assignee
Kai Lindfors
|
Sponsoring Entity
Kai Lindfors
|
Magnetorheological fluid devices | ||
Patent #
US 5,398,917 A
Filed 02/07/1994
|
Current Assignee
Lord Corporation
|
Sponsoring Entity
Lord Corporation
|
Cylinder for artificial leg | ||
Patent #
US 5,405,407 A
Filed 01/14/1993
|
Current Assignee
Nabco Ltd.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Nabco Ltd.
|
Hydraulic control unit for prosthetic leg | ||
Patent #
US 5,405,409 A
Filed 01/21/1994
|
Current Assignee
Ossur hf
|
Sponsoring Entity
Knoth Donald E.
|
Portable analyte measuring system for multiple fluid samples | ||
Patent #
US 5,405,510 A
Filed 05/17/1993
|
Current Assignee
RADIOMETER CALIFORNIA INC.
|
Sponsoring Entity
PPG Industries Incorporated
|
Adjustable lower limb prosthesis having conical support | ||
Patent #
US 5,405,410 A
Filed 07/14/1993
|
Current Assignee
Ohio Willow Wood Company
|
Sponsoring Entity
Ohio Willow Wood Company
|
Computerized electronic prosthesis apparatus and method | ||
Patent #
US 5,413,611 A
Filed 07/21/1992
|
Current Assignee
MCP SERVICES INC.
|
Sponsoring Entity
MCP SERVICES INC.
|
Multicell battery power system | ||
Patent #
US 5,422,558 A
Filed 05/05/1993
|
Current Assignee
Astec International Limited
|
Sponsoring Entity
Astec International Limited
|
Hydraulic control unit for prosthetic leg | ||
Patent #
US 5,443,521 A
Filed 12/30/1993
|
Current Assignee
Ossur hf
|
Sponsoring Entity
MAUCH LABORATORIES INC.
|
Coil spring prosthetic foot | ||
Patent #
US 5,443,528 A
Filed 11/17/1992
|
Current Assignee
MEDONICS L.L.C.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Scott Allen
|
Teaching playback swing-phase-controlled above knee prosthesis | ||
Patent #
US 5,443,524 A
Filed 06/09/1993
|
Current Assignee
HYOGO PREFECTUAL SOCIAL WELFARE CORPORATION, Klaus Schmidt
|
Sponsoring Entity
HYOGO PREFECTUAL SOCIAL WELFARE CORPORATION, Klaus Schmidt
|
Control method for prostehetic devices | ||
Patent #
US 5,458,655 A
Filed 07/26/1994
|
Current Assignee
The United States of America As Represented By The Secretary of Agriculture, United States Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
The United States of America As Represented By The Secretary of Agriculture, United States Incorporated
|
Limb brace with adjustable hydraulic resistance unit | ||
Patent #
US 5,472,412 A
Filed 04/05/1994
|
Current Assignee
Ossur hf
|
Sponsoring Entity
MAUCH LABORATORIES INC.
|
Controlled-brake orthosis | ||
Patent #
US 5,476,441 A
Filed 09/30/1993
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Sponsoring Entity
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Magnetorheological fluid dampers | ||
Patent #
US 5,277,281 A
Filed 06/18/1992
|
Current Assignee
Lord Corporation
|
Sponsoring Entity
Lord Corporation
|
Magnetorheological fluid devices | ||
Patent #
US 5,284,330 A
Filed 06/18/1992
|
Current Assignee
Lord Corporation
|
Sponsoring Entity
Lord Corporation
|
Method and apparatus for switching degrees of freedom in a prosthetic limb | ||
Patent #
US 5,336,269 A
Filed 06/09/1992
|
Current Assignee
Liberating Technologies Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
|
An adjustable resilient foot prosthesis | ||
Patent #
US 5,376,133 A
Filed 10/01/1992
|
Current Assignee
GRAMTEC INNOVATION AB
|
Sponsoring Entity
Gramnas Finn
|
Control system for prosthetic devices | ||
Patent #
US 5,376,128 A
Filed 08/31/1992
|
Current Assignee
United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration
|
Sponsoring Entity
United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration
|
Artificial leg with hydraulic knee flexion resistance | ||
Patent #
US 5,376,137 A
Filed 07/19/1993
|
Current Assignee
CHAS A Blatchford Sons Limited
|
Sponsoring Entity
CHAS A Blatchford Sons Limited
|
Swivel connection between two parts of an orthopedic technical aid | ||
Patent #
US 5,181,931 A
Filed 01/28/1991
|
Current Assignee
OTTO BOCK ORTHOPAEDISCHE INDUSTRIE BESITZ- UND VERWALTUNGS-KOMMANDITGESELLSCHAFT INDUSTRIESTRASSE 3408 DUDERSTADT 1 FED. REP. OF GERMANY
|
Sponsoring Entity
OTTO BOCK ORTHOPAEDISCHE INDUSTRIE BESITZ- UND VERWALTUNGS-KOMMANDITGESELLSCHAFT INDUSTRIESTRASSE 3408 DUDERSTADT 1 FED. REP. OF GERMANY
|
Knee joint load measuring instrument and joint prosthesis | ||
Patent #
US 5,197,488 A
Filed 04/05/1991
|
Current Assignee
N. K. BIOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING COMPANY
|
Sponsoring Entity
N. K. BIOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING COMPANY
|
System for resisting limb movement | ||
Patent #
US 5,201,772 A
Filed 01/31/1991
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Sponsoring Entity
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Prosthetic leg | ||
Patent #
US 5,217,500 A
Filed 01/12/1990
|
Current Assignee
Van L. Phillips
|
Sponsoring Entity
Van L. Phillips
|
Prosthetic foot | ||
Patent #
US 5,219,365 A
Filed 08/26/1992
|
Current Assignee
NOVACARE ORTHOTICS PROSTHETICS EAST INC.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Sabolich Inc.
|
Computerized exercise, physical therapy, or rehabilitating apparatus with improved features | ||
Patent #
US 5,230,672 A
Filed 03/13/1991
|
Current Assignee
MOTIVATOR INC. A CORP OF KY
|
Sponsoring Entity
MOTIVATOR INC. A CORP OF KY
|
Apparatus and method for monitoring contact pressure between body parts and contact surfaces | ||
Patent #
US 5,253,656 A
Filed 05/23/1991
|
Current Assignee
Richard G. Rincoe, Paul J. Moore Jr
|
Sponsoring Entity
Richard G. Rincoe, Paul J. Moore Jr
|
Electronic range of motion apparatus, for orthosis, prosthesis, and CPM machine | ||
Patent #
US 5,252,102 A
Filed 08/05/1992
|
Current Assignee
ELECTROBIONICS CORPORATION
|
Sponsoring Entity
ELECTROBIONICS CORPORATION
|
Seal with spring energizer | ||
Patent #
US 5,265,890 A
Filed 12/03/1990
|
Current Assignee
Bal Seal Engineering Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
BALSELLS PETER J. CO-TRUSTEES UNDER DECLARATION OF TRUST DATED 10185 UNDER THE LAW OF CA, BALSELLS JOAN C. CO-TRUSTEES UNDER DECLARATION OF TRUST DATED 10185 UNDER THE LAW OF CA
|
Hydraulic control unit for prosthetic leg | ||
Patent #
US 5,092,902 A
Filed 08/09/1991
|
Current Assignee
Ossur hf
|
Sponsoring Entity
Mauch Laboratories Inc.
|
Lower limb prosthesis with means for restricting dorsi-flexion | ||
Patent #
US 5,112,356 A
Filed 02/25/1991
|
Current Assignee
CHAS A BLATCHFORD SONS LIMITED LISTER ROAD BASINGSTOKE HAMPSHIRE RG22 4AH
|
Sponsoring Entity
CHAS A BLATCHFORD SONS LIMITED LISTER ROAD BASINGSTOKE HAMPSHIRE RG22 4AH
|
Biofeedback activated orthosis for foot-drop rehabilitation | ||
Patent #
US 5,112,296 A
Filed 04/30/1991
|
Current Assignee
Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University Agricultural Mechanical College
|
Sponsoring Entity
Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University Agricultural Mechanical College
|
Prosthetic foot | ||
Patent #
US 5,139,525 A
Filed 12/23/1991
|
Current Assignee
Kaupthing Bank HF
|
Sponsoring Entity
Ossur Kristinsson
|
Cell monitor and control unit for multicell battery | ||
Patent #
US 5,153,496 A
Filed 09/27/1990
|
Current Assignee
WORLD HEART CORPORATION
|
Sponsoring Entity
Baxter International Inc.
|
Universal modular frame for above-knee endoskeletal prosthesis | ||
Patent #
US 4,994,086 A
Filed 06/04/1990
|
Current Assignee
UNITED STATES MANUFACTURING COMPANY LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
United States Manufacturing Company
|
Powered gait orthosis | ||
Patent #
US 5,020,790 A
Filed 10/23/1990
|
Current Assignee
Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University Agricultural Mechanical College
|
Sponsoring Entity
Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University Agricultural Mechanical College
|
Orthosis with variable motion controls | ||
Patent #
US 5,044,360 A
Filed 02/27/1990
|
Current Assignee
UNITED STATES MANUFACTURING COMPANY LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
UNITED STATES MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Analogic Corporation
|
Myoelectrically controlled knee joint locking device | ||
Patent #
US 5,062,857 A
Filed 06/05/1990
|
Current Assignee
ADVANCED PROSTHESTETICS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION A CORP. OF PA
|
Sponsoring Entity
ADVANCED PROSTHESTETICS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION A CORP. OF PA
|
Teaching playback swing-phase-controlled above-knee prosthesis | ||
Patent #
US 5,062,856 A
Filed 03/23/1989
|
Current Assignee
Klaus Schmidt
|
Sponsoring Entity
Klaus Schmidt
|
Control valve | ||
Patent #
US 4,893,648 A
Filed 09/30/1988
|
Current Assignee
OTTO BOCK ORTHOPADISCHE INDUSTRIE BESITZ-UND VERWALTUNGS-KG BAHNHOFSTRASSE 20 D-3428 DUDERSTADT
|
Sponsoring Entity
OTTO BOCK ORTHOPADISCHE INDUSTRIE BESITZ-UND VERWALTUNGS-KG BAHNHOFSTRASSE 20 D-3428 DUDERSTADT
|
Computerized drive mechanism for exercise, physical therapy and rehabilitation | ||
Patent #
US 4,919,418 A
Filed 04/24/1989
|
Current Assignee
MOTIVATOR FITNESS SYSTEMS INC.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Miller Jan W.
|
Hydraulic controller, especially for the movement of a prosthetic joint | ||
Patent #
US 4,958,705 A
Filed 10/28/1988
|
Current Assignee
OTTO BOCK ORTHOPADISCHE INDUSTRIE BESITZ-UND VERWALTUNGS-KG A CORP. OF FED. REP. OF GERMANY
|
Sponsoring Entity
OTTO BOCK ORTHOPADISCHE INDUSTRIE BESITZ-UND VERWALTUNGS-KG A CORP. OF FED. REP. OF GERMANY
|
Tactile stimulus receptor for a hand prosthesis | ||
Patent #
US 4,808,187 A
Filed 10/05/1987
|
Current Assignee
Iowa State University Research Foundation Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Iowa State University Research Foundation Incorporated
|
Double-acting hydraulic piston-and-cylinder device | ||
Patent #
US 4,854,428 A
Filed 09/22/1988
|
Current Assignee
OTTO BOCK ORTHOPADISCHE INDUSTRIE BESITZUND VERWALTUNGS-KG A CORPORATION OF THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY
|
Sponsoring Entity
OTTO BOCK ORTHOPADISCHE INDUSTRIE BESITZUND VERWALTUNGS-KG A CORPORATION OF THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY
|
Pneumatic limb control system | ||
Patent #
US 4,876,944 A
Filed 03/03/1988
|
Current Assignee
Duke University
|
Sponsoring Entity
Duke University
|
Devices for neural signal transmission | ||
Patent #
US 4,878,913 A
Filed 09/04/1987
|
Current Assignee
Brown University
|
Sponsoring Entity
Pfizer Hospital Products Group Inc.
|
Method for balancing assistance | ||
Patent #
US 4,760,850 A
Filed 05/15/1986
|
Current Assignee
WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY 3640 COLONEL GLENN HIGHWAY A STATE UNIVERSITY OF OH.
|
Sponsoring Entity
WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY 3640 COLONEL GLENN HIGHWAY A STATE UNIVERSITY OF OH.
|
Sensate vibratory prosthesis | ||
Patent #
US 4,770,662 A
Filed 07/13/1987
|
Current Assignee
Vincent C. Giampapa
|
Sponsoring Entity
Vincent C. Giampapa
|
Artificial musculoskeletal mechanism | ||
Patent #
US 4,776,852 A
Filed 11/24/1986
|
Current Assignee
Frank R. Bubic
|
Sponsoring Entity
Frank R. Bubic
|
Electroviscous fluid control device | ||
Patent #
US 4,790,522 A
Filed 02/25/1988
|
Current Assignee
JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Elaine M. Drutchas
|
Braked knee joint | ||
Patent #
US 4,685,927 A
Filed 05/28/1986
|
Current Assignee
OTTO BOCK ORTHOPAEDISCHE INDUSTRIE BESITZ- UND VERWALTUNGS-KOMMANDITGESELLSCHAFT
|
Sponsoring Entity
OTTO BOCK ORTHOPAEDISCHE INDUSTRIE BESITZ- UND VERWALTUNGS-KOMMANDITGESELLSCHAFT
|
Control system for knee joint | ||
Patent #
US 4,711,242 A
Filed 02/18/1986
|
Current Assignee
Wright State University
|
Sponsoring Entity
Wright State University
|
Multi-mode exercising apparatus | ||
Patent #
US 4,711,450 A
Filed 05/28/1985
|
Current Assignee
Biodex Medical Systems Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
CHATTECX CORPORATION 101 MEMORIAL DRIVE CHATTANOOGA TENNESSEE A CORP. OF TN
|
Feedback control system for walking | ||
Patent #
US 4,569,352 A
Filed 11/15/1984
|
Current Assignee
Wright State University
|
Sponsoring Entity
Wright State University
|
Artificial knee-joint | ||
Patent #
US 4,310,932 A
Filed 09/26/1979
|
Current Assignee
Otto Bock Orthopadische Industrie KG
|
Sponsoring Entity
Otto Bock Orthopadische Industrie KG
|
Apparatus for discrimination of myoelectric potential patterns | ||
Patent #
US 4,314,379 A
Filed 02/20/1980
|
Current Assignee
Agency of Industrial Science Technology Ministry of International Trade Industry
|
Sponsoring Entity
Agency of Industrial Science Technology Ministry of International Trade Industry
|
Exerciser | ||
Patent #
US 4,354,676 A
Filed 10/13/1978
|
Current Assignee
Gideon B. Ariel
|
Sponsoring Entity
PepsiCo Incorporated
|
System and method for multifunctional control of upper limb prosthesis via EMg signal identification | ||
Patent #
US 4,209,860 A
Filed 02/13/1978
|
Current Assignee
The United States of America As Represented By The Secretary of Agriculture
|
Sponsoring Entity
The United States of America As Represented By The Secretary of Agriculture
|
Prosthetic leg with a hydraulic control | ||
Patent #
US 4,212,087 A
Filed 11/16/1978
|
Current Assignee
Lavaugh L. Mortensen
|
Sponsoring Entity
Lavaugh L. Mortensen
|
Artificial leg having a lockable knee joint | ||
Patent #
US 4,179,759 A
Filed 02/16/1978
|
Current Assignee
James D. Smith
|
Sponsoring Entity
James D. Smith
|
Hydraulically controlled artificial leg | ||
Patent #
US 4,065,815 A
Filed 09/28/1976
|
Current Assignee
Chen Sen-Jung
|
Sponsoring Entity
Chen Sen-Jung
|
Prosthetic knee joint | ||
Patent #
US 4,005,496 A
Filed 06/13/1975
|
Current Assignee
HosmerDorrance Corporation
|
Sponsoring Entity
HosmerDorrance Corporation
|
Multi-function control system for an artificial upper-extremity prosthesis for above-elbow amputees | ||
Patent #
US 4,030,141 A
Filed 02/09/1976
|
Current Assignee
The United States of America As Represented By The Secretary of Agriculture
|
Sponsoring Entity
The United States of America As Represented By The Secretary of Agriculture
|
Artificial polycentric knee joint | ||
Patent #
US 4,064,569 A
Filed 09/23/1976
|
Current Assignee
Harry E. Campbell
|
Sponsoring Entity
Harry E. Campbell
|
Actuator device for artificial leg | ||
Patent #
US 3,995,324 A
Filed 09/12/1975
|
Current Assignee
United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration
|
Sponsoring Entity
United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration
|
Active ankle foot orthosis | ||
Patent #
US 8,075,633 B2
Filed 09/25/2003
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Sponsoring Entity
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Computerized stitching including embroidering | ||
Patent #
US 7,308,333 B2
Filed 11/10/2005
|
Current Assignee
MELCO INTERNATIONAL LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Melco Industries Incorporated
|
Method for adjusting a leg prosthesis and verifying the adjustment, and apparatus for the measurement of forces or moments in a leg prosthesis | ||
Patent #
US 8,083,807 B2
Filed 10/25/2006
|
Current Assignee
Otto Bock HealthCare GmbH
|
Sponsoring Entity
Otto Bock HealthCare GmbH
|
Body movement monitoring device | ||
Patent #
US 8,109,890 B2
Filed 02/06/2003
|
Current Assignee
ECOLE POLYTECHNIQUE FEDERALE DE LAUSANE - SERVICE DES RELATIONS IDUSTRIELLES
|
Sponsoring Entity
ECOLE POLYTECHNIQUE FEDERALE DE LAUSANE - SERVICE DES RELATIONS IDUSTRIELLES
|
Actuated leg prosthesis for above-knee amputees | ||
Patent #
US 8,231,687 B2
Filed 11/29/2005
|
Current Assignee
Victhom Human Bionics Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Victhom Human Bionics Inc.
|
Joint actuation mechanism for a prosthetic and/or orthotic device having a compliant transmission | ||
Patent #
US 8,435,309 B2
Filed 01/07/2008
|
Current Assignee
Victhom Laboratory Inc
|
Sponsoring Entity
Victhom Laboratory Inc
|
Control system and method for a prosthetic knee | ||
Patent #
US 8,617,254 B2
Filed 01/22/2010
|
Current Assignee
Ossur hf
|
Sponsoring Entity
Ossur hf
|
Systems and methods for actuating a prosthetic ankle | ||
Patent #
US 8,657,886 B2
Filed 06/16/2011
|
Current Assignee
ssur hf
|
Sponsoring Entity
ssur hf
|
Shoulder disarticulation prosthetic system | ||
Patent #
US 3,866,246 A
Filed 11/14/1972
|
Current Assignee
the united states of america as represented by the secretary of the navy
|
Sponsoring Entity
the united states of america as represented by the secretary of the navy
|
Artificial leg | ||
Patent #
US 2,568,051 A
Filed 10/10/1947
|
Current Assignee
John G. Catranis
|
Sponsoring Entity
John G. Catranis
|
SYSTEM FOR OPERATING A PROSTHETIC LIMB | ||
Patent #
US 3,820,168 A
Filed 09/11/1972
|
Current Assignee
Horvath E
|
Sponsoring Entity
Horvath E
|
10 Claims
- 1. A mobile computing device (MCD) configured to receive data from a prosthetic or orthotic device (P/O), the P/O having one or more moveable joints, a damper configured to control a resistance at the one or more moveable joints, an actuator associated with the damper to control movement or resistance at the one or more moveable joints, and a controller configured to operate the damper, the MCD comprising:
a network interface configured to establish a wireless communication link directly with the P/O at least while the P/O is attached to a limb of a user and to receive from the P/O a first configuration parameter value associated with an adjustable configuration parameter of the P/O; and a processor communicatively coupled to the network interface and configured to; cause a display associated with the MCD to display an indicia of the first configuration parameter value; receive a second configuration parameter value based at least in part on a user interaction with the MCD; and cause the network interface to communicate the second configuration parameter value to the P/O, wherein the controller adjusts the adjustable configuration parameter based at least in part on the second configuration parameter value. - View Dependent Claims (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10)
1 Specification
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/692,438, filed Jan. 22, 2010, entitled, “Control System And Method for a Prosthetic Knee,” which is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/077,177, filed Mar. 9, 2005, entitled “Control System And Method for a Prosthetic Knee,” which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Pat. App. No. 60/551,717, entitled “Control System And Method for a Prosthetic Knee,” filed Mar. 10, 2004; U.S. Provisional Pat. App. No. 60/572,996, entitled “Control System And Method for a Prosthetic Knee,” filed May 19, 2004; U.S. Provisional Pat. App. No. 60/569,511, entitled “Control System And Method for a Prosthetic Knee,” filed on May 7, 2004; each of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
This application also incorporates by reference U.S. Pat. No. 6,610,101, filed Mar. 29, 2001, issued Aug. 26, 2003; U.S. Pat. No. 6,764,520, filed Jan. 22, 2001, issued Jul. 20, 2004; U.S. Provisional Pat. App. No. 60/569,512, entitled “Magnetorheologically Actuated Prosthetic Knee,” filed May 7, 2004; and U.S. Provisional Pat. App. No. 60/624,986, entitled “Magnetorheologically Actuated Prosthetic Knee,” filed Nov. 3, 2004.
1. Field
The present invention relates to devices to be attached to limbs in general, such as prosthetics and orthotics, and, in addition, to an adaptive control method and system for an external knee prosthesis. Further, the present invention relates to a system and method of configuring and maintaining the adaptive control system for the external knee prosthesis.
2. Description of the Related Technology
Advances in microelectronics have enabled prosthetic systems, for example, prosthetic knees, to provide more natural functionality to patients who are equipped with such systems. However, the advances in electronics have thus far outpaced the advances in control systems. Thus, a need exists for improved control systems for prosthetic systems.
Moreover, the development of electronic control systems for prosthetic systems has created a need for systems and methods of configuring and monitoring the control systems. Many such systems have included special purpose hardware and custom user interfaces. Further, configuration options have typically been based on a prosthetist setting a variety of arbitrary damping parameters, in some cases, while the user walks on the knee. The custom controls and configurations make it more difficult and expensive to train prosthetists and prevent patients from being able to adjust their devices. Thus, a need exists for improved systems and methods of configuring and monitoring of the control systems of prosthetic systems.
The system, method, and devices of the invention each have several aspects, no single one of which is solely responsible for its desirable attributes. Without limiting the scope of this invention as expressed by the claims which follow, its more prominent features will now be discussed briefly. After considering this discussion, and particularly after reading the section entitled “Detailed Description of the Embodiments” one will understand how the features of this invention provide advantages that include providing a prosthetic control system that provides more natural and comfortable movement to its users and enabling more convenient and intuitive configuration through graphical computing devices.
One embodiment is a device configured to be attached to a limb including a magneto-rheological (MR) damper. The device may be a prosthetic or orthotic. The MR damper may be configured to operate in shear mode. In one embodiment, the MR damper includes a rotary MR damper. A controller is configured to operate the damper. A mobile computing device may be adapted to intermittently communicate configuration parameters to the controller. The controller may also be adapted to intermittently communicate configuration parameters to the mobile computing device. The configuration parameters may include target values. In one embodiment, the controller is adapted to intermittently communicate operational data to the mobile computing device.
The mobile computing device may be a personal digital assistant. The personal digital assistant may be a commercial off-the-shelf unit. In other embodiments, the mobile computing device may be a mobile telephone handset, a personal computer, or a mobile personal computer. The mobile computing device may include a graphical user interface. The graphical user interface may display indicia associating parameter values with state machine conditions. The state machine conditions may include terrain conditions and/or gait cycle states. The graphical user interface may display indicia associating parameter values with adaptive parameters.
Another embodiment is a device configured to be attached to a limb including a controller configured to operate an actuator. The device may be a prosthetic or orthotic. A mobile computing device may have an iconic graphical user interface and adapted to intermittently communicate configuration parameters to the controller. The controller may be further configured to communicate data to the mobile computing device. The graphical user interface may display indicia associating parameter values with state machine conditions. The state machine conditions may include terrain conditions and/or gait cycle states. The graphical user interface may display indicia associating parameter values with adaptive parameters.
Yet another embodiment is a prosthetic or orthotic knee system that includes a MR damper. The MR damper may be configured to be operated in shear mode. The MR damper may include a rotary MR damper. A software system is configured to adaptively change damping parameters of the damper while the system is operating. A mobile computing device may be adapted to intermittently communicate damping parameters to the software system. The software system may be further configured to communicate data to the mobile computing device. The damping parameters may include target values.
Another embodiment is prosthetic or orthotic knee system including an MR damper. The MR damper may be configured to be operated in shear mode. The MR damper may include a rotary MR damper. A controller may be configured to operate the damper, wherein the controller is configured to receive data from a computing network. The computing network may include the Internet. A wireless transceiver may be configured to receive the data from the computing network. The data may be sent from a network computing device. The controller may also be configured to send data to the network. The data received from the computing network may be executable software. The controller may be configured to execute the executable software.
Another embodiment of a prosthetic or orthotic knee system may include a MR damper and a controller configured to operate the damper. The MR damper may be configured to be operated in shear mode. The MR damper may include a rotary MR damper. The controller is configured to send data to a computing network. The computing network may include the Internet. A wireless transceiver may be configured to send the data to the computing network. The data may be sent from a network computing device.
Another embodiment is a method of maintaining an electro-magnetic actuator in a prosthesis or orthotic that is actuated by a first current pulse having a first current polarity. The prosthesis may be an MR knee. The method may include applying a second current pulse to the electro-magnetic actuator wherein the current pulse has an electrical current polarity that is opposite the first current polarity. The second current pulse may have a magnitude that is determined with reference to a maximum current value. The maximum current value may be measured since the time of a third pulse having an electrical current polarity that is opposite the first current polarity. Preferably, the second current pulse has a magnitude that is in the range of one fifth to one half of the maximum current value. More preferably, the second current pulse has a magnitude that is in the range of one fourth to one third of the maximum current value. In one embodiment, the second current pulse has a magnitude that is approximately one fourth of the maximum current value.
Another embodiment is a method of controlling a prosthetic knee during swing extension while descending stairs. The prosthetic knee may be a MR knee. The method may include identifying a stair swing extension state, measuring an extension angle of the knee, and damping the identified swing of the knee with a first gain value only if the extension angle is less than a predetermined value and a second gain value otherwise. The second gain value may be substantially zero. The first gain value may be greater than the second gain value. The first gain value may be substantially greater than the second gain value. The predetermined value may include a soft damping angle. The step of identifying may include detecting the absence of a preswing. The step of detecting the absence of a preswing may include measuring a moment, and determining whether the moment is less than a weighted average of a plurality of measured moments. Measuring the moment may include measuring a knee angle rate, measuring a knee load, and calculating the moment from the knee angle rate and the knee load.
Yet another embodiment is a method of controlling a prosthetic knee system, including measuring at least one characteristic of knee movement, identifying a control state based at least partly on the at least one measured characteristic of knee movement, calculating a damping value based at least partly on the control state, and applying the damping value to control the resistance of a MR damper. The MR damper may be configured to operate in shear mode. The MR damper may include a rotary MR damper. The measuring may include receiving a value from a knee angle sensor and/or receiving a value from a load sensor. Receiving a value from the load sensor may include receiving at least one value from a strain gauge. In one embodiment the damping value is filtered based at least partly on values of previous damping values. The filtering may include applying a fixed point infinite impulse response filter to filter the damping value. The calculating may include adapting a damping parameter. The adapting may be based at least partly on an empirical function.
Another embodiment is a prosthetic knee system that includes a MR damper, at least one sensor configured to measure knee motion; and a software system configured to identify a control state based at least partly on the measure of knee motion and configured to send a control signal to the damper based at least partly the control state. The MR damper may be configured to operate in shear mode. In one embodiment, the MR damper includes a rotary MR damper. The at least one sensor may include a knee angle sensor, a load sensor, and/or at least one strain gauge. The control signal may include a current. The damper may be configured to vary resistance to rotation in response to the current. The software system may be further configured to filter a value of the control signal based at least partly on values of previous control signals. The software system may also be configured to apply a fixed point infinite impulse response filter to filter the value of the control signal.
Another embodiment is a method of controlling a prosthetic having a movement damper. The method may include measuring at least one characteristic of prosthetic movement, calculating a damping value based at least partly on the control state, applying a fixed point infinite impulse response filter to filter the damping value based at least partly on values of previous damping values, and applying the damping value to control the resistance of a damper.
Another embodiment is a method of controlling a device attached to a limb. The controlled device may be a prosthetic or orthotic. The method includes reading data from at least one sensor at a first frequency. A damping value is updated at a second frequency based on the data of the at least one sensor. The damping value is applied to an actuator at the first frequency. Preferably, the first frequency is greater than the second frequency.
Yet another embodiment is a method of controlling a device attached to a limb. The controlled device may be a prosthetic or orthotic. The method includes controlling at least one of a sensor and an actuator at a first frequency. Data associated with the at least one of the sensor and the actuator are processed at a second frequency. Preferably, the first frequency is greater than the second frequency.
Another embodiment is a prosthetic or orthotic system. The system includes a first module adapted to control at least one of a sensor and an actuator at a first frequency. A second module is adapted to process data associated with the at least one of the sensor and the actuator at a second frequency. Preferably, the first frequency is greater than the second frequency.
Another embodiment is a prosthetic or orthotic system. The system includes a means for controlling at least one of a sensor and an actuator at a first frequency and a means for processing data associated with the at least one of the sensor and the actuator at a second frequency. Preferably, the first frequency is greater than the second frequency.
Another embodiment is a computer-readable medium having stored thereon a computer program which, when executed by a computer, controls at least one of a sensor and an actuator at a first frequency and processes data associated with the at least one of the sensor and the actuator at a second frequency. Preferably, the first frequency is greater than the second frequency.
The following detailed description is directed to certain specific embodiments of the invention. However, the invention can be embodied in a multitude of different ways as defined and covered by the claims. In this description, reference is made to the drawings wherein like parts are designated with like numerals throughout.
It is to be appreciated that depending on the embodiment, the acts or events of any methods described herein can be performed in any sequence, may be added, merged, or left out all together (e.g., not all acts or events are necessary for the practice of the method), unless the text specifically and clearly states otherwise. Moreover, unless clearly stated otherwise, acts or events may be performed concurrently, e.g., through interrupt processing or multiple processors, rather than sequentially.
Further, for convenience and clarity of discussion, certain embodiments of systems and methods are described herein with respect to a prosthetic knee. However, it is to be appreciated that the principles discussed with respect to the exemplifying embodiments may also be applied to systems and methods directed to knee, ankle or foot or even other joints. Moreover, these principles also apply to orthotics, muscle replacement, or muscle assist devices as well as prosthetics.
The terms “prosthetic” and “prosthesis” as used herein are broad terms and are used in their ordinary sense and refer to, without limitation, any system, device or apparatus usable as an artificial substitute or support for a body part.
The terms “orthotic” and “orthosis” as used herein are broad terms and are used in their ordinary sense and refer to, without limitation, any system, device or apparatus usable to support, align, prevent, protect, correct deformities of, immobilize, or improve the function of parts of the body, such as joints and/or limbs.
The prosthetic device 100, e.g., a prosthetic knee, may include a computer processor 102, attached to a memory 104. The processor may be any general or special purpose processor, such as, for example, a Motorola MC68HC912B32CFU8. The memory 104 may include volatile components, such as, for example, DRAM or SRAM. The memory 104 may also include non-volatile components, such as, for example, memory or disk based storage. The processor 102 may be coupled to one or more sensors 106 that provide data relating to, for example, the angular rate, position, or angle of the knee 100.
The processor 102 is coupled to one or more actuators 108. In one embodiment, the prosthetic device includes one or more movable joints, and each joint has one or more actuators 108. The actuators 108 of a joint may include a damper that is configured to control damping, e.g., the resistance to motion, of the joint. Damping generally refers to providing resistance to a torque, e.g. rotational motion or torque of a knee, foot, or other joint.
In one embodiment, maintenance of smooth and relatively natural movement with the prosthetic device 100 is achieved by frequent processing of data from the sensors 106 with correspondingly frequent updates of the control input to the actuator 108. Thus, a low-level sensor reading process may be configured to frequently provide generalized control of the actuator. A high-level process may concurrently operate at a lower speed to, for example, sense state changes, or adapt to the particular gait pattern of the user. In one preferred embodiment, the sensors 102 produce data with a frequency, or duty cycle, of at least approximately 1000 Hz that is used by a low-level, e.g., interrupt driven, software process on the processor 102 to maintain the damping for a given state. In this preferred embodiment, the processor 102 also executes a high-level process that updates the system state with a frequency, or duty cycle, of at least approximately 200 Hz. Control of the actuator 108 may occur in the low-level process at higher frequency, e.g., at the frequency of readings from the sensor 102. In one preferred embodiment, control of the actuator 108 is maintained at 1000 Hz. By maintaining low-level actuator control at a higher frequency than high-level state determination and motion adaptation, a lower power (for longer-battery life) and lower cost processor 102 can be employed. The low-level and high-level routines may communicate through inter-process communication (IPC) mechanisms that are well known in the art, e.g. through a shared block of memory or a shared data structure.
In one embodiment, a software system translates inputs from the sensors into current command for the actuator and monitors the health of the system providing user warning in failure modes. Ancillary functions may include communication with external devices implementation of user control functions, recording of key performance parameters, diagnostic and test functions, and parameter recording during debug mode.
In one embodiment, the software is logically decomposed into the low-level and high-level routines, or modules, discussed herein. Lower level or operating system code may provide basic functionality and support for the operation of the knee. High-level code makes decisions at a higher level concerning the operation of the prosthetic and implements these decisions through interfaces provided by the low-level code. In particular, in one exemplifying embodiment, the low-level code include hardware initialization, scheduling, communication, high-level code loading, low-level debug and test, data recording, virtual damper implementation. In this embodiment, the high-level routines include high-level initialization, parameter read routing, a main operational routine, state machine operation, damping parameter level and mode determination, auto adaptation settings, safety, parameter set routine, user control functions, storage of user specific data. Interface between the low-level and high-level routines may occur through a series of function calls. In the exemplifying embodiment, the high-level routines provides interfaces for use by the low-level routines that include initialization functions, parameter reading function, the main operating function, and an output control function. Additional specialized functions interfaces include calibration, parameter storage, and PDA interface functions. Other interface between the high-level and the low-level routines include virtual damper control functions and debug support.
In an exemplifying embodiment, when power is supplied to the system, the low-level code begins operation and initializes the hardware system. The low-level routines checks for the presence of stored high-level routines. If the high-level routines are present, the high-level routines are loaded into memory and started. If not, the low-level code opens the communications channel and waits for external instructions. If the high-level routines are present, load successfully and pass a check sum validation, the low-level routines first call an initialization routine presented by the high-level routines. After this completes, the low-level routines begin the scheduling system. The scheduler executes low-level routines every 1 ms and high-level routines every 5 ms. At the beginning of each 5 ms loop, the low-level routines first determine if the high-level code has completed its last cycle. If not, scheduling is deferred until the next 1 ms time slot. If the high-level routines did complete the last cycle, the high-level routines for the parameter read function, main operating function and output control function are executed. This cycle continues until power down or unless interrupted by receipt of communication from an instrumentation system or from another computing device, such as described below.
In a preferred embodiment, the low-level code is firmware and the high level code is usercode. The modules of the firmware sub-system include communications, data recording, debug routines, global variables, interrupt service vectors, scheduler, serial communications routines, initialization routines, shared communication data, serial peripheral interface control routines, timer control routines, version information, warning control routines, a/d control, damping control routines, and assembly language start system. The usercode sub-system includes global variables, instrumentation variables, non-volatile storage management, main control routines, system health monitor, sensor and actuator control, and shared communications data.
It is to be appreciated that each of the modules comprises various sub-routines, procedures, definitional statements and macros. Each of the modules may be separately compiled and linked into a single executable program. The following description of each of the modules is used for convenience to describe the functionality of one embodiment of a system. Thus, the processes that are performed by each of the modules may be redistributed to one of the other modules, combined together in a single module, or made available in, for example, a shareable dynamic link library. The modules may be produced using any computer language or environment, including general-purpose languages such as C, Java, C++, or FORTRAN.
In the preferred embodiment, a global variable module is configured to instantiate variables. The system 100 maintains a large structure that is a global array of floating point values. This structure serves several purposes. First, it allows a centralized storage area for most variables used in the usercode and some variables used in firmware. Second, it allows access to those variables by routines in the data module so that they can be recorded and accessed without intervention of the usercode.
In the exemplifying embodiment, the global data structure may include three data arrays. The first is a global array of floating point variables. If the instrumentation system is to be configured to report a variable it is placed in this array. The second array is an array of structures that provide information about variables that are contained in the global array and are therefore eligible for recording and reporting. It is not necessary to include references to each variable in the global array in the second array but only to those variables accessed by the instrumentation system. The information in this array of structures is used by the data module to manage the recording of and transmission of information. The third array is identical to the second array but manages variables sent to the PDA when it is connected. This is generally a subset of the variables available for transmission to the instrumentation system.
By separating the functions of high-level adaptation and/or gait related calculations from the low-level control functions, the software of the high-level process may be updated or replaced independently of the low-level control software. Advantageously, this division of the software also encapsulates different hardware embodiments and the corresponding low-level software from the high-level functionality. Thus, control programs related to, for example, a specific activity may be used without needing to be customized or configured for a given embodiment of the hardware.
A battery 110 and associated power control and switching electronics (not shown) may be coupled to each of the processor 102, the memory 104, the sensors 106, and the actuator 108. The battery 110 may also include a charging circuit, or include a connector for coupling the battery 110 to a charging circuit.
While embodiments of prosthetic devices are discussed herein with respect to embodiments of prosthetic knees, the prosthetic device 100 may also be embodied in prosthetic devices other than knees, such as prosthetic feet and ankles, for example as described in U.S. application Ser. No. 11/056,344, filed Feb. 11, 2005, the entirety of which is hereby incorporated by reference. It will be appreciated that the concepts described above can be incorporated into orthotic devices as well.
The processor 102 of the system 100 may also be coupled to an interface 112. The interface 112 may include a serial port, a Universal Serial Bus (USB), a parallel port, a Bluetooth transceiver and/or any other communications port. In particular, the interface 112 may also comprise a network interface. The interface 112 may provide network connectivity to including, for example, the following networks: Internet, Intranet, Local Area Networks (LAN) or Wide Area Networks (WAN). In addition, the connectivity to the network may be, for example, remote modem, Ethernet (IEEE 802.3), Token Ring (IEEE 802.5), Fiber Distributed Datalink Interface (FDDI) Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM), Wireless Ethernet (IEEE 802.11), Bluetooth (IEEE 802.15.1), or infrared interfaces including IRDA. Note that computing devices may be desktop, server, portable, hand-held, set-top, or any other desired type of configuration. As used herein, the network includes network variations such as the public Internet, a private network within the Internet, a secure network within the Internet, a private network, a public network, a value-added network, an intranet, and the like.
In various embodiments, the processor 102, memory 104, sensors 106, and the interface 112 may comprise one or more integrated circuits with each of these components divided in any way between those circuits. In addition, components may also comprise discrete electronic components rather than integrated circuits, or a combination of both discrete components and integrated circuits. More generally, it is to be appreciated that while each element of the block diagrams included herein may be, for convenience, discussed as a separate element, various embodiments may include the described features in merged, separated, or otherwise rearranged as discrete electronic components, integrated circuits, or other digital or analog circuits. Further, while certain embodiments are discussed with respect to a particular partitioning of functionality between software and hardware components, various embodiments may incorporate the features described herein in any combination of software, hardware, or firmware.
In operation, the processor 102 receives data from the sensors 106. Based on configuration parameters and the sensor data, adaptive control software on the processor 102 sends a control signal to the knee actuator 108. In one embodiment, the knee actuator 108 is a magnetorheological (MR) brake. The brake may be of the class of variable torque rotary devices. The MR actuator 108 provides a movement-resistive torque that is proportional to an applied current and to the rate of movement. The control signal may drive a pulse width modulator that controls current through a coil of the actuator 108 and thus controls the magnitude of the resistive torque.
Next at step 240, the method 200 begins the main control sequence. At step 240, the system 100 may degauss the actuator 240. For example, in an MR damper, the application of the control current to the actuator may cause a residual magnetic field to be imparted to the steel plates that make up the actuator. This can cause a degradation in the performance of the actuator. Advantageously, the application of a current pulse having the opposite polarity of the current pulses used for damping can degauss the actuator, i.e., remove the residual magnetization. Step 240 is discussed in more detail below with reference to
Continuing at step 250, the system 100 may perform safety routines. Safety routines may include detecting, for example, whether the user of the knee 100 is losing balance and hold the knee in a locked upright position to prevent the user from falling. Moving to step 260, the method 200 determines the state of the system 100. In one embodiment, the state may correspond to a physical or kinesthetic state of the prosthetic. Preferably, the state in a knee embodiment of system 100 is related to a state in a human gait cycle. Step 260 is discussed below in more detail with reference to
Continuing at step 280, housekeeping functions may be performed. In one embodiment, this may include the processor 102 reading values from the sensors 106, e.g., during interrupt handling routines. Housekeeping functions may also include activity related to maintaining the battery 110, e.g., battery conditioning, checking charge levels, or indicating to the user that the battery 110 is, e.g., at a specified discharge level. Next at step 290, the system 100 checks for an interrupt to the system, e.g., a command to enter the adjustment mode. If the system is interrupted, the method 200 returns to step 220. If the system is not interrupted, the method 200 continues at step 240. In one embodiment, the step 270 may be performed in a low-level process that operates at a higher frequency than, for example, the determination of the state at step 260 running in a high-level process.
As depicted in
The network computing device may include a network interface 342 coupled to a processor 344 and a user interface 346. In one embodiment, the network interface 342 may also communicate with the network interface 112 of the prosthetic system 100.
In one embodiment, the mobile computing device 320 may provide a user interface for configuring operational parameters of the system 100. In particular, the user interface 326 may include one or more displays for configuring and monitoring of the knee 100. The configuration of the prosthetic system 100 is discussed below in more detail with respect to
In addition to configuring the knee 100, the mobile computing device 320 may also be configured to receive performance and diagnostic information from the knee 100. For example, the prosthetic system 100 may send, via interfaces 112 and 122, data such as, for example, a total of the number of steps taken on a particular knee system 100, to the mobile computing device 320 for display via the user interface 126. Further, if the control system detects specific types of failures, these failures may be included in the data. In one embodiment, the user interface 126 may depict the number of times that a particular class of error has occurred.
In addition to configuration and maintenance through the mobile computing device 320, in one embodiment, a network computing device 140 may be adapted to configure and receive maintenance data from the knee 100 directly. In this case, the knee 100 may have a wireless transceiver integrated in it to handle computer network connectivity functions. In another embodiment, the network computing device 140 may be adapted to configure and receive maintenance data from the knee via the mobile computing device 320.
In various embodiments, a short distance protocol such as RS232, Bluetooth, or WiFi and an Internet connected device such as a programmable mobile telephone handset, a PC, laptop, PDA, etc., communicate remotely with a prosthetic device using the Internet or other suitable data network as the long distance transport media.
The software program running on processor 102 of knee or other prosthetic device 100 may be as simple as a double sided transponder or transceiver that creates a bridge between the interface 112 through the interfaces 322 and 328 on the mobile computing device 320 to an interface 342 on the network computing device 340 via, e.g., the Internet. The communication protocol used from the internet connected device to the service center end of the system may be any of a variety of suitable network protocols. Embodiments may use connection-oriented protocols such as TCP, or a combination of connection oriented protocols and connectionless packet protocols such as IP. Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) is a transport layer protocol used to provide a reliable, connection-oriented, transport layer link among computer systems. The network layer provides services to the transport layer. Using a two-way handshaking scheme, TCP provides the mechanism for establishing, maintaining, and terminating logical connections among computer systems. TCP transport layer uses IP as its network layer protocol. Additionally, TCP provides protocol ports to distinguish multiple programs executing on a single device by including the destination and source port number with each message. TCP performs functions such as transmission of byte streams, data flow definitions, data acknowledgments, lost or corrupt data re-transmissions, and multiplexing multiple connections through a single network connection. Finally, TCP is responsible for encapsulating information into a datagram structure. The program may be a web service running on a PC that sends out a message to the service center each time the prosthetic device is connected and needs service.
In one embodiment, the prosthetic device 100 is directly coupled to a network, and thus to the network computing device 340. For example, interface 112 may be a WiFi (e.g., 802.11a, 802.11b, 802.11g) interface that connects to a network through a LAN or at public hotspots to transmit and receive data to either of the network computing device 340, or mobile computing device 320.
The network connection between the device 100 and the network computing device 340 (which may be via the mobile computing device 320) may use any appropriate application level protocol including, for example, HTTP, CORBA, COM, RPC, FTP, SMTP, POP3, or Telnet.
The method 400 proceeds from a start state to state 410 where, for example, the mobile computing device 320 receives a current parameter value from the prosthetic device 100. In one embodiment, the parameters may be target values, such as, e.g., the target flexion angle, transmitted through the interface 112. Next at step 420, the values of parameters may be displayed on a graphical user interface, e.g., user interface 326 of mobile computing device 320. The graphical user interface may associate graphical indicia relating to state machine conditions to the parameter values.
Continuing to step 430 of the method 400, the display may provide graphical indicia to distinguish adaptive values. In one embodiment, an adaptation configuration control 550 may be provided on the display 500 of
Next at step 440 new values for parameters may be received from the user through the display 500. Moving to step 450, these new values are updated on the prosthesis system 100 by, e.g., communicating the values from the mobile computing device 320 through the interfaces 322 and 112, to the prosthetic system 100 and the method 400 ends.
A remote service person is able to open a remote screen on the network computing device 340 using the VNC program which represents the interface 326 of the mobile computing device 320 on the interface 346 the network computing device 340 for the service person is using on the other side of the Internet. In one embodiment, this connection enables remote debugging and maintenance of the knee 100 over the Internet, and thus from anywhere in the world. The network computing device 340 may access a configuration program for the prosthetic system 100 or it may access a diagnostic program capable of providing more detailed information and greater control over the device 100.
Embodiments of prosthetic device 100 may allow some or all of the following functions: remote or telemaintenance, remote prosthetic configuration, installation of software upgrades on the prosthetic system 100, collection of medical data, collection of activity data relating to the patient'"'"'s use of the prosthetic system 100, and remote optimization of the system 100.
The software upgrade mechanism of the system may, for example, be automatic so the device 100 is up to date with the newest (and safest) version of the software directly from the network computing device 340. Software upgrades may include software to replace software that is already installed on the device 100, or software to add new features or capabilities to the device 100. In other embodiments, software upgrades may be downloaded from the mobile computing device 320. Such updates may be automatically, and/or manually initiated. Furthermore, software upgrades may be made to the mobile computing device 320 via the network computing device 340.
In one embodiment, users of prosthetic systems 100 may maintain a personal profile with a service center that includes the network computing device 340 and update the database with data on regular basis.
Moving to a step 260, the knee state is determined based on the measured values. This determination is discussed in more detail below with reference to
Moving to step 730, a damping current is calculated based on the knee state. Table 1 recites the formulas used to calculate the current in one embodiment of a MR knee system 100. These formulas employ constant values that are derived from the weight of a given device, user configuration, and constants based on the specific sensors and geometry of the system 100. The damping during swing flexion is based on a preconfigured target angle. Preferably, the default target angle is 60°.
Beginning at step 740, a filter is applied to the calculated damping current. At decision step 240, the current is compared to the last applied damping current. If the new value is greater than the last value, the method 700 proceeds to step 742. If the value is less than the last value, the method 700 proceeds to step 744.
Continuing at step 742, an up filter is applied to smooth the damping values to, for example, accommodate jitter or noise in the measurements from the 106. In one embodiment the filter is an infinite impulse response filter. The filter receives as input the computed current C, the value of the previous damping control cycle ON-1, and a filter coefficient F. The output ON=F*C+(1−F)*ON-1. In one embodiment, this calculation is performed using fixed point mathematics to enable faster processing. In one embodiment, the fixed point numbers are represented in 8 bits allowing 245 levels of filtering. Next, the method 200 moves to the step 750. Returning to step 744, a down filter is applied as in step 742 with the exception of the filter value being different. Using different filtering coefficients for up and down filtering enables greater control over the filtering and, e.g., enables increases in the magnitude of damping to be faster or slower than decreases in the magnitude of damping.
Next at step 750, the filtered current value is applied to the actuator 108. Finally at step 755, the applied filtered current value is stored for use in later invocations of the method 700.
Returning to step 260 of
It is to be appreciated that, in some embodiments, the acts and events related to the steps depicted in
State 820 is a stance extension state (STE). This state represents gait positions where the knee moves from flexion to full extension. Patients who have developed a characteristic gait while using less advanced prosthetics may not encounter this state.
State 830 is a pre-swing state (PS). This state represents a transition state between stance and swing. During this state, in one embodiment of the method 200, the knee torque may drop to a minimum value in order to allow for easy initiation of knee flexion. In normal walking, this occurs during the time that the knee destabilizes in pre-swing to allow initiation of knee flexion while the foot remains on the ground.
State 840 is a swing flexion state (SWF). This state represents the swing phase of the lower leg in a human gait. A typical value for the angle of knee flexion is 60°. State 850 is a swing extension state (SWE). This state represents the gate phase in which the knee begins to extend.
Normal level ground walking typically consists of one of the following two state patterns. This pattern includes a state transition pattern of the STF state 810, to the STE state 820, to the PS state 830, to the SWF state 840 and finally to the SWE state 850. This pattern follows a gait pattern more closely resembling nominal human walking. However, this pattern may be less common among amputees and thus requires more practice to consistently use this feature. Advantageously, by recognizing each of the states 810, 820, 830, 840, and 850, the knee prosthetic system 100 may support this pattern by maintaining knee stability following initial knee flexion in early stance. Once patients learn to trust the resulting stance control of the knee prosthetic system 100, this gait pattern may be utilized.
As noted above, long term amputees accustomed to less advanced prosthetics may develop a second characteristic walking pattern. This pattern includes a state transition pattern of the STF state 810, to the PS state 830, to the SWF state 840 and finally to the SWE state 850. The stance extension state is thus skipped because the prosthesis remains extended from initial contact until pre-swing. Although this is a deviation from normal human locomotion, this is a typical gait pattern for a transfemoral amputee.
The state machine transition and associated conditions recognized by one embodiment of the method 700 will now be discussed in more detail with respect to
A second transition 912 is a transition from the STF 810 state to the PS state 830. This may occur in amputees walking in the second pattern, discussed above. This transition may be guarded by several conditions to prevent inadvertent loss of knee support to the user. The transition may be recognized when a minimum period during which no substantial flexion or extension occurs, i.e., knee motion is within a small configurable threshold angle. In addition, the knee is preferably within 2 degrees of full extension and the knee extension moment is preferably a parameterized constant times an average of the maximum extension moment that is measured during operation. More preferably, the parameterized constant is 0.2. Preferably, the system 100 dynamically measures the maximum knee extension moment during every step, recalculates, and applies the stability factor for the next step. This advantageously provides dynamic stability calibration rather than a fixed calibration that is made by a prosthetist during configuration of the device. Dynamic stability control enables the system 100 to exhibit increased stance stability for the user while maintaining easy initiation of knee flexion during ambulation.
A third transition 914 is from the state 810 to the SWF state 840. This transition typically occurs on stair or ramps. During these activities, the knee sensors 106 detect a period of stance flexion followed by rapid unloading. At this point, the knee moves directly into a swing state without passing through the pre-swing state. Again, multiple conditions may be used to recognize this state to enhance stability for the user. First, the knee must be unloaded or the load must be less than linearly related to the maximum load measured during the present step. Preferably, this linear relation includes multiplying by a factor of 0.05. Second, the knee angle must be greater than a specified angle. Preferably, this specified angle is 10 degrees. Finally, the duration of the stance phase must be measured to be at least a specified time. Preferably, this specified time is approximately 0.23 s.
A transition 922 between the STE state 820 and the STF state 810 is also recognized. This state transition may occur during standing and walking. The transition is triggered by a change in direction of the knee movement during stance from stance extension to stance flexion. The transition may be delayed until the angular velocity of flexion exceeds a minimum value. Recognition of the transition 922 generally requires detection of an angular rate greater than a selected hysteresis value. Preferably, this selected value is approximately 10.
A transition 920 may be recognized between the STE state 820 and the PS state 830. The transition 920 may occur during weighted stance and generally occurs when the user is walking using stance flexion, as in the first, nominal, human walking pattern. In one embodiment, this transition may be recognized by the same conditions that are tested to recognize the transition 912.
Another transition 924 may be recognized between the STE state 820 and the SWF state 840. This transition 924 is typically a less frequent state transition that may occur when walking up stairs foot over foot. During this ambulation pattern, the knee reads a period of stance extension followed by rapid unloading. At this point, the knee moves directly into swing without moving into the pre-swing state. In one embodiment, this transition is recognized using the same conditions as used to recognize transition 914, discussed above.
Another transition 930 may be recognized between the PS state 830 and the SWF state 840. This transition represents the end of pre-swing and the beginning of initial swing. This is the point where low-level damping may be initiated to control heel rise. In one exemplifying embodiment, the knee is considered to be on the ground or weighted when the total force is greater than 5 kg for a period greater than 0.02 seconds. Otherwise, the foot is considered to be off the ground. This transition 930 is recognized when the knee is not on the ground or the angle of the knee must be greater than a specified angle. Preferably, this specified angle is 10°.
Another transition 932 may be recognized between the PS state 830 and the STF state 810. This is a safety transition intended to prevent inadvertent loss of support during stance when the user is not ready for swing. This implements a stumble recovery stance control feature of the system 100. The following conditions may be used to recognize the transition 932. The knee angle is greater than a specified angle. Preferably, the specified angle is 7 degrees. A calculated knee moment is greater than a specified fraction of an average maximum moment during extension. Preferably, this fraction is 0.01. Finally, the total force measured on the knee is greater than a fraction of the average total force on the knee. Note that in one embodiment, this average total force may be represented by a constant value, e.g., 19 kg.
A number of transitions from swing flexion, SWF state 840, may also be recognized. Transition 940 may be recognized between the state 840 and the SWE state 850. This transition 940 occurs during unloaded swing or may be triggered when a user is sitting so that little to no resistance to extension occurs during standing from a seated position. When walking, this transition is detected when the knee is extending and a filtered measure of angular velocity is greater than some non-calibrated minimum value. Preferably, this filtered measure is based on the infinite impulse filter described above. The minimum value is preferably less than −2. A condition on the non-filtered angular velocity may also be checked, e.g., whether the angular rate is less than a specified value. Preferably, the specified value is 10.
When sitting, a different set of conditions may be employed to recognize the transition 940. For example, the knee angle is greater than a specified angle. Preferably, this angle is 75° and the angular velocity is in a specified range of less, e.g., + or −1.5., i.e., the knee is relatively still.
A second transition from the SWF state 840 is a transition 942 to the state STF 810. This transition occurs when walking in small spaces or ‘shuffling’ feet. Recognition of the transition 942 generally accounts for some foot contact with the ground and may occur when: the knee must be considered loaded or ‘on the ground’, the knee angle is less than some specified angle, e.g., 20°, and the filtered velocity is less than a specified value, e.g., 5.
Transition 950 from the swing extension state 850 to the STF state 810 may be recognized. This is the normal transition from Swing to Stance. In one embodiment, two conditions are tested to recognize transition 950. First, the knee load sensor 106 reads at least a specified of total force, e.g., 5 kg, for a period greater than a specified time, e.g., 0.02 seconds. Second, the knee flexion angle is less than a specified angle. Preferably, this angle is 50°.
In addition to the above conditions, transition 950 may also occur with reference to one or more substates. In one embodiment, three substates are recognized within the SWE state 850. These states may be considered ‘hold states’ where the knee system 100 is programmed to apply torque at the end of terminal swing. The use of these substates may be configured using the graphical user interface described above. When certain conditions are met, the substate transitions become active and allow the knee to remain in extension for a fixed period at the end of swing phase. Preferably, this fixed period is approximately 4.5 seconds. This may enable a user to enter a vehicle easily without holding the shin of the prosthesis in extension during the transfer. This special feature eliminates the effect of gravity for a brief period of time that would otherwise cause the knee to move into flexion and cause an uncomfortable transfer process. Substate transitions preferably occur in the following order, Substate 1 to Substate 2 to Substate 3.
Substate 1 may be recognized during terminal swing where a positive velocity is found after terminal impact with a bumper in the knee. This Substate acts like an activation switch for initiation of the Substate transition sequences. The torque output is equal to that found in Swing Extension in Table 1, above. To recognize the transition to Substate 1 within the state 850, the angular velocity is measured as greater than zero, the knee angle is less than a specified angle, e.g., 30 degrees, and the user is not on stairs.
Substate 2 initiates active torque which provides an ‘extension hold’. The damping during this state may be equal to a fraction of the STF 810 state damping multiplied by the absolute value of velocity plus a fixed ‘hold’ value. The transition to Substate 2 is recognized when the peak knee angle during swing phase is greater than a specified value, e.g., 20 degrees, the angular velocity is low, e.g., below a specified minimum, e.g., 5, and the knee angle must be less than some fixed constant angle, e.g., 2 degrees.
If the knee remains in Substate 2 for some fixed period of time, it will generally transition to Substate 3. Substate 3 prepares the knee system 100 for contact with the ground and loading. The damping output in this Substate may be equal to that in Substate 2 minus the fixed ‘hold’ value. The transition to Substate 3 is recognized when the time is greater than a specified hold time. This hold time may be configured using the graphical user interface described above. The initial value is preferably 4.5 seconds. In addition, the filtered velocity may be required to be greater than a specified value. In one embodiment, this value is 10.
In, for example, a knee embodiment of the prosthetic system 100, it may be advantageous to allow the knee to swing without damping when descending a ramp or stairs.
Embodiments of the invention can efficaciously utilize other field responsive (FR) fluids and mediums. In one embodiment, an electrorheological (ER) fluid is used whose rheology can be changed by an electric (energy) field. Thus, the electrorheological (ER) fluid undergoes a rheology or viscosity change or variation which is dependent on the magnitude of the applied electric field. Other suitable electronically or electrically controlled or controllable mediums may be efficaciously utilized, as needed or desired.
Embodiments of the invention and the concepts disclosed, taught or suggested herein can be used in conjunction with other types of prosthetic knees and other prosthetic devices and joints including ankles, hips, elbows and wrists. Some embodiments of a prosthetic ankle are disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/056,344, filed Feb. 11, 2005, the entirety of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein.
In view of the above, one will appreciate that embodiments of the invention overcome many of the longstanding problems in the art by providing a prosthetic or orthotic control system that provides more natural and comfortable movement to its users. Moreover, this system enables more convenient and intuitive configuration through graphical computing devices. In addition, the system provides remote configuration and maintenance that allows for more efficient and flexible service to be provided to patients by reducing the need for in person visits to a prosthetist.
While the above detailed description has shown, described, and pointed out novel features of the invention as applied to various embodiments, it will be understood that various omissions, substitutions, and changes in the form and details of the device or process illustrated may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit of the invention. As will be recognized, the present invention may be embodied within a form that does not provide all of the features and benefits set forth herein, as some features may be used or practiced separately from others. The scope of the invention is indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description. All changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are to be embraced within their scope.