Method and apparatus for simulating head impacts for helmet testing

• US 9,372,139 B2
• Filed: 08/31/2015
• Issued: 06/21/2016
• Est. Priority Date: 03/31/2011
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Fraser Worden Saunders, Martin William Ten Hove, Mihaly Kis Jr, Mihaly Kis Sr
• Original Assignee: Martin William Ten Hove, Mihaly Kis Jr, Mihaly Kis Sr
• Inventors: Ten Hove, Martin William, Kis, Mihaly Jr., Kis, Mihaly Sr., Saunders, Fraser Worden
• Primary Examiner(s): Caputo, Lisa
• Assistant Examiner(s): DAVIS HOLLINGTON, OCTAVIA L
• Application Number:
  US14/841,434
• Publication Number:
  US 20150369714A1
• Time in Patent Office: 295 Days
• Field of Search: 73/120.4
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: A42B 3/0433 Detecting, signalling or lighting devices
• CPC Class Codes: G01M 17/0078 Shock-testing of vehicles
• CPC Class Codes: G01N 2033/008 sport articles (balls, skis, rackets)
• CPC Class Codes: G01N 2033/0086 clothes; hosiery
• CPC Class Codes: G01N 3/30 by applying a single impulsive force, e.g. by falling weight

Abstract

An apparatus is disclosed that includes a frame, an impact delivery unit for delivering an impact force and at least one head form. The head form is adapted to be mounted to the frame such that the impact delivery unit can deliver an impact force to a designated location on the head form. The head form is configured to have a helmet installed thereon. The head form is selectively rotatable about each of a plurality of different axes of rotation, wherein movement of the head form is constrained to be able to move only in rotation and in rotation about only one axis of rotation of the plurality of axes at any time. A measuring system provides an indicator of the rotational acceleration of the head form when rotated about each of the plurality of axes. Also disclosed are methods for comparing the degree of protection afforded by first and second helmets.

Claims

1. A method for testing a helmet, said method comprising:

i. selecting a head form adapted and constrained to rotate about a first axis of rotation of a plurality of axes of rotation;

ii. impacting the head form at a first designated location with a force actuator operable to exert a constant force against said head form to thereby cause said selected head form to rotate about said one axis of rotation;

iii. measuring an indicator of rotational acceleration in relation to said first axis of said head form;

iv. determining a baseline rotational acceleration in relation to said first axis of said head form;

v. installing a helmet on said head form;

vi. impacting the helmet installed on said head form at said first designated location with a force actuator operable to exert said constant force against said head form to thereby cause said selected head form to rotate about said one axis of rotation;

vii. measuring an indicator of rotational acceleration in relation to said first axis of said head form;

viii. determining a rotational acceleration of said selected head form when said helmet is installed on said head form; and

ix. determining a degree of protection against rotational acceleration in relation to said first axis afforded by the helmet for said impact point;

x. selecting a head form adapted and constrained to rotate about a second axis of rotation of a plurality of axes of rotation;

xi. impacting the head form at a second designated location with a force actuator operable to exert a constant force against said head form to thereby cause said selected head form to rotate about said second axis of rotation;

xii. measuring an indicator of rotational acceleration of said head form;

xiii. determining a baseline rotational acceleration in relation to said second axis of said head form;

xiv. installing said helmet on said head form;

xv. impacting the helmet installed on said head form at said second designated location with a force actuator operable to exert said constant force against said head form to thereby cause said selected head form to rotate about said one axis of rotation;

xvi. measuring an indictor of rotational acceleration in relation to said second axis of said head form;

xvii. determining a rotational acceleration in relation to said second axis of said selected head form when said helmet is installed on said head form; and

xviii. determining a degree of protection against rotational acceleration in relation to said second axis afforded by the helmet for said impact point.

2. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein said indicators are indicators of peak rotational accelerations.

3. A method as claimed in claim 2 wherein said head from is impacted multiple times at said designated location such that steps ii and iii and are repeated said multiple of times to generate the baseline rotational acceleration in relation to said first axis.

4. A method as claimed in claim 3 further comprising obtaining an acceptable degree of variance in the baseline rotational acceleration in relation to the first axis.

5. A method as claimed in claim 4 wherein said head from is impacted multiple times at said designated location such that steps xi and xii are repeated said multiple of times to generate the baseline rotational acceleration in relation to said second axis.

6. A method as claimed in claim 5 further comprising obtaining an acceptable degree of variance in the baseline rotational acceleration in relation to the second axis.

7. A method as claimed in claim 6 wherein with said helmet installed on said head form, said helmet installed on said head from is impacted multiple times such that steps vi, vii and viii are repeated multiple times to determine the degree of protection against rotational acceleration in relation to said first axis.

8. A method as claimed in claim 7 wherein with said helmet installed on said head form, said helmet installed on said head from is impacted multiple times such that steps xv, xvi and xvii are repeated multiple times to determine the degree of protection against rotational acceleration in relation to said second axis.

9. A method as claimed in claim 8 wherein said head from is impacted multiple times at said designated location such that steps b and c and are repeated said multiple of times to generate the baseline rotational acceleration in relation to said third axis.

10. A method as claimed in claim 8 wherein mean acceleration measurements for from both baseline accelerations and helmet attached head form accelerations in relation to said second axis are compared to determine said degree of protection in relation to said second axis.

11. A method as claimed in claim 7 wherein mean acceleration measurements for from both baseline accelerations and helmet attached head form accelerations in relation to said first axis are compared to determine said degree of protection in relation to said first axis.

12. A method as claimed in claim 1 further comprising:

a. selecting a head form adapted and constrained to rotate about a third axis of rotation of a plurality of axes of rotation;

b. impacting the head form at a third designated location with a force actuator operable to exert a constant force against said head form to thereby cause said selected head form to rotate about said third axis of rotation;

c. measuring an indictor of rotational acceleration of said head form;

d. determining a baseline rotational acceleration in relation to said third axis of said head form;

e. installing a helmet on said head form;

f. impacting the helmet installed on said head form at said third designated location with a force actuator operable to exert said constant force against said head form to thereby cause said selected head form to rotate about said third axis of rotation;

g. measuring an indictor of rotational acceleration of said head form;

h. determining a rotational acceleration in relation to said third axis of said selected head form when said helmet is installed on said head form; and

i. determining a degree of protection against rotational acceleration in relation to said third axis afforded by the helmet for said impact point.

13. A method as claimed in claim 12 wherein said indicators are indicators of peak rotational accelerations.

14. A method as claimed in claim 12 further wherein said first, second and third axes are orthogonal to each other.

15. A method as claimed in claim 12 wherein each of said first, second and third axes are orthogonal to a different one of a sagittal plane, a coronal plane and an axial plane of said head from.

16. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein said head from is impacted multiple times at said designated location such that steps ii and iii and are repeated said multiple of times to generate the baseline rotational acceleration in relation to said first axis.

17. A method as claimed in claim 16 further comprising obtaining an acceptable degree of variance in the baseline rotational acceleration in relation to the first axis.

18. A method as claimed in claim 17 wherein said head from is impacted multiple times at said designated location such that steps xi and xii are repeated said multiple of times to generate the baseline rotational acceleration in relation to said second axis.

19. A method as claimed in claim 18 further comprising obtaining an acceptable degree of variance in the baseline rotational acceleration in relation to the second axis.

20. A method as claimed in claim 19 wherein with said helmet installed on said head form, said helmet installed on said head from is impacted multiple times such that steps vi, vii and viii are repeated multiple times to determine the degree of protection against rotational acceleration in relation to said first axis.

21. A method as claimed in claim 20 wherein with said helmet installed on said head form, said helmet installed on said head from is impacted multiple times such that steps xv, xvi and xvii are repeated multiple times to determine the degree of protection against rotational acceleration in relation to said second axis.

22. A method as claimed in claim 21 wherein said indicators are indicators of peak rotational accelerations.

23. A method as claimed in claim 21 wherein mean acceleration measurements for both baseline accelerations and helmet attached head form accelerations in relation to said first axis are compared to determine said degree of protection in relation to said first axis.

24. A method as claimed in claim 23 wherein mean acceleration measurements for from both baseline accelerations and helmet attached head form accelerations in relation to said second axis are compared to determine said degree of protection in relation to said second axis.

25. A method as claimed in claim 23 further comprising

generating a baseline rotational acceleration in relation to said third axis of said head form;

generating a rotational acceleration in relation to said third axis when said helmet is installed on said head form; and

determining a degree of protection against rotational acceleration in relation to said second axis afforded by the helmet.

26. A method as claimed in claim 19 wherein with said helmet installed on said head form, said helmet installed on said head from is impacted multiple times such that steps f, g and h are repeated multiple times to determine the degree of protection against rotational acceleration in relation to said third axis.

27. A method as claimed in claim 26 wherein said indicators are indicators of peak rotational accelerations.

28. A method as claimed in claim 16 further comprising obtaining an acceptable degree of variance in the baseline rotational acceleration in relation to the third axis.

29. A method for testing a helmet, said method comprising:

providing a head form adapted and constrained to rotate separately about a first axis of rotation and a second axis of rotation;

generating a baseline rotational acceleration in relation to said first axis of said head form;

generating a rotational acceleration in relation to said first axis when said helmet is installed on said head form;

determining a degree of protection against rotational acceleration in relation to said first axis afforded by the helmet;

generating a baseline rotational acceleration in relation to said second axis of said head form;

generating a rotational acceleration in relation to said second axis when said helmet is installed on said head form; and

determining a degree of protection against rotational acceleration in relation to said second axis afforded by the helmet.

30. A method for comparing first and second helmets, said method comprising:

providing a head form adapted and constrained to rotate separately about a first axis of rotation and a second axis of rotation;

generating a rotational acceleration in relation to said first axis when said first helmet is installed on said head form;

generating a rotational acceleration in relation to said first axis when said second helmet is installed on said head form;

comparing the rotational acceleration in relation to said first axis and the second axis between when the first and second helmets are installed on the head form.

31. A method for comparing first and second helmets, said method comprising:

i. selecting a first head form adapted and constrained to rotate about a first axis of rotation of a plurality of axes of rotation;

ii. installing a first helmet on said first head form;

iii. exerting a first force on said first helmet installed on said first head form at a first designated location to thereby cause said first head form to rotate about said first axis of rotation;

iv. measuring an indicator of rotational acceleration in relation to said first axis of said first head form;

v. determining a rotational acceleration in relation to said first axis of said first head form when said first helmet is installed on said first head form; and

vi. installing a second helmet on said first head form;

vii. exerting said first force on said second helmet installed on said first head form at said first designated location to thereby cause said first head form to rotate about said second axis of rotation;

viii. measuring an indicator of rotational acceleration in relation to said second axis of said first head form;

ix. determining a rotational acceleration in relation to said second axis of said first head form when said second helmet is installed on said first head form; and

x. comparing the rotational accelerations in relation to said first axis between said first and second helmets;

xi. selecting a second head form adapted and constrained to rotate about a second axis of rotation of a plurality of axes of rotation;

xii. installing said first helmet on said second head form;

xiii. exerting a second force on said first helmet installed on said second head form at a second designated location to thereby cause said second head form to rotate about said second axis of rotation;

xiv. measuring an indicator of rotational acceleration in relation to said second axis of said second head form;

xv. determining a rotational acceleration in relation to said second axis of said second head form when said first helmet is installed on said second head form;

xvi. installing a second helmet on said second head form;

xvii. exerting said force on said second helmet installed on said second head form at said second location to thereby cause said second head form to rotate about said second axis of rotation;

xviii. measuring an indicator of rotational acceleration in relation to said second axis of said second head form;

xix. determining a rotational acceleration in relation to said second axis of said second head form when said second helmet is installed on said head form;

xx. comparing the rotational accelerations in relation to said first axis between said first and second helmets.