Syntactic tagging in a domain-specific context

• US 9,471,664 B2
• Filed: 12/13/2015
• Issued: 10/18/2016
• Est. Priority Date: 03/15/2013
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Locus LP
• Original Assignee: Locus LP
• Inventors: Riggs, Rory
• Primary Examiner(s): LE, HUNG D
• Application Number:
  US14/967,328
• Publication Number:
  US 20160098475A1
• Time in Patent Office: 310 Days
• Field of Search: None
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/00 Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/21 Design, administration or maintenance of databases
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/2291 User-Defined Types; Storage management thereof
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/2358 Change logging, detection, and notification replication G06F16/27
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/2365 Ensuring data consistency and integrity
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/2379 Updates performed during online database operations; commit processing
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/245 Query processing
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/24575 using context
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/248 Presentation of query results
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/282 Hierarchical databases, e.g. IMS, LDAP data stores or Lotus Notes
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/283 Multi-dimensional databases or data warehouses, e.g. MOLAP or ROLAP
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/285 Clustering or classification
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/287 Visualization; Browsing
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/29 Geographical information databases
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/9024 Graphs; Linked lists G06F16/9027 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/9535 Search customisation based on user profiles and personalisation
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/9554 by using bar codes
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 40/06 Asset management; Financial planning or analysis

Abstract

This application relates generally to defining a domain-specific syntax characterizing a functional information system and performing operations on data entities represented by the domain-specific syntax, including defining a domain-specific syntax, receiving and storing a domain-specific data entity, assigning a syntactic tag to the domain-specific data entity, and electronically storing the tag assigned to the data entity in the electronic data store so that the tag is logically linked to the stored data entity.

Claims

1. A method for executing a command in a computing environment to perform a database operation utilizing a computerized representation of a functional system, the method comprising:

electronically storing a set of data entities in a database system, wherein the data entities represent elements of the functional system, and wherein the functional system comprises a group of elements related by their functional roles;

electronically storing a computerized representation of a functional system syntax;

the functional system syntax representing functional attributes of the elements of the functional system, wherein the functional attributes are properties of the elements of the functional system in converting inputs to outputs, or as the inputs, or as the outputs, or as intermediates between the inputs and the outputs;

the functional system syntax representing functional relationships among inputs to the elements, outputs from the elements, intermediates between the inputs and the outputs, or roles of the elements in converting the inputs to the outputs; and

enabling data creating, reading, updating, and deleting operations on the data entities in the data store to correspond with changes in the functional system.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising electronically assigning syntactic tags to the data entities based on the computerized representation of the functional system.

3. The method of claim 2, further comprising electronically assigning syntactic tags to the data entities based on the functional attributes of the elements which the data entities represent.

4. The method of claim 3, further comprising assigning a value to a tag corresponding to at least one of the functional attributes, wherein the value provides a numerical, statistical, semantic, or visual characterization of a property of an element in the functional system.

5. The method of claim 2, further comprising electronically assigning syntactic tags to the data entities based on the electronically stored functional relationships among the elements.

6. The method of claim 2, further comprising:

ordering or grouping the data entities based on their associated syntactic tags;

performing a relational search based on the associated syntactic tags; and

returning a resultant set based on the relational search, the set comprising data entities, relations on the set of data entities, or values based on the search.

7. The method of claim 2, further comprising performing an automated assignment of syntactic tags, attributes, or values using algorithms associated with the data entities.

8. The method of claim 2, further comprising controlling for the heterogeneity of a population or of attributes, tags, or values associated with its members by grouping representations of populations according to their syntactic tags, electronically storing the representations, and algorithmically allocating populations based on the tagged groups.

9. The method of claim 8, further comprising controlling for heterogeneity within a gene database, wherein the database electronically represents two or more genes.

10. The method of claim 8, wherein the syntax is used to reduce statistical dependence or increase diversification among groups of data entities or elements.

11. The method of claim 1, wherein one or more data entities represent one or more nodes, a relation on a set of nodes, or connections among one or more nodes.

12. The method of claim 11, wherein a node comprises a vertex in a graph, and a connection between a node comprises an edge in a graph.

13. The method of claim 11, wherein one or more nodes, or one or more connections among one or more nodes, represent one or more resources, activities, elements, inputs, outputs, intermediates, functions, nouns, verbs, subjects, objects, or loci.

14. The method of claim 13, wherein the nodes, connections, or their referents are represented as coordinates in a space having an arbitrary number of dimensions.

15. The method of claim 11, further comprising iterating through the database to construct a graph representation of one or more data entities representing the inputs, intermediates, outputs, resources, activities, or elements, or the relationships among them, in the functional system.

16. The method of claim 15, further comprising configuring a mechanism for traversing, visualizing, or interacting with the graph.

17. The method of claim 1, further comprising clustering the data entities based on one or more of the functional attributes or functional relationships.

18. The method of claim 17, further comprising clustering the data entities based on statistical relationships among the functional relationships or functional attributes.

19. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

associating a statistical property with one or more functional relationships or functional attributes;

calculating two or more statistical values associated with the statistical property;

determining the statistical significance of the calculated statistical values of or among one or more functional attributes or functional relationships.

20. The method of claim 1, further comprising generating a coordinate space graphic plot.

21. The method of claim 1, wherein the functional system syntax represents an ordered relationship among functional attributes of at least two elements of the functional system, wherein the ordered relationship is functional, nonfunctional, temporal, spatial, or mechanical.

22. The method of claim 1, wherein the properties are characteristic.

23. The method of claim 1, further comprising combining data entities to form valid syntactic expressions by assigning syntactic tags to the data entities in the computerized representation of the functional system based on the functional attributes of the elements to which the data entities correspond.

24. The method of claim 23, wherein the tags or expressions are ordered, stratified, or segmented and represented in graphical, sequential, clustered, or networked form.

25. The method of claim 1, wherein:

the elements further comprise one or more resources or activities;

a resource comprises an input, intermediate, or output in the functional system; and

an activity comprises a function in the functional system.

26. The method of claim 1, further comprising associating geographic, temporal, or other non-functional or non-syntactic attributes, tags, or values with one or more data entities.

27. The method of claim 1, wherein:

the functional system syntax is represented by an n-dimensional coordinate system comprising a set of positions.

28. The method of claim 27, wherein:

a set of n values in an n-tuple of tags represents a specific valid functional location in the functional system syntax; and

any set of positions that has common values represents a common set of valid functional locations in the functional system syntax.

29. The method of claim 1, further comprising building population groupings of entities based on proximity in the functional system syntax, wherein the proximity is based on temporal, geographic, spatial, mechanical, anatomical, physical, ecological, genomic, biological, environmental, astronomical, or functional order in the functional system.

30. The method of claim 1, further comprising allocating data entities across differentiated population groupings to increase the predictability or stability of performance in the functional system.