Integrated system and method for validating the functionality and performance of software applications

• US 9,477,581 B2
• Filed: 03/26/2013
• Issued: 10/25/2016
• Est. Priority Date: 03/15/2006
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (JP Morgan Chase & Co)
• Original Assignee: JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (JP Morgan Chase & Co)
• Inventors: Lukashevich, Judit, Hudgons, Morrisha, Frank, Michael E., Rheingans, Alex
• Primary Examiner(s): Dam, Tuan Q.
• Assistant Examiner(s): Wei, Zheng
• Application Number:
  US13/850,554
• Publication Number:
  US 20130205172A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,309 Days
• Field of Search: None
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/3672 Test management
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/3684 for test design, e.g. generating new test cases

Abstract

The system and method presented provides a multi-phase, end-to-end integrated process for testing application software using a standard software testing tool. The system and method involve integrating the functional, automated regression and performance phases of software application testing by leveraging deliverables at each phase so that the deliverables may be efficiently reused in subsequent test phases. Deliverables such as functional and technical test conditions and manual test scripts are used as inputs for each phase of the integrated tests. The use of leveraged requirements-based deliverables between test phases significantly reduces much of the repetitive testing typically associated with functionality and performance testing and minimizes repetition of testing errors discovered in earlier test phases. This integrated system and method for validating the functionality and performance of software applications by leveraging deliverables provides enhanced efficiencies, test procedure consistency throughout multiple test phases, consistent test results and high quality software applications.

Claims

1. An integrated method for validating the functionality and performance of software applications through multiple test phases using a common set of business requirements-based manual test scripts, the method comprising the steps of:

deriving software application test conditions;

generating manual test scripts based on the software application test conditions;

creating, using at least one processor, functional tests for a functional test phase based on the generated manual test scripts;

selecting, for an automated regression test phase, a first subset of the generated manual test scripts, the selecting based on attributes of the generated manual test scripts and the functional tests created for the functional test phase;

creating automated regression tests for the automated regression test phase based on the selected first subset of manual test scripts, wherein creating automated regression tests comprises;

identifying object types;

identifying actions;

creating reusable functions for each action identified;

identifying identifiers for each unique object of the identified object types;

creating automated functions based on the reusable functions and a plurality of reusable Extensible Markup Language (XML) objects; and

creating automated test scripts including a plurality of the automated functions for the automated regressions test; and

automatically executing the functional test phase and the automated regression test phase concurrently.

2. The method as recited in claim 1, further comprising the steps of:

selecting a second subset of manual test scripts from the manual test scripts;

generating performance tests based on the second subset of manual test scripts, wherein the performance tests validates the functionality of the software application; and

executing, using at least one processor, performance tests concurrently with the automated regression tests.

3. The method as recited in claim 2, wherein the step of creating performance tests based on the second subset of manual test scripts further comprises the steps of:

identifying key business transactions; and

implementing script standards.

4. The method as recited in claim 2, wherein the step of creating performance tests based on the second subset of manual test scripts further comprises the steps of:

reviewing system requirements;

defining user scenarios;

defining test data requirements;

defining environment requirements; and

creating performance test data.

5. The method as recited in claim 2, further comprising the step of evaluating test results from the performance tests executed.

6. The method as recited in claim 5, wherein the step of evaluating test results from the performance tests further comprises the steps of remediating performance defects, executing performance tests and generating results.

7. The method as recited in claim 2, wherein the steps of generating and executing of performance tests are performed before the step of executing the automated regression tests.

8. The method as recited in claim 1, further comprising the steps of

generating test results based on the manual test scripts processed;

and

evaluating the test results for at least two test cycles and validating the results before selecting a first or second subset of manual test scripts to be used for subsequent test phases.

9. The method as recited in claim 1, further comprising the step of evaluating the test results from the automated regression tests executed during the automated test phase.

10. The method as recited in claim 9, wherein the step of evaluating the test results comprises remediating performance defects and generating results.

11. An integrated method for validating the functionality and performance of software applications in the functional and performance test phases using a common set of business requirements-based manual test scripts, the method comprising the steps of:

deriving software application test conditions;

generating manual test scripts based on the software application test conditions;

creating, using at least one processor, functional tests for a functional test phase based on the generated manual test scripts;

generating performance tests based on at least one processed script of the manual test scripts;

selecting, for an automated regression test phase, a first subset of the generated manual test scripts, the selecting based on attributes of the generated manual test scripts and the functional tests created for the functional test phase;

generating automated regression tests for the automated regression test phase based on the selected first subset of manual test scripts, wherein generating the automated regression tests comprises;

creating reusable functions for each action identified;

creating automated functions based on the reusable functions and reusable Extensible Markup Language (XML) objects;

grouping reusable automated functions to create grouped reusable automated functions; and

creating automated test scripts including a plurality of grouped automated functions for the automated regressions test; and

executing, using at least one processor, the automated regression tests; and

executing, using at least one processor, the performance tests;

automatically executing the functional test phase and the automated regression test phase concurrently.

12. The method as recited in claim 11, wherein the step of generating performance tests based on at least one processed script of the manual test scripts further comprises the steps of:

identifying key business transactions by using the subset of manual test scripts, reviewing business requirements and using a transaction risk-based selection process; and

implementing script standards that include the steps of developing a single script, managing script based workflow, automatically centralizing application functions, validating context sensitive data, and automatically centralizing error handling.

13. An integrated system for validating the functionality and performance of software applications through multiple test phases using a common set of business requirements-based manual test scripts, the system comprising:

a functional test phase module that derives software application test condition, generates, using at least one processor, manual test scripts based on the software application test conditions, and processes, using at least one processor, the manual test scripts; and

an automated regression test phase module that creates and executes automated regression tests based on a first subset of processed manual test scripts, the automated regression test phase module creates the automated regression tests by performing at least the steps of;

selecting a first subset of the generated manual test scripts, the selecting based on attributes of the generated manual test scripts and the functional tests created for the functional test phase;

identifying object types, identifying actions for each object type identified, creating reusable functions for each action identified;

identifying identifiers for each unique object of the identified object types;

creating automated functions based on the reusable functions and a plurality of reusable Extensible Markup Language (XML) objects; and

creating automated test scripts based on the automated functions; and

automatically executing the functional test phase and the automated regression test phase concurrently.

14. The system as recited in claim 13, further comprising:

a performance test phase module configured for creating performance tests based on a second subset of manual test scripts and executing the performance tests.

15. The system as recited in claim 14, wherein the performance test phase module is further configured for identifying key business transactions by using the second subset of manual test scripts, reviewing business requirements and using a transaction risk-based selection process and implementing script standards based on a single script, a script based workflow management, centralized application functions, context sensitive data validation, and centralized error handling.

16. The system as recited in claim 14, wherein the performance test phase module is further configured for generating test results and evaluating the test results from the performance tests executed.

17. The system as recited in claim 16, evaluating the test results includes remediating performance defects, executing performance tests and generating results.

18. The method as recited in claim 14, wherein performance test phase module is configured to generate and execute the performance tests before the executing of the automated regression tests by the automated regression test phase module.

19. The system as recited in claim 13, wherein the functional test phase module is further configured for generating test results based on the manual test scripts processed, evaluating the test results for at least two test cycles and validating the results before selecting a first or second subset of manual test scripts to be used for subsequent test phases.

20. The system as recited in claim 13, wherein the automated regression test phase module is further configured for evaluating the test results from the automated regression tests.