System and method for reviewing role definitions

• US 9,495,393 B2
• Filed: 12/12/2011
• Issued: 11/15/2016
• Est. Priority Date: 07/27/2011
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Emc IP Holding Company LLC (Dell Technologies Inc.)
• Original Assignee: Emc IP Holding Company LLC (Dell Technologies Inc.)
• Inventors: Ducharme, James, Miller, Michael Sean, McLaren, Christopher Clifton, Zehme, Dan Uwe, Taneja, Deepak
• Primary Examiner(s): Gorney, Boris
• Assistant Examiner(s): ANDERSEN, KRISTOPHER E
• Application Number:
  US13/316,946
• Publication Number:
  US 20130031070A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,800 Days
• Field of Search: 707/705, 707/781
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/21 Design, administration or maintenance of databases

Abstract

A system for reviewing role definitions includes a database that stores a plurality of roles. Each of the plurality of roles associates an identifier with at least one entitlement. The system also includes a second database that stores role review definitions. The review definitions define role review processes for the plurality of roles. The system further includes a processor that is in communication with the role database and the review definition database. The processor executes the role review processes defined by the review definitions at the appropriate times.

Claims

1. A system for reviewing role definitions, comprising:

a first database storing a plurality of roles, each of the plurality of roles having an identifier and at least one associated entitlement, each of the plurality of roles representing an object that associates some number of people or identities with a common set of access rights or entitlements;

a second database storing a review definition, the review definition defining a role review process for at least one of the plurality of roles, the role review process ensuring that role definitions are accurate and meaningful over a period of time and enabling changes to be made to a role structure where inaccuracies are found; and

a processor in communication with the first and second databases, the processor executing instructions to execute the role review process defined by the review definition;

wherein a meaningful role definition of a role within an organization is one in which the role definition aligns with actual business roles of people within an organization;

wherein the review definition stored in the second database includes;

i) a schedule defining when a review process for a role is to be run,

ii) a review duration defining how long the review process runs,

iii) an identifier of a review owner identifying a person authorized by the system to select at least one reviewer to perform the role review process, and

iv) an indicator indicating whether the review process is to be coarse-grained or fine-grained, a coarse-grained review being a review of a role at a high level either by maintaining or revoking the role, a fine-grained review being a review of details of the role including membership and entitlements; and

wherein the processor, prior to storing the review definition, further executes instructions to receive, at the direction of the review owner, by a graphical user interface (GUI) generated by the processor and displayed on a display device coupled to the processor, a selection of at least one reviewer to perform a role review specified by the role review process,

wherein the processor further executes instructions to present the user with controls for receiving from the user a reviewer delegation indication indicating whether the at least one reviewer may delegate performing the role review process to another person, wherein the controls include a checkbox configured to provide the processor with (i) a first value in response to the user clicking the checkbox to indicate that the at least one reviewer is allowed to delegate performing the role review process to another person and (ii) a second value in response to the user clicking the checkbox to indicate that the at least one reviewer is not allowed to delegate performing the role review process to another person,

wherein the processor further executes instructions to store the reviewer delegation indication and

to allow the at least one reviewer to delegate, or prevent the at least one reviewer from delegating, performing of the role review process to another person based on whether the checkbox respectively provides the processor with the first value or the second value,

wherein a reviewer has a role within the organization defined by a role definition associating a group of people with access rights to resources,

wherein the processor further executes instructions to present the user with controls for receiving a self-review prevention indicator indicating whether to prevent the at least one reviewer from performing a self review of access rights to the resources, wherein the controls include another checkbox configured to provide the processor with (i) a first self-review value in response to the user clicking the other checkbox to indicate that the at least one reviewer is allowed to perform a self review of access rights to the resources and (ii) a second self-review value in response to the user clicking the other checkbox to indicate that the at least one reviewer is not allowed to perform a self review of access rights to the resources,

wherein the processor further executes instructions to store the self-review prevention indicator and

to allow the at least one reviewer to perform, or prevent the at least one reviewer from performing, a self review of access rights to the resources based on whether the other checkbox respectively provides the processor with the first self-review value or second self-review value.

2. The system of claim 1 wherein the second database stores a plurality of review definitions, each of the plurality of review definitions defining a role review process for a corresponding one of the plurality of roles.

3. The system of claim 1 wherein the processor further executes instructions to create the review definition by receiving information from a user.

4. The system of claim 3, wherein the processor further executes instructions to utilize a user selection of at least one of the plurality of roles for the role review process to create the review definition.

5. The system of claim 4, wherein the user selection may be selected from the group consisting of:

role type, role name, role attributes, role entitlements, role members and role owners.

6. The system of claim 3, wherein the processor further executes instructions to utilize a user selection of a schedule for the review to create the review definition.

7. The system of claim 1, wherein the processor further executes instructions to create a first instance of the role review process while executing the review process.

8. The system of claim 1, wherein the processor further executes instructions to create an instance of the role review process each time the processor executes the role review process.

9. The system of claim 1, wherein the processor further executes instructions to notify the at least one selected reviewer of the role review process.

10. The system of claim 1, wherein the processor further executes instructions to modify the at least one of the plurality of roles in response to receiving a user instruction to modify the at least one of the plurality of roles.

11. A method for reviewing role definitions in a role review system, comprising the steps of:

storing a plurality of roles in a first database, each of the plurality of roles having an identifier and at least one associated entitlement, each of the plurality of roles representing an object that associates some number of people or identities with a common set of access rights or entitlements; and

storing a review definition in a second database, the review definition defining a role review process for at least one of the plurality of roles, the role review process specifying role reviews arranged to verify that role definitions are accurate and meaningful over a period of time and enabling changes to be made to a role structure where inaccuracies are found;

wherein a meaningful role definition of a role within an organization is one in which the role definition aligns with actual business roles of people within an organization;

wherein storing the review definition in the second database includes storing

i) a schedule defining when a review process for a role is to be run,

ii) a review duration defining how long the review process runs,

iii) an identifier of a review owner identifying a authorized by the system to select at least one reviewer to perform the role review process, and

iv) an indicator indicating whether the review process is to be coarse-grained or fine-grained, a coarse-grained review being a review of a role at a high level either by maintaining or revoking the role, a fine-grained review being a review of details of the role including membership and entitlements,

wherein the method further comprises, prior to storing the review definition, receiving, at the direction of the review owner, by a graphical user interface (GUI) generated by a processor of the role review system and displayed on a display device coupled to the processor, a selection of at least one reviewer to perform a role review specified by the role review process,

wherein generating the GUI includes presenting the user with controls for receiving from the user a reviewer delegation indication indicating whether the at least one reviewer may delegate performing the role review process to another person, wherein the controls include a checkbox configured to provide the processor with (i) a first value in response to the user clicking the checkbox to indicate that the at least one reviewer is allowed to delegate performing the role review process to another person and (ii) a second value in response to the user clicking the checkbox to indicate that the at least one reviewer is not allowed to delegate performing the role review process to another person,

wherein storing the review definition in the set of databases further includes storing the reviewer delegation indication, and

wherein the method further comprises executing the role review process, wherein executing includes allowing the at least one reviewer to delegate, or preventing the at least one reviewer from delegating, performing of the role review process to another person based on whether the checkbox respectively provides the processor with the first value or the second value,

wherein a reviewer has a role within the organization defined by a role definition associating a group of people with access rights to resources,

wherein generating the GUI further includes presenting the user with controls for receiving a self-review prevention indicator indicating whether to prevent the at least one reviewer from performing a self review of access rights to the resources, wherein the controls include another checkbox configured to provide the processor with (i) a first self-review value in response to the user clicking the other checkbox to indicate that the at least one reviewer is allowed to perform a self review of access rights to the resources and (ii) a second self-review value in response to the user clicking the other checkbox to indicate that the at least one reviewer is not allowed to perform a self review of access rights to the resources,

wherein storing the review definition in the set of databases includes storing the self-review prevention indicator, and

wherein executing the role review process defined by the inputs further includes allowing the at least one reviewer to perform, or preventing the at least one reviewer from performing, a self review of access rights to the resources based on whether the other checkbox respectively provides the processor with the first self-review value or the second self-review value.

12. The method of claim 11 further comprising the step of storing a plurality of review definitions in the second database, each of the plurality of review definitions defining a role review process for one of the plurality of roles.

13. The method of claim 11, wherein creating the review definition further comprises the processor receiving a selection from predetermined review options.

14. The method of claim 11, wherein the step of creating the review definition comprises the processor receiving a selection of at least one of the plurality of roles for the role review process.

15. The method of claim 14, wherein the selection may be selected from the group consisting of:

role type, role name, role attributes, role entitlements, role members and role owners.

16. The method of claim 11, wherein the step of creating the review definition further comprises the processor receiving a schedule for the review.

17. The method of claim 11, wherein the step of creating the review definition further comprises the processor receiving a plurality of reviewers among which to distribute the review.

18. The method of claim 11, wherein the step of executing the review process further comprises creating a first instance of the review process.

19. The method of claim 11, further comprising the step of executing the review a plurality of times, wherein an instance of the role review process is created by the processor for each execution.

20. The method of claim 11, wherein the step of executing the review process further comprises notifying the at least one selected reviewer of the role review process.

21. The method of claim 11, further comprising the step of receiving, by the processor, an instruction from a user regarding the at least one of the plurality of roles.

22. The method of claim 21 wherein the instruction is to maintain the at least one of the plurality of roles.

23. The method of claim 11, wherein the processor utilizes a user selection of a plurality of reviewers among which to distribute the role review process to create the review definition.

24. The method of claim 11 wherein the at least one reviewer is an associated role owner.

25. The method of claim 11,

wherein the method further comprises changing a role definition when the role definition is found to be inaccurate.

26. The method of claim 25, wherein each of the plurality of roles has a set of members, each of the set of members being a person or identity that matches a membership rule for that role;

wherein the method further comprises defining a metric for a role of the plurality of roles, the metric being based upon i) a list of people who are members of the role but do not satisfy the criteria determined by the membership rule for that role, and ii) a list of people who are not members of the role but satisfy the criteria determined by the membership rule for that role.