Methods and devices for evaluating eyewear fit

• US 9,507,175 B2
• Filed: 10/16/2012
• Issued: 11/29/2016
• Est. Priority Date: 10/16/2012
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: 3M Innovative Properties Company (3M Company)
• Original Assignee: 3M Innovative Properties Company (3M Company)
• Inventors: Cuta, Karen, Dujovski, Christopher J., Froissard, Laurent, Henderson, Christopher, Rust, Donald, Viner, Andrew Stephen
• Primary Examiner(s): Won, Bumsuk
• Assistant Examiner(s): Beatty, Collin X
• Application Number:
  US13/652,854
• Publication Number:
  US 20140104568A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,505 Days
• Field of Search: 332/00, 335/11, 335/12, 338/10, 338/11, 338/12, 351/159.75, 351/204, 351/205
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: G02C 13/003 Measuring during assembly or fitting of spectacles
• CPC Class Codes: G02C 7/027 considering wearer's parameters

Abstract

Methods and tools for evaluating fit of eyewear are provided. In an exemplary embodiment, the method includes steps of evaluating coverage provided by an eyewear article on the face of the wearer and evaluating a gap formed between a peripheral edge of the eyewear article and the face of the wearer.

Claims

1. A gauge for evaluating fit of an eyewear article, comprising:

an elongate body having first and second major surfaces and first and second end portions;

a first sphere having a diameter D1 proximate the first end; and

a second sphere having a diameter D2 proximate the second end;

wherein the first major surface is calibrated with a scale extending between the first and second end portions comprising a marked zero location and markings on each side of the zero location, and wherein diameter DI is different than diameter D2, and wherein the markings on each side of the zero location include;

first indicia and second indicia different from the scale markings at opposite sides of the zero location and designating a predetermined minimum distance from the zero location for eyewear coverage in a vertical direction; and

third indicia and fourth indicia apart from the first and second indicia and different from the scale markings, the third and fourth indicia being at opposite sides of the zero location and designating a predetermined minimum distance from the zero location for coverage in a horizontal direction.

2. The gauge of claim 1, wherein the markings on each side of the zero location are representative of a predetermined distance from the zero location to provide an indication whether coverage of an eyewear article on the face of a wearer in a particular direction is sufficient.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of evaluating a gap comprises determining a distance between a lowermost peripheral edge of the eyewear article and soft tissue of the wearer away from the wearer'"'"'s eyes at a location along the lowermost peripheral edge.

4. A method of evaluating an eyewear article for use as safety eyewear, comprising:

(1) obtaining a model of at least a portion of a wearer'"'"'s head and a model of at least an eyewear article;

(2) evaluating coverage provided by the eyewear article over the wearer'"'"'s face in response to a difference between the model of at least a portion of the wearer'"'"'s head and the model of at least the eyewear article;

(3) evaluating a gap formed between a peripheral edge of the eyewear article and the wearer'"'"'s face in response to a difference between the model of at least a portion of the wearer'"'"'s head and the model of at least the eyewear article; and

(4) determining an ability of the eyewear article to function as safety eyewear for the wearer in protecting the wearer'"'"'s eyes and face based upon the evaluations of steps (2) and (3), wherein steps (2) and (3) further comprise using the gauge of claim 1; and

(5) providing a suggestion as to whether the eyewear article is expected to provide a desired fit on the wearer in response to at least one of coverage in a vertical direction, coverage in a horizontal direction, and the gap.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein the model of at least the eyewear article is obtained while an eyewear article is positioned for use on the wearer.

6. The method of claim 4, wherein the step of evaluating coverage comprises:

analyzing the models to determine a first vertical distance V1 between a location on the eyewear article in front of a center of a pupil of the wearer and an upper peripheral edge of the eyewear article in a substantially vertical direction;

comparing the first vertical distance V1 with a predetermined value V0; and

designating the eyewear article as not providing sufficient coverage for the wearer as safety eyewear when the first vertical distance V1 is less than the predetermined value V0.

7. The method of claim 6, further comprising analyzing the models to determine a second vertical distance V2 between a location on the eyewear article substantially in front of a center of a pupil of the wearer and a lower peripheral edge of the eyewear article in a substantially vertical direction.

8. The method of claim 4, wherein the step of evaluating coverage further comprises:

analyzing the models to determine a first horizontal distance H1 between a location on the eyewear article substantially in front of a center of a pupil of the wearer and an outer peripheral edge of the eyewear article in a substantially horizontal direction;

comparing the first horizontal distance H1 with a predetermined value H0; and

designating the eyewear article as not providing sufficient coverage for the wearer as safety eyewear when the first horizontal distance H1 is less than the predetermined value H0.

9. The method of claim 8, further comprising analyzing the models to determine a second horizontal distance H2 between a location on the eyewear article substantially in front of a center of a pupil of the wearer and an inner peripheral edge of the eyewear article in a substantially horizontal direction.

10. The method of claim 4, wherein the step of evaluating a gap comprises analyzing the models to determine a size of a gap between a peripheral edge of the eyewear article and the wearer'"'"'s face.

11. The method of claim 4, further comprising, before or after one or both of steps (2) or (3):

(4) evaluating field of view of the wearer by analyzing the models to determine whether the eyewear article interferes with the wearer'"'"'s field of view.

12. The method of claim 4, further comprising, before or after one or both of steps (2) or (3):

(5) evaluating security by analyzing the models.

13. The method of claim 4, further comprising:

(6) selecting one or more eyewear articles based on steps (2) and (3).

14. The method of claim 4, wherein steps (2) and (3) occur in any order.

15. The method of claim 4, wherein the step of evaluating a gap comprises determining a distance between a peripheral edge of one or more eyewear articles and the wearer'"'"'s face at a plurality of locations along the peripheral edge.

16. A method of evaluating an eyewear article for use as safety eyewear, comprising:

(1) positioning an eyewear article for use on a wearer;

(2) evaluating coverage provided by the eyewear article on the wearer'"'"'s face;

(3) evaluating a gap formed between a peripheral edge of the eyewear article and the wearer'"'"'s face by measuring a distance between a peripheral edge of the eyewear article and the wearer'"'"'s face;

(4) evaluating field of view of the wearer;

(5) evaluating security of the eyewear article on the wearer during movement of the wearer'"'"'s head; and

(6) determining an ability of the eyewear article to function as safety eyewear for the wearer in protecting the wearer'"'"'s eyes and face based upon the evaluations of steps (2) through (5),

wherein steps (2) and (3) further comprise using the gauge of claim 1.

17. The method of claim 16, wherein steps (2) through (5) occur in sequence.

18. The method of claim 16, wherein steps (2) through (5) occur in any order.

19. The method of claim 16, wherein the step of evaluating coverage comprises:

measuring a first vertical distance V1 between a location on a lens of the eyewear article substantially in front of a center of a pupil of the wearer and an upper peripheral edge of the eyewear article in a substantially vertical direction;

comparing the first vertical distance V1 with a predetermined value V0; and

designating the eyewear article as not providing sufficient coverage for the wearer as safety eyewear when the first vertical distance V1 is less than the predetermined value V0.

20. The method of claim 19, wherein the step of evaluating coverage further comprises measuring a second vertical distance V2 between a location on the lens substantially in front of a center of a pupil of the wearer and a lower peripheral edge of the eyewear article in a substantially vertical direction.

21. The method of claim 16, wherein the step of evaluating coverage comprises:

measuring a first horizontal distance H1 between a location on the eyewear article substantially in front of a center of a pupil of the wearer and an outer peripheral edge of the eyewear article in a substantially horizontal direction;

comparing the first horizontal distance H1 with a predetermined value H0; and

designating the eyewear article as not providing sufficient coverage for the wearer as safety eyewear when the first horizontal distance H1 is less than the predetermined value H0.

22. The method of claim 21, wherein the step of evaluating coverage further comprises measuring a second horizontal distance H2 between a location on the eyewear article substantially in front of a center of a pupil of the wearer and an inner peripheral edge of the eyewear article in a substantially horizontal direction.

23. The method of claim 16, wherein the step of evaluating a gap comprises measuring a gap between a peripheral edge of the eyewear article and the wearer'"'"'s face by attempting to insert a sphere of known diameter D1 into the gap.

24. The method of claim 16, wherein the step of evaluating the field of view of the wearer comprises moving an object in and around the field of view of the wearer.

25. The method of claim 16, further comprising:

selecting another eyewear article different than the eyewear article from an inventory of eyewear articles for potential use as safety eyewear for the wearer based on steps (2) through (5) when it is determined at step (6) that the eyewear article is not suitable as safety eyewear for the wearer.