System and method for analyzing communications

• US 9,514,233 B2
• Filed: 07/09/2014
• Issued: 12/06/2016
• Est. Priority Date: 12/01/1999
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Meta Platforms, Inc. (f/k/a Facebook, Inc.)
• Original Assignee: Meta Platforms, Inc. (f/k/a Facebook, Inc.)
• Inventors: Isaacs, Ellen, Nardi, Bonnie A., Whittaker, Stephen
• Primary Examiner(s): Tran, Jimmy H
• Application Number:
  US14/327,226
• Publication Number:
  US 20150006549A1
• Time in Patent Office: 881 Days
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: A63B 2071/0666 worn on the head or face, e.g. combined with goggles or glasses
• CPC Class Codes: A63B 33/004 comprising two separate lenses joined by a flexible bridge
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/24578 using ranking
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/26 Visual data mining; Browsing structured data
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/284 Relational databases
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/955 using information identifiers, e.g. uniform resource locators [URL]
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/107 Computer-aided management of electronic mailing [e-mailing]
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 51/226 Delivery according to priorities
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 51/42 Mailbox-related aspects, e.g. synchronisation of mailboxes

Abstract

The invention provides a system and method for analyzing a collection of communication messages. The communication messages may be any one of a collection of electronic mail messages, voicemail messages, instant messaging dialogs and other forms of communications. The collections of communications, such as electronic mail messages, may be selected by a user and then subsequently processed to determine the identity of any of the user'"'"'s contacts within the communications. The contacts may then be arranged in a relative priority arrangement whereby contacts which have been identified as engaging in prior reciprocal communications with the user are given higher priority. Higher priority may also be given to contacts which engage in more recent communications with the user. Specific contact relationships may be inferred from the communications depending on whether specific contacts are repeatedly mentioned within the communication messages.

Claims

1. A method comprising:

accessing, by at least one computing device comprising a processor, a plurality of communications associated with a user;

analyzing, by the at least one computing device, the plurality of communications to determine a recency of the plurality of communications and a frequency of the plurality of communications; and

ranking, based at least in part on the recency and the frequency of the plurality of communications, a plurality of contacts associated with the plurality of communications relative to one another, wherein a different priority is assigned to the recency of the plurality of communications than to the frequency of the plurality of communications.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein analyzing the plurality of communications to determine a frequency of the plurality of communications comprises analyzing the plurality of communications to determine how frequently each of the plurality of contacts communicates with the user.

3. The method of claim 2, further comprising assigning a score to each of the plurality of contacts based on how frequently the contact communicates with the user.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein assigning the score to each of the plurality of contacts comprises assigning a higher score to a contact if the contact communicates with the user relatively frequently, and assigning a lower score to a contact if the contact communicates with the user relatively infrequently.

5. The method of claim 4, further comprising, for each of the plurality of contacts, identifying communications from the plurality of communications that are specific to the contact.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein assigning the score to each of the plurality of contacts comprises assigning the score based on an analysis of the identified communications that are specific to the contact.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein analyzing the plurality of communications to determine a frequency of the plurality of communications comprises identifying, for each of the plurality of contacts, a number of communications between the contact and the user.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein analyzing the plurality of communications to determine a frequency of the plurality of communications further comprises determining, for each of the plurality of contacts, whether the number of communications between the contact and the user satisfies a predetermined threshold.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein the predetermined threshold comprises a specific number of communications.

10. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

prioritizing the recency of the plurality of communications with respect to the frequency of the plurality of communications by assigning a first weight constant to the recency of communications and a second weight constant to the frequency of the plurality of communications.

11. The method of claim 10, further comprising assigning a larger value to the first weight constant of the recency of the plurality of communications and a smaller value to the second weight constant of the frequency of the plurality of communications.

12. The method of claim 11, further comprising ranking the plurality of contacts relative to one another based on one or more additional factors.

13. The method of claim 12, wherein the one or more additional factors comprise at least one of a reciprocity of communications, a duration of communications, a response rapidity of communications, or a formality of communications.

14. The method of claim 1, wherein ranking the plurality of contacts relative to one another comprises:

identifying one or more contacts that have communicated relatively frequently with the user;

identifying one or more contacts that have communicated relatively infrequently with the user; and

ranking the one or more contacts that have communicated relatively frequently with the user higher than the one or more contacts that have communicated relatively infrequently with the user.

15. The method of claim 1, further comprising presenting a listing of the ranked plurality of contacts.

16. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

identifying one or more additional communications;

updating the ranking of the plurality of contacts based on an analysis of the one or more additional communications.

17. The method of claim 16, wherein updating the ranking comprises:

identifying, from the one or more additional communications, one or more additional contacts; and

ranking, based on an analysis of the plurality of communications and the one or more additional communications, the plurality of contacts and the one or more additional contacts relative to one another.

18. The method of claim 1, wherein ranking the plurality of contacts relative to one another comprises ranking the plurality of contacts relative to one another with specific respect to the user.

19. The method of claim 1, further comprising providing, for each of the plurality of contacts, a selectable option to add the contact to or remove the contact from a contact network for the user.

20. A system comprising:

a computing device including at least one processor; and

at least one non-transitory computer readable medium storing instructions thereon that, when executed by the at least one processor, cause the system to;

access a plurality of communications associated with a user;

analyze the plurality of communications to determine a recency of the plurality of communications and a frequency of the plurality of communications; and

rank, based at least in part on the recency and the frequency of the plurality of communications, a plurality of contacts associated with the plurality of communications relative to one another, wherein a different priority is assigned to the recency of the plurality of communications than to the frequency of the plurality of communications.

21. The system of claim 20, wherein analyzing the plurality of communications to identify a frequency of the plurality of communications comprises analyzing the plurality of communications to determine how frequently each of the plurality of contacts communicates with the user.

22. The system of claim 21, further comprising instructions that, when executed by the at least one processor, further cause the system to assign a score to each of the plurality of contacts based on how frequently the contact communicates with the user.

23. The system of claim 20, further comprising instructions that, when executed by the at least one processor, further cause the system to:

identify one or more additional contacts from one or more additional communications; and

rank, based at least in part on the recency and the frequency of the plurality of communications and an analysis of the one or more additional communications, the plurality of contacts and the one or more additional contacts relative to one another.

24. The system of claim 20, further comprising instructions that, when executed by the at least processor, further cause the system to:

identify one or more contacts that have communicated relatively frequently with the user;

identify one or more contacts that have communicated relatively infrequently with the user; and

rank the one or more contacts that have communicated relatively frequently with the user higher than the one or more contacts that have communicated relatively infrequently with the user.