Low power operation of an optical touch-sensitive device for detecting multitouch events

• US 9,524,060 B2
• Filed: 07/10/2013
• Issued: 12/20/2016
• Est. Priority Date: 07/13/2012
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Beechrock Limited
• Original Assignee: Rapt Ip Limited
• Inventors: Drumm, Owen
• Primary Examiner(s): NGUYEN, JENNIFER T
• Application Number:
  US13/938,888
• Publication Number:
  US 20140015803A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,259 Days
• Field of Search: 345/173, 345/175
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 2203/04104 Multi-touch detection in digitiser, i.e. details about the simultaneous detection of a plurality of touching locations, e.g. multiple fingers or pen and finger
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 3/041661 using detection at multiple resolutions, e.g. coarse and fine scanning; using detection within a limited area, e.g. object tracking window
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 3/042 by opto-electronic means
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 3/0421 by interrupting or reflecting a light beam, e.g. optical touch-screen
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 3/0428 by sensing at the edges of the touch surface the interruption of optical paths, e.g. an illumination plane, parallel to the touch surface which may be virtual sensing beam interruptions in a planar beam grid of an optical touch-screen G06F3/0421

Abstract

An optical touch-sensitive device is able to determine the locations of multiple simultaneous touch events. The optical touch-sensitive device includes multiple emitters and detectors. Each emitter produces optical beams which are received by the detectors. Touch events disturb the optical beams. Detection schemes define the operation of the touch capability. Different detection schemes consume different amounts of power and may be used in combination to reduce overall power consumption.

Claims

1. A method for resolving touch events on a surface, the surface having emitters and detectors arranged around its periphery, the emitters producing optical beams received by the detectors, the touch events disturbing the optical beams, the method comprising:

scanning for touch events using a lower power detection scheme that includes determining transmission coefficients for pairs of emitters and detectors;

determining whether a touch event is present when scanning using the lower power detection scheme;

computing, based on the transmission coefficients, a numerical measure of confidence in the determination of whether the touch event is present when scanning using the lower power detection scheme;

determining that the computed measure of confidence is lower than a specified confidence threshold;

responsive to the determination, scanning for the touch events using a higher power detection scheme; and

determining presence of one or more of the touch events based upon the higher power detection scheme scan.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein in comparison to the lower power detection scheme, the higher power detection scheme is configured to determine touch events with comparatively greater confidence.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein the numerical measure of confidence is based on a signal to noise ratio of an individual optical beam received by one of the detectors.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein the numerical measure of confidence is based on an aggregate signal to noise ratio of a plurality of the optical beams received by a plurality of the detectors.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein in comparison to the lower power detection scheme, the higher power detection scheme is configured to determine touch events with comparatively greater precision in location on the surface.

6. The method of claim 1 wherein in comparison to the lower power detection scheme, the higher power detection scheme is configured to determine touch events with comparatively greater precision in sizes of touch events on the surface based on expected sizes of the touch events.

7. The method of claim 1 wherein the higher power detection scheme is configured to consume sufficient power to determine at least a significant majority of expected touch events, and the lower power detection scheme is configured to consume sufficient power to minimize an average power to resolve touch events, the average power being computed across a plurality of different scanning instances of the lower and higher power detection schemes and that resolved the touch events, relative to a number of the resolved touch events.

8. The method of claim 7 wherein an amount of power consumed by the lower power detection scheme is dynamically incremented and decremented over time during use of the device in order to minimize the average power.

9. The method of claim 1 wherein parameters of the lower power detection scheme are dynamically adjusted during use of the device.

10. The method of claim 1 comprising:

scanning for touch events using an intermediate power detection scheme configured to consume more power than the lower power detection scheme, and less power than the higher power detection schemes; and

upon a determination that both the lower power detection scheme and the intermediate power detection scheme were inadequate to determine touch events, scanning for touch events using the higher power detection scheme.

11. The method of claim 1 comprising:

generating the higher power detection scheme based upon a result of the scan using the lower power detection scheme, the higher power detection scheme calculated to consume sufficient power to determine touch events.

12. The method of claim 1 wherein the higher power detection scheme and the lower power detection scheme differ in power consumption with respect to at least one from the group consisting of:

power levels of the emitters and detectors,

scan rates of the emitters and detectors,

activations of the emitters and detectors,

multiplexing of the optical beams produced by emitters and received by detectors, and

a sampling rate of the emitters and detectors.

13. The method of claim 1 wherein the at least one of the higher and lower power detection schemes scans a center area of the surface with at least one from the group consisting of a higher power, a higher scan rate, and a higher resolution in comparison to a periphery of the surface.

14. The method of claim 1, wherein the transmission coefficients each include a value and an associated uncertainty, and the numerical measure of confidence is based on uncertainties of transmission coefficients of the touch event scans obtained from the lower power detection scheme.

24. The method of claim 2, wherein the average power is computed by multiplying a probability that the lower power detection scheme will fail to resolve a touch event by a first power consumed by attempting to resolve the touch event using the lower power detection scheme and adding a second power consumed by attempting to resolve the touch event using the higher power detection scheme.

15. A method for resolving touch events on a surface, the surface having emitters and detectors arranged around its periphery, the emitters producing optical beams received by the detectors, the touch events disturbing the optical beams, the method comprising:

over a plurality of different scanning instances;

scanning for events using a lower power detection scheme;

for a subset of the instances;

determining that the lower power detection scheme was inadequate to resolve the touch events, and

scanning for the touch events using a higher power detection scheme, and

determining touch events based upon the higher power detection scheme scan; and

adjusting mechanisms of the lower power detection scheme based on feedback regarding a proportion of scans acquired using the higher power detection scheme during the different instances to determine the touch events.

16. The method of claim 15, wherein the feedback comprises a number of touch events determined using the higher power detection scheme.

17. The method of claim 15, wherein the feedback comprises a number of touch events determined using the lower power detection scheme.

18. The method of claim 15, wherein the feedback comprises a ratio of a first number of touch events determined using the higher power detection scheme to a second number of touch events determined using the lower power detection scheme.

19. The method of claim 15, wherein the feedback is based on different scanning instances having occurred since a prior adjustment to the lower power detection scheme.

20. The method of claim 15, wherein the feedback is based on different scanning instances having occurred within a moving time window.

21. The method of claim 15, wherein the feedback is based on a confidence in the determination of the touch events by the lower power detection scheme.

22. An optical touch-sensitive device capable of resolving touch events comprising:

a surface on which touch events are to be detected;

emitters and detectors arranged around a periphery of the surface, the emitters producing optical beams received by the detectors, the touch events disturbing the optical beam; and

a touch event processor coupled, directly or indirectly, to the emitters and detectors, the touch event processor receiving information indicating which beams have been disturbed by touch events and configured to;

control activation of the emitters and detectors to scan for touch events using a lower power detection scheme;

resolve a first set of the touch events using the lower power detection scheme;

determine that the lower power detection scheme was inadequate to determine a second set of the touch events with at least a required confidence;

control activation of the emitters and detectors to scan for touch events using a higher power detection scheme; and

attempt to resolve the second set of the touch events based upon the higher power detection scheme scan,

wherein the higher power detection scheme is configured to consume sufficient power to resolve at least a threshold proportion of the second set of the touch events, and the lower power detection scheme is configured to consume sufficient power to minimize an average power to resolve touch events.

23. The method of claim 22, wherein the average power is computed across a plurality of different scanning instances of the lower and higher power detection schemes that resolved the touch events.