Devices and methods for knee arthroplasty

• US 9,549,742 B2
• Filed: 05/17/2013
• Issued: 01/24/2017
• Est. Priority Date: 05/18/2012
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Orthalign, Inc.
• Original Assignee: Orthalign, Inc.
• Inventors: Berend, Michael, Nielsen, Jonathan, van der Walt, Nicholas, Small, Scott Richard
• Primary Examiner(s): BOLES, SAMEH RAAFAT
• Application Number:
  US14/401,274
• Publication Number:
  US 20150127009A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,348 Days
• Field of Search: None
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 17/155 Cutting femur
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 17/157 Cutting tibia
• CPC Class Codes: A61F 2/389 Tibial components A61F2/3868 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: A61F 2/4684 Trial or dummy prostheses

Abstract

The present invention provides, in certain embodiments, a device for positioning and orienting the femoral cutting block. The present invention also provides a device for setting rotation of sagittal resection for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. The present invention further provides methods for setting the rotation of the tibial implant by kinematic measurements.

Claims

1. A method for setting tibial implant rotation, comprising:

coupling at least one inertial sensor with at least one of a tibia and a femur of a leg of a patient;

positioning an implant on a resected surface of the tibia of the patient;

moving the leg to position the tibia in a plurality of positions differing in flexion, axial rotation, and/or varus-valgus relative to the femur;

comparing values based on output of the at least one inertial sensor indicative of tibio-femoral kinematics with tibio-femoral kinematic target values for one or more of flexion, axial rotation, and/or varus-valgus; and

quantitatively comparing the varus and valgus laxity.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein comparing values further comprises comparing values based on output of the at least one inertial sensor with target values for a healthy knee.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein comparing values further comprises comparing values based on output of the at least one inertial sensor with one or more patient-specific values.

4. The method of claim 3, further comprising recording patient-specific values of tibio-femoral kinematics of the knee prior to resecting the tibia.

5. The method of claim 3, further comprising recording patient-specific values of tibio-femoral kinematics of a contralateral knee prior to resecting the tibia.

6. The method of claim 1, further comprising adjusting the rotation of the knee and repeating the moving step and the comparing step.

7. The method of claim 1, further comprising balancing the varus and valgus laxity by soft tissue releases.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein coupling the at least one inertial sensor comprises coupling a first device with the femur and a second device with the tibia.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein quantitatively comparing the varus and valgus laxity comprises applying alternating varus and valgus torque in order to gauge the tibio-femoral rotation allowed in each direction.

10. A method for setting tibial implant rotation, comprising:

coupling at least one inertial sensor with at least one of a tibia and a femur of a leg of a patient;

positioning an implant between the tibia and the femur;

moving the leg to gather a measurement from the at least one inertial sensor;

comparing information based on the measurement with a target value of tibio-femoral kinematics; and

quantitatively comparing the varus and valgus laxity.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein comparing information further comprises comparing information based on output of the at least one inertial sensor with target values for a healthy knee.

12. The method of claim 10, wherein comparing information further comprises comparing information based on output of the at least one inertial sensor with one or more patient-specific values.

13. The method of claim 10, further comprising balancing the varus and valgus laxity by soft tissue releases.

14. The method of claim 10, wherein coupling the at least one inertial sensor comprises coupling a first device with the femur and a second device with the tibia.

15. The method of claim 10, wherein quantitatively comparing the varus and valgus laxity comprises applying alternating varus and valgus torque in order to gauge the tibio-femoral rotation allowed in each direction.

16. The method of claim 10, further comprising performing calculations to convert the measurements from the at least one inertial sensor to tibio-femoral kinematic information, wherein comparing information based on the measurement comprises comparing the tibio-femoral kinematic information to the target values of tibio-femoral kinematics.

17. A method for setting tibial implant rotation, comprising:

coupling at least one inertial sensor with at least one of a tibia and a femur of a leg of a patient;

moving the leg to gather one or more measurements from the at least one inertial sensor in one or more positions differing in flexion, axial rotation, and/or varus-valgus relative to the femur;

comparing a value based on the one or more measurements indicative of tibio-femoral kinematics with a tibio-femoral kinematic target value for one or more of flexion, axial rotation, and/or varus-valgus; and

quantitatively comparing the varus and valgus laxity.

18. The method of claim 17, further comprising positioning an implant between the tibia and the femur.

19. The method of claim 17, wherein quantitatively comparing the varus and valgus laxity comprises applying alternating varus and valgus torque in order to gauge the tibio-femoral rotation allowed in each direction.