Method for representing and generating a flat pattern for a composite ply that folds over itself

• US 9,582,616 B2
• Filed: 01/23/2015
• Issued: 02/28/2017
• Est. Priority Date: 01/23/2015
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Siemens Industry Software Limited (Siemens AG)
• Original Assignee: Siemens Product Lifecycle Management Software Incorporated (Siemens AG)
• Inventors: Carrera, Julio Cesar, Moran, Jonathan T.
• Primary Examiner(s): Saxena, Akash
• Application Number:
  US14/604,375
• Publication Number:
  US 20160217220A1
• Time in Patent Office: 767 Days
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: B29C 61/10 by bending plates or sheets in general B29C53/36
• CPC Class Codes: B29C 70/30 Shaping by lay-up, i.e. applying fibres, tape or broadsheet on a mould, former or core; Shaping by spray-up, i.e. spraying of fibres on a mould, former or core
• CPC Class Codes: B29C 70/345 using matched moulds
• CPC Class Codes: B32B 3/04 characterised by at least one layer folded at the edge, e.g. over another layer ; characterised by at least one layer enveloping or enclosing a material
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 2111/04 Constraint-based CAD
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 2113/24 Sheet material
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 2113/26 Composites
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 2119/18 Manufacturability analysis or optimisation for manufacturability
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 30/00 Computer-aided design [CAD]
• CPC Class Codes: G06T 17/00 Three dimensional [3D] modelling, e.g. data description of 3D objects
• CPC Class Codes: G06T 19/00 Manipulating 3D models or images for computer graphics
• CPC Class Codes: Y02P 90/02 Total factory control, e.g. smart factories, flexible manufacturing systems [FMS] or integrated manufacturing systems [IMS]

Abstract

Methods for generating a flat pattern for a composite ply. A method includes receiving a tool model and a ply coverage, wherein the ply coverage defines a plurality of plies, a fiber orientation for each of the plies, and a boundary for each of the plies, determining one or more subset regions on the tool model based on the boundaries from the ply coverage, creating a merged ply combining the plies and aligning the fiber orientations, defining staging instances of the merged ply for each ply covering a subset region, determining a laydown order of the staging instances, running a draping simulation using the laydown order to solve the staging instances, generating a flat pattern from the draping simulation, and storing the flat pattern of the composite ply.

Claims

1. A method for generating a flat pattern for a composite ply, the method performed by a data processing system and comprising:

receiving data defining a tool and a ply coverage, wherein the ply coverage defines a plurality of plies, a fiber orientation for each of the plies, and a boundary for each of the plies;

determining one or more subset regions on the tool based on the boundaries from the ply coverage;

creating at least one merged ply combining at least two of the plies and aligning the fiber orientations of the at least two of the plies;

defining staging instances for each ply of the at least one merged ply which indicates the respective subset region that each respective ply covers such that the at least one merged ply is folded or is wrapped around a corner of the tool at the boundary between the at least two plies;

determining a laydown order of the plies based on the staging instances;

running a draping simulation using the laydown order to solve the staging instances, in which each ply of each staging instance is laid down at the respective subset region for each staging instance in the laydown order, which draping simulation takes into account thickness increase due to previously laid down plies;

generating a flat pattern that defines a shape for cutting at least one composite ply corresponding to the at least one merged ply based on the draping simulation; and

storing the flat pattern of the composite ply.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the boundary for a ply is defined by one or more curves and an origin point.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the staging instance is configured with the boundary inherited from a covered subset region.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the merged ply comprises a fold line configured between the boundaries of a referring instance and a constraint instance, which constraint instance corresponds to a first one of the at least two plies of the at least one merged ply that is laid down in the laydown order prior to the referring instance which corresponds to a second one of the at least two plies of the at least one merged ply.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein the fold line is not all of the boundaries when the referring instance and the constraint instance cover a same subset region.

6. The method of claim 4, wherein the fold line does not overlap when sibling instances corresponding to two referring instances cover a same subset region and reference a same constraint instance.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the staging instances are connected to trace back to a first child corresponding to a first one of the at least two plies that is laid down in the laydown order.

8. A data processing system comprising:

a processor; and

an accessible memory, the data processing system particularly configured to;

receive data defining a tool and a ply coverage, wherein the ply coverage defines a plurality of plies, a fiber orientation for each of the plies, and a boundary for each of the plies;

determine one or more subset regions on the tool based on the boundaries from the ply coverage;

create at least one merged ply combining at least two of the plies and aligning the fiber orientations of the at least two of the plies;

define staging instances for each ply of the at least one merged ply which indicates the respective subset region that each respective ply covers such that the at least one merged ply is folded or is wrapped around a corner of the tool at the boundary between the at least two plies;

determine a laydown order of the plies based on the staging instances;

run a draping simulation using the laydown order to solve the staging instances, in which each ply of each staging instance is laid down at the respective subset region for each staging instance in the laydown order, which draping simulation takes into account thickness increase due to previously laid down plies;

generate a flat pattern that defines a shape for cutting at least one composite ply corresponding to the at least one merged ply based on the draping simulation; and

store the flat pattern of the composite ply.

9. The data processing system of claim 8, wherein the boundary for a ply is defined by one or more curves and an origin point.

10. The data processing system of claim 8, wherein the staging instance is configured with the boundary inherited from a covered subset region.

11. The data processing system of claim 8, wherein the merged ply comprises a fold line configured between the boundaries of a referring instance and a constraint instance, which constraint instance corresponds to a first one of the at least two plies of the at least one merged ply that is laid down in the laydown order prior to the referring instance which corresponds to a second one of the at least two plies of the at least one merged ply.

12. The data processing system of claim 11, wherein the fold line is not all of the boundaries when the referring instance and the constraint instance cover a same subset region.

13. The data processing system of claim 11, wherein the fold line does not overlap when sibling instances corresponding to two referring instances cover a same subset region and reference a same constraint instance.

14. The data processing system of claim 8, wherein the staging instances are connected to trace back to a first child corresponding to a first one of the at least two plies that is laid down in the laydown order.

15. A non-transitory computer-readable medium encoded with executable instructions that, when executed, cause one or more data processing systems to:

receive data defining a tool and a ply coverage, wherein the ply coverage defines a plurality of plies, a fiber orientation for each of the plies, and a boundary for each of the plies;

determine one or more subset regions on the tool based on the boundaries from the ply coverage;

create at least one merged ply combining at least two of the plies and aligning the fiber orientations of the at least two of the plies;

define staging instances for each ply of the at least one merged ply which indicates the respective a subset region that each respective ply covers such that the at least one merged ply is folded or is wrapped around a corner of the tool at the boundary between the at least two plies;

determine a laydown order of the plies based on the staging instances;

run a draping simulation using the laydown order to solve the staging instances, in which each ply of each staging instance is laid down at the respective subset region for each staging instance in the laydown order, which draping simulation takes into account thickness increase due to previously laid down plies;

generate a flat pattern that defines a shape for cutting at least one composite ply corresponding to the at least one merged ply based on the draping simulation; and

store the flat pattern of the composite ply.

16. The computer-readable medium of claim 15, wherein the boundary for a ply is defined by one or more curves and an origin point.

17. The computer-readable medium of claim 15, wherein the staging instance is configured with the boundary inherited from a covered subset region.

18. The computer-readable medium of claim 15, wherein the merged ply comprises a fold line configured between the boundaries of a referring instance and a constraint instance, which constraint instance corresponds to a first one of the at least two plies of the at least one merged ply that is laid down in the laydown order prior to the referring instance which corresponds to a second one of the at least two plies of the at least one merged ply.

19. The computer-readable medium of claim 18, wherein the fold line is not all of the boundaries when the referring instance and the constraint instance cover a same subset region.

20. The computer-readable medium of claim 18, wherein the fold line does not overlap when sibling instances corresponding to two referring instances cover a same subset region and reference a same constraint instance.