Resource-adaptive video encoder sharing in multipoint control unit

• US 9,609,276 B2
• Filed: 10/26/2015
• Issued: 03/28/2017
• Est. Priority Date: 06/24/2013
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Dialogic, Inc. (Enghouse Systems Limited)
• Original Assignee: Dialogic, Inc. (Enghouse Systems Limited)
• Inventors: Yang, Kyeong Ho, Kolakowski, Lawrence
• Primary Examiner(s): Gauthier, Gerald
• Application Number:
  US14/922,320
• Publication Number:
  US 20160044280A1
• Time in Patent Office: 519 Days
• Field of Search: 348/14.09, 348/14.07, 348/14.08, 348/469, 375/240.03, 375/240.24, 375/240.01, 709/219, 709/204, 382/246
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: H04N 19/42 characterised by implementation details or hardware specially adapted for video compression or decompression, e.g. dedicated software implementation H04N19/635 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: H04N 19/503 involving temporal prediction adaptive coding with adaptive selection between spatial and temporal predictive coding H04N19/107; adaptive coding with adaptive selection among a plurality of temporal predictive coding modes H04N19/109
• CPC Class Codes: H04N 19/593 involving spatial prediction techniques
• CPC Class Codes: H04N 19/91 Entropy coding, e.g. variable length coding [VLC] or arithmetic coding
• CPC Class Codes: H04N 7/152 Multipoint control units therefor

Abstract

Systems and methods of video conferencing, in which existing video encoders associated with a multipoint control unit (MCU) can be shared among conference participant devices, depending upon the availability of processor and/or memory resources for the MCU. In making decisions regarding the sharing of video encoders, the systems and methods take into account various parameters associated with potential conference participant devices and the total cost of the processor/memory resources for the MCU, to determine whether a video encoder of the MCU can be shared with, or allocated to, the respective conference participant devices. By determining whether to share or allocate a video encoder of the MCU, depending upon the available processor/memory resources for the MCU, the MCU can be made to operate with increased stability. The systems and methods can be applied to any application that sends the same content to multiple receivers, including announcement and video streaming applications.

Claims

1. In a multimedia communications system, a method of allocating one or more of processor resources and memory resources of a multimedia communications server, the multimedia communications server including at least a first video encoder, the multimedia communications system including a plurality of multimedia participant devices communicably coupleable to the multimedia communications server over at least one network, the method comprising:

receiving, at the multimedia communications server in a process of joining a multimedia session, a request for use of a video encoder from a respective multimedia participant device, the request including one or more video encoder attributes;

determining, by the multimedia communications server using at least some of the one or more video encoder attributes, a first cost of sharing the first video encoder among the respective multimedia participant device and at least one other multimedia participant device participating in the multimedia session;

determining, by the multimedia communications server, a second cost of implementing an additional video encoder for use with the respective multimedia participant device;

comparing the first cost with the second cost to obtain a comparison result; and

based at least upon the comparison result, performing, by the multimedia communications server, one of sharing the first video encoder with the respective multimedia participant device, and implementing the additional video encoder for use with the respective multimedia participant device.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the first video encoder is one of a plurality of first video encoders, wherein the first cost is one of a plurality of first costs, and wherein the determining of the first cost of sharing the first video encoder includes determining the plurality of first costs of sharing the plurality of first video encoders, respectively.

3. The method of claim 2 wherein the comparing of the first cost with the second cost includes determining a minimum first cost among the plurality of first costs, and comparing the minimum first cost with the second cost.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein the one or more video encoder attributes include at least a frame size and a target bitrate, and wherein the determining of the first cost of sharing the first video encoder includes determining one or more of (1) a third cost associated with a difference in frame sizes supported by the first video encoder and the respective multimedia participant device, and (2) a fourth cost associated with a target bitrate range of the first video encoder.

5. The method of claim 4 wherein the determining of the first cost of sharing the first video encoder further includes obtaining a sum of the third cost associated with the difference in the frame sizes and the fourth cost associated with the target bitrate range.

6. The method of claim 5 wherein the request further includes one or more video parameters, the one or more video parameters including at least a layout identifier and a codec type, and wherein the determining of the first cost of sharing the first video encoder further includes assigning a predetermined maximum cost to the first cost if one of the layout identifier and the codec type is not supported by the first video encoder.

7. The method of claim 6 wherein the determining of the first cost of sharing the first video encoder further includes assigning the predetermined maximum cost to the first cost if the target bitrate is outside the target bitrate range of the first video encoder.

8. The method of claim 4 wherein the determining of the first cost of sharing the first video encoder further includes determining whether the first video encoder is a scalable video encoder.

9. The method of claim 8 wherein the target bitrate range of the scalable video encoder is defined by a minimum bitrate and a maximum bitrate, and wherein the determining of the first cost of sharing the first video encoder further includes setting the maximum bitrate to be equal to the target bitrate if the minimum bitrate multiplied by a predetermined bitrate range factor is higher than or equal to the target bitrate.

10. The method of claim 9 wherein the determining of the first cost of sharing the first video encoder further includes setting the minimum bitrate to be equal to the target bitrate if the target bitrate multiplied by the predetermined bitrate range factor is higher than or equal to the maximum bitrate.

11. The method of claim 1 wherein the determining of the second cost of implementing the additional video encoder includes one or more of (1) determining a current availability of processor resources on the multimedia communications server, and (2) determining a current availability of memory resources on the multimedia communications server.

12. The method of claim 11 wherein one or more of (1) the determining of the current availability of processor resources on the multimedia communications server, and (2) the determining of the current availability of memory resources on the multimedia communications server includes determining a reference video encoder load for the multimedia communications server.

13. The method of claim 12 wherein the reference video encoder load corresponds to a central processing unit (CPU) load for running a reference video encoder having one or more of a predetermined resolution, a predetermined bitrate, and a predetermined frame rate, and wherein the method further comprises:

obtaining one or more scaling factors for one or more of the predetermined resolution, the predetermined bitrate, and the predetermined frame rate, respectively, of the reference video encoder if the additional video encoder does not support one or more of the predetermined resolution, the predetermined bitrate, and the predetermined frame rate.

14. The method of claim 11 wherein the determining of the second cost of implementing the additional video encoder further includes assigning a predetermined maximum cost to the second cost if one or more of (1) sufficient processor resources are not available on the multimedia communications server, and (2) sufficient memory resources are not available on the multimedia communications server.

15. A multimedia communications server for use in a multimedia communications system, the multimedia communications system including a plurality of multimedia participant devices communicably coupleable to the multimedia communications server over at least one network, the multimedia communications server comprising:

a first video encoder; and

a controller including at least one processor operative;

to receive, in a process of joining a multimedia session, a request for use of a video encoder from a respective multimedia participant device, the request including one or more video encoder attributes;

to determine, using at least some of the one or more video encoder attributes, a first cost of sharing the first video encoder among the respective multimedia participant device and at least one other multimedia participant device participating in the multimedia session;

to determine a second cost of implementing an additional video encoder for use with the respective multimedia participant device;

to compare the first cost with the second cost to obtain a comparison result; and

based at least upon the comparison result, to perform one of sharing the first video encoder with the respective multimedia participant device, and implementing the additional video encoder for use with the respective multimedia participant device.

16. The multimedia communications server of claim 15 wherein the first video encoder is one of a plurality of first video encoders, wherein the first cost is one of a plurality of first costs, and wherein the at least one processor is further operative to determine the plurality of first costs of sharing the plurality of first video encoders, respectively.

17. The multimedia communications server of claim 16 wherein the at least one processor is further operative to determine a minimum first cost among the plurality of first costs, and to compare the minimum first cost with the second cost.

18. The multimedia communications server of claim 15 wherein the one or more video encoder attributes include at least a frame size and a target bitrate, and wherein the at least one processor is further operative:

to determine one or more of (1) a third cost associated with a difference in frame sizes supported by the first video encoder and the respective multimedia participant device, and (2) a fourth cost associated with a target bitrate range of the first video encoder.

19. The multimedia communications server of claim 18 wherein the at least one processor is further operative:

to determine the first cost of sharing the first video encoder as a sum of the third cost associated with the difference in the frame sizes and the fourth cost associated with the target bitrate range.