Systems and methods for high-Z threat alarm resolution

• US 9,625,606 B2
• Filed: 02/04/2016
• Issued: 04/18/2017
• Est. Priority Date: 05/16/2009
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Rapiscan Systems Incorporated (OSI Systems Incorporated)
• Original Assignee: Rapiscan Systems Incorporated (OSI Systems Incorporated)
• Inventors: Bendahan, Joseph, Morton, Edward James, Yaish, David, Kolkovich, Yossi, Goldberg, Jacques
• Primary Examiner(s): Kim, Kiho
• Application Number:
  US15/015,369
• Publication Number:
  US 20160216398A1
• Time in Patent Office: 439 Days
• CPC Class Codes: G01N 9/24 by observing the transmission of wave or particle radiation through the material
• CPC Class Codes: G01V 5/22 Active interrogation, i.e. by irradiating objects or goods using external radiation sources, e.g. using gamma rays or cosmic rays

Abstract

A second stage screening system configured to resolve a threat alarm detected in a cargo by a first stage screening system. The second stage screening system includes layers of first muon detectors placed above the cargo to detect a first coordinate and an angle of incidence of incoming muons and layers of second muon detectors placed below the cargo to detect an actual coordinate and an actual angle of exit of the incoming muons. The first and second detectors measure a momentum of the incoming muons. A processing unit receives threat sensitivity vectors determined from the first stage, operates a cargo positioning system that centers a high-Z threat within the cargo, relative to the first and second muon detectors, and analyzes the momentum and a distribution of deflection angles between the angles of incidence and exit to resolve the threat alarm.

Claims

1. A screening system to resolve an alarm detected in a cargo positioned within a scanning volume, wherein said screening system comprises a first muon detector, a second muon detector, a detector configured to detect muons, and, a processing unit, wherein said processing unit is configured to:

receive a plurality of threat sensitivity vectors;

record coordinates and directions of muons entering and leaving the scanning volume;

record measurements of momentum of said muons;

receive a two dimensional or three dimensional mass density map;

use the two dimensional or three dimensional mass density map and the measurements of momentum of said muons to determine an expected energy loss of said muons as said muons traverse the scanned volume;

use said an expected energy loss to determine an expected muon momentum at each point along its path; and

use said expected muon momentum at each point along its path to reconstruct a 3D scattering density map.

2. The screening system of claim 1, wherein said plurality of threat sensitivity vectors are generated from a high energy X-ray cargo inspection system.

3. The screening system of claim 1, wherein said first and second muon detectors comprise Thin Gap Chamber (TGC) detectors.

4. The screening system of claim 1, wherein said first and second muon detectors comprise Thick Gas Electron Multiplier (THGEM) detectors.

5. The screening system of claim 1, wherein said plurality of threat sensitivity vectors comprise:

a number of suspected high-Z threats, an approximate shape and an approximate size of said suspected high-Z threats, dimensional information, density information, approximate Z distribution of content of said cargo, and an area or a volume of suspected high-Z threats along a path length of a radiation beam employed for scanning said cargo.

6. The screening system of claim 1, further comprising a positioning system, wherein said positioning system comprises a range sensor to detect a position of the cargo relative to a center of said first and second muon detectors and an indicator to assist said cargo in attaining said position.

7. The screening of claim 6, wherein said indicator comprises at least one of a traffic light and a digital display showing a distance to stop said cargo.

8. The screening system of claim 1, wherein scattering density is defined as a mean square scattering expected for muons per unit depth.

9. The screening system of claim 1, wherein the processing unit is further configured to use the plurality of threat sensitivity vectors to align the muon detectors with reference to the suspected threat.

10. The screening system of claim 1, wherein said processing unit is further configured to identify regions where a mass density of said scanning volume is similar to air.

11. The screening system of claim 1, wherein said processing unit is further configured to use the mass density map to identify a candidate scattering density map, wherein said processing unit is configured to use the candidate scattering density map as a seed for reconstructing said 3D scattering density map.

12. The screening system of claim 11, wherein said processing unit is further configured to determine local deviations by summing up and filtering adjacent voxels.

13. The screening system of claim 12, wherein said processing unit is further configured to visually inspect the 3D scattering density map and the local deviations.

14. The screening system of claim 12, wherein said processing unit is further configured to activate an alarm based on a statistical significance of the local deviations.

15. The screening system of claim 1, further comprising at least two layers of muon detectors sized to be placed in a gap between wheels of said cargo.

16. The screening system of claim 1, wherein said second muon detector has a different size than said first muon detector.

17. The screening system of claim 1, wherein said first and second muon detectors comprise at least two layers of detectors that are substantially parallel.

18. The screening system of claim 17, wherein said at least two layers of first and second muon detectors are spaced at a distance ranging from approximately 50 mm to 500 mm.

19. The screening system of claim 1, wherein said first and second muon detectors have dimensions within a range of approximately 2 m×

3 m (length) to 3 m×

4 m (width).

20. The screening system of claim 1, wherein said first and second muon detectors have dimensions within a range of approximately 3 m×

4 m (length) to 3 m×

4 m (width).