Device interrogation framework

• US 9,626,183 B1
• Filed: 08/15/2014
• Issued: 04/18/2017
• Est. Priority Date: 08/15/2014
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: United Services Automobile Association
• Original Assignee: United Services Automobile Association
• Inventors: Jamison, Andrew, Smith, Eric
• Primary Examiner(s): Das, Chameli
• Application Number:
  US14/460,850
• Time in Patent Office: 977 Days
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 8/71 Version control security arrangements therefor G06F21/57; Configuration management
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 9/44505 Configuring for program initiating, e.g. using registry, configuration files
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 9/44542 Retargetable
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 4/50 Service provisioning or reconfiguring
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 8/245 from a network towards a terminal

Abstract

A system provides support for a device interrogation framework. The system may include an electronic device and an application server. The electronic device may perform a device interrogation to identify one or more device characteristics, and adaptively disable one or more application functions of a software application according to the device characteristics. For example, the electronic device may send the device characteristics to the application server, and the application server may apply a set of feature support criteria to determine particular application functions to enable or disable on the electronic device. The application server may send a compatibility determination to the electronic device specifying which application functions of the software application to disable.

Claims

1. A method comprising:

in an electronic device;

receiving a feature support criteria request, from the software application, identifying electronic device criterion for implementing a target feature;

initiating a software application;

analyzing the feature support criteria request;

determining the feature support criteria request does not include a missing electronic device criterion corresponding to a performance of an electronic device component for implementing the target feature;

in response to determining the feature support criteria request does not include the missing electronic device criterion, performing a device interrogation to identify a device characteristic of the electronic device corresponding to the missing electronic device criterion;

assessing whether the device characteristic of the electronic device would adversely affect a particular function of the software application; and

disabling the particular function, while maintaining implementation of other functions of the software application, in response to an assessment that the device characteristic would adversely affect the particular function.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein assessing whether the device characteristic would adversely affect the particular function comprises:

accessing a feature support criterion applicable to the particular function; and

determining that the device characteristic does not satisfy the feature support criterion.

3. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

running the software application within an operating system; and

,

disabling the particular function in response to the device characteristic being a particular version of the operating system.

4. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

sending the device characteristic to an application server; and

wherein assessing whether the device characteristic would adversely affect a particular function comprises;

receiving a compatibility determination message from the application server specifying disabling of the particular function.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein disabling the particular function comprises presenting a visual indication through a user interface that the particular function is disabled.

6. The method of claim 1, further comprising presenting a disabling explanation via the user interface indicating why the particular function has been disabled.

7. The method of claim 1, further comprising presenting a resolution indication specifying an instruction of how to enable the particular function.

8. An electronic device comprising:

a communication interface;

a user interface; and

device circuitry configured to;

receive a feature support criteria request, from the software application, identifying electronic device criterion for implementing a target feature;

initiate a software application;

analyze the feature support criteria request;

determine the feature support criteria request does not include a missing electronic device criterion corresponding to a performance of an electronic device component for implementing the target feature;

in response to determining the feature support criteria request does not include the missing electronic device criterion, perform a device interrogation to identify a device characteristic of the electronic device;

determine whether the device characteristic would adversely affect a particular function of the software application; and

disable the particular function, while maintaining implementation of other functions of the software application, in response to determining that the device characteristic would adversely affect the particular function.

9. The device of claim 8, wherein the device circuitry is configured to assess whether the device characteristic would adversely affect the particular function by:

accessing a feature support criterion applicable to the particular function; and

determining that the device characteristic does not satisfy the feature support criterion.

10. The device of claim 8, wherein the device circuitry is configured to initiate the software application within an operating system;

and,

disable the particular function in response to the device characteristic being a particular version of the operating system.

11. The device of claim 8, wherein the device circuitry is further configured to:

send the device characteristic through the communication interface to an application server; and

wherein the device circuitry is configured to assess whether the device characteristic would adversely affect a particular function by;

receiving, through the communication interface, a compatibility determination message from the application server specifying disabling of the particular function.

12. The device of claim 8, wherein the device circuitry is configured to disable the particular function by:

presenting, through the user interface, a visual indication that the particular function is disabled.

13. The device of claim 8, wherein the device circuitry is further configured to presenting, through the user interface, a disabling explanation indicating why the particular function has been disabled.

14. The device of claim 8, wherein the device circuitry is further configured to present, through the user interface, a resolution indication specifying an instruction of how to enable the particular function.

15. A product comprising:

a non-transitory computer readable medium storing instructions that, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to;

receive a feature support criteria request, from the software application, identifying electronic device criterion for implementing a target feature;

initiate a software application;

determine the feature support criteria request does not include a missing electronic device criterion corresponding to a performance of an electronic device component for implementing the target feature;

in response to determining the feature support criteria request does not include the missing electronic device criterion, perform a device interrogation to identify a device characteristic of an electronic device;

assess whether the device characteristic would adversely affect a particular function of the software application; and

disable the particular function, while maintaining implementation of other functions of the software application, in response to determining that the device characteristic would adversely affect the particular function.

16. The product of claim 15, wherein the instructions causes the processor to assess whether the device characteristic would adversely affect a particular function by:

accessing a feature support criterion applicable to the particular function; and

determining that the device characteristic does not satisfy the feature support criterion.

17. The product of claim 15, further comprising:

running the software application within an operating system; and

,

disabling the particular function in response to the device characteristic being a particular version of the operating system.

18. The product of claim 15, wherein the instructions further cause the processor to:

send the device characteristic to an application server; and

wherein the instructions cause the processor to assess that the device characteristic would adversely affect the particular function by;

receiving a compatibility determination message from the

application server specifying disabling of the particular function.

19. The product of claim 15, wherein the instructions cause the processor to disable the particular function of the application by:

presenting, through a user interface, a visual indication that the particular function is disabled.

20. The product of claim 15, wherein the instructions further cause the processor to:

present, through a user interface, a disabling explanation indicating why the particular function has been disabled.