Web server for multi-version web documents

• US 9,672,296 B2
• Filed: 03/15/2010
• Issued: 06/06/2017
• Est. Priority Date: 05/06/2004
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Oracle International Corporation (Oracle Corporation)
• Original Assignee: Oracle International Corporation (Oracle Corporation)
• Inventors: Wu, Zhe
• Primary Examiner(s): MENG, JAU SHYA
• Application Number:
  US12/723,727
• Publication Number:
  US 20100223260A1
• Time in Patent Office: 2,640 Days
• Field of Search: None
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/9574 of access to content, e.g. by caching
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/958 Organisation or management of web site content, e.g. publishing, maintaining pages or automatic linking
• CPC Class Codes: Y10S 707/99955 Archiving or backup

Abstract

A repository server that provides stored copies of Web-accessible documents A client of the repository server may register a document in the repository server. The repository server makes a copy of the registered document and returns a repository URL for the copy to the client. The repository URL may be used to fetch the copy from the repository URL. Registration further relates the stored copy to its document URL, to an identifier for the stored copy, to a fingerprint that is a condensed representation of the stored copy'"'"'s content and can be used to determine degrees of similarity other than match-no match, and to a set of stored copies having similar content. The fingerprints are used to compute similarity. The similarity computation further employs comparisons of links in the documents and of document URLS to determine whether it is necessary to use the fingerprints to compute similarity.

Claims

1. A method of comparing digital documents, the method comprising:

filtering documents to reduce a total number of documents for fingerprint comparison at least by;

performing a comparison of respective total numbers of links respectively included in a pair of documents in the documents and one or more websites pointed to by the respective total numbers of links based in part or in whole upon rates of change comprising a first rate of change and a second rate of change, wherein the first rate of change associated with at least one respective total number of links is slower than the second rate of change associated with contents of at least one document of the pair of documents in the documents, and the comparison is performed without comparing fingerprints of the pair of documents; and

determining whether or not to compare the fingerprints of the pair of documents based at least in part upon the rates of change and whether a degree of difference in the respective total numbers of links from the comparison falls within a predetermined range; and

in response to determining that the fingerprints should be compared, generating the fingerprints on determining the fingerprints are not existing, and comparing the fingerprints, at a computing system, to determine a similarity value indicating a degree of similarity of the pair of documents being compared, the similarity value expressing degrees of similarity in addition to whether the pair of documents being compared are identical or not identical.

2. The method set forth in claim 1 wherein:

performing the comparison of the links comprises comparing a number of links in the documents.

3. The method set forth in claim 1 wherein:

performing the comparison of the links comprises comparing destinations of the links in the documents.

4. The method set forth in claim 1 wherein:

the documents comprise digital documents identified by identifiers; and

the method includes relating the fingerprint for a digital document to the digital document'"'"'s identifier,

the digital documents whose identifiers are known and have fingerprints may be compared without reference to the documents or copies thereof.

5. The method set forth in claim 4 wherein:

the identifiers are document locators used to locate the documents in a network.

6. The method set forth in claim 1 further comprising:

relating a given one of the documents to similarity values for a set of other ones of the documents.

7. The method set forth in claim 6 wherein:

the documents are identified by identifiers; and

in relating the given one of the documents to the similarity values, an identifier for the given one of the documents is related to the identifiers and similarity values for the set of other ones of the documents.

8. The method set forth in claim 7 wherein:

the identifiers are document locators used to locate the documents in a network.

9. The method set forth in claim 1 wherein:

the documents comprise digital documents including both structural information and content information and a fingerprint for a document of the documents comprises;

a structural encoding portion in which a first encoding preserves semantic information about components of the digital document'"'"'s structural information; and

a content encoding portion in which a second encoding preserves content information about components of the digital document'"'"'s content.

10. The method set forth in claim 9 wherein:

components of the structural encoding portion and components of the content encoding portion occur in the fingerprint in an order in which the components encoded in the encoding portions occur in the digital document.

11. The method set forth in claim 10 wherein:

in the digital document, the components are nested.

12. The method set forth in claim 10 wherein:

the components of the structural information are HTML tags.

13. The method set forth in claim 9 wherein generating the fingerprint further comprises:

encoding the structural information using a first encoding preserving semantic information about the structural information; and

encoding the content information using a second encoding.

14. The method set forth in claim 13 wherein:

in encoding the structural information, the structural information is encoded in an order in which the structural information occurs in the digital document; and

content information is encoded as it is encountered while encoding the structural information.

15. The method set forth in claim 14 wherein:

the structural information is HTML tags.

16. The method set forth in claim 9 wherein the act of comparing the fingerprints further comprises:

(a). finding an encoding of structural information in a first fingerprint;

(b). finding a second fingerprint substring matching a first fingerprint substring that begins at the found encoding;

(c). adding a length of the found substring to a running length total;

(d). finding another encoding of structural information in the first fingerprint not contained in any found substring and repeating acts (a)-(c) with the other encoding of structural information in the first fingerprint;

(e). repeating acts (a)-(d) until no further encodings of structural information can be found in act (d); and

(f). using a length of one of the fingerprints and the running length total to compute a similarity value.

17. A computer program product embodied on a non-transitory computer readable medium, the non-transitory computer readable medium having stored a sequence of instructions executed by a processor causes the process to perform a set of acts, the set of acts comprising:

filtering documents to reduce a total number of documents for fingerprint comparison at least by;

performing a comparison of respective total numbers of links respectively included in a pair of documents in the documents and one or more websites pointed to by the respective total numbers of links based in part or in whole upon rates of change comprising a first rate of change and a second rate of change, wherein the first rate of change associated with at least one respective total number of links is slower than the second rate of change associated with contents of at least one document of the pair of documents in the documents, and the comparison is performed without comparing fingerprints of the pair of documents; and

determining whether or not to compare the fingerprints of the pair of documents based at least in part upon the rates of change and whether a degree of difference in the respective total numbers of links from the comparison falls within a predetermined range; and

in response to determining that the fingerprints should be compared, generating the fingerprints on determining the fingerprints are not existing, and comparing the fingerprints, at a computing system, to determine a similarity value indicating a degree of similarity of the pair of documents being compared, the similarity value expressing degrees of similarity in addition to whether the pair of documents being compared are identical or not identical.

18. The computer program product set forth in claim 17, wherein:

the documents comprise digital documents including both structural information and content information and a fingerprint for a document of the documents comprises;

a structural encoding portion in which a first encoding preserves semantic information about components of the digital document'"'"'s structural information; and

a content encoding portion in which a second encoding preserves content information about components of the digital document'"'"'s content.

19. The computer program product set forth in claim 18, wherein the act of generating the fingerprint further comprises:

encoding the structural information using a first encoding preserving semantic information about the structural information; and

encoding the content information using a second encoding.

20. The computer program product set forth in claim 18, wherein comparing the fingerprints further comprises:

(a). finding an encoding of structural information in a first fingerprint;

(b). finding a second fingerprint substring matching a first fingerprint substring that begins at the found encoding;

(c). adding a length of the found substring to a running length total;

(d). finding another encoding of structural information in the first fingerprint not contained in any found substring and repeating acts (a)-(c) with the other encoding of structural information in the first fingerprint;

(e). repeating acts (a)-(d) until no further encodings of structural information can be found in act (d); and

(f). using a length of one of the fingerprints and the running length total to compute a similarity value.

21. An apparatus for comparing digital documents, the apparatus comprising:

a processor and a memory to store instructions, the instructions is executed by the processor to perform;

filtering documents to reduce a total number of documents for fingerprint comparison at least by;

performing a comparison of respective total numbers of links respectively included in a pair of documents in the documents and one or more websites pointed to by the respective total numbers of links based in part or in whole upon rates of change comprising a first rate of change and a second rate of change, wherein the first rate of change associated with at least one respective total number of links is slower than the second rate of change associated with contents of at least one document of the pair of documents in the documents, and the comparison is performed without comparing fingerprints of the pair of documents; and

determining whether or not to compare the fingerprints of the pair of documents based at least in part upon the rates of change and whether a degree of difference in the respective total numbers of links from the comparison falls within a predetermined range; and

in response to determining that the fingerprints should be compared, generating the fingerprints on determining the fingerprints are not existing, and comparing the fingerprints, at a computing system, to determine a similarity value indicating a degree of similarity of the pair of documents being compared, the similarity value expressing degrees of similarity in addition to whether the pair of documents being compared are identical or not identical.

22. The apparatus set forth in claim 21 wherein:

the digital documents include both structural information and content information and a fingerprint for a document of the documents comprises;

a structural encoding portion in which a first encoding preserves semantic information about components of the digital document'"'"'s structural information; and

a content encoding portion in which a second encoding preserves content information about components of the digital document'"'"'s content.

23. The apparatus set forth in claim 22, wherein the instructions are further executed by the processor to:

encode the structural information using a first encoding preserving semantic information about the structural information; and

encode the content information using a second encoding.

24. The apparatus set forth in claim 22 wherein the instructions are further executed by the processor to:

(a). find an encoding of structural information in a first fingerprint;

(b). find a second fingerprint substring matching a first fingerprint substring that begins at the found encoding;

(c). add a length of the found substring to a running length total;

(d). find another encoding of structural information in the first fingerprint not contained in any found substring and repeating acts (a)-(c) with the other encoding of structural information in the first fingerprint;

(e). repeat acts (a)-(d) until no further encodings of structural information can be found in act (d); and

(f). use a length of one of the fingerprints and the running length total to compute a similarity value.