Techniques for benchmarking paring strategies in a contact center system
First Claim
Patent Images
1. A method for benchmarking contact-agent pairing strategies in a contact center system comprising:
- cycling, by at least one computer processor communicatively coupled to and configured to operate in the contact center system, among at least three phases of contact-agent pairing;
a first phase of contact-agent pairing using a first contact-agent pairing strategy,followed by a benchmarking stabilization phase of contact-agent pairing using a second contact-agent pairing strategy, andfollowed by a second phase of contact-agent pairing using the second contact-agent pairing strategy;
determining, by the at least one computer processor, a difference in performance between the first and second contact-agent pairing strategies based on the first and second phases of contact-agent pairing and excluding the benchmarking stabilization phase of contact-agent pairing; and
outputting, by the at least one computer processor, the difference in performance, wherein the performance difference demonstrates that optimizing performance of the contact center system may be realized using the first contact-agent pairing strategy instead of the second contact-agent pairing strategy.
3 Assignments
0 Petitions
Accused Products
Abstract
Techniques for benchmarking pairing strategies in a contact center system are disclosed. In one particular embodiment, the techniques may be realized as a method for techniques for benchmarking pairing strategies in a contact center system comprising: cycling, by at least one processor, among at least two pairing strategies; and determining, by the at least one processor, a difference in performance between the at least two pairing strategies.
-
Citations
28 Claims
-
1. A method for benchmarking contact-agent pairing strategies in a contact center system comprising:
-
cycling, by at least one computer processor communicatively coupled to and configured to operate in the contact center system, among at least three phases of contact-agent pairing; a first phase of contact-agent pairing using a first contact-agent pairing strategy, followed by a benchmarking stabilization phase of contact-agent pairing using a second contact-agent pairing strategy, and followed by a second phase of contact-agent pairing using the second contact-agent pairing strategy; determining, by the at least one computer processor, a difference in performance between the first and second contact-agent pairing strategies based on the first and second phases of contact-agent pairing and excluding the benchmarking stabilization phase of contact-agent pairing; and outputting, by the at least one computer processor, the difference in performance, wherein the performance difference demonstrates that optimizing performance of the contact center system may be realized using the first contact-agent pairing strategy instead of the second contact-agent pairing strategy. - View Dependent Claims (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7)
-
-
8. A method for benchmarking pairing strategies in a contact center system comprising:
-
cycling, by at least one computer processor communicatively coupled to and configured to operate in the contact center system, among at least two pairing strategies; determining, by the at least one computer processor, a difference in performance between the at least two pairing strategies, wherein a first subset of a plurality of contact-agent pairings using a first or second pairing strategy of the at least two pairing strategies is excluded from determining the difference in performance; and outputting, by the at least one computer processor, the difference in performance, wherein the performance difference demonstrates that optimizing performance of the contact center system may be realized using the first contact-agent pairing strategy instead of the second contact-agent pairing strategy. - View Dependent Claims (9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14)
-
-
15. A system for benchmarking in a contact center system comprising:
at least one computer processor communicatively coupled to and configured to operate in the contact center system, wherein the at least one computer processor is further configured to; cycle among at least three phases of contact-agent pairing; a first phase of contact-agent pairing using a first contact-agent pairing strategy, followed by a benchmarking stabilization phase of contact-agent pairing using a second contact-agent pairing strategy, and followed by a second phase of contact-agent pairing using the second contact-agent pairing strategy; determine a difference in performance between the first and second contact-agent pairing strategies based on the first and second phases of contact-agent pairing and excluding the benchmarking stabilization phase of contact-agent pairing; and output the difference in performance, wherein the performance difference demonstrates that optimizing performance of the contact center system may be realized using the first contact-agent pairing strategy instead of the second contact-agent pairing strategy. - View Dependent Claims (16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21)
-
22. A system for benchmarking in a contact center system comprising:
at least one computer processor communicatively coupled to and configured to operate in the contact center system, wherein the at least one computer processor is further configured to; cycle among at least two pairing strategies; determine a difference in performance between the at least two pairing strategies, wherein a first subset of a plurality of contact-agent pairings using a first or second pairing strategy of the at least two pairing strategies is excluded from determining the difference in performance; and output the difference in performance, wherein the performance difference demonstrates that optimizing performance of the contact center system may be realized using the first contact-agent pairing strategy instead of the second contact-agent pairing strategy. - View Dependent Claims (23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28)
Specification