Deployment and deployment planning as a service

• US 9,710,363 B2
• Filed: 03/11/2016
• Issued: 07/18/2017
• Est. Priority Date: 12/15/2009
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Original Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Inventors: Rajaraman, Bala, Lindquist, David B., Garapati, Rekha D.
• Primary Examiner(s): Tsai, Henry
• Assistant Examiner(s): BARTELS, CHRISTOPHER A.
• Application Number:
  US15/067,462
• Publication Number:
  US 20160196202A1
• Time in Patent Office: 494 Days
• Field of Search: None
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/3668 Software testing software testing in telephone exchanges H04M3/242, testing of hardware G06F11/22
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 8/61 Installation

Abstract

A system and method of deploying software provides for comparing a current software topology of a deployment site to a software deployment topology of an application, wherein the software deployment topology is required to deploy the application. One or more mismatches between the current software topology and the software deployment topology may be identified.

Claims

1. A method comprising:

comparing, by a server processing system, a current software topology detailing at least one characteristic of user equipment at a deployment site to a software deployment topology detailing at least one characteristic required to deploy an application;

identifying, by the server processing system, a mismatch between the current software topology and the software deployment topology before deployment of the application is attempted at the deployment site, wherein the mismatch identifies a problem of the current software topology that is currently preventing the deployment of the application; and

generating, by the server processing system, an action plan based on the mismatch, wherein the action plan resolves the mismatch between the current software topology and the software deployment topology by a change to an adequate characteristic needed to successfully deploy the application from a presently existing deficient and normally operating characteristic of the user equipment at the deployment site identified as the problem of the current software topology that prevents the successful deployment of the application if the change is not made in the user equipment.

2. The method of claim 1, further including:

prompting, by the server processing system, a user to implement the action plan;

recording, by the server processing system, the user'"'"'s progress in implementing the action plan; and

deploying, by the server processing system, the application to the deployment site if the user'"'"'s progress indicates that implementation of the action plan is complete.

3. The method of claim 1, further including:

generating, by the server processing system, a customized software stack based on the mismatch;

deploying, by the server processing system, the customized software stack to the deployment site; and

deploying, by the server processing system, the application to the deployment site.

4. The method of claim 1, further including transmitting, by the server processing system, the action plan to a user via a graphical user interface.

5. The method of claim 1, further including:

identifying, by the server processing system, a plurality of mismatches between the current software topology and the software deployment topology; and

generating, by the server processing system, the action plan based on the plurality of mismatches, wherein the action plan resolves the plurality of mismatches between the current software topology and the software deployment topology by a change to every adequate characteristic needed to successfully deploy the application from every presently existing deficient and normally operating characteristic of the user equipment at the deployment site identified as the problem of the current software topology.

6. The method of claim 1, further including receiving, by the server processing system, the current software topology from the deployment site.

7. A computer readable storage medium comprising instructions, where, if executed by a processor, causes a server to:

compare a current software topology detailing at least one characteristic of user equipment at a deployment site to a software deployment topology detailing at least one characteristic required to deploy an application;

identify a mismatch between the current software topology and the software deployment topology before deployment of the application is attempted at the deployment site, wherein the mismatch is to identify a problem of the current software topology that is currently preventing the deployment of the application; and

generate an action plan based on the mismatch, wherein the action plan is to resolve the mismatch between the current software topology and the software deployment topology by a change to an adequate characteristic needed to successfully deploy the application from a presently existing deficient and normally operating characteristic of the user equipment at the deployment site identified as the problem of the current software topology that prevents the successful deployment of the application if the change is not to be made in the user equipment.

8. The computer readable storage medium of claim 7, comprising instructions, where, if executed by a processor, further causes the server to:

prompt a user to implement the action plan;

record the user'"'"'s progress in implementing the action plan; and

deploy the application to the deployment site if the user'"'"'s progress indicates that implementation of the action plan is complete.

9. The computer readable storage medium of claim 7, comprising instructions, where, if executed by a processor, further causes the server to:

generate a customized software stack based on the mismatch;

deploy the customized software stack to the deployment site; and

deploy the application to the deployment site.

10. The computer readable storage medium of claim 7, comprising instructions, where, if executed by a processor, further causes the server to transmit the action plan to a user via a graphical user interface.

11. The computer readable storage medium of claim 7, comprising instructions, where, if executed by a processor, further causes the server to:

identify a plurality of mismatches between the current software topology and the software deployment topology; and

generate the action plan based on the plurality of mismatches, wherein the action plan is to resolve the plurality of mismatches between the current software topology and the software deployment topology by a change to every adequate characteristic needed to successfully deploy the application from every presently existing deficient and normally operating characteristic of the user equipment at the deployment site identified as the problem of the current software topology.

12. The computer readable storage medium of claim 7, comprising instructions, where, if executed by a processor, further causes the server to receive the current software topology from the deployment site.

13. The computer readable storage medium of claim 7, wherein the current software topology and the software deployment topology are to be defined in extensible markup language (XML) files.

14. The computer readable storage medium of claim 7, wherein the software deployment topology is to be required to deploy the application as a new software installation.

15. An apparatus comprising a processor to:

compare a current software topology detailing at least one characteristic of user equipment at a deployment site to a software deployment topology detailing at least one characteristic required to deploy an application;

identify a mismatch between the current software topology and the software deployment topology before deployment of the application is attempted at the deployment site, wherein the mismatch is to identify a problem of the current software topology that is currently preventing the deployment of the application; and

generate an action plan based on the mismatch, wherein the action plan is to resolve the mismatch between the current software topology and the software deployment topology by a change to an adequate characteristic needed to successfully deploy the application from a presently existing deficient and normally operating characteristic of the user equipment at the deployment site identified as the problem of the current software topology that prevents the successful deployment of the application if the change is not to be made in the user equipment.

16. The apparatus of claim 15, wherein the processor is further to:

prompt a user to implement the action plan;

record the user'"'"'s progress in implementing the action plan; and

deploy the application to the deployment site if the user'"'"'s progress indicates that implementation of the action plan is complete.

17. The apparatus of claim 15, wherein the processor is further to:

generate a customized software stack based on the mismatch;

deploy the customized software stack to the deployment site; and

deploy the application to the deployment site.

18. The apparatus of claim 15, wherein the processor is further to transmit the action plan to a user via a graphical user interface.

19. The apparatus of claim 15, wherein the processor is further to:

identify a plurality of mismatches between the current software topology and the software deployment topology; and

generate the action plan based on the plurality of mismatches, wherein the action plan is to resolve the plurality of mismatches between the current software topology and the software deployment topology by a change to every adequate characteristic needed to successfully deploy the application from every presently existing deficient and normally operating characteristic of the user equipment at the deployment site identified as the problem of the current software topology.

20. The apparatus of claim 15, wherein the processor is further to receive the current software topology from the deployment site.