Computer-implemented patent portfolio analysis method and apparatus

• US 9,710,457 B2
• Filed: 01/09/2012
• Issued: 07/18/2017
• Est. Priority Date: 02/05/1999
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Ontologics Incorporated
• Original Assignee: Gregory A. Stobbs, John V. Biernacki
• Inventors: Stobbs, Gregory A., Biernacki, John V.
• Primary Examiner(s): Corrielus, Jean M
• Application Number:
  US13/346,280
• Publication Number:
  US 20120109642A1
• Time in Patent Office: 2,017 Days
• Field of Search: 707934, 707923, 707930, 707931, 707933
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 40/30 Semantic analysis
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/10 Office automation; Time management
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 40/06 Asset management; Financial planning or analysis
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 50/184 Intellectual property management
• CPC Class Codes: Y10S 707/934 Analyzing patent activity

Abstract

A computer-implemented apparatus and method for performing patent portfolio analysis. The patent portfolio analysis apparatus and method clusters a group of patents based upon one or more techniques. The clustering techniques include linguistic clustering techniques (e.g., eigenvector analysis), claim meaning, and patent classification techniques. Different aspects of the clusters are analyzed, including financial, claim breadth, and assignee patent comparisons. Moreover, patents and/or their clusters are linked to the Internet in order to determine what products might be covered by the claims of the patents or whether materials on the Internet might render patent claims invalid.

Claims

1. A computer-implemented patent portfolio analysis method comprising:

providing user-prescribed categories which were specified by a user;

retrieving a corpus of patent information from a database, wherein the patent information is information from multiple patent documents;

analyzing said patent information to generate a category model corresponding to at least one of said user-prescribed categories; and

applying said model against said patent information to select from said patent information a subset that fits said model and storing said subset in association with a label corresponding to said at least one of said user-prescribed categories in a computer-readable dataset,

wherein said patent information includes textual information selected from the group consisting of patent specification, abstract, title and combinations thereof to be analyzed and wherein said analyzing step includes;

processing the textual information to strip out delimiters that designate different fields within the textual information and thereby produce processed textual information;

defining an eigenspace representing a training population of training textual information;

representing at least a portion of said training textual information in said eigenspace and associating a predefined category with each training textual information in said eigenspace; and

projecting the processed textual information to be analyzed into said eigenspace and associating with said projected processed textual information the predefined category of the training textual information to which said projected textual information is closest within the eigenspace.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein said patent information includes patent classification information and wherein said analyzing step is performed by defining a plurality of categories and mapping classification information onto said categories.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein said patent information includes using both patent classification information and linguistic analysis results to define said category model.

4. The method of claim 3 wherein the category model is indicative of technical areas of the patent documents.

5. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

retrieving text of claims from the database, wherein the text of claims are from the plurality of patent documents;

analyzing the text of the claims in order to generate claim breadth metrics for the claims, wherein a claim breadth metric is indicative of claim breadth of a claim, wherein the claim breadth metrics are used to analyze the claims.

6. The method of claim 1 wherein a label associated with the category model is predetermined.

7. The method of claim 1 wherein a label associated with the category model is dynamically determined.