Method and device for automatically comparing flight trajectories of aircraft

• US 9,725,157 B2
• Filed: 04/28/2015
• Issued: 08/08/2017
• Est. Priority Date: 04/30/2014
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Airbus Operations (European Aeronautic Defence and Space Company EADS NV)
• Original Assignee: Airbus Operations (European Aeronautic Defence and Space Company EADS NV)
• Inventors: Albert, Nicolas, Kozlow, Boris
• Primary Examiner(s): MOTT, GENNA M
• Application Number:
  US14/697,896
• Publication Number:
  US 20150314854A1
• Time in Patent Office: 833 Days
• CPC Class Codes: G08G 5/0039 Modification of a flight plan

Abstract

A method and device for automatically comparing two flight trajectories for an aircraft includes a central processing unit having a first comparison element for automatically comparing lateral trajectories of the two flight trajectories, and a second comparison element for automatically comparing vertical trajectories of these two flight trajectories, these comparisons being carried out successively leg by leg of the flights, these comparisons being carried out as long as the respective successive legs are identical and at least for a predefined distance in the horizontal plane.

Claims

1. A method for automatic comparison of a first flight trajectory and a second flight trajectory for an aircraft, wherein the first flight trajectory includes a first vertical trajectory and a first lateral trajectory, and the second flight trajectory includes a second vertical trajectory and a second lateral trajectory, wherein the first lateral trajectory and the second lateral trajectory each include a succession of lateral segments, with each lateral segment being defined by corresponding geometric parameters which describe a shape of the lateral segment and identify respective lateral departure and arrival points for the lateral segment, and the first vertical trajectory and the second vertical trajectory each include a succession of vertical segments, with each vertical segment being defined by corresponding geometric parameters which describe a shape of the vertical segment and identify respective vertical departure and arrival points for the vertical segment, the method comprising:

a) receiving the first flight trajectory and the second flight trajectory;

b) automatically carrying out at least one of the following comparison steps b1 and b2;

b1) comparing the first lateral trajectory and the second lateral trajectory of the first and second flight trajectories, wherein the comparison is performed by comparing the corresponding geometric parameters describing the shapes and the respective departure and arrival points of successive lateral segments of the first and second lateral flight trajectories, rather than comparing individual points along the first and second lateral trajectories, and wherein the comparison is continued for as long as the respective successive lateral segments of the first and second lateral flight trajectories are identical over a predetermined distance in a horizontal plane; and

b2) comparing the first vertical trajectory and the second vertical trajectory of the first and second flight trajectories, wherein the comparison is performed by comparing the corresponding geometric parameters describing the shapes and respective departure and arrival points of successive vertical segments of the first and second vertical flight trajectories, rather than comparing individual points along the first and second vertical trajectories, and wherein the comparison is continued for as long as the respective successive vertical segments of the first and second vertical flight trajectories are identical over the predetermined distance in the horizontal plane; and

c) transmitting automatically the result of the comparison carried out in step b1) or b2) to a guidance device comprising an automatic pilot and/or flight director of the aircraft, a display that presents graphical information to a crew in the aircraft cockpit and a trajectory change unit that changes the first flight trajectory of the aircraft to the second flight directory where the comparison carried out in step b1) or b2) indicates that the first and second flight trajectories are the same for the predetermined distance.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein in step b1 the comparison includes comparing a first lateral segment of the first lateral trajectory and a second lateral segment of the second lateral trajectory, wherein the first lateral segment and the second lateral segment are both one of a rectilinear shape or a curved shape, and have the respective departure point and arrival points, and the comparison includes:

E1) verifying that the respective departure points of the first and second lateral segments are identical and, if they are not identical, concluding that the first and second lateral segments are different and, if they are identical, carrying out step E2;

E2) verifying if the first and second lateral segments are of the same shape and, if they are not of the same shape, concluding that the first and second lateral segments are different and, if they are of the same shape, carrying out step E3;

E3) determining if the first and second lateral segments are of a rectilinear shape or a curved shape, and if the first and second lateral segments are of the rectilinear shape carrying out a step E4), and if first and second later lateral segments are of the curved shape carrying out a step E5);

E4) verifying if the respective arrival points of the first and second lateral segments are identical and, if they are identical, finding that the first and second lateral segments are identical; and

otherwise, carrying out a step E4A);

E4A) verifying if the orientations of the first and second lateral segments are identical and, if they are not identical, concluding that the first and second lateral segments are different; and

otherwise, carrying out a step E4B);

E4B) determining a shorter one of the first and second lateral segments and treating the shorter of the first and second lateral segments as corresponding to the start of the longer segment;

E5) verifying if directions of rotation of the first and second lateral segments are identical and, if they are not identical, determining that the first and second lateral segments are different; and

otherwise, carrying out a step E5A);

E5A) verifying if centers of the first and second lateral segments are identical and, if they are not identical, concluding that the first and second lateral segments are different; and

otherwise, carrying out a step E5B);

E5B) verifying if the respective arrival points of the first and second lateral segments are identical and, if they are identical, concluding that the first and second lateral segments are identical; and

otherwise, carrying out a step E5C);

E5C) verifying if a turn radii of the first and second lateral segments are identical and, if they are not identical, concluding that the first and second lateral segments are different; and

otherwise, carrying out a step E5D); and

E5D) determining which of the first and second lateral segments is the shorter of the first and second lateral segments and using the shorter lateral segment as corresponding to the start of the longer segment.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein in step b2 the comparison includes a comparison between a first vertical segment of the first flight trajectory and a second vertical segment of the second flight trajectory, each of the first and second vertical segments being either a vertical segment of rectilinear shape or a vertical segment of curved shape and each of the first and second vertical segments including the respective departure and arrival points, wherein the comparison between the first and second vertical segments includes:

F0) verifying if the first and second vertical segments correspond to a same lateral segment and, if they do not correspond to the same lateral segment, drawing the conclusion that the first and second vertical segments are different; and

otherwise, carrying out a step F1);

F1) verifying if the departure points of the first and second vertical segments are identical and, if they are not identical, drawing the conclusion that the first and second vertical segments are different; and

otherwise, carrying out a step F2)

F2) verifying if the shapes of the first and second vertical segments are identical and, if they are not identical, drawing the conclusion that the first and second vertical segments are different; and

otherwise, carrying out a step F3);

F3) verifying if the two vertical segments of identical shape are of rectilinear shape or curved shape, and if the two vertical segments are of rectilinear shape carrying out a step F4), and if the two vertical segments are of curved shape carrying out a step F5);

F4) verifying if the arrival points of the first and second vertical segments are identical and, if they are identical, drawing the conclusion that the first and second vertical segments are identical; and

otherwise, carrying out a step F4A);

F4A) verifying if the slopes of the first and second vertical segments are identical and, if they are not identical, drawing the conclusion that the first and second vertical segments are different; and

otherwise, carrying out a step F4B);

F4B) verifying which of the two vertical segments is the shortest and using the shortest vertical segment as corresponding to the start of the other vertical segment;

F5) verifying if the directions of rotation of the first and second vertical segments are identical and, if they are not identical, drawing the conclusion that the first and second vertical segments are different; and

otherwise, carrying out a step F5A);

F5A) verifying if the centers of rotation of the first and second vertical segments are identical and, if they are not identical, drawing the conclusion that the first and second vertical segments are different; and

otherwise, carrying out a step F5B);

F5B) verifying if the arrival points of the first and second vertical segments are identical and, if they are identical, concluding that the first and second vertical segments are identical; and

otherwise, carrying out a step F5C);

F5C) verifying if a turn radii of the first and second vertical segments are identical and, if they are not identical, concluding that the first and second vertical segments are different; and

otherwise, carrying out a step F5D);

F5D) identifying a shortest one of the first and second vertical segments and using the shortest one of the first and second vertical segments as corresponding to a start of the othersegment.

4. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein step b) includes successively carrying out the comparison steps b1 and b2.

5. The method as claimed in claim 1, further comprising copying the first flight trajectory and using the copied first flight trajectory to form the second flight trajectory.

6. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the first and second flight trajectories are low-altitude flight trajectories.

7. A device for automatic comparison of a first and a second flight trajectories for an aircraft, the first flight trajectory comprising a first vertical trajectory and a first lateral trajectory, and the second flight trajectory comprising a second vertical trajectory and a second lateral trajectory, the first lateral trajectory and the second lateral trajectory comprising a succession of a plurality of lateral segments, with each lateral segment being defined by corresponding geometric parameters which characterize a shape of the lateral segment and identify respective lateral departure and arrival points, and the first vertical trajectory and the second vertical trajectory comprising a succession of a plurality of vertical segments, with each vertical segment being defined by corresponding geometric parameters which characterize a shape of the vertical segment and identify respective lateral departure and arrival points, the device comprising a processing unit configured to execute instructions stored on a non-transitory memory, wherein execution of the instructions by the processing unit causes the device to:

receive the first flight trajectory and the second flight trajectory;

compare the first lateral trajectory and the second lateral trajectory of the first flight trajectory and the second flight trajectory, wherein the comparison is performed by comparing the geometric parameters defining the shapes and the respective departure and arrival points of successive lateral flight segments of the first and second lateral flight trajectories, rather than comparing individual points along the first and second lateral trajectories, and the comparison being performed while the successive lateral flight segments are identical over at least a predetermined distance in a horizontal plane; and

compare the first vertical trajectory and the second vertical trajectory of the first and second flight trajectories, wherein the comparison is performed by comparing the corresponding geometric parameters defining the shapes and the respective departure and arrival points of successive vertical flight segments of the first and second vertical flight trajectories, rather than comparing individual points along the first and second vertical trajectories, the comparison being performed while the successive vertical segments are identical over at least the predetermined distance; and

automatically transmit results of the comparisons to a guidance device comprising an automatic pilot and/or flight director of the aircraft, a display that presents graphical information to a crew in the aircraft cockpit and a trajectory change unit that changes the first flight trajectory of the aircraft to the second flight directory when both comparisons indicate that the first and second flight trajectories are the same for the predetermined distance.

8. A guidance system for an aircraft comprising:

a flight control calculator configured to automatically calculate, during a flight of the aircraft along a current flight trajectory and an auxiliary flight trajectory;

a guidance device configured to guide the aircraft along a flight trajectory;

the comparison device of claim 7, configured to compare the current trajectory and the auxiliary trajectory; and

the trajectory change unit configured to automatically make a change in the flight trajectory if the current and auxiliary trajectories have a common leg of length greater than a predetermined threshold, the change in the flight trajectory consisting of replacing the current trajectory with the auxiliary trajectory so that the guidance device guides the aircraft along the auxiliary trajectory as of the change being effected.

9. An aircraft comprising the device recited in claim 7.

10. An aircraft comprising the guidance system recited in claim 8.

11. A method for comparing a first flight trajectory with a second flight trajectory for an aircraft, the method comprising:

causing a guidance device comprising a trajectory change unit to have the first flight trajectory govern a flight path of the aircraft;

designating the second flight trajectory as a desired flight path of the aircraft;

forming a first segment of the first flight trajectory, wherein the first segment includes a starting point and the first segment is defined by geometric parameters characterizing a shape of the first segment and, besides the first segment starting point, a first segment arrival point;

forming a second segment of the second flight trajectory, wherein the second segment includes the starting point of the first segment and the second segment is defined by geometric parameters characterizing a shape of the second segment and, besides the second segment starting point, a second segment arrival point;

comparing the shape and the starting and arrival points of the first segment to the shape and the starting and arrival points of the second segment, rather than comparing individual points along the first segment to individual points along the second segment;

based on the comparison, determining that the first segment and the second segment are or are not identical;

if the determination is that the first and second segments are not identical, causing the first flight trajectory to continue governing the flight path and reporting that the second flight trajectory is not suited to govern the flight path;

if the determination is that the first and second segments are identical, segmenting the first flight trajectory to form another first segment which is in succession to the first segment and segmenting the second flight trajectory to form another second segment which is in succession to the second segment;

repeating the forming, comparing and determining steps until a determination is made that one of the successive first and second segments are not identical or until at least one the first and second segments extend a predetermined distance, and

in response to a succession of determinations that the first and second segments are identical, causing a guidance device comprising an automatic pilot and/or flight director of the aircraft, a display that presents graphical information to a crew in the aircraft cockpit and a trajectory change unit that changes the first flight trajectory of the aircraft to the second flight trajectory to thereby govern the flight path of the aircraft and reporting to the cockpit display the change in the flight trajectory governing the flight path of the aircraft.

12. The method of claim 11 wherein the first flight trajectory includes a first vertical trajectory and the second flight trajectory includes a second vertical trajectory, and the first segment is a first vertical segment and the second segment is a second vertical segment, wherein in the comparison step the first vertical segment is compared to the second vertical segment and in the determining step the determination is whether the first vertical segment is identical to the second vertical segment.

13. The method of claim 11 wherein the first flight trajectory includes a first vertical trajectory and the second flight trajectory includes a second vertical trajectory, and the first segment is a first vertical segment and the second segment is a second vertical segment, wherein in the comparison step a geometric parameter of the first vertical segment is compared to a corresponding geometric parameter of the second vertical segment and in the determining step the determination is whether the first vertical segment is identical to the second vertical segment.

14. The method of claim 11 wherein the first flight trajectory includes a first lateral trajectory and the second flight trajectory includes a second lateral trajectory, and the first segment is a first lateral segment and the second segment is a second lateral segment, wherein in the comparison step a geometric parameter of the first lateral segment is compared to a corresponding geometric parameter of the second lateral segment and in the determining step the determination is whether the first lateral segment is identical to the second lateral segment.

15. The method of claim 11 further comprising at least one of:

comparing a turn radius of the first segment to a turn radius of the second segment;

comparing a direction of rotation of the first segment to a direction of rotation of the second segment, and comparing an orientation of the first segment to an orientation of the second segment.

16. The method of claim 11 wherein the repeating step includes setting a starting point for each of successive first and second segments as corresponding to an ending point of a shorter one of immediately prior first and second segments.