Dynamic scheduling based on carrier aggregation capabilities

• US 9,794,943 B1
• Filed: 12/18/2014
• Issued: 10/17/2017
• Est. Priority Date: 12/18/2014
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Sprint Spectrum LP (Deutsche Telekom AG)
• Original Assignee: Sprint Spectrum LP (Deutsche Telekom AG)
• Inventors: Oroskar, Siddharth S., Singh, Jasinder P.
• Primary Examiner(s): Beyen, Zewdu A
• Application Number:
  US14/574,882
• Time in Patent Office: 1,034 Days
• Field of Search: None
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 72/535 based on resource usage policies

Abstract

Disclosed herein are methods and systems that may help to dynamically schedule data transmissions in accordance with a fairness policy between different classes of a users. An example method may be implemented in an access network that is configured for carrier-aggregation service via a plurality of component carriers in a given coverage area, and involves: (i) determining a usage level in the given coverage area, and (ii) determining that the usage level in the given coverage area is greater than a threshold usage level and responsively: (a) determining relative carrier-aggregation capabilities between two or more classes of user equipment (UE) that have established data connections in the coverage area, and (b) adjusting a per-carrier scheduling ratio for the given coverage area based on the relative carrier-aggregation capabilities between the two or more UE classes.

Claims

1. A method comprising:

determining, by a radio access network (RAN) that is configured for carrier-aggregation service via a plurality of component carriers in a given coverage area, that a second user equipment (UE) is both (i) associated with a second user-equipment class from a plurality of user-equipment classes, and (ii) configured for carrier-aggregation service, wherein the second UE has established a data connection in the given coverage area;

determining, by the RAN, that a first UE that has also established a data connection in the given coverage area, is both (i) associated with a first user-equipment class from the plurality of user-equipment classes, and (ii) not configured for carrier-aggregation service;

at least in part in response to the determination that both the first UE and the second UE have established respective data connections in the given coverage area, the RAN;

(a) determining, based at least in part on a target aggregate scheduling ratio across all the component carriers for the given coverage area, a per-carrier scheduling ratio between the first user-equipment class and the second user-equipment class; and

(b) using the determined per-carrier scheduling ratio to schedule data communications via the plurality of component carriers.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

initially determining a usage level in the given coverage area; and

in response to determining that the usage level in the given coverage area is greater than a threshold usage level, carrying out the method of claim 1.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the first user-equipment class corresponds to first user accounts having a standard data-usage level, and wherein the second user-equipment class corresponds to second user accounts having a heavy data-usage level.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein a given user account is assigned to the first user-equipment class if data usage associated with the given user account is below a threshold level, and wherein the given user account is assigned to the second user-equipment class if data usage associated with the given user account is above a threshold level.

5. The method of claim 3, wherein the first user-equipment class comprises UEs that are assigned quality-of-service class identifier (QCI) 9, and wherein the second user-equipment class comprises UEs that are assigned QCI 8.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein, initially, the first UE has not yet established the data connection in the coverage area, the method further comprising:

initially using a first per-carrier scheduling ratio to schedule data communications via the plurality of component carriers in the coverage area;

wherein the determined per-carrier scheduling ratio is a second per-carrier scheduling ratio between the first user-equipment class and the second user-equipment class; and

wherein, in order to use the determined per-carrier scheduling ratio to schedule data communications via the plurality of component carriers, the RAN switches from using the first per-carrier scheduling ratio to using the second per-carrier scheduling ratio to schedule data communications via the plurality of component carriers in the given coverage area.

7. The method of claim 6:

wherein using the first per-carrier scheduling ratio to schedule data communications via the plurality of component carriers results in an aggregate scheduling ratio across all of the component carriers that is equal to the target aggregate scheduling ratio when both (a) all UEs of the first user-equipment class, which are engaged in communications in the coverage, are not configured for carrier aggregation and (b) all UEs of the first user-equipment class, which are engaged in communications in the coverage, are not configured for carrier aggregation; and

wherein using the second per-carrier scheduling ratio to schedule data communications via the plurality of component carriers results in an aggregate scheduling ratio across all of the component carriers that is equal to the target aggregate scheduling ratio when both (a) at least one UE of the first user-equipment class is not configured for carrier aggregation and (b) at least one UE of the second user-equipment class is configured for carrier aggregation.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein the first per-carrier scheduling ratio is equal to the target aggregate scheduling ratio, and wherein the second per-carrier scheduling ratio multiplies the number of resource blocks that should be assigned to the first user-equipment class, for each resource block that is assigned to the second user-equipment class, by the number of component carriers in the coverage area.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein determining the per-carrier scheduling ratio comprises:

using a number of component carriers available for carrier aggregation in the given coverage area as a basis for determining the second per-carrier scheduling ratio.

10. The method of claim 9, wherein a number of component carriers are available for carrier aggregation in the given coverage area, wherein the target aggregate scheduling ratio specifies an aggregate number of resource blocks that should be designated for the first UE in the given coverage area, for each resource block that is designated for the second UE in the given coverage area, and wherein determining the per-carrier scheduling ratio comprises:

determining a per-carrier number of resource blocks to designate to the first UE by multiplying the aggregate number of resource blocks that should be designated for the first UE by the number of component carriers in the given coverage area; and

setting the second per-carrier scheduling ratio to designate the determined per-carrier number of resource blocks to first UE on a given component carrier, for each resource block that is designated to the second UE on the given component carrier.

11. A method comprising:

determining, by a radio access network (RAN) that is configured for carrier-aggregation service via a plurality of component carriers in a given coverage area, a usage level in the given coverage area, wherein a target aggregate scheduling ratio is defined for the coverage area, and wherein the target aggregate scheduling ratio indicates that a first number of data units that should be sent to a user equipment (UE) of a first user-equipment class for each data unit that is sent to a UE of a second user-equipment class; and

determining, by the RAN, that the usage level in the given coverage area is greater than a threshold usage level and responsively;

(a) determining, by the RAN, that a first UE that has established a data connection in the given coverage area is both (i) associated with a first user-equipment class from the plurality of user-equipment classes, and (ii) not configured for carrier-aggregation service;

(b) determining that a second UE that has established a data connection in the given coverage area is both (i) associated with a second user-equipment class, and (ii) configured for carrier-aggregation service; and

(c) in response to the determining that both the first UE and the second UE have established respective data connections in the given coverage area, implementing a per-carrier scheduling ratio that indicates that a UE of the first user-equipment class should be sent a second number of data units for each data unit that is sent to a UE of the second user-equipment class, wherein the second number is greater than the first number.

12. The method of claim 11, wherein the per-carrier scheduling ratio is a second per-carrier scheduling ratio, the method further comprising:

initially using a first per-carrier scheduling ratio to schedule data communications via the plurality of component carriers in the coverage area; and

in response to the determining that both the first UE and the second UE have established respective data connections in the given coverage area, switching from using of the first per-carrier scheduling ratio to using the second per-carrier scheduling ratio to schedule data communications on the plurality of component carriers in the given coverage area.

13. The method of claim 11, wherein the second number of data units is equal to the first number of data units multiplied by the number of component carriers in the coverage area.

14. A method comprising:

determining, by a radio access network (RAN) that is configured for carrier-aggregation service via a plurality of component carriers in a given coverage area, a usage level in the given coverage area; and

determining, by the RAN, that the usage level in the given coverage area is greater than a threshold usage level and responsively;

determining relative carrier-aggregation capabilities between two or more classes of user equipment (UE) that have established data connections in the coverage area;

determining that the relative carrier-aggregation capabilities in the coverage indicate at least one UE of a first user-equipment class that is not configured for carrier-aggregation service, and at least one UE of a second user-equipment class is configured for carrier-aggregation service;

responsively adjusting a per-carrier scheduling ratio for the given coverage area based on the relative carrier-aggregation capabilities between the two or more UE classes; and

scheduling communications for transmission over the plurality of component carriers, via the at least one wireless communication interface, in accordance with the adjusted per-carrier scheduling ratio.

15. The method of claim 14, wherein determining the relative carrier-aggregation capabilities between the two or more UE classes comprises:

(a) determining that a first UE that has established a data connection in the given coverage area is both (i) associated with a first user-equipment class from the plurality of user-equipment classes, and (ii) not configured for carrier-aggregation service; and

(b) determining that a second UE that has established a data connection in the given coverage area is both (i) associated with a second user-equipment class, and (ii) configured for carrier-aggregation service.

16. The system of claim 15, wherein adjusting the per-carrier scheduling ratio for the given coverage area based on the relative carrier-aggregation capabilities between the two or more UE classes that have established data connections in the coverage area comprises:

in response to the determining that both the first UE and the second UE have established respective data connections in the given coverage area, implementing a per-carrier scheduling ratio that indicates that a UE of the first user-equipment class should be sent a second number of data units for each data unit that is sent to a UE of the second user-equipment class, wherein the second number is greater than the first number.

17. A system comprising:

at least one wireless communication interface operable to provide carrier-aggregation service via a plurality of component carriers in a given coverage area of a radio access network; and

a controller configured to determine that a usage level in the given coverage area is greater than a threshold usage level and responsively perform functions comprising;

determining relative carrier-aggregation capabilities between two or more classes of user equipment (UE) that have established data connections in the coverage area; and

determining that the relative carrier-aggregation capabilities in the coverage indicate at least one UE of a first user-equipment class that is not configured for carrier-aggregation service, and at least one UE of a second user-equipment class is configured for carrier-aggregation service, and responsively;

(a) adjusting a per-carrier scheduling ratio for the given coverage area based on the relative carrier-aggregation capabilities between the two or more UE classes that have established data connections in the coverage area; and

(b) scheduling communications for transmission over the plurality of component carriers, via the at least one wireless communication interface, in accordance with the adjusted per-carrier scheduling ratio.

18. The system of claim 17, wherein the function of determining the relative carrier-aggregation capabilities between the two or more UE classes comprises:

(a) determining that a first UE that has established a data connection in the given coverage area is both (i) associated with a first user-equipment class from the plurality of user-equipment classes, and (ii) not configured for carrier-aggregation service; and

(b) determining that a second UE that has established a data connection in the given coverage area is both (i) associated with a second user-equipment class, and (ii) configured for carrier-aggregation service.

19. The system of claim 18, wherein the function of adjusting the per-carrier scheduling ratio for the given coverage area based on the relative carrier-aggregation capabilities between the two or more UE classes that have established data connections in the coverage area comprises:

in response to the determining that both the first UE and the second UE have established respective data connections in the given coverage area, implementing a per-carrier scheduling ratio that indicates that a UE of the first user-equipment class should be sent a second number of data units for each data unit that is sent to a UE of the second user-equipment class, wherein the second number is greater than the first number.

20. The system of claim 18, wherein a given user account is assigned to the first user-equipment class if data usage associated with the given user account is below a threshold level, and wherein the given user account is assigned to the second user-equipment class if data usage associated with the given user account is above a threshold level.