Mapping process changes

• US 9,824,205 B2
• Filed: 12/14/2016
• Issued: 11/21/2017
• Est. Priority Date: 06/08/2015
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Accenture Global Services Limited (Accenture PLC)
• Original Assignee: Accenture Global Services Limited (Accenture PLC)
• Inventors: Hassanzadeh, Amin
• Primary Examiner(s): CERVETTI, DAVID GARCIA
• Application Number:
  US15/378,252
• Publication Number:
  US 20170109520A1
• Time in Patent Office: 342 Days
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 21/44 Program or device authentication
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 21/53 by executing in a restricted environment, e.g. sandbox or secure virtual machine
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 21/604 Tools and structures for managing or administering access control systems
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 21/6218 to a system of files or objects, e.g. local or distributed file system or database

Abstract

In one implementation, a computer-implemented method includes receiving a request to run a particular process; determining whether the particular process is to be run in isolation on the computer system; selecting a particular permission scheme from among a plurality of permission schemes based, at least in part, on one or more characteristics of the particular process; fetching, according to the particular permission scheme, a copy object that corresponds to an actual object for the particular process, wherein the copy object is instantiated in an isolated environment; running the particular process is isolation on the computer system by executing the copy object in the isolated environment; applying, according to the particular permission scheme, one or more changes to the copy object; and mapping, according to the particular permission scheme, the one or more changes in the copy object to the actual object.

Claims

1. A computer-implemented method comprising:

identifying one or more characteristics of a particular process that is to be run in an isolated environment and that is characterized as possibly malware;

before the particular process is run in the isolated environment, selecting, by a process manager running on a computer system and based on one or more of the characteristics of the particular process, a particular permission scheme from among (i) a first permission scheme in which a user is prompted for permission a single time in advance of a first change being made to a copy object by the particular process and is not subsequently prompted for permission for any other change being made to the copy object by the particular process after that, and (ii) a second permission scheme in which the user is prompted for permission in response to each change being made to the copy object by the particular process;

obtaining, by the process manager and according to the particular permission scheme, an isolated copy object that (a) is in the isolated environment, and (b) corresponds to an actual object that is not in the isolated environment;

after selecting the particular permission scheme, running the particular process in the isolated environment on the computer system, thereby generating one or more changes to the isolated copy object; and

copying, by the process manager and according to the particular permission scheme, one or more of the changes to the isolated copy object to the actual object that is not in the isolated environment.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, comprising:

outputting, by the computer system and before obtaining the isolated copy object, information to prompt the user to provide permission for changes to the isolated copy object in advance of any changes being made; and

receiving, at the computer system and before obtaining the isolated copy object, user input comprising permission for changes to the isolated copy object,

wherein the copy object is obtained in response to the user input being received.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, comprising:

outputting, by the computer system after obtaining the isolated copy object and before applying the one or more changes to the copy object, information to prompt the user to provide permission for each of the one or more changes to the isolated copy object; and

receiving, at the computer system and before applying the one or more changes to the isolated copy object, user input comprising permission for each of the one or more changes to the isolated copy object,

wherein the one or more changes are applied to the isolated copy object in response to the user input being received.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, comprising:

receiving, at the process manager, a request to run the particular process on the computer system; and

determining, by the process manager, that the particular process is characterized as possibly malware.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein one or more of the characteristics of the particular process that is characterized as possibly malware comprise a trust score associated with the particular process.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein one or more of the characteristics of the particular process that is characterized as possibly malware comprise a quantity of changes to objects that the particular process previously required during a prior execution.

7. A non-transitory computer-readable medium having stored thereon instructions, which, when executed by one or more computers, cause the one or more computers to perform operations comprising:

identifying one or more characteristics of a particular process that is to be run in an isolated environment and that is characterized as possibly malware;

before the particular process is run in the isolated environment, selecting, by a process manager running on a computer system and based on one or more of the characteristics of the particular process, a particular permission scheme from among (i) a first permission scheme in which a user is prompted for permission a single time in advance of a first change being made to a copy object by the particular process and is not subsequently prompted for permission for any other change being made to the copy object by the particular process after that, and (ii) a second permission scheme in which the user is prompted for permission in response to each change being made to the copy object by the particular process;

obtaining, by the process manager and according to the particular permission scheme, an isolated copy object that (a) is in the isolated environment, and (b) corresponds to an actual object that is not in the isolated environment;

after selecting the particular permission scheme, running the particular process in the isolated environment on the computer system, thereby generating one or more changes to the isolated copy object; and

copying, by the process manager and according to the particular permission scheme, one or more of the changes to the isolated copy object to the actual object that is not in the isolated environment.

8. The medium of claim 7, wherein the operations comprise:

outputting, by the computer system and before obtaining the isolated copy object, information to prompt the user to provide permission for changes to the isolated copy object in advance of any changes being made; and

receiving, at the computer system and before obtaining the isolated copy object, user input comprising permission for changes to the isolated copy object,

wherein the copy object is obtained in response to the user input being received.

9. The medium of claim 7, wherein the operations comprise:

outputting, by the computer system after obtaining the isolated copy object and before applying the one or more changes to the copy object, information to prompt the user to provide permission for each of the one or more changes to the isolated copy object; and

receiving, at the computer system and before applying the one or more changes to the isolated copy object, user input comprising permission for each of the one or more changes to the isolated copy object,

wherein the one or more changes are applied to the isolated copy object in response to the user input being received.

10. The medium of claim 7, wherein the operations comprise:

receiving, at the process manager, a request to run the particular process on the computer system; and

determining, by the process manager, that the particular process is characterized as possibly malware.

11. The medium of claim 7, wherein one or more of the characteristics of the particular process that is characterized as possibly malware comprise a trust score associated with the particular process.

12. The medium of claim 7, wherein one or more of the characteristics of the particular process that is characterized as possibly malware comprise a quantity of changes to objects that the particular process previously required during a prior execution.

13. A system comprising:

one or more processors and one or more computer storage media storing instructions that are operable, when executed by the one or more processors, to cause the one or more processors to perform operations comprising;

identifying one or more characteristics of a particular process that is to be run in an isolated environment and that is characterized as possibly malware;

before the particular process is run in the isolated environment, selecting, by a process manager running on a computer system and based on one or more of the characteristics of the particular process, a particular permission scheme from among (i) a first permission scheme in which a user is prompted for permission a single time in advance of a first change being made to a copy object by the particular process and is not subsequently prompted for permission for any other change being made to the copy object by the particular process after, and (ii) a second permission scheme in which the user is prompted for permission in response to each change being made to the copy object by the particular process;

obtaining, by the process manager and according to the particular permission scheme, an isolated copy object that (a) is in the isolated environment, and (b) corresponds to an actual object that is not in the isolated environment;

after selecting the particular permission scheme, running the particular process in the isolated environment on the computer system, thereby generating one or more changes to the isolated copy object; and

copying, by the process manager and according to the particular permission scheme, one or more of the changes to the isolated copy object to the actual object that is not in the isolated environment.

14. The system of claim 13, wherein the operations comprise:

outputting, by the computer system and before obtaining the isolated copy object, information to prompt the user to provide permission for changes to the isolated copy object in advance of any changes being made; and

receiving, at the computer system and before obtaining the isolated copy object, user input comprising permission for changes to the isolated copy object,

wherein the copy object is obtained in response to the user input being received.

15. The system of claim 13, wherein the operations comprise:

outputting, by the computer system after obtaining the isolated copy object and before applying the one or more changes to the copy object, information to prompt the user to provide permission for each of the one or more changes to the isolated copy object; and

receiving, at the computer system and before applying the one or more changes to the isolated copy object, user input comprising permission for each of the one or more changes to the isolated copy object,

wherein the one or more changes are applied to the isolated copy object in response to the user input being received.

16. The system of claim 13, wherein the operations comprise:

receiving, at the process manager, a request to run the particular process on the computer system; and

determining, by the process manager, that the particular process is characterized as possibly malware.

17. The system of claim 13, wherein one or more of the characteristics of the particular process that is characterized as possibly malware comprise a trust score associated with the particular process.

18. The system of claim 13, wherein one or more of the characteristics of the particular process that is characterized as possibly malware comprise a quantity of changes to objects that the particular process previously required during a prior execution.