Antenna validation for vehicle-to-vehicle communication

• US 9,830,816 B1
• Filed: 10/27/2016
• Issued: 11/28/2017
• Est. Priority Date: 10/27/2016
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Ford Global Technologies, LLC (Ford Motor Company)
• Original Assignee: Ford Global Technologies, LLC (Ford Motor Company)
• Inventors: Murray, Allen R., Lei, Oliver
• Primary Examiner(s): Pham, Toan N
• Application Number:
  US15/336,653
• Time in Patent Office: 397 Days
• Field of Search: 340902, 340505, 340514, 3405391, 34053921, 340 104, 4554561, 370312
• CPC Class Codes: G08G 1/096791 where the origin of the information is another vehicle
• CPC Class Codes: H04B 17/12 of transmit antennas, e.g. of the amplitude or phase
• CPC Class Codes: H04B 17/318 Received signal strength
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 4/023 using mutual or relative location information between multiple location based services [LBS] targets or of distance thresholds
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 4/46 for vehicle-to-vehicle communication [V2V]
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 4/80 Services using short range communication, e.g. near-field communication [NFC], radio-frequency identification [RFID] or low energy communication

Abstract

Systems, methods and apparatus are disclosed for antenna validation for vehicle-to-vehicle communication. An example disclosed vehicle includes a wireless communication module and an antenna calibrator. The example antenna calibrator, for each of a plurality of validation responses received from second vehicles (a) determines an estimated received signal strength based on an estimated open path signal strength loss, and (b) in response to a difference between the estimated received signal strength and an actual received signal strength from the validation response not satisfying a threshold, provides an alert to occupants of the vehicle.

Claims

1. A vehicle comprising:

a wireless communication module; and

an antenna calibrator to, for each of a plurality of validation responses received from second vehicles;

determine an estimated received signal strength based on an estimated open path signal strength loss; and

in response to a difference between the estimated received signal strength and an actual received signal strength from the validation response not satisfying a threshold, provide an alert to occupants of the vehicle.

2. The vehicle of claim 1, wherein the antenna calibrator is to, for each of the second vehicles, determine the estimated open path signal strength loss based on first coordinates of the vehicle and second coordinates of the second vehicle.

3. The vehicle of claim 1, wherein the antenna calibrator is to broadcast, using the wireless communication module, multiple validation request messages with an identifier that identifies the vehicle, each one of the validation request messages having a different transmission power.

4. The vehicle of claim 3, wherein to determine the estimated received signal strength for the validation messages, the antenna calibrator is to subtract a cable loss from and add the estimated open path signal strength loss to the corresponding transmission power.

5. The vehicle of claim 1, wherein:

when the difference between the estimated received signal strength and the actual received signal strength from the validation response satisfies the threshold, the antenna calibrator is to increment a first counter associated with a number of validation responses indicative of success and a second counter associated with a total number of validation responses; and

when the difference between the estimated received signal strength and the actual received signal strength from the validation response does not satisfy the threshold, the antenna calibrator is to increment the second counter.

6. The vehicle of claim 5, wherein after comparing the difference between the estimated received signal strength and the actual received signal strength for each of the validation responses, the antenna calibrator is to determine a success ratio by dividing the number of validation responses indicative of success and the total number of validation responses received.

7. The vehicle of claim 6, wherein, in response to the success ratio not satisfying a second threshold, the antenna calibrator is to:

provide the alert to occupants of the vehicle; and

increase a transmission power of the wireless communication module if the transmission power is below a maximum allowed power limit.

8. A method to test an antenna of a vehicle-to-vehicle communication module, comprising:

receiving a validation response from a plurality of vehicles;

for each of the validation responses, determining, with a processor, an estimated received signal strength based on an estimated open path signal strength loss; and

in response to a difference between the estimated received signal strength and an actual received signal strength from one of the validation responses not satisfying a threshold, providing an alert to occupants of the vehicle.

9. The method of claim 8, including for each of the validation responses determining the estimated open path signal strength loss based on first coordinates of the antenna and second coordinates of one of the plurality of vehicles.

10. The method of claim 8, including broadcasting, using the vehicle-to-vehicle wireless communication module and a transmission power, a validation request message with an identifier that identifies the vehicle.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein determining the estimated received signal strength includes subtracting a cable loss from and adding the estimated open path signal strength loss to the transmission power.

12. The method of claim 8, including:

incrementing a first counter associated with a number of validation responses indicative of success and a second counter associated with a total number of validation responses when the difference between the estimated received signal strength and the actual received signal strength from the validation response satisfies the threshold; and

incrementing the second counter when the difference between the estimated received signal strength and the actual received signal strength from the validation response does not satisfy the threshold.

13. The method of claim 12, including, after comparing the difference between the estimated received signal strength and the actual received signal strength for each of the validation responses, determining a success ratio by dividing the number of validation responses indicative of success and the total number of validation responses received.

14. The method of claim 13, including, in response to the success ratio not satisfying a second threshold:

providing the alert to occupants of the vehicle; and

increasing a transmission power of the vehicle-to-vehicle wireless communication module.

15. A system comprising:

a plurality of first vehicles, each one of the plurality of first vehicles to, in response to receiving a validation request message, broadcast a validation response message including first coordinates and a received signal strength value of the validation request message; and

a second vehicle to;

from time to time, determine second coordinates of the second vehicle and send the validation request message; and

for each of the received validation responses messages, determine an indication of operational status of an antenna of the second vehicle based on the second coordinates, the first coordinates, and the received signal strength value.

16. The system of claim 15, wherein, based on the indications of operational status of the antenna determined from the received validation responses messages from the plurality of first vehicles, the second vehicle is to determine whether the antenna is malfunctioning.

17. The system of claim 15, include a roadside unit to, in response to receiving the validation request message, broadcast the validation response message including first coordinates of the roadside unit and the received signal strength value of the validation request message.

18. The system of claim 17, wherein, based on the indications of operational status of the antenna determined from the received validation responses messages from the plurality of first vehicles and the roadside unit, the second vehicle is to determine whether the antenna is malfunctioning.

19. The system of claim 18, wherein the indication of operational status of the antenna determined from the roadside unit is weighted more than the indications of operational status of the antenna determined from the plurality of first vehicles.