De-referenced package execution

• US 9,836,315 B1
• Filed: 06/25/2014
• Issued: 12/05/2017
• Est. Priority Date: 06/25/2014
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Amazon Technologies, Inc. (Amazon.com, Inc.)
• Original Assignee: Amazon Technologies, Inc. (Amazon.com, Inc.)
• Inventors: Ramalingam, Harsha, Lathia, Bhavnish H.
• Primary Examiner(s): Dao, Thuy
• Assistant Examiner(s): Wang, Ben C
• Application Number:
  US14/314,205
• Time in Patent Office: 1,259 Days
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/3664 Environments for testing or debugging software
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/3688 for test execution, e.g. scheduling of test suites
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 8/30 Creation or generation of source code
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 8/36 Software reuse
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 8/65 Updates security arrangements therefor G06F21/57
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 9/445 Program loading or initiating bootstrapping G06F9/4401; security arrangements for program loading or initiating G06F21/57
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 9/44521 Dynamic linking or loading; Link editing at or after load time, e.g. Java class loading
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 9/44536 Selecting among different versions
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 9/541 via adapters, e.g. between incompatible applications
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 9/547 Remote procedure calls [RPC]; Web services

Abstract

A library registry service receives a library interface definition that defines an interface for a library stub and data indicating whether a corresponding package is to be executed locally or remotely. An application is then built using the library stub. When the application calls the library stub, the library stub determines whether the package is to be executed locally or remotely either dynamically or by consulting the library registry service. The library stub then causes the package to be executed in the determined location. An updated library may be periodically generated and deployed for execution by the library stub locally or remotely. The library stub might also batch calls and/or provide a control interface for configuring aspects of its operation.

Claims

1. A computer-implemented method for executing a package, the method comprising:

receiving, at a first computing device, an interface definition that defines an interface for calling a library stub configured to provide functionality for de-referenced execution of the package;

receiving, at the first computing device, execution location data that defines whether the package is to be executed locally or remotely, the execution location data including data indicating a frequency of calls to the package and a size of a response generated by the call to the package;

storing the interface definition and the execution location data;

subsequent to the storing the interface definition and the execution location data, receiving, from a second computing device executing an application and the library stub, a first request for the execution location data;

in response to the first request, providing a first response to the library stub that includes the execution location data, the first response to provide the functionality to the application based on execution of the package;

subsequent to the providing the first response, receiving an updated version of the package that includes one or more changes to the package;

storing the updated version of the package as an updated package;

subsequent to the storing the updated package, receiving, from the second computing device, a second request for the execution location data; and

in response to the second request, providing a second response to the library stub that includes the execution location data, the second response to provide the functionality to the application based on execution of the updated package without the application being rebuilt or redeployed on the second computing device.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the execution location data comprises data identifying a remote location at which the package is to be executed.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 2, wherein the execution location data further comprises version data defining which version of the package is to be executed.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 3, further comprising instructing a deployment system to deploy the package to the remote location at which the package is to be executed.

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 3, further comprising instructing a deployment system to deploy the package to the second computing device.

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, further comprising transmitting an instruction to the second computing device to invalidate a cache storing the execution location data that defines whether the package is to be executed locally or remotely.

7. A system, comprising:

a library registry service comprising a first processor and a first non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing instructions executable on the first processor for;

receiving a registration request to register an interface definition for a package, the registration request comprising execution location data that predefines one or more conditions for use in determining whether the package is to be executed locally or remotely,

storing the execution location data, and

receiving and responding to requests for the execution location data; and

an application server comprising a second processor and a second non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing instructions executable on the second processor for;

executing an application configured to call upon a library stub that exposes an interface defined by the interface definition to the application,

receiving a call to the library stub from the application, and

in response to receiving the call, determining if the package is to be executed remotely at a remote server associated with the package or locally at the application server based upon the execution location data, a frequency of calls to the package, and a size of a response generated by the call to the package, and;

in response to determining that the package is to be executed locally, causing the package to be executed at the application server, or

in response to determining that the package is to be executed remotely, determining a network address of the remote server associated with the package by way of the library registry service and causing the package to be executed at the remote server.

8. The system of claim 7, wherein determining if the package is to be executed remotely at the remote server or locally at the application server comprises transmitting, to the library registry service, a request for the execution location data.

9. The system of claim 7, wherein the execution location data comprises the network address of the remote server at which the package is to be executed.

10. The system of claim 9, wherein the application server is configured to cache the execution location data identifying the remote server at which the package is to be executed.

11. The system of claim 7, wherein determining if the package is to be executed remotely at the remote server or locally at the application server is based on one or more of a status of at least one of:

the library registry service,

the remote server, or

the application server.

12. The system of claim 7, wherein the call specifies a version identifier for the package and wherein a version of the package having the specified version identifier is executed locally or remotely.

13. A computer-implemented method for executing a package, the method comprising:

receiving a registration request to register an interface definition for the package, the registration request comprising execution location data that predefines conditions for use in determining whether the package is to be executed locally or remotely,

storing the execution location data;

receiving one or more requests for the execution location data;

executing an application configured to call upon a library stub that exposes an interface defined by the interface definition to the application;

receiving a call to the library stub from the application executing on an application server; and

in response to receiving the call to the library stub, determining, based on the conditions, if the package is to be executed remotely from the application server or locally at the application server, the conditions including a current level of computing resources of the application server, a frequency of calls to the package, and a size of a response generated by the call to the package, and;

in response to determining that the package is to be executed locally at the application server, causing the package to be executed locally at the application server;

or

in response to determining that the package is to be executed remotely from the application server, causing the package to be executed remotely from the application server at a remote server associated with the package.

14. The computer-implemented method of claim 13, wherein determining if the package is to be executed remotely from the application server or locally at the application server comprises transmitting a request to a library registry service for data indicating whether the package is to be executed locally or remotely from the application server.

15. The computer-implemented method of claim 14, wherein the method further comprises:

storing the data; and

invalidating a cache in response to an instruction received from the library registry service.

16. The computer-implemented method of claim 13, wherein determining if the package is to be executed remotely from the application server or locally at the application server is based on a status of the application server.

17. The computer-implemented method of claim 13, wherein the call to the library stub specifies a version identifier for the package and wherein a version of the package having the version identifier is executed locally or remotely.

18. The computer-implemented method of claim 13, wherein the library stub is further configured to batch two or more calls to the library stub prior to executing the package locally at the application server or remotely from the application server.

19. The computer-implemented method of claim 13, wherein the library stub is further configured to expose a control interface for receiving commands to configure operation of the library stub.

20. The computer-implemented method of claim 19, wherein the control interface can be utilized to configure the library stub to log calls to the library stub from the application, trigger one or more events in response to receiving the call from the application, perform a service call in response to receiving the call from the application, or execute a plug-in to the library stub in response to receiving the call from the application.