Fraud detection via mobile device location tracking

• US 9,858,575 B2
• Filed: 12/16/2014
• Issued: 01/02/2018
• Est. Priority Date: 12/16/2014
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: AT&T Intellectual Property I LP (AT&T, Inc.)
• Original Assignee: AT&T Intellectual Property I LP (AT&T, Inc.), AT&T Mobility II LLC (AT&T, Inc.)
• Inventors: Meredith, Sheldon Kent, Patterson, David, Abrahamian, Edmond
• Primary Examiner(s): Mikels, Matthew
• Application Number:
  US14/572,522
• Publication Number:
  US 20160171499A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,113 Days
• Field of Search: 235375, 235379, 235380, 235383, 705 5, 705 35- 45
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 20/3224 Transactions dependent on location of M-devices
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 20/4016 involving fraud or risk level assessment in transaction processing

Abstract

Methods, computer-readable media and devices for calculating fraud scores for pending payment transactions are disclosed. A method includes a processor receiving a request for a fraud score. The request comprises a notification of a pending payment transaction that is associated with a credit card of a user and associated with a first location. The processor then detects a location of a device associated with the user, calculates a fraud score based upon the location of the device and the first location, and sends a response comprising the fraud score that is calculated.

Claims

1. A method, comprising:

receiving, by a processor, a request for a fraud score, the request comprising a notification of a pending payment transaction that is associated with a credit card of a user and associated with a first location;

detecting, by the processor, a location of a device associated with the user;

calculating, by the processor, the fraud score based upon the location of the device associated with the user and the first location, wherein the fraud score is further based upon a comparison of historical location information associated with the device associated with the user and historical usage information associated with the credit card, wherein the comparison generates a percentage of historical payment transactions associated with the credit card where the device associated with the user is co-located with a location of one of the historical payment transactions, wherein the fraud score is indicative of a likelihood that the pending payment transaction comprises a fraudulent use of the credit card, and wherein when the first location and the location of the device associated with the user are not a same location, the fraud score is indicative of a greater likelihood that the pending payment transaction is fraudulent; and

sending, by the processor, a response comprising the fraud score that is calculated.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the fraud score is further based upon a distance between the first location and the location of the device associated with the user.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the fraud score is further based upon a determination of whether the device associated with the user is in motion.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the notification is received from a device associated with an issuer of the credit card.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the location of the device associated with the user is determined via one of:

location information provided by a serving base station, location information provided by a serving wireless access point, location information provided by a cellular location system, global positioning system location information provided by the device associated with the user, and location information provided by a second device that is acting as a proxy for the device associated with the user.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the device associated with the user is identified via one of:

an electronic serial number of the device, a mobile equipment identifier of the device, an integrated circuit card identifier of the device, an international mobile equipment identity of the device, an international mobile subscriber identity associated with the user and with the device, and a media access control address of a transceiver of the device.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the first location comprises a location of a point-of-sale terminal.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the pending payment transaction comprises an online transaction, wherein the first location is determined from an internet protocol address from which the online transaction is originated.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein the response is sent to a server that is processing the pending payment transaction.

10. A non-transitory computer-readable medium storing instructions which, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to perform operations, the operations comprising:

receiving a request for a fraud score, the request comprising a notification of a pending payment transaction that is associated with a credit card of a user and associated with a first location;

detecting a location of a device associated with the user;

calculating the fraud score based upon the location of the device associated with the user and the first location, wherein the fraud score is further based upon a comparison of historical location information associated with the device associated with the user and historical usage information associated with the credit card, wherein the comparison generates a percentage of historical payment transactions associated with the credit card where the device associated with the user is co-located with a location of one of the historical payment transactions, wherein the fraud score is indicative of a likelihood that the pending payment transaction comprises a fraudulent use of the credit card, and wherein when the first location and the location of the device associated with the user are not a same location, the fraud score is indicative of a greater likelihood that the pending payment transaction is fraudulent; and

sending a response comprising the fraud score that is calculated.

11. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 10, wherein the fraud score is further based upon a distance between the first location and the location of the device associated with the user.

12. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 10, wherein the fraud score is further based upon a determination of whether the device associated with the user is in motion.

13. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 10 wherein the notification is received from a device associated with an issuer of the credit card.

14. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 10, wherein the location of the device associated with the user is determined via one of:

location information provided by a serving base station, location information provided by a serving wireless access point, location information provided by a cellular location system, global positioning system location information provided by the device associated with the user, and location information provided by a second device that is acting as a proxy for the device associated with the user.

15. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 10, wherein the device associated with the user is identified via one of:

an electronic serial number of the device, a mobile equipment identifier of the device, an integrated circuit card identifier of the device, an international mobile equipment identity of the device, an international mobile subscriber identity associated with the user and with the device, and a media access control address of a transceiver of the device.

16. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 10, wherein the first location comprises a location of a point-of-sale terminal.

17. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 10, wherein the pending payment transaction comprises an online transaction, wherein the first location is determined from an internet protocol address from which the online transaction is originated.

18. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 10, wherein the response is sent to a server that is processing the pending payment transaction.