Processing a unit of work

• US 9,876,876 B2
• Filed: 01/27/2017
• Issued: 01/23/2018
• Est. Priority Date: 06/29/2010
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Original Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Inventors: Banks, Andrew D. J., Beardall, Gavin D.
• Primary Examiner(s): Walsh, John B
• Application Number:
  US15/418,384
• Publication Number:
  US 20170142224A1
• Time in Patent Office: 361 Days
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 9/54 Interprogram communication
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 67/01 Protocols
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 67/60 Scheduling or organising the servicing of application requests, e.g. requests for application data transmissions using the analysis and optimisation of the required network resources admission control or resource allocation H04L47/70
• CPC Class Codes: H05K 999/99 dummy group

Abstract

A client computer batch message transaction group is created that includes a set of client computers from which messages are committed as a batch messaging transaction to a single message reception queue. In response to receiving separate messages from at least two of the set of client computers within the client computer batch message transaction group, the separate messages are grouped under the batch messaging transaction as a single unit of work to commit to the single message reception queue. A single batch transaction commit decision is computed based upon whether a write of each of the separate messages grouped within the single unit of work to the single message reception queue is successful.

Claims

1. An apparatus for processing a unit of work, comprising:

a network interface; and

a processor programmed to;

create a client computer batch message transaction group comprising a plurality of client computers from which messages are committed as a batch messaging transaction to a single message reception queue;

in response to receiving separate messages over the network interface from at least two of the plurality of client computers within the client computer batch message transaction group, group the separate messages under the batch messaging transaction as a single unit of work to commit to the single message reception queue; and

compute a single batch transaction commit decision based upon whether a write of each of the separate messages grouped within the single unit of work to the single message reception queue is successful.

2. The apparatus of claim 1, where the single unit of work is not under control of a client application associated with a client computer.

3. The apparatus of claim 1, where the processor is further programmed to assign, via a server application of the apparatus, a single thread to the single unit of work.

4. The apparatus of claim 1, where the processor is further programmed to send an acknowledgement identifying a batch transaction commitment to each client computer in the client computer batch message transaction group if the single batch transaction commit decision comprises a decision to commit the single unit of work comprising the grouped separate messages to the single message reception queue.

5. The apparatus of claim 1, where the processor is further programmed to send an acknowledgement identifying a batch transaction rollback to each client computer in the client computer batch message transaction group if the single batch transaction commit decision comprises a decision to rollback the single unit of work comprising the grouped separate messages.

6. The apparatus of claim 1, where each of the plurality of client computers has a separate communication channel with the apparatus via the network interface, and where the processor is further programmed to terminate each separate communication channel associated with each client computer in the client computer batch message transaction group if the single batch transaction commit decision comprises a decision to rollback the single unit of work comprising the grouped separate messages.

7. The apparatus of claim 1, where, in being programmed to create the client computer batch message transaction group comprising the plurality of client computers, the processor is programmed to create the client computer batch message transaction group by selecting the plurality of client computers based upon a determination that each client application of each client computer in the plurality of client computers produces a same message or similar messages to each other client application.

8. The apparatus of claim 1, where the processor is further programmed to perform pre-processing checks on each client application of each client computer in the client computer batch message transaction group before commencement of the single unit of work comprising receiving a client identifier via a server middleware application from each client application of each client computer in the client computer batch message transaction group.

9. The apparatus of claim 1, where, in being programmed to create the client computer batch message transaction group comprising the plurality of client computers, the processor is programmed to create the client computer batch message transaction group by selecting the plurality of client computers according to historical statistics to provide efficiency within the client computer batch message transaction group relative to individual client message processing.

10. The apparatus of claim 1, where more than one client computer batch message transaction group is created.

11. A computer program product for processing a unit of work, comprising:

a computer readable storage medium having computer readable program code embodied therewith, where the computer readable storage medium is not a transitory signal per se and where the computer readable program code when executed on a computer causes the computer to;

create a client computer batch message transaction group comprising a plurality of client computers from which messages are committed as a batch messaging transaction to a single message reception queue;

in response to receiving separate messages from at least two of the plurality of client computers within the client computer batch message transaction group, group the separate messages under the batch messaging transaction as a single unit of work to commit to the single message reception queue; and

compute a single batch transaction commit decision based upon whether a write of each of the separate messages grouped within the single unit of work to the single message reception queue is successful.

12. The computer program product of claim 11, where the single unit of work is not under control of a client application associated with a client computer.

13. The computer program product of claim 11, where the computer readable program code when executed on the computer further causes the computer to assign, via a server application, a single thread to the single unit of work.

14. The computer program product of claim 11, where the computer readable program code when executed on the computer further causes the computer to send an acknowledgement identifying a batch transaction commitment to each client computer in the client computer batch message transaction group if the single batch transaction commit decision comprises a decision to commit the single unit of work comprising the grouped separate messages to the single message reception queue.

15. The computer program product of claim 11, where the computer readable program code when executed on the computer further causes the computer to send an acknowledgement identifying a batch transaction rollback to each client computer in the client computer batch message transaction group if the single batch transaction commit decision comprises a decision to rollback the single unit of work comprising the grouped separate messages.

16. The computer program product of claim 11, where each of the plurality of client computers has a separate communication channel with the computer, and where the computer readable program code when executed on the computer further causes the computer to terminate each separate communication channel associated with each client computer in the client computer batch message transaction group if the single batch transaction commit decision comprises a decision to rollback the single unit of work comprising the grouped separate messages.

17. The computer program product of claim 11, where, in causing the computer to create the client computer batch message transaction group comprising the plurality of client computers, the computer readable program code when executed on the computer causes the computer to create the client computer batch message transaction group by selecting the plurality of client computers based upon a determination that each client application of each client computer in the plurality of client computers produces a same message or similar messages to each other client application.

18. The computer program product of claim 11, where the computer readable program code when executed on the computer further causes the computer to perform pre-processing checks on each client application of each client computer in the client computer batch message transaction group before commencement of the single unit of work comprising receiving a client identifier via a server middleware application from each client application of each client computer in the client computer batch message transaction group.

19. The computer program product of claim 11, where, in causing the computer to create the client computer batch message transaction group comprising the plurality of client computers, the computer readable program code when executed on the computer causes the computer to create the client computer batch message transaction group by selecting the plurality of client computers according to historical statistics to provide efficiency within the client computer batch message transaction group relative to individual client message processing.

20. The computer program product of claim 11, where more than one client computer batch message transaction group is created.