Autonomous enhanced node B

• US 9,888,376 B2
• Filed: 06/27/2014
• Issued: 02/06/2018
• Est. Priority Date: 01/06/2014
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Intel Corporation
• Original Assignee: Intel IP Corporation (Intel Corporation)
• Inventors: Luft, Achim, Venkatachalam, Muthaiah, Sirotkin, Alexander
• Primary Examiner(s): NGO, RICKY QUOC
• Assistant Examiner(s): Samuel, Dewanda
• Application Number:
  US14/318,351
• Publication Number:
  US 20150195706A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,320 Days
• Field of Search: 370217, 370331, 370242, 370401
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 24/02 Arrangements for optimising operational condition
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 24/04 Arrangements for maintaining operational condition
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 4/90 Services for handling of emergency or hazardous situations, e.g. earthquake and tsunami warning systems [ETWS]
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 76/19 Connection re-establishment
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 76/50 for emergency connections
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 8/30 Network data restoration; Network data reliability; Network data fault tolerance
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 84/20 Master-slave selection or change arrangements
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 88/16 Gateway arrangements

Abstract

Embodiments allow one or more eNBs that become isolated from core network entities (e.g., evolved packet core entities such as mobility management entity, serving gate way, packet data network gateway, and so forth) to form a resilient mode network. Such a network can function in a limited fashion and provide for UE to UE communications within the resilient mode network coverage area. One or more of the eNBs function as an autonomous eNB and provide a subset of core network functions that allow UE to UE communications within the resilient mode network coverage area. Embodiments disclosed herein select which eNB functions as the autonomous eNB and then the other eNBs establish an S1-MME and/or S1-U interface with the autonomous eNB.

Claims

1. An Enhanced NodeB (eNB) comprising:

memory; and

hardware processing circuitry, configured to;

detect disruption of a first S1 interface to a Core Network (CN);

evaluate whether the eNB should assume a role of an autonomous eNB;

responsive to assuming the role of the autonomous eNB, configuring the processing circuitry to;

establish a second S1 interface with at least one other eNB; and

provide a subset of functions provided by the CN to the at least one other eNB; and

responsive to not assuming the role of the autonomous eNB, configuring the processing circuitry to;

establish a second S1 interface with an eNB that has assumed the role of the autonomous eNB; and

rely on the autonomous eNB to provide the subset of functions;

wherein;

the processing circuitry is further configured to;

evaluate whether the eNB should assume the role of the autonomous eNB by being configured to compare a master priority of the eNB to master priorities of the at least one other eNB; and

select as the autonomous eNB the eNB with a highest associated master priority;

the master priorities of the at least one other eNB are computed by the eNB; and

the master priorities of the at least one other eNB are computed after the S1 interface is disrupted.

3. The eNB of claim 1, wherein the subset of functions comprises at least one of:

network access control functions;

packet routing and transfer functions;

security functions;

or

user equipment (UE) reachability procedures.

18. The eNB of claim 1, wherein the subset of functions comprises:

network access control functions;

packet routing and transfer functions;

security functions; and

user equipment (UE) reachability procedures.

2. An Enhanced NodeB (eNB) comprising hardware processing circuitry configured to:

detect disruption of a first S1 interface to a Core Network (CN);

evaluate whether the eNB should assume the role of an autonomous eNB;

responsive to assuming the role of the autonomous eNB, configuring the processing circuitry to;

establish a second S1 interface with at least one other eNB; and

provide a subset of functions provided by the CN to the at least one other eNB; and

responsive to not assuming the role of the autonomous eNB, configuring the processing circuitry to;

establish a second S1 interface with an eNB that has assumed the role of the autonomous eNB; and

rely on the autonomous eNB to provide the subset of functions;

wherein the processing circuitry is further configured to, during operation;

evaluate whether the eNB should assume the role of the autonomous eNB by being configured to compare a master priority of the eNB to master priorities of the at least one other eNB; and

select as the autonomous eNB the eNB with a highest associated master priority.

4. The eNB of claim 2, wherein the master priorities of the at least one other eNB are computed by the eNB.

5. The eNB of claim 2, wherein the master priorities of the at least one other eNB are pre-assigned before the S1 interface is disrupted.

6. The eNB of claim 4, wherein the master priorities of the at least one other eNB are computed after the S1 interface is disrupted.

7. A method performed by an Enhanced NodeB (eNB) comprising:

detecting disruption of a first S1 interface to a Core Network (CN);

selecting an eNB to be an autonomous eNB;

establishing a second S1 interface with the autonomous eNB; and

relying on the autonomous eNB to provide a subset of functions provided by the CN;

wherein selecting the eNB to be the autonomous eNB is performed by executing operations comprising;

receiving a first message from a second eNB, the first message comprising a master priority associated with the second eNB; and

sending an S1 setup request message to the second eNB in order to use the second eNB as the autonomous eNB.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein selecting the eNB to be the autonomous eNB is performed by executing operations comprising:

retrieving the identity of which eNB should be used as the autonomous eNB; and

sending an S1 setup request message to the autonomous eNB.

9. The method of claim 7, further comprising receiving an S1 setup response message from the autonomous eNB.

10. The method of claim 7, wherein selecting the eNB to be the autonomous eNB is performed by executing operations comprising:

receiving a second message from a third eNB, the second message comprising a master priority associated with the third eNB;

selecting from among the second eNB and the third eNB whichever eNB has the highest associated master priority as the autonomous eNB; and

sending an S1 setup request message to the selected autonomous eNB.

11. A method performed by an Enhanced NodeB (eNB) comprising:

detecting disruption of a first S1 interface to a Core Network (CN);

selecting an eNB that is not in communication with the CN to be an autonomous eNB based on the detecting of the disruption;

subsequent to the selecting, establishing a second S1 interface with the autonomous eNB;

relying on the autonomous eNB to provide a subset of functions provided by the CN;

detecting availability the first S1 interface to the CN;

sending a S1 setup request message to the CN; and

sending a S1 disconnect request message to the autonomous eNB.

12. A computer storage medium comprising computer executable instructions that when executed configure a device to:

detect disruption of a first S1 interface to a Core Network (CN);

send a first message advertising the eNB is an autonomous eNB and implements a subset of capabilities provided by the CN;

establish a second S1 interface with a second eNB; and

provide the subset of capabilities to the second eNB;

wherein;

the first message comprises at least one of;

an S1 transport network layer (TNL) address;

or

a master priority that identifies the priority of the eNB assuming the role of an autonomous eNB.

13. The computer storage medium of claim 12, wherein the subset of capabilities comprises at least one of:

network access control functions;

packet routing and transfer functions;

security functions;

or user equipment (UE) reachability procedures.

14. The computer storage medium of claim 12, wherein the master priority is pre-assigned before the S1 interface is disrupted.

15. The computer storage medium of claim 12, wherein the master priority is computed after the S1 interface is disrupted.

16. The computer storage medium of claim 12, wherein the executable instructions further configure the device to:

receive a second message from a third eNB, the second message comprising at least one of;

an S1 TNL of the third eNB;

or a master priority of the third eNB that identifies the priority of the third eNB assuming the role of an autonomous eNB.

17. An Enhanced NodeB (eNB) device comprising:

at least one antenna;

transceiver circuitry coupled to the at least one antenna;

memory;

a processor coupled to the memory and transceiver circuitry; and

instructions, stored in the memory, which when executed cause the eNB processor to;

detect disruption of a first S1 interface to a Core Network (CN);

select an eNB that is not in communication with the CN to be an autonomous eNB, based on the detected disruption;

subsequent to the select, send a message to the autonomous eNB to establish a second S1 interface with the autonomous eNB;

determine whether the second S1 interface was successfully established; and

responsive to determining that the second S1 interface was not successfully established;

select a different autonomous eNB; and

send a second message to the different autonomous eNB to establish the second S1 interface with the different autonomous eNB.