Elevator control apparatus and method for minimizing an elevator group load difference

• US 9,890,015 B2
• Filed: 02/13/2017
• Issued: 02/13/2018
• Est. Priority Date: 09/05/2014
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Kone Corporation
• Original Assignee: Kone Corporation
• Inventors: Hakonen, Henri, Sorsa, Janne, Siikonen, Marja-Liisa
• Primary Examiner(s): SALATA, ANTHONY J
• Application Number:
  US15/431,411
• Publication Number:
  US 20170158460A1
• Time in Patent Office: 365 Days
• Field of Search: 187247, 187277, 187281, 187289, 187293, 187296, 187297, 187380-389, 187391, 187393
• CPC Class Codes: B66B 1/2458 For elevator systems with multiple shafts and a single car per shaft
• CPC Class Codes: B66B 1/3446 Data transmission or communication within the control system
• CPC Class Codes: B66B 2201/103 Destination call input before entering the elevator car
• CPC Class Codes: B66B 2201/216 Energy consumption
• CPC Class Codes: Y02B 50/00 Energy efficient technologies in elevators, escalators and moving walkways, e.g. energy saving or recuperation technologies

Abstract

A method for controlling an elevator group including at least a first elevator and a second elevator, wherein a counterweight balance of the first elevator differs from a counterweight balance of the second elevator, the method including: controlling the elevator group; determining threshold loads for the first and second elevator separately for up and down direction, a threshold load being dependent of the counterweight balance of the corresponding elevator, wherein the threshold load being a load for which consumed energy per up-down run is approximately zero; and controlling, when allocating an elevator in response to a destination call, route determination for the first and second elevator involves minimizing a load difference from the threshold loads.

Claims

1. An elevator control apparatus comprising:

at least one processor; and

at least one memory comprising computer program code for one or more programs, the at least one memory and the computer program code operating together with the at least one processor to cause the apparatus to;

control an elevator group comprising at least a first elevator and a second elevator, wherein a counterweight balance of the first elevator differs from a counterweight balance of the second elevator;

determine threshold loads for the first and second elevator separately for up and down direction for each elevator, a threshold load being dependent of the counterweight balance of the corresponding elevator and being a load for which consumed energy per up-down run is approximately zero; and

control, when allocating an elevator in response to a destination call, route determination for the first and second elevators by minimizing a load difference of the first and second elevators from the threshold loads.

2. The elevator control apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the threshold loads determine a preferred maximum load in up direction and a preferred minimum load in down direction.

3. The elevator control apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the at least one memory and the computer program code operate together with the at least one processor to cause the apparatus to:

control the route determination such that in up direction a load of the allocated elevator is below the load threshold of the allocated elevator for up direction.

4. The elevator control apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the at least one memory and the computer program code operate together with the at least one processor to cause the apparatus to:

control the route determination such that in down direction a load of the allocated elevator is above the load threshold of the allocated elevator for down direction.

5. The elevator control apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the at least one memory and the computer program code operate together with the at least one processor to cause the apparatus to:

take into account, in the route determination, the threshold loads as a fine term in order to prevent energy inefficient route determinations.

6. An elevator system comprising:

a plurality of elevators comprising at least a first elevator and a second elevator, wherein a counterweight balance of the first elevator differs from a counterweight balance of the second elevator; and

the elevator control apparatus of claim 1.

14. The elevator control apparatus according to claim 2, wherein the at least one memory and the computer program code operate together with the at least one processor to cause the apparatus to:

control the route determination such that in up direction a load of the allocated elevator is below the load threshold of the allocated elevator for up direction.

15. The elevator control apparatus according to claim 2, wherein the at least one memory and the computer program code operate together with the at least one processor to cause the apparatus to:

control the route determination such that in down direction a load of the allocated elevator is above the load threshold of the allocated elevator for down direction.

16. The elevator control apparatus according to claim 3, wherein the at least one memory and the computer program code operate together with the at least one processor to cause the apparatus to:

control the route determination such that in down direction a load of the allocated elevator is above the load threshold of the allocated elevator for down direction.

17. The elevator control apparatus according to claim 2, wherein the at least one memory and the computer program code operate together with the at least one processor to cause the apparatus to:

take into account, in the route determination, the threshold loads as a fine term in order to prevent energy inefficient route determinations.

18. The elevator control apparatus according to claim 3, wherein the at least one memory and the computer program code operate together with the at least one processor to cause the apparatus to:

take into account, in the route determination, the threshold loads as a fine term in order to prevent energy inefficient route determinations.

19. The elevator control apparatus according to claim 4, wherein the at least one memory and the computer program code operate together with the at least one processor to cause the apparatus to:

take into account, in the route determination, the threshold loads as a fine term in order to prevent energy inefficient route determinations.

20. An elevator system comprising:

a plurality of elevators comprising at least a first elevator and a second elevator, wherein a counterweight balance of the first elevator differs from a counterweight balance of the second elevator; and

the elevator control apparatus of claim 2.

7. A method for controlling an elevator group comprising at least a first elevator and a second elevator, wherein a counterweight balance of the first elevator differs from a counterweight balance of the second elevator, the method comprising:

controlling the elevator group comprising at least the first elevator and the second elevator;

determining threshold loads for the first and second elevator separately for up and down direction for each elevator, a threshold load being dependent of the counterweight balance of the corresponding elevator and being a load for which consumed energy per up-down run is approximately zero; and

controlling, when allocating an elevator in response to a destination call, route determination for the first and second elevators comprises minimizing a load difference from the threshold loads.

8. The method according to claim 7, wherein the threshold loads determine a preferred maximum load in up direction and a preferred minimum load in down direction.

9. The method according to claim 7, wherein controlling, when allocating an elevator in response to a destination call, route determination for the first and second elevator by minimizing load difference from the threshold loads causing energy consumption comprises:

controlling the route determination such that in up direction a load of the allocated elevator is below the load threshold of the allocated elevator for up direction.

10. The method according to claim 7, wherein controlling, when allocating an elevator in response to a destination call, route determination for the first and second elevator by minimizing load difference from the threshold loads comprises:

controlling the route determination such that in down direction a load of the allocated elevator is above the load threshold of the allocated elevator for down direction.

11. The method according to claim 7, further comprising:

taking into account, in the route determination, the threshold loads as a fine term in order to prevent energy inefficient route determinations.

12. A computer program comprising program code, which when executed by a processor, performs the method of claim 7.

13. The computer program according to claim 12, wherein the computer program is embodied on a computer-readable medium.