Method for extraction and surfactant enhanced subsurface contaminant recovery

• US 9,895,730 B2
• Filed: 09/26/2008
• Issued: 02/20/2018
• Est. Priority Date: 09/26/2007
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Ethical Solutions, LLC
• Original Assignee: Ethical Solutions, LLC
• Inventors: Hoag, George E., Collins, John B., Anderson, Douglas K.
• Primary Examiner(s): DAVIS, SHENG HAN
• Application Number:
  US12/667,478
• Publication Number:
  US 20100185039A1
• Time in Patent Office: 3,434 Days
• Field of Search: None
• CPC Class Codes: B09C 1/00 Reclamation of contaminated soil
• CPC Class Codes: B09C 1/002 involving in-situ ground water treatment
• CPC Class Codes: B09C 1/02 Extraction using liquids, e.g. washing, leaching , flotation
• CPC Class Codes: B09C 1/08 chemically

Abstract

Methods and compositions for removing contaminants from soil and groundwater by extracting the contaminants and assisting the extraction by provision of an oxidant introduced prior to or simultaneously with a surfactant into the subsurface. Extractable contaminant can be extracted from the subsurface. The amount and/or distribution of contaminant in the subsurface can be characterized. The extracting of contaminant and the introducing of oxidant and surfactant can be coordinated to reduce contaminant to a target amount. A portion of the contaminant can be oxidizable.

Claims

1. A method for decreasing an amount of a contaminant at a site in a subsurface, wherein at least a portion of the contaminant is non-aqueous phase liquid (NAPL), comprising:

introducing a liquid oxidant prior to or simultaneously with a surfactant into the subsurface;

generating gaseous oxygen in the subsurface in the form of bubbles by decomposition of the liquid oxidant;

allowing the oxygen bubbles to hydrodynamically scrub soil particles in the subsurface sufficient to release contaminant from the soil particles and form extractable NAPL contaminant in the subsurface;

extracting NAPL contaminant from the subsurface;

wherein the liquid oxidant is a gas phase generating oxidant; and

wherein the extracting of NAPL reduces the amount of the contaminant in the subsurface.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the contaminant is extracted from the subsurface through an extraction well, and the surfactant is introduced as a fluid into the subsurface at an injection locus.

3. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

selecting a remediation zone including the contaminant;

allowing the oxidant to establish an oxidation zone in the subsurface;

providing an extraction well; and

inducing the flow of contaminant toward the extraction well to establish an extraction zone,

wherein the oxidation zone and the extraction zone lie within the remediation zone, and the oxidation zone prevents spread of the contaminant beyond the remediation zone.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein the contaminant migrates downgradient along streamlines that pass through the contaminated site and wherein the oxidation zone intercepts the streamlines that pass through the contaminated site.

5. The method of claim 3, wherein the oxidant is introduced into the subsurface at an injection locus, and wherein the injection locus is the extraction well.

6. The method of claim 3, wherein the oxidant is introduced into the subsurface in an injection well, and wherein a plurality of extraction wells surrounds the injection well.

7. The method of claim 3, wherein the oxidant is introduced into the subsurface through a plurality of injection wells, and wherein the plurality of injection wells surrounds the extraction well.

8. The method of claim 3, wherein the surfactant is injected through a well upgradient of the contaminated site.

9. The method of claim 1, further comprising introducing an iron nanoparticle into the subsurface.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein the surfactant is a biodegradable surfactant, is a naturally occurring plant extract, or is made from a naturally occurring plant extract.

11. The method of claim 1, further comprising introducing a base selected from the group consisting of sodium hydroxide, alkali carbonate, alkali bicarbonate, and sodium bicarbonate into the subsurface.

12. The method of claim 1, comprising introducing a chelated metal activator into the subsurface.

13. The method of claim 12, wherein the chelated metal activator is selected from the group consisted of a chelated iron activator, Fe-NTA (iron-nitrilotriacetic acid), Fe(II)-EDTA (iron II-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid), Fe(III)-EDTA (iron III-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid), Fe(II)-citric acid, Fe(III)-citric acid, Fe(II)-EDDS (iron II-ethylenediaminedisuccinic acid), Fe(III)-EDDS (iron III-ethylenediaminedisuccinic acid), Fe(II)-DTPA (iron(II)-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid), Fe(III)-DPTA (iron(III)-diethlyenetriaminepentaacetic acid), and combinations.

14. The method of claim 1, wherein the introduction of the oxidant and the surfactant and the extraction of the contaminant produced simultaneously.

15. The method of claim 1, wherein a mixture in the subsurface comprising the contaminant and the surfactant has an interfacial tension of at least the interfacial tension associated with the critical micelle concentration of the surfactant.

16. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

allowing the surfactant to solubilize and/or desorb contaminant; and

allowing the oxidant to oxidize contaminant,

wherein an overall rate of oxidation of contaminant is controlled to a predetermined value and an overall rate of solubilization of contaminant is controlled to a predetermined value by selecting the oxidant and surfactant and adjusting the concentrations of oxidant and surfactant, so that the rate of oxidation of contaminant is greater than, less than, or equal to the rate of solubilization of contaminant.

17. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

obtaining a sample from the contaminated site or composing a simulated or analogous sample;

testing the sample with various concentrations of oxidant and surfactant under various conditions of temperature, pressure, and flow rate of oxidant and surfactant;

determining the rate of mobilization of the contaminant under the various conditions; and

selecting optimum oxidant and surfactant for introduction into the subsurface, optimum concentrations of oxidant and surfactant for injection into the subsurface, and optimum temperature, pressure, and flow rate conditions for decreasing the amount of contaminant and the site of the subsurface.

18. The method of claim 1, wherein the oxidant comprises a peroxide or hydrogen peroxide.

19. The method of claim 1, wherein the surfactant is a non-ionic surfactant.

20. The method of claim 1, comprising introducing an activator.

21. The method of claim 1, wherein the surfactant has a hydrophilic-lipophilic balance (HLB) value within the range of between 10 and 15.

22. The method of claim 21, wherein the surfactant has an HLB value within the range of 10 to 12.

23. The method of claim 21, wherein the surfactant has an HLB value within the range of 12 to 15.

24. The method of claim 1, comprising the step of introducing an iron nanoparticle into the subsurface.

25. A method for decreasing an amount of a contaminant at a site in a subsurface, wherein at least a portion of the contaminant is non-aqueous phase liquid (NAPL), comprising:

introducing an oxidant prior to or simultaneously with a surfactant into the subsurface;

generating gaseous oxygen in the subsurface in the form of bubbles by decomposition of the oxidant;

allowing the oxygen bubbles to hydrodynamically scrub soil particles in the subsurface sufficient to release contaminant from the soil particles and form extractable contaminant in the subsurface;

extracting extractable contaminant from the subsurface;

wherein the oxidant is a gas phase generating oxidant;

and wherein the extracting of NAPL contaminant reduces the amount of the contaminant in the subsurface.

26. The method of claim 25, wherein the surfactant has a hydrophilic-lipophilic balance (HLB) value within the range of between 10 and 15.

27. The method of claim 26, wherein the surfactant has an HLB value within the range of 10 to 12.

28. The method of claim 26, wherein the surfactant has an HLB value within the range of 12 to 15.

29. The method of claim 25, comprising the step of introducing an iron nanoparticle into the subsurface.

30. A method for decreasing an amount of a contaminant at a site in a subsurface, wherein at least a portion of the contaminant is extractable, comprising:

introducing an oxidant prior to or simultaneously with a surfactant into the subsurface;

introducing an antioxidant into the subsurface;

extracting extractable contaminant from the subsurface;

characterizing the amount and/or distribution of contaminant in the subsurface;

wherein the extracting of contaminant and the introducing of oxidant and surfactant reduces the amount of the contaminant.

31. The method of claim 30, wherein the surfactant has a hydrophilic-lipophilic balance (HLB) value within the range of between approximately 10 and approximately 15.

32. The method of claim 31, wherein the surfactant has an HLB value within the range of approximately 10 to approximately 12.

33. The method of claim 31, wherein the surfactant has an HLB value within the range of approximately 12 to approximately 15.