Method for mixed biomass hydrolysis

• US 9,920,389 B2
• Filed: 10/26/2015
• Issued: 03/20/2018
• Est. Priority Date: 04/22/2014
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Renmatix, Inc.
• Original Assignee: Renmatix, Inc.
• Inventors: Colakyan, Manuk, Jara-Moreno, Rory Hernan
• Primary Examiner(s): CALL, DOUGLAS BRYANT
• Application Number:
  US14/922,483
• Publication Number:
  US 20160040259A1
• Time in Patent Office: 876 Days
• CPC Class Codes: C13K 13/002 Xylose

Abstract

Methods and systems are disclosed for the hydrolysis of mixed biomass. The methods include forming a mixture of at least two modified biomass feedstocks to achieve various benefits, such as maximizing sugar yields and minimizing the formation of degradation products.

Claims

1. A hydrolysis method comprising:

(1) providing at least two modified biomass feedstocks comprising;

(a) from greater than 0 wt % to less than 100 wt % of a first modified biomass feedstock exhibiting a maximum hydrolysis yield at time X, when subjected to a first condition; and

(b) from greater than 0 wt % to less than 100 wt % of a second modified biomass feedstock exhibiting a maximum hydrolysis yield at time Y, when subjected to the first condition;

wherein;

the second modified biomass feedstock is different from the first modified biomass feedstock;

time X is less than or equal to time Y;

and time X and time Y differ by at least about 10% of time X;

and

(2) subjecting a mixture of the first modified biomass feedstock and the second modified biomass feedstock to the first condition to achieve a maximum hydrolysis yield at time Z, wherein time Z is less than time Y;

wherein;

the hydrolysis method is performed at a pH of at least 2.2;

all weight percent values are on a dry basis and are based on the total weight of the at least two modified biomass feedstocks;

the maximum hydrolysis yields at times X, Y, and Z are for total hemicellulosic sugars; and

when a maximum hydrolysis yield for total hemicellulosic sugars is measured for a 50/50 wt. % mixture of the first and second modified biomasses, the maximum hydrolysis yield for total hemicellulosic sugars for the 50/50 wt. % mixture is higher than an average of the maximum hydrolysis yields for total hemicellulosic sugars at times X and Y.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the second modified biomass feedstock is different from the first modified biomass feedstock by a difference selected from the group consisting of compositional proportions, biomass type, hemicellulose structure, and any combination thereof.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the second modified biomass feedstock is a different biomass species from the first modified biomass feedstock, and the biomass species of the first and second modified biomass feedstocks is independently selected from the group consisting of balsam, sugar cane bagasse, palm trees, bamboo, palm empty fruit bunches, palm fruit fronds, rice husks, loblolly pine, black ash, basswood, red oak, paper birch, red maple, sugar maple, balm poplar, eucalyptus, hybrid poplar, monterey pine, switchgrass, wheat straw, yellow poplar, and any combination thereof.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the hydrolysis method is performed at a pH of at least 3.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein

(a) the first modified biomass feedstock is prepared by a first treatment;

and

(b) the second modified biomass feedstock is prepared by a second treatment;

wherein the first and second treatments independently are selected from the group consisting of size reduction, explosive decompression, ammonia explosion, enzymatic treatment, acid treatment, base treatment, hydrothermal treatment, biological treatment, catalytic treatment, non-catalytic treatment, and any combination thereof; and

wherein the first treatment is the same or different than the second treatment.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein at least one of the first and the second treatments is size reduction, and wherein the average equivalent spherical diameter of at least one of the first and second modified biomass feedstocks is less than about 60 mm.

7. The method of claim 5, wherein the first and the second treatment are size reduction, and wherein the second modified biomass feedstock has an average equivalent spherical diameter of less than about 80% of an average equivalent spherical diameter of the first modified biomass feedstock.

8. The method of claim 5, wherein at least one of the first and second treatments is explosive decompression.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein time Z is less than about 90% of time Y.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein when the maximum hydrolysis yield for total hemicellulosic sugars is measured for the 50/50 wt. % mixture, the maximum hydrolysis yield for total hemicellulosic sugars for the 50/50 wt. % mixture is at least 3% higher than the average of the maximum hydrolysis yields for total hemicellulosic sugars at times X and Y.

11. The method of claim 1, wherein when the maximum hydrolysis yield for total hemicellulosic sugars is measured for the 50/50 wt. % mixture, the maximum hydrolysis yield for total hemicellulosic sugars for the 50/50 wt. % mixture is achieved at a time that is less than an average of time X and time Y.

12. The method of claim 1, wherein a first degradation yield of a degradation product at time Z achieved in the subjecting the mixture to the first condition is lower than at least one of (1) a second degradation yield of the degradation product of the first modified biomass feedstock at time X, when subjected to the first condition, and (2) a third degradation yield of the degradation product of the second modified biomass feedstock at time Y, when subjected to the first condition;

and

optionally, wherein the degradation product is furfural.

13. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

preparing the first modified biomass feedstock with a first treatment; and

preparing the second modified biomass feedstock with a second treatment;

wherein the first and second treatments independently are selected from the group consisting of size reduction, explosive decompression, ammonia explosion, enzymatic treatment, acid treatment, base treatment, hydrothermal treatment, biological treatment, catalytic treatment, non-catalytic treatment, and any combination thereof; and

wherein the first treatment is the same or different than the second treatment.

14. The method of claim 1, wherein the first condition is sub-critical fluid extraction, near-critical fluid extraction, or supercritical fluid extraction, and wherein the extraction fluid is selected from the group consisting of water, carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide, methanol, ethanol, and any combination thereof.

15. The method of claim 1, wherein time X and time Y differ by less than or equal to about 150% of time X.

16. The method of claim 1, wherein the first condition is sub-critical fluid extraction, near-critical fluid extraction, or supercritical fluid extraction, and the sub-critical fluid extraction, near-critical fluid extraction, or supercritical fluid extraction does not comprise exogenous acid.

17. The method of claim 1, wherein the total hemicellulosic sugars is total xylose, wherein the total xylose is a sum of xylose monomer and xylose oligo-saccharide expressed as its equivalent mass as xylose.

18. The method of claim 1, wherein the total hemicellulosic sugars comprise mannose.

19. The method of claim 1, wherein the first condition is sub-critical fluid extraction, near-critical fluid extraction, or supercritical fluid extraction;

and

wherein the sub-critical fluid extraction, near-critical fluid extraction, or supercritical fluid extraction employs an extraction fluid consisting essentially of water.

20. The method of claim 1, wherein the first condition is sub-critical fluid extraction, near-critical fluid extraction, or supercritical fluid extraction;

and

wherein the sub-critical fluid extraction, near-critical fluid extraction, or supercritical fluid extraction is performed for a residence time of 60 min to about 300 min.