Computer-aided multiple standard-based functional evaluation and medical reporting system

• US 9,940,437 B2
• Filed: 07/26/2010
• Issued: 04/10/2018
• Est. Priority Date: 07/26/2010
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Michael Chillemi
• Original Assignee: Michael Chillemi
• Inventors: Chillemi, Michael
• Primary Examiner(s): Nguyen, Tran N
• Application Number:
  US12/804,646
• Publication Number:
  US 20120022884A1
• Time in Patent Office: 2,815 Days
• Field of Search: 705 2
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 2560/0223 of calibration, e.g. protocols for calibrating sensors
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 5/1075 for measuring dimensions by non-invasive methods, e.g. for determining thickness of tissue layer A61B8/0858 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 5/1121 Determining geometric values, e.g. centre of rotation or angular range of movement
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 5/4566 Evaluating the spine A61B5/4561 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 5/4576 Evaluating the shoulder
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 5/458 Evaluating the elbow
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 5/743 Displaying an image simultaneously with additional graphical information, e.g. symbols, charts, function plots
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 5/7435 Displaying user selection data, e.g. icons in a graphical user interface
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 3/048 Interaction techniques based on graphical user interfaces [GUI]
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 15/00 ICT specially adapted for medical reports, e.g. generation or transmission thereof
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 40/63 for local operation
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 50/30 for calculating health indices; for individual health risk assessment

Abstract

A method of performing an objective functional evaluation of a person'"'"'s physical capacity comprises of a computer program particularly designed to amass and assess test data in accordance with a selected standard. A wide variety of evaluation protocols are incorporated to lead an operator in a step-by-step process. The method includes special testing tools, many of which have been modified to input data directly into the computer diagnostic program. The interface may be a wired or a wireless connection. The software program may use an algorithm to calculate a coefficient of variation for the multiple trials of a test, using the entered data, to providing a determination of validity of the trials. A second algorithm calculates an average result of the condition-specific protocol of tests, after which the software program correlates those average results to a database of normative standards to compute an impairment rating.

Claims

1. A method for displaying assessment information relating to and facilitating determining one or more functional abilities of a patient being determined in a functional evaluation using a plurality of specialized measurement devices and a computer system with displaying of measurements from three successive test trials out of a maximum of six total trials on a graphical user interface, the method comprising:

dynamically displaying each measurements in a respective plurality of locations in a measurement display region, each location in the measurement display region corresponding to the measurements taken in three successive test trials for the left and right sides of the patient, the three measurements representing strength or range of motion measurements associated with at least one protocol of tests to assess the one or more current functional abilities of the patient during the functional evaluation;

dynamically displaying a respective coefficient of variation in a plurality of locations in a test results display region, each location in the test results display region corresponding to a coefficient of variation for the left side of the patient and the right side of the patient, the coefficient of variation representing test validity of the three successive test trials out of the maximum of six total trials for each of the left side and right side of the patient;

displaying the measurement display region and the test results display region in relation to each other, positioned below a measurement graph displaying taking of each measurement, such that when there is a deficiency between the right and left sides, a percentage of deficiency is displayed on the deficient left side or right side; and

immediately stopping the functional evaluation when the coefficient of variation for the left side or the right side is above a threshold amount;

displaying a test protocol selection graphical user interface comprising a pictorial image of a front side and a back side of a human body for identifying a plurality of body regions, each of said plurality of body regions being selectable for said functional evaluation; and

associating a respective protocol of tests with each body region of the plurality of body regions; and

in response to a selection of one or more of the body regions by a single action of a user input device, displaying of the respective protocol of tests for each of the selected one or more body regions, and providing instructions in an instructions graphical user interface for completing the respective protocol of tests for said functional evaluation.

2. The method of claim 1 further comprising displaying said coefficient of variation using a median of the displayed measurements from the three successive test trials as a comparison value.

3. The method of claim 1 further comprising displaying said coefficient of variation using a mean of the displayed measurements from the three successive test trials as a comparison value.

4. The method of claim 1 further comprising displaying said coefficient of variation using a largest of the displayed measurements from the three successive test trials as a comparison value.

5. The method of claims 2, 3, or 4 further comprising displaying an impairment rating based on the measurements of the associated protocols of tests, by correlating an average of the displayed measurements to a database of population normative standards, when the coefficient of variation for the left side and the right side are each below the threshold amount.

6. The method of claim 5 further comprising displaying a color-coded bar chart identifying functional loss experienced by the patient, by arranging each comparison value with a respective one of the population normative standards, for each of the associated protocols of tests.

7. The method of claim 6 further comprising generating a printed report of the assessment information.