Collaborative threat assessment

• US 9,947,199 B2
• Filed: 06/19/2014
• Issued: 04/17/2018
• Est. Priority Date: 06/19/2014
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Original Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Inventors: Mittal, Vani, Ponniah, Anbumunee
• Primary Examiner(s): YANG, JAMES J
• Application Number:
  US14/309,020
• Publication Number:
  US 20150371518A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,398 Days
• CPC Class Codes: G08B 21/02 Alarms for ensuring the safety of persons
• CPC Class Codes: G08B 21/182 Level alarms, e.g. alarms responsive to variables exceeding a threshold

Abstract

One or more processors determine whether a hazard that is detected by a first mobile device exists based on data received from at least one second mobile device. The second mobile device is within a proximity to the first mobile device, which is determined based on a type of the hazard. One or more processors respond to a determination that the hazard does exist by determining a course of action. The course of action is configured for a user based on at least one attribute of the user. One or more processors send the course of action to the first mobile device.

Claims

1. A method to recommend a course of action to a user, the method comprising:

determining, by one or more processors, that a hazard is indicated by a first mobile computing device that is associated with a user;

determining, by the one or more processors, a proximity respective to the first mobile computing device that is based on a type of the hazard;

identifying, by the one or more processors, at least one second mobile computing device that is within the proximity to the first mobile computing device;

sending, by the one or more processors, a query regarding the hazard to the at least one second mobile computing device;

receiving, by the one or more processors, a query response regarding the hazard from the at least one second mobile computing device;

responsive to receiving the query response regarding the hazard, determining, by one or more processors, a course of action, wherein the course of action is configured for one or both of (i) the first mobile computing device and (ii) for the user based, at least in part, on at least one attribute of the user; and

sending, by one or more processors, the course of action to the first mobile computing device.

2. The method of claim 1, the method further comprising:

determining, by one or more processors, that the hazard that is indicated by a first mobile computing device likely exists based, at least in part, on details of the hazard that are retrieved from a data store.

3. The method of claim 1, the method further comprising:

determining, by one or more processors, that the hazard that is indicated by a first mobile computing device likely exists based, at least in part, on one or more of a profile of the user, sensor data from one or more sensors of the first mobile computing device, and one or more rules created by the user.

4. The method of claim 3, the method further comprising:

responsive to a signal from the first mobile computing device that indicates that a first level of assessment has determined that the hazard likely exists, initiating, by the one or more processors, a second level of assessment that is configured to confirm whether the hazard exists, wherein the first mobile computing device is configured to (i) perform the first level of assessment to determine whether a hazard likely exists and to (ii) send the signal that initiates the second level of assessment in response to a determination by the first level of assessment that the hazard likely exists.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein determining, by one or more processors, a course of action further comprises:

retrieving, by one or more processors, information from a data store; and

determining, by the one or more processors, the course of action by using at least a portion of the information as one or more variables in a rule that dictates, at least in part, a course of action to be recommended to the user, wherein the information includes one or more of (i) an indication of an ability of the user and (ii) a preference stored in a profile of the user.

6. The method of claim 1, the method further comprising:

responsive to a query response regarding the hazard that indicates that the hazard does not exist, configuring, by the one or more processors, the course of action to initiate a calibration of one or more sensors of the first mobile computing device based, at least in part, on a historical record of sensor data that yielded a false positive identification of the hazard.

7. The method of claim 1, the method further comprising:

sending, by one or more processors, a query for data regarding the hazard to the at least one second mobile computing device in response to receiving a signal from the first mobile computing device that indicates the hazard likely exists.

8. A computer program product to recommend a course of action to a user, the computer program product comprising:

one or more computer-readable storage media and program instructions stored on the one or more computer-readable storage media, the program instructions comprising;

program instructions to determine that a hazard is indicated by a first mobile computing device that is associated with a user;

program instructions to determine a proximity respective to the first mobile computing device that is based on a type of the hazard;

program instructions to identify at least one second mobile computing device that is within the proximity to the first mobile computing device;

program instructions to send a query regarding the hazard to the at least one second mobile computing device;

receiving, by the one or more processors, a query response regarding the hazard from the at least one second mobile computing device;

program instructions to respond to receiving the query response regarding the hazard by determining a course of action, wherein the course of action is configured for one or both of (i) the first mobile computing device and (ii) for the user based, at least in part, on at least one attribute of the user; and

program instructions to send the course of action to the first mobile computing device.

9. The computer program product of claim 8, the program instructions further comprising:

program instructions to determine that the hazard that is indicated by a first mobile computing device likely exists based, at least in part, on details of the hazard that are retrieved from a data store.

10. The computer program product of claim 8, the program instructions further comprising:

program instructions to determine that the hazard that is indicated by a first mobile computing device likely exists based, at least in part, on one or more of a profile of the user, sensor data from one or more sensors of the first mobile computing device, and one or more rules created by the user.

11. The computer program product of claim 10, the program instructions further comprising:

program instructions to respond to a signal from the first mobile computing device that indicates that a first level of assessment has determined that the hazard likely exists by initiating a second level of assessment that is configured to confirm whether the hazard exists, wherein the first mobile computing device is configured to (i) perform the first level of assessment to determine whether a hazard likely exists and to (ii) send the signal that initiates the second level of assessment in response to a determination by the first level of assessment that indicates that the hazard likely exists.

12. The computer program product of claim 8, wherein program instructions to determine a course of action further comprises:

program instructions to retrieve information from a data store; and

program instructions to determine the course of action by using at least a portion of the information as one or more variables in a rule that dictates, at least in part, a course of action to be recommended to the user, wherein the information includes one or more of (i) an indication of an ability of the user and (ii) a preference stored in a profile of the user.

13. The computer program product of claim 8, the program instructions further comprising:

program instructions to respond to a query response regarding the hazard that indicates that the hazard does not exist by configuring the course of action to initiate a calibration of one or more sensors of the first mobile computing device based, at least in part, on a historical record of sensor data that yielded a false positive identification of the hazard.

14. The computer program product of claim 11, the program instructions further comprising:

program instructions to send a query for data regarding the hazard to the at least one second mobile computing device in response to a signal from the first computing mobile device that indicates the hazard likely exists.

15. A computer system to recommend a course of action to a user, the computer system comprising:

one or more computer processors;

one or more computer readable storage medium;

program instructions stored on the computer readable storage medium for execution by at least one of the one or more processors, the program instructions comprising;

program instructions to determine that a hazard is indicated by a first mobile computing device that is associated with a user;

program instructions to determine a proximity respective to the first mobile computing device that is based on a type of the hazard;

program instructions to identify at least one second mobile computing device that is within the proximity to the first mobile computing device;

program instructions to send a query regarding the hazard to the at least one second mobile computing device;

receiving, by the one or more processors, a query response regarding the hazard from the at least one second mobile computing device;

program instructions to respond to receiving the query response regarding the hazard by determining a course of action, wherein the course of action is configured for one or both of (i) the first mobile computing device and (ii) for the user based, at least in part, on at least one attribute of the user; and

program instructions to send the course of action to the first mobile computing device.

16. The computer system of claim 15, the program instructions further comprising:

program instructions to determine that the hazard that is indicated by a first mobile computing device likely exists based, at least in part, on details of the hazard that are retrieved from a data store.

17. The computer system of claim 15, the program instructions further comprising:

program instructions to determine that the hazard that is indicated by a first mobile computing device likely exists based, at least in part, on one or more of a profile of the user, sensor data from one or more sensors of the first mobile computing device, and one or more rules created by the user.

18. The computer system of claim 17, the program instructions further comprising:

program instructions to respond to a signal from the first mobile computing device that indicates that a first level of assessment has determined that the hazard likely exists by initiating a second level of assessment that is configured to confirm whether the hazard exists, wherein the first mobile computing device is configured to (i) perform the first level of assessment to determine whether a hazard likely exists and to (ii) send the signal that initiates the second level of assessment in response to a determination by the first level of assessment that indicates that the hazard likely exists.

19. The computer system of claim 15, wherein program instructions to determine a course of action further comprises:

program instructions to retrieve information from a data store; and

program instructions to determine the course of action by using at least a portion of the information as one or more variables in a rule that dictates, at least in part, a course of action to be recommended to the user, wherein the information includes one or more of (i) an indication of an ability of the user and (ii) a preference stored in a profile of the user.

20. The computer system of claim 15, the program instructions further comprising:

program instructions to respond to a query response regarding the hazard that indicates that the hazard does not exist by configuring the course of action to initiate a calibration of one or more sensors of the first mobile computing device based, at least in part, on a historical record of sensor data that yielded a false positive identification of the hazard.