Method, system, and computer program product for determining a patient radiation and diagnostic study score

• US 9,974,512 B2
• Filed: 03/09/2015
• Issued: 05/22/2018
• Est. Priority Date: 03/13/2014
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Clinicentric LLC
• Original Assignee: Convergence Medical, LLC
• Inventors: Huizenga, James, Breneman, Brian C., Huizenga, Kathleen
• Primary Examiner(s): NEGIN, RUSSELL SCOTT
• Application Number:
  US14/641,463
• Publication Number:
  US 20150317443A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,170 Days
• Field of Search: None
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 6/032 Transmission computed tomography [CT]
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 6/5294 involving using additional data, e.g. patient information, image labeling, acquisition parameters
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 6/542 involving control of exposure
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 20/40 relating to mechanical, radiation or invasive therapies, e.g. surgery, laser therapy, dialysis or acupuncture
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 50/20 for computer-aided diagnosis, e.g. based on medical expert systems
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 50/30 for calculating health indices; for individual health risk assessment
• CPC Class Codes: G16Z 99/00 Subject matter not provided for in other main groups of this subclass

Abstract

A method for determining a patient radiation and diagnostic study score associated with past diagnostic radiologic tests. In light of the obvious benefits of diagnostic radiology, the risks inherent in its use are often overlooked. Ionizing radiation, which is a component of much, but not all, diagnostic radiology, carries with it a small risk of inducing cancer every time it is used. This additional risk, known as “Lifetime Attributable Risk,” is layered on top of an individual'"'"'s lifetime base risk of invasive cancer. The present method for determining a patient radiation and diagnostic study score provides right time, right place, and right format radiology information to assist providers in their medical decision-making. With greater awareness of recent study history, and individually contextualized risk and benefit considerations, providers are more likely to decrease their overall usage of diagnostic radiology and better counsel their patients on future risk.

Claims

1. A method for determining a patient radiation and diagnostic study score (10) associated with a series of past diagnostic radiologic tests associated with a patient, and treating the patient to manage the risk of cancer associated with future radiologic testing, comprising the steps of:

a) accessing, by at least one score processor, a database (100) and retrieving data indicative of a plurality of a patient'"'"'s past radiologic tests (200) during a scoring period, wherein the plurality of past radiologic tests (200) includes at least two different tests;

b) associating, by the at least one score processor, a measure of ionizing radiation with each of the plurality of the patient'"'"'s past radiologic tests (200) from the scoring period;

c) forming, by the at least one score processor, a lifetime attributable risk (400) for each of the plurality of the patient'"'"'s past radiologic tests (200) from the scoring period, and creating a total lifetime attributable risk (400) for the scoring period;

d) transforming, by the at least one score processor, the total lifetime attributable risk (400) for the scoring period into a scaled lifetime attributable risk (410) for the scoring period by comparing the total lifetime attributable risk (400) for the scoring period with general population radiologic test data, wherein the scaled lifetime attributable risk (410) indicates a measure of the total lifetime attributable risk (400) relative to the general population, further including the step of scaling the general population radiologic test data so that the total lifetime attributable risk (400) of approximately unity is associated with a predetermined scaled lifetime attributable risk (410);

e) creating, by the at least one score processor, the patient radiation and diagnostic study score (10) from the scaled lifetime attributable risk (410) to display on a visual media; and

f) treating the patient and directing future radiologic testing at least in part on the patient radiation and diagnostic study score (10).

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of forming the lifetime attributable risk (400) for each of the patient'"'"'s past radiologic tests (200) within the scoring period is further modified by an age adjustment factor (300), wherein the at least one score processor determines the age adjustment factor (300) by analyzing a patient birth date retrieved from the database (100) and a radiologic test date for each radiologic test (200) retrieved from the database (100), and wherein the at least one score processor scales the measure of ionizing radiation for each radiologic test (200) by the age adjustment factor (300) for each radiologic test (200) to form the lifetime attributable risk (400) for each radiologic test (200).

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the predetermined scaled lifetime attributable risk (410) associated with the total lifetime attributable risk (400) of approximately unity is approximately 50.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of creating, by the at least one score processor, the patient radiation and diagnostic study score (10) from the scaled lifetime attributable risk (410) to display on a visual media, further includes the step of determining a recent study indicator (500) indicative of the number of radiologic tests (200) performed within a recent indicator time period (510) of no more than one year and including the recent study indicator (500) as a single digit in the patient radiation and diagnostic study score (10).

5. The method of claim 4, further including the steps of creating, by the at least one score processor, an indicator alert if the patient has the recent study indicator (500) is above a predetermined recent study alert value (520), and treating the patient and directing future radiologic testing at least in part on the indicator alert.

6. The method of claim 1, further including the steps of creating, by the at least one score processor, a score alert if the patient has the radiation and diagnostic study score (10) is above a predetermined score alert value (600), and treating the patient and directing future radiologic testing at least in part on the score alert.

7. A method for determining a patient radiation and diagnostic study score (10) associated with a series of past diagnostic radiologic tests associated with a patient, comprising the steps of:

a) accessing, by at least one score processor, a database (100) and retrieving data indicative of a plurality of a patient'"'"'s past radiologic tests (200) during a scoring period, wherein the plurality of past radiologic tests (200) includes at least two different tests;

b) associating, by the at least one score processor, a previous study factor (800) for each radiologic test (200) from the scoring period that has been performed 2 or more times;

c) associating, by the at least one score processor, a time decay element (900) for each radiologic test (200) from the scoring period that has been performed 2 or more times;

d) forming, by the at least one score processor, a test specific usage metric (1000) for each of the patient'"'"'s past radiologic tests (200) from the scoring period wherein the at least one score processor scales the previous study factor (800) for each radiologic test (200) by the time decay element (900) for each radiologic test (200) to form the test specific usage metric (1000) for each radiologic test (200), and using the test specific usage metric (1000) for each radiologic test (200) to create a total usage metric (1000) for the scoring period;

e) transforming, by the at least one score processor, the total usage metric (1000) for the scoring period into a scaled usage metric (1010) for the scoring period by comparing the total usage metric (1000) for the scoring period with general population radiologic test data, wherein the scaled usage metric (1010) indicates a measure of the total usage metric (1000) relative to the general population;

f) creating, by the at least one score processor, the patient radiation and diagnostic study score (10) from the scaled usage metric (1010) to display on a visual media; and

g) treating the patient and directing future radiologic testing at least in part on the patient radiation and diagnostic study score (10) to manage the risk of cancer associated with radiologic tests.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein the step of creating, by the at least one score processor, the patient radiation and diagnostic study score (10) from the scaled usage metric (1010) to display on the visual media, further includes the step of determining a recent study indicator (500) indicative of the number of radiologic tests (200) performed within a recent indicator time period (510) of less than one year and including the recent study indicator (500) as a single digit in the patient radiation and diagnostic study score (10).

9. A method for determining a patient radiation and diagnostic study score (10) associated with a series of past diagnostic radiologic tests associated with a patient, comprising the steps of:

a) accessing, by at least one score processor, a database (100) and retrieving data indicative of a patient'"'"'s past radiologic tests (200) during a scoring period;

b) associating, by the at least one score processor, a measure of ionizing radiation with each of the patient'"'"'s past radiologic tests (200) from the scoring period;

c) associating, by the at least one score processor, a previous study factor (800) for each radiologic test (200) from the scoring period that has been performed 2 or more times;

d) associating, by the at least one score processor, a time decay element (900) for each radiologic test (200) from the scoring period that has been performed 2 or more times;

e) forming, by the at least one score processor, a lifetime attributable risk (400) for each of the patient'"'"'s past radiologic tests (200) from the scoring period, and creating a total lifetime attributable risk (400) for the scoring period;

f) forming, by the at least one score processor, a test specific usage metric (1000) for each of the patient'"'"'s past radiologic tests (200) from the scoring period wherein the at least one score processor scales the previous study factor (800) for each radiologic test (200) by the time decay element (900) for each radiologic test (200) to form the test specific usage metric (1000) for each radiologic test (200), and using the test specific usage metric (1000) for each radiologic test (200) to create a total usage metric (1000) for the scoring period;

g) transforming, by the at least one score processor, the total lifetime attributable risk (400) for the scoring period into a scaled lifetime attributable risk (410) for the scoring period by comparing the total lifetime attributable risk (400) for the scoring period with general population radiologic test data, wherein the scaled lifetime attributable risk (410) indicates a measure of the total lifetime attributable risk (400) relative to the general population;

h) transforming, by the at least one score processor, the total usage metric (1000) for the scoring period into a scaled usage metric (1010) for the scoring period by comparing the total usage metric (1000) for the scoring period with general population radiologic test data, wherein the scaled usage metric (1010) indicates a measure of the total usage metric (1000) relative to the general population;

i) creating, by the at least one score processor, the patient radiation and diagnostic study score (10) from the (i) the product of the scaled lifetime attributable risk (410) and a scaled LAR weighting factor (420), and (ii) the product of the scaled usage metric (1010) and a scaled usage weighting factor (1020), and displaying the patient radiation and diagnostic study score (10) on a visual media; and

j) treating the patient and directing future radiologic testing at least in part on the patient radiation and diagnostic study score (10) to manage the risk of cancer associated with radiologic tests.

10. The method of claim 9, wherein the scaled LAR weighting factor (420) ranges from 0.0 to 1.0, the scaled usage weighting factor (1020) ranges from 0.0 to 1.0, and the sum of the scaled LAR weighting factor (420) and the scaled usage weighting factor (1020) is 1.0.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein the scaled LAR weighting factor (420) ranges from 0.2 to 0.8, the scaled usage weighting factor (1020) ranges from 0.2 to 0.8, and the sum of the scaled LAR weighting factor (420) and the scaled usage weighting factor (1020) is 1.0.

12. The method of claim 9, wherein the step of forming the lifetime attributable risk (400) for each of the patient'"'"'s past radiologic tests (200) within the scoring period is further modified by an age adjustment factor (300), wherein the at least one score processor determines the age adjustment factor (300) by analyzing a patient birth date retrieved from the database (100) and a radiologic test date for each radiologic test (200) retrieved from the database (100), and wherein the at least one score processor scales the measure of ionizing radiation for each radiologic test (200) by the age adjustment factor (300) for each radiologic test (200) to form the lifetime attributable risk (400) for each radiologic test (200).

13. The method of claim 9, further including the steps of:

a) associating, by the at least one score processor, a resolution metric (1100) with at least each of the patient'"'"'s past radiologic tests (200) that are not associated with ionizing radiation, from the scoring period, and using each test specific resolution metric (1100) to create a total resolution metric (1100) for the scoring period;

b) transforming, by the at least one score processor, the total resolution metric (1100) for the scoring period into a scaled resolution metric (1110) for the scoring period by comparing the total resolution metric (1100) for the scoring period with general population radiologic test data, wherein the scaled resolution metric (1110) indicates a measure of the total resolution metric (1100) relative to the general population; and

c) creating, by the at least one score processor, the patient radiation and diagnostic study score (10) from (i) the product of the scaled lifetime attributable risk (410) and the scaled LAR weighting factor (420), (ii) the product of the scaled usage metric (1010) and the scaled usage weighting factor (1020), and (iii) the product of the scaled resolution metric (1110) and a scaled resolution weighting factor (1120), and displaying the patient radiation and diagnostic study score (10) on the visual media.

14. The method of claim 13, wherein the scaled LAR weighting factor (420) ranges from 0.0 to 1.0, the scaled usage weighting factor (1020) ranges from 0.0 to 1.0, the scale resolution weighting factor ranges from 0.0 to 1.0, and the sum of the scaled LAR weighting factor (420), the scaled usage weighting factor (1020), and scaled resolution weighting factor (1120) is 1.0.

15. The method of claim 14, wherein the scaled LAR weighting factor (420) ranges from 0.5 to 0.9, the scaled usage weighting factor (1020) is less than 0.5, the scaled resolution weighting factor (1120) is less than 0.5, and the sum of the scaled LAR weighting factor (420), the scaled usage weighting factor (1020), and scaled resolution weighting factor (1120) is 1.0.