Method and apparatus for visualizing crime deterrent effects

• US 10,048,918 B2
• Filed: 07/07/2016
• Issued: 08/14/2018
• Est. Priority Date: 07/07/2016
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Motorola Solutions, Inc.
• Original Assignee: Motorola Solutions, Inc.
• Inventors: Oyenan, Walamitien H, Fang, Zheng, Jiao, Huitian, Lin, Wei
• Primary Examiner(s): Caschera, Antonio A
• Application Number:
  US15/203,965
• Publication Number:
  US 20180011670A1
• Time in Patent Office: 768 Days
• CPC Class Codes: G01C 21/3461 Preferred or disfavoured areas, e.g. dangerous zones, toll or emission zones, intersections, manoeuvre types, segments such as motorways, toll roads, ferries
• CPC Class Codes: G01C 21/367 Details, e.g. road map scale, orientation, zooming, illumination, level of detail, scrolling of road map or positioning of current position marker
• CPC Class Codes: G01C 21/3676 Overview of the route on the road map
• CPC Class Codes: G01C 21/3697 Output of additional, non-guidance related information, e.g. low fuel level G01C21/3679 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/29 Geographical information databases
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/444 Spatial browsing, e.g. 2D maps, 3D or virtual spaces
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 3/14 Digital output to display device ; Cooperation and interconnection of the display device with other functional units
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06 Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 50/18 Legal services
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 50/26 Government or public services business processes related to the transportation industry G06Q50/40
• CPC Class Codes: G06T 11/001 Texturing; Colouring; Generation of texture or colour inpainting G06T5/77
• CPC Class Codes: G06T 3/40 Scaling of whole images or parts thereof, e.g. expanding or contracting

Abstract

A process for displaying crime deterrent effects includes first receiving patrol route information indicating a patrol route taken by a law enforcement patrol and determining a type of the law enforcement patrol. Subsequently, a deterrent effect parameter associated with the law enforcement patrol is determined as a function of the determined type of the law enforcement patrol. Finally, an electronic display is caused to display a cartographic map of a geographic area at least partially including the patrol route taken by the law enforcement patrol and, along the patrol route taken, to display a deterrent effect indicator having a radius, width, size, and/or fade time that varies as a function of the type of the determined deterrent effect parameter.

Claims

1. A method of displaying crime deterrent effects for varying types of law enforcement patrols, the method comprising:

receiving, at a computing device, patrol route information indicating a patrol route taken by a law enforcement patrol;

determining, by the computing device, a type of the law enforcement patrol;

determining, by the computing device, as a function of the determined type of the law enforcement patrol, a deterrent effect parameter value associated with the law enforcement patrol amongst one or more other different deterrent effect parameter values associated with types of law enforcement patrol other than the determined type of the law enforcement patrol, the deterrent effect parameter value setting forth a relative measure of an amount of crime deterrence effect provided by the law enforcement patrol relative to other types of law enforcement patrols; and

causing, by the computing device, an electronic display to display a cartographic map of a geographic area at least partially including the patrol route taken by the law enforcement patrol and, along the patrol route taken, to display a deterrent effect indicator having at least one of a radius, width, size, and fade time that varies as a function of the determined deterrent effect parameter value.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the type of the law enforcement patrol is selected from a marked vehicle, an unmarked vehicle, a marked patrolman or patrolwoman, an unmarked patrolman or patrolwoman, a marked drone, and a marked helicopter.

3. The method of claim 1, further comprising retrieving, by the computing device, a deterrent effect parameter mapping that, for each of a plurality of different types of law enforcement patrols, sets forth the at least one of the radius, width, and fade time deterrent effect parameter value to be associated with the corresponding type of law enforcement patrol.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein the deterrent effect parameter mapping reflects a deterrent effect parameter value associated with a patrolman or patrolwoman type of law enforcement patrol having a higher relative crime deterrent effect than a deterrent effect parameter value associated with a vehicle type of law enforcement patrol.

5. The method of claim 3, wherein the deterrent effect parameter mapping reflects a deterrent effect parameter value associated with a marked drone type of law enforcement patrol having a lower relative crime deterrent effect than a deterrent effect parameter value associated with a patrolman or patrolwoman type of law enforcement patrol and lower than a deterrent effect parameter value associated with a the vehicle type of law enforcement patrol.

6. The method of claim 3, wherein the deterrent effect parameter mapping reflects a deterrent effect parameter values associated with marked types of law enforcement patrols having a higher relative crime deterrent effect than deterrent effect parameter values associated with unmarked types of law enforcement patrols.

7. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

receiving, at the computing device, an indication that the law enforcement patrol has changed from the determined type of the law enforcement patrol to a second type of the law enforcement patrol different from the determined type of the law enforcement patrol, and subsequently receiving second patrol route information indicating a second patrol route taken by the law enforcement patrol after having changed from the determined type of the law enforcement patrol to the second type of the law enforcement patrol; and

causing, by the computing device, the electronic display to display, along the second patrol route taken by the law enforcement patrol, a second deterrent effect indicator having at least one of a second radius, width, and fade time different from the at least one of the radius, width, and fade time of the deterrent effect indicator.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the deterrent effect indicator is a line that follows the patrol route taken by the law enforcement patrol and has a width that varies as a function of the determined deterrent effect parameter value.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein the deterrent effect indicator comprises a plurality of geometric shapes having a spacing there-between that follows the patrol route taken by the law enforcement patrol and each geometric shape having a size that varies as a function of the determined deterrent effect parameter value.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein the deterrent effect indicator is a line or a plurality of geometric shapes having a spacing there-between that follows the patrol route taken by the law enforcement patrol and having a fade time that varies as a function of the determined deterrent effect parameter value.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein the deterrent effect indicator fades steadily over the fade time and, at an end of the fade time, is no longer visible on the electronic display.

12. The method of claim 1, further comprising retrieving, by the computing device, a level of historical crime associated with an area along the patrol route taken by the law enforcement patrol, and the computing device further varying the displayed at least one of the radius, width, size, and/or fade time of the deterrent effect indicator as a function of the level of historical crime.

13. The method of claim 1, further comprising retrieving, by the computing device, a plurality of levels of historical crime associated with a plurality of areas along the patrol route taken by the law enforcement patrol, and further varying portions of the displayed at least one of the radius, width, size, and fade time of the deterrent effect indicator as a function of the level of historical crimes in each of the plurality of areas along the patrol route.

14. The method of claim 1, further comprising retrieving, by the computing device, one or more of current weather condition information, current time of day information, current day of week information, and current day of year information, and further varying the displayed at least one of the radius, width, size, and fade time of the deterrent effect indicator as a function of the one or more of current weather condition information, current time of day information, current day of week information, and current day of year information.

15. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

receiving, at the computing device, second patrol route information indicating a second patrol route taken by a second law enforcement patrol;

determining, by the computing device, a type of the second law enforcement patrol different from the type of the law enforcement patrol;

determining, by the computing device, as a function of the determined type of the second law enforcement patrol, a second deterrent effect parameter value associated with the second law enforcement patrol, the second deterrent effect parameter value different from the deterrent effect parameter value; and

causing, by the computing device, the electronic display to display, along the second patrol route taken, a second deterrent effect indicator having at least one of a second radius, width, size, and fade time that varies as a function of the type of the determined second deterrent effect parameter value, the second deterrent effect indicator different from the deterrent effect indicator.

16. The method of claim 1, wherein the cartographic map is obtained via a geographic information system (GIS).

17. A controller for causing an electronic display of crime deterrent effects for varying types of law enforcement patrols, the controller comprising:

a transceiver;

a data store; and

one or more processors configured to;

receive, via the transceiver, patrol route information indicating a patrol route taken by a law enforcement patrol;

determine a type of the law enforcement patrol;

determine, as a function of the determined type of the law enforcement patrol, a deterrent effect parameter value associated with the law enforcement patrol amongst one or more other different deterrent effect parameter values associated with types of law enforcement patrol other than the determined type of the law enforcement patrol, the deterrent effect parameter value setting forth a relative measure of an amount of crime deterrence effect provided by the determined type of law enforcement patrol relative to other types of law enforcement patrols; and

cause an electronic display to display a cartographic map of a geographic area at least partially including the patrol route taken by the law enforcement patrol and, along the patrol route taken, to display a deterrent effect indicator having at least one of a radius, width, size, and fade time that varies as a function of the determined deterrent effect parameter value.

18. The controller of claim 17, wherein the type of the law enforcement patrol is selected from a marked vehicle, an unmarked vehicle, a marked patrolman or patrolwoman, an unmarked patrolman or patrolwoman, a marked drone, and a marked helicopter.

19. The controller of claim 17, the one or more processors further configured to:

retrieve, via the data store, a deterrent effect parameter mapping that, for each of a plurality of different types of law enforcement patrols, sets forth the at least one of the radius, width, and fade time deterrent effect parameter value to be associated with the corresponding type of law enforcement patrol.

20. The controller of claim 19, wherein the deterrent effect parameter mapping reflects a deterrent effect parameter value associated with marked types of law enforcement patrols having a higher relative crime deterrent effect than deterrent effect parameters associated with unmarked types of law enforcement patrols.