Methods and systems for enabling fact reliability

• US 10,523,582 B2
• Filed: 06/22/2018
• Issued: 12/31/2019
• Est. Priority Date: 03/15/2013
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Advanced Elemental Technologies, Inc.
• Original Assignee: Advanced Elemental Technologies, Inc.
• Inventors: Shear, Victor Henry, Williams, Peter Robert, Rho, Jaisook, Redmond, Timothy St. John, Horning, James Jay
• Primary Examiner(s): Chang, Jungwon
• Application Number:
  US16/016,476
• Publication Number:
  US 20180367467A1
• Time in Patent Office: 557 Days
• Field of Search: 709224, 706 46, 706 47
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/245 Query processing
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/24575 using context
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/3329 Natural language query formulation or dialogue systems
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/338 Presentation of query results
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/951 Indexing; Web crawling techniques
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 40/00 Handling natural language data speech analysis or synthesis, speech recognition G10L
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 9/5072 Grid computing
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 47/70 Admission control; Resource allocation
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 47/83 based on usage prediction
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/10 for controlling access to devices or network resources

Abstract

Systems and methods for purposeful computing that, among other things, include a fact reliability system employing standardized and interoperably interpretable one or more fact test methods.

Claims

1. A system for enabling fact reliability using standardized and interoperably interpretable one or more test methods and fact assertion expression languages, such system comprising:

a hardware and software computing arrangement, comprising at least in part at least one hardware processor, at least one memory, and at least one communications means, for establishing an effective fact assertion platform, such platform comprising, at least in part, specifications and/or resources that enable;

providing a stakeholder hardware and software computing arrangement for creating, by a stakeholder, an effective fact information set,

wherein such set comprises;

(a) a fact assertion information set, asserted at least in part using interpretable by end users one or more standardized and interoperably interpretable fact assertion expression languages,

(b) stakeholder person identifying information comprising, at least in part, biometrically based identification information, such biometrically based identification information based on information acquired using at least one biometric sensor, and

(c) at least one fact rule test procedure information set, specified and/or selected by such stakeholder, such test procedure information set specifying at least one asserted fact set test method set for securely validating that such fact assertion information set was stipulated by such biometrically identified stakeholder person, where such stakeholder person is securely identifiable through effective fact secure rule processing subsequent to the stipulation of such asserted fact information set, and

wherein such stakeholder publishes such effective fact information set for use by users who are independent of such stakeholders; and

ensuring effective fact integrity through security governance by processing such (a) fact assertion information set, (b) test procedure information set, and (c) stakeholder person at least in part biometrically based identifying information set, using a tamper resistant processing and memory arrangement.

4. A system as in any one of claims 1, 2, and 3, wherein such platform enables, at least in part, such test method set to provide a certificate used for testing such fact assertion information set.

5. A system as in any one of claims 1, 2, and 3, wherein such platform supports testing such fact assertion information set, at least in part, through the use of such set'"'"'s certificates and encryption techniques.

7. A system as in any one of claims 1, 2, and 3, wherein such platform enables, at least in part, associating such effective fact information set'"'"'s one or more stakeholders with one or more quality to purpose specifications asserted by one or more non-assertion information set stakeholder parties.

8. A system as in claim 4, wherein such platform enables, at least in part, associating such effective fact information set'"'"'s one or more stakeholders with one or more quality to purpose specifications asserted by one or more non-assertion information set stakeholder parties.

9. A system as in claim 5, wherein such platform enables, at least in part, associating such effective fact information set'"'"'s one or more stakeholders with one or more quality to purpose specifications asserted by one or more non-assertion information set stakeholder parties.

10. A system as in any one of claims 1, 2, and 3, wherein such platform enables, at least in part, associating at least one of such (a) effective fact information set, (b) fact test method set, and (c) fact assertion information set, with a trust level.

11. A system as in claim 1, wherein such platform enables, at least in part, such stakeholder to issue an encrypted certificate information set for securely enabling such at least one fact test method set specified in such effective fact information set.

12. A system as in claim 1, wherein such platform supports securely validating such fact assertion information set through the use of at least in part encrypted communications with a fact validating, trusted authority.

13. A system as in claim 12, wherein such platform supports declaring such fact assertion information set as a fact by a specific and convincing authority related to assertion topic context and/or other characteristics.

14. A system as in claim 1, wherein such platform supports at least one such fact test procedure and such fact authority has a specified reliability level information set.

15. A system as in any one of claims 1, 2, 3, 11, 12, 13, and 14, wherein such platform supports such effective fact information set being a first effective fact information set and such first effective fact information set further at least one of including and referencing a second effective fact information set regarding a fact assertion information set attribute of an asserting at least one of a stakeholder author, publisher, fact authority, and provider of such first effective fact information set.

16. A system as in any one of claims 1, 2, and 3, wherein such platform supports specifying fact assertion information set one or more subject matter characteristics, wherein such characteristics comprise at least one of expertise credentials, employment positions, professional positions, and organization memberships.

17. A system as in any one of claims 1, 2, 3, 11, 12, 13, and 14, wherein such platform supports specifying fact assertion information set subject matter characteristics, wherein such characteristics comprise at least one of expertise credentials, organization memberships, professional positions, employment positions, degree types, employment institution rankings, locations, credit worthiness, age, affiliations, accomplishments, service background, and litigation history.

18. A system as in claim 15, wherein such platform supports specifying fact assertion information set subject matter characteristics, wherein such characteristics comprise at least one of expertise credentials, organization memberships, professional positions, employment positions, degree types, employment institution rankings, locations, credit worthiness, age, affiliations, accomplishments, service background, and litigation history.

19. A system as in any one of claims 1, 2, 3, 11, 12, 13, and 14, wherein such platform supports specifying fact assertion information set subject matter characteristics, wherein such characteristics comprise plural of:

expertise credentials, organization memberships, professional positions, employment positions, degree types, employment institution rankings, locations, credit worthiness, age, affiliations, accomplishments, service background, and litigation history.

20. A system as in claim 15, wherein such platform supports specifying fact assertion information set subject matter characteristics, wherein such characteristics comprise plural of:

expertise credentials, organization memberships, professional positions, employment positions, degree types, employment institution rankings, locations, credit worthiness, age, affiliations, accomplishments, service background, and litigation history.

21. A system as in claim 16 wherein such platform enables, at least in part, specifying such effective fact information set, where such effective fact information set includes at least one of time, date, and location for one or more associated characteristics.

22. A system as in claim 17, wherein such platform enables, at least in part, specifying such effective fact information set, where such effective fact information set includes at least one of time, date, and location associated one or more associated characteristics.

23. A system, as in any one of claims 1, 2, 3, 11, 12, 13, and 14, wherein such platform enables, at least in part, employing such effective fact information set as at least one of a filtering and a prioritizing element for evaluating, filtering, prioritizing, and/or other ranking, of resources.

2. A system for enabling fact reliability using standardized and interoperably interpretable one or more fact set test methods, such system comprising:

a hardware and software computing arrangement, comprising at least in part at least one hardware processor, at least one memory, and at least one communications means, for establishing a fact reliability, computing resource platform, such platform comprising, at least in part, specifications and/or resources that enable;

providing an effective fact creator person hardware and software computing arrangement that enables;

cryptographically signing an effective fact information set, wherein such set'"'"'s elements comprise and/or otherwise associate (1) creator biometrically based information for creator identification, resulting from use of a biometric sensor set, (2) a fact assertion information set, and (3) an asserted fact set, rule test method set for validating such fact assertion information set,

employing at least a portion of creator biometrically based information, at least in part, for cryptographically signing at least a portion of such effective fact information set, such signing representing that the fact assertion information set of such effective fact information set is valid and can be verified by such asserted fact test method set, and

cryptographically signing, by a fact authority, a specific asserted fact test validation result set and communicating information securely confirming such fact assertion information set to such effective fact information set'"'"'s user computing arrangement; and

ensuring effective fact integrity through security governance by processing such (a) fact assertion information set, (b) asserted fact set test method set, and (c) creator biometrically based information, using a tamper resistant processing and memory arrangement.

6. A system as in any one of claims 2 and 3, wherein such platform enables, at least in part, associating one or more elements of such effective fact information set with such elements'"'"' respective validation certificates.

3. A system for enabling fact reliability using standardized and interoperably interpretable one or more fact set test methods, such system comprising:

a hardware and software computing arrangement, comprising at least in part at least one hardware processor, at least one memory, and at least one communications means, for establishing a fact reliability, computing resource platform, such platform comprising, at least in part, specifications and/or resources that enable;

providing a stakeholder hardware and software computing arrangement for creating an effective fact information set,

wherein such effective fact information set'"'"'s elements comprise and/or otherwise associate (1) a fact assertion information set, and (2) an asserted fact set test method set for validating such fact assertion information set, and

wherein such test method set can be used to validate the specific asserted fact set of such fact assertion information;

cryptographically signing, by a fact authority, a specific asserted fact set test method validation result set, and communicating information securely confirming such fact assertion information validation to a user computing arrangement;

employing, one or more portions of such (1) fact assertion information set and/or (2) asserted fact set test method set using a tamper resistant processing and memory arrangement;

comparing such fact assertion information set to fact assertion information managed by such validation authority, where such authority certifies validation matching result success or validation matching result failure; and

communicating confirmation of such fact assertion information set between a remotely located, associated fact assertion information set validation authority and a user'"'"'s computing arrangement.

24. A method for enabling fact reliability, using standardized and interoperably interpretable one or more test methods and fact assertion expression languages, such method comprising:

establishing an effective fact assertion platform using a hardware and software computing arrangement, comprising at least in part at least one hardware processor, at least one memory, and at least one communications means, wherein such platform comprises, at least in part, specifications and/or resources that enable;

providing a stakeholder hardware and software computing arrangement for creating, by a stakeholder, an effective fact information set,

wherein such set comprises;

(a) a fact assertion information set, asserted at least in part using interpretable by end users one or more standardized and interoperably interpretable fact assertion expression languages,

(b) stakeholder person identifying information comprising, at least in part, biometrically based identification information, such biometrically based identification information based on information acquired using at least one biometric sensor, and

(c) at least one fact rule test procedure information set, specified and/or selected by such stakeholder, such test procedure information set specifying at least one asserted fact set test method set for securely validating that such fact assertion information set was stipulated by such biometrically identified stakeholder person, where such stakeholder person is securely identifiable through effective fact secure rule processing subsequent to the stipulation of such asserted fact information set, and

wherein such stakeholder publishes such effective fact information set for use by users who are independent of such stakeholders; and

ensuring effective fact integrity through security governance by processing such (a) fact assertion information set, (b) test procedure information set, and (c) stakeholder person at least in part biometrically based identifying information set, using a tamper resistant processing and memory arrangement.

27. A method as in any one of claims 24, 25, and 26, wherein such platform enables, at least in part, such test method set to provide a certificate used for testing such fact assertion information set.

28. A method as in any one of claims 24, 25, and 26, wherein such platform supports testing such fact assertion information set, at least in part, through the use of such set'"'"'s certificates and encryption techniques.

30. A method as in any one of claims 24, 25, and 26, wherein such platform enables, at least in part, associating such effective fact information set'"'"'s one or more stakeholders with one or more quality to purpose specifications asserted by one or more non-assertion information set stakeholder parties.

31. A method as in claim 27, wherein such platform enables, at least in part, associating such effective fact information set'"'"'s one or more stakeholders with one or more quality to purpose specifications asserted by one or more non-assertion information set stakeholder parties.

32. A method as in claim 28, wherein such platform enables, at least in part, associating such effective fact information set'"'"'s one or more stakeholders with one or more quality to purpose specifications asserted by one or more non-assertion information set stakeholder parties.

33. A method as in any one of claims 24, 25, and 26, wherein such platform enables, at least in part, associating at least one of such (a) effective fact information set, (b) fact test method set, and (c) fact assertion information set, with a trust level.

34. A method as in claim 24, wherein such platform enables, at least in part, such stakeholder to issue an encrypted certificate information set for securely enabling such at least one fact test method set specified in such effective fact information set.

35. A method as in claim 24, wherein such platform supports securely validating such fact assertion information set through the use of at least in part encrypted communications with a fact validating, trusted authority.

36. A method as in claim 35, wherein such platform supports declaring such fact assertion information set as a fact by a specific and convincing authority related to assertion topic context and/or other characteristics.

37. A method as in claim 24, wherein such platform supports at least one such fact test procedure and such fact authority has a specified reliability level information set.

38. A method as in any one of claims 24, 25, 26, 34, 35, 36, and 37, wherein such platform supports such effective fact information set being a first effective fact information set and such first effective fact information set further at least one of including and referencing a second effective fact information set regarding a fact assertion information set attribute of an asserting at least one of a stakeholder author, publisher, fact authority, and provider of such first effective fact information set.

39. A method as in any one of claims 24, 25, and 26, wherein such platform supports specifying fact assertion information set one or more subject matter characteristics, wherein such characteristics comprise at least one of expertise credentials, employment positions, professional positions, and organization memberships.

40. A method as in any one of claims 24, 25, 26, 34, 35, 36, and 37, wherein such platform supports specifying fact assertion information set subject matter characteristics, wherein such characteristics comprise at least one of expertise credentials, organization memberships, professional positions, employment positions, degree types, employment institution rankings, locations, credit worthiness, age, affiliations, accomplishments, service background, and litigation history.

41. A method as in any one of claim 38, wherein such platform supports specifying fact assertion information set subject matter characteristics, wherein such characteristics comprise at least one of expertise credentials, organization memberships, professional positions, employment positions, degree types, employment institution rankings, locations, credit worthiness, age, affiliations, accomplishments, service background, and litigation history.

42. A method as in any one of claims 24, 25, 26, 34, 35, 36, and 37, wherein such platform supports specifying fact assertion information set subject matter characteristics, wherein such characteristics comprise plural of:

expertise credentials, organization memberships, professional positions, employment positions, degree types, employment institution rankings, locations, credit worthiness, age, affiliations, accomplishments, service background, and litigation history.

43. A method as in claim 38, wherein such platform supports specifying fact assertion information set subject matter characteristics, wherein such characteristics comprise plural of:

expertise credentials, organization memberships, professional positions, employment positions, degree types, employment institution rankings, locations, credit worthiness, age, affiliations, accomplishments, service background, and litigation history.

44. A method as in claim 39 wherein such platform enables, at least in part, specifying such effective fact information set, where such effective fact information set includes at least one of time, date, and location for one or more associated characteristics.

45. A method as in claim 40, wherein such platform enables, at least in part, specifying such effective fact information set, where such effective fact information set includes at least one of time, date, and location associated one or more associated characteristics.

46. A method as in any one of claims 24, 25, 26, 34, 35, 36, and 37, wherein such platform enables, at least in part, employing such effective fact information set as at least one of a filtering and a prioritizing element for evaluating, filtering, prioritizing, and/or other ranking, of resources.

25. A method for enabling fact reliability, using standardized and interoperably interpretable one or more fact set test methods, such method comprising:

establishing a fact reliability, computing resource platform, using a hardware and software computing arrangement, comprising at least in part at least one hardware processor, at least one memory, and at least one communications means, wherein such platform comprises, at least in part, specifications and/or resources that enable;

providing an effective fact creator person hardware and software computing arrangement that enables;

cryptographically signing an effective fact information set, wherein such set'"'"'s elements comprise and/or otherwise associate (1) creator biometrically based information for creator identification, resulting from use of a biometric sensor set, (2) a fact assertion information set, and (3) an asserted fact set, rule test method set for validating such fact assertion information set,

employing at least a portion of creator biometrically based information, at least in part, for cryptographically signing at least a portion of such effective fact information set, such signing representing that the fact assertion information set of such effective fact information set is valid and can be verified by such asserted fact test method set, and

cryptographically signing, by a fact authority, a specific asserted fact test validation result set and communicating information securely confirming such fact assertion information set to such effective fact information set'"'"'s user computing arrangement; and

ensuring effective fact integrity through security governance by processing such (a) fact assertion information set, (b) asserted fact set test method set, and (c) creator biometrically based information, using a tamper resistant processing and memory arrangement.

29. A method as in any one of claims 25 and 26, wherein such platform enables, at least in part, associating one or more elements of such effective fact information set with such elements'"'"' respective validation certificates.

26. A method for enabling fact reliability, using standardized and interoperably interpretable one or more fact set test methods, such fact reliability ensuring method comprising:

establishing a fact reliability, computing resource platform, using a hardware and software computing arrangement, comprising at least in part at least one hardware processor, at least one memory, and at least one communications means, wherein such platform comprises, at least in part, specifications and/or resources that enable;

providing a stakeholder hardware and software computing arrangement for creating an effective fact information set,

wherein such effective fact information set'"'"'s elements comprise and/or otherwise associate (1) a fact assertion information set, and (2) an asserted fact set test method set for validating such fact assertion information set, and

wherein such test method can be used to validate the specific asserted fact set of such fact assertion information;

cryptographically signing, by a fact authority, a specific asserted fact set test method validation result set, and communicating information securely confirming such fact assertion information validation to a user computing arrangement;

employing one or more portions of such (1) a fact assertion information set, and/or (2) an asserted fact set test method set, using a tamper resistant processing and memory arrangement;

comparing such fact assertion information set to fact assertion information managed by such validation authority, where such authority certifies validation matching result success or validation matching result failure; and

communicating confirmation of such fact assertion information set between a remotely located, associated fact assertion information set validation authority and a user'"'"'s computing arrangement.