Dynamic core selection for heterogeneous multi-core systems

• US 10,534,424 B2
• Filed: 01/02/2016
• Issued: 01/14/2020
• Est. Priority Date: 03/11/2011
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Intel Corporation
• Original Assignee: Intel Corporation
• Inventors: Wu, Youfeng, Hu, Shiliang, Borin, Edson, Wang, Cheng
• Primary Examiner(s): Yen, Paul
• Assistant Examiner(s): Chang, Eric
• Application Number:
  US14/986,676
• Publication Number:
  US 20160116963A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,473 Days
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 1/3287 by switching off individual functional units in the computer system
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 1/329 by task scheduling
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/3409 for performance assessment
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/3452 Performance evaluation by statistical analysis
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/3466 Performance evaluation by tracing or monitoring
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 2201/81 Threshold
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 2201/865 Monitoring of software
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 2201/88 Monitoring involving counting
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 2209/501 Performance criteria
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 9/3851 from multiple instruction streams, e.g. multistreaming
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 9/445 Program loading or initiating bootstrapping G06F9/4401; security arrangements for program loading or initiating G06F21/57
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 9/4893 taking into account power or heat criteria power management in computers in general G06F1/3203; thermal management in computers in general G06F1/206
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 9/5027 the resource being a machine, e.g. CPUs, Servers, Terminals
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 9/5094 where the allocation takes into account power or heat criteria power management in computers in general G06F1/3203; thermal management in computers in general G06F1/206
• CPC Class Codes: Y02D 10/00 Energy efficient computing, e.g. low power processors, power management or thermal management
• CPC Class Codes: Y02D 30/50 in wire-line communication networks, e.g. low power modes or reduced link rate

Abstract

Dynamically switching cores on a heterogeneous multi-core processing system may be performed by executing program code on a first processing core. Power up of a second processing core may be signaled. A first performance metric of the first processing core executing the program code may be collected. When the first performance metric is better than a previously determined core performance metric, power down of the second processing core may be signaled and execution of the program code may be continued on the first processing core. When the first performance metric is not better than the previously determined core performance metric, execution of the program code may be switched from the first processing core to the second processing core.

Claims

1. One or more non-transitory, machine-readable storage media comprising a plurality of instructions stored thereon that, in response to execution by one or more processors of a computer system, causes the one or more processors to:

execute program code on a first processor core of the one or more processors;

collect performance metrics of execution of the program code by the first processor core;

determine, while the program code is executed on the first processor, a performance of execution of the same program code by a second processor core, wherein the first processor core is of a first type and the second processor core is of a second type different from the first type and wherein to determine the performance of execution of the same program code by the second processor core comprises to apply the performance metrics of the first processor core as an input to a prediction function; and

switch execution of the program code from the first processor core to the second processor core in response to a determination that the performance of the second processor core is better than a performance of the first processor core or continue execution of the program code with the first processor core in response to a determination that the performance of the second processor core is not better than the performance of the first processor core.

2. The one or more non-transitory, machine-readable storage media of claim 1, wherein the first processor core is an in-order processor core and the second processor core is an out-of-order processor core.

3. The one or more non-transitory, machine-readable storage media of claim 1, wherein the second processor core is an in-order processor core and the first processor core is an out-of-order processor core.

4. The one or more non-transitory, machine-readable storage media of claim 1, wherein to switch execution of the program code from the first processor core to the second processor core comprises to switch execution of the program code from the first processor core to the second processor core in response to a determination that a threshold value associated with a performance metric has been exceeded.

5. The one or more non-transitory, machine-readable storage media of claim 1, wherein the plurality of instructions further causes the one or more processors to power up the second processor core in response to a determination that the performance of the second processor core is better than the performance of the first processor core.

6. The one or more non-transitory, machine-readable storage media of claim 1, wherein to switch execution of the program code from the first processor core to the second processor core comprises to transfer context data from the first processor core to the second processor core over a data bus.

7. The one or more non-transitory, machine-readable storage media of claim 1, wherein to switch execution of the program code from the first processor core to the second processor core comprises to transfer context data from the first processor core to the second processor core through a shared memory.

8. The one or more non-transitory, machine-readable storage media of claim 1, wherein the plurality of instructions further causes the one or more processors to power down the first processor core in response to a switch in execution of the program code from the first processor core to the second processor core.

9. A multi-core processing system comprising an integrated circuit including:

a first processor core of a first type to execute program code;

a second processor core of a second type different from the first type; and

a code distribution module to (i) determine, while the program code is executed on the first processor, a performance of execution of the same program code by the second processor core, wherein to determine the performance of execution of the same program code by the second processor core comprises to apply the performance metrics of the first processor core as an input to a prediction function and (ii) switch execution of the program code from the first processor core to the second processor core in response to a determination that the performance of the second processor core is better than a performance of the first processor core or continue execution of the program code with the first processor core in response to a determination that the performance of the second processor core is not better than the performance of the first processor core.

10. The multi-core processing system of claim 9, wherein the first processor core is an in-order processor core and the second processor core is an out-of-order processor core.

11. The multi-core processing system of claim 9, wherein the second processor core is an in-order processor core and the first processor core is an out-of-order processor core.

12. The multi-core processing system of claim 9, wherein to switch execution of the program code from the first processor core to the second processor core comprises to switch execution of the program code from the first processor core to the second processor core in response to a determination that a threshold value associated with a performance metric has been exceeded.

13. The multi-core processing system of claim 9, wherein the code distribution module is further to power up the second processor core in response to a determination that the performance of the second processor core is better than the performance of the first processor core.

14. The multi-core processing system of claim 9, wherein to switch execution of the program code from the first processor core to the second processor core comprises to transfer context data from the first processor core to the second processor core over a data bus.

15. The multi-core processing system of claim 9, further comprising a shared memory;

wherein to switch execution of the program code from the first processor core to the second processor core comprises to transfer context data from the first processor core to the second processor core through the shared memory.

16. The multi-core processing system of claim 9, wherein the code distribution module is further to power down the first processor core in response to a switch in execution of the program code from the first processor core to the second processor core.

17. A method of multi-core processing, the method comprising:

executing program code on a first processor core;

collecting performance metrics of execution of the program code by the first processor core;

determining, while the program code is executed on the first processor, a performance of execution of the same program code by a second processor core, wherein the first processor core is of a first type and the second processor core is of a second type different from the first type and wherein to determine the performance of execution of the same program code by the second processor core comprises to apply the performance metrics of the first processor core as an input to a prediction function; and

switching execution of the program code from the first processor core to the second processor core in response to determining that the performance of the second processor core is better than a performance of the first processor core or continuing execution of the program code with the first processor core in response to a determination that the performance of the second processor core is not better than the performance of the first processor core.

18. The method of claim 17, wherein the first processor core is an in-order processor core and the second processor core is an out-of-order processor core.

19. The method of claim 17, wherein the second processor core is an in-order processor core and the first processor core is an out-of-order processor core.

20. The method of claim 17, wherein switching execution of the program code from the first processor core to the second processor core comprises switching execution of the program code from the first processor core to the second processor core in response to determining that a threshold value associated with a performance metric has been exceeded.

21. The method of claim 17, further comprising powering up the second processor core in response to determining that the performance of the second processor core is better than the performance of the first processor core.

22. The method of claim 17, wherein switching execution of the program code from the first processor core to the second processor core comprises transferring context data from the first processor core to the second processor core over a data bus.

23. The method of claim 17, wherein switching execution of the program code from the first processor core to the second processor core comprises transferring context data from the first processor core to the second processor core through a shared memory.

24. The method of claim 17, further comprising powering down the first processor core in response to switching execution of the program code from the first processor core to the second processor core.