Method and system for determining interface compatibility based on component model

• US 10,761,816 B2
• Filed: 03/31/2010
• Issued: 09/01/2020
• Est. Priority Date: 10/01/2007
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
• Original Assignee: Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
• Inventors: Son, Kyoung-Ho, Kwon, Ja-Gun
• Primary Examiner(s): Alrobaye, Idriss N
• Assistant Examiner(s): Taylor, Brooke J
• Application Number:
  US12/751,470
• Publication Number:
  US 20100192125A1
• Time in Patent Office: 3,807 Days
• Field of Search: 717120
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 8/36 Software reuse

Abstract

A method and system for determining interface compatibility between components are provided. In the system for determining interface compatibility in component model-based software design, the system includes a compatibility rule manager managing interface compatibility rules, and an interface compatibility validator verifying interface compatibility between components based on the interface compatibility rules.

Claims

1. An apparatus configured to determine interface compatibility in component model-based software design, the apparatus comprising:

a processor configured to;

update a software platform comprising a first interface and a second interface;

provide a function set for the first interface;

provide a function set for the second interface;

provide interface compatibility rules comprising interface connectivity, based on a capability to connect components, or interface substitutability, based on a capability to substitute a component;

verify, based on the interface compatibility rules, existence of each function in the function set for the second interface in the function set for the first interface, wherein the interface compatibility rules comprise

(1) determining whether to select an interface according to an on state or off state of the interface for an optional variability type,

(2) determining whether to select one interface from a plurality of related interfaces for an alternative variability type, and

(3) determining whether to select any one or any two or more of interfaces for a selective variability type;

add functions in the function set for the second interface that do not exist in the function set for the first interface to a remainder function list based on a result of the verify; and

upon a determination that a function exists in the remainder function list, submit a notification of incompatibility; and

automatically apply rules for interface connectivity and rules for interface substitutability in determining interface compatibility,

wherein the optional variability type selects an interface according to an on state or off state of the interface, the alternative variability type selects one interface from a plurality of related interfaces, and the selective variability type selects any two or more of interfaces for a selective variability type.

2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the processor is further configured to connect the first interface and the second interface based on a determination that no function exists in the remainder function list and the compatibility rule.

3. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the processor is further configured to describe the function set of the first interface and the function set of the second interface based on an Interface Definition Language (IDL) or a header.

4. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the function set of the first interface defines functions being provided by a component, and the function set of the second interface defining functions being required by a component.

5. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the compatibility rules dictate the compatibility or the substitutability of the first interface.

6. The apparatus of claim 4, wherein the first interface is a provide interface and the second interface is a require interface, and

wherein the processor is further configured to implement a rule dictating that a future provide interface is capable of being substituted for the provide interface, based upon a determination that a function set in the future provide interface includes each function in the function set in the provide interface.

7. The apparatus of claim 4, wherein the first interface is a provide interface and the second interface is a require interface, and

wherein the processor is further configured to implement a rule dictating that a future require interface can be substituted for the require interface, based upon a determination that a function set for the require interface includes each function in the function set of the future require interface.

8. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the interface compatibility rules comprise the alternative variability type for the second interface and the second interface further comprises a function set of an alternative second interface,

wherein the verifying further comprises verifying that each function in the function set for the first alternative interface exists in the function set for the second interface, and

adding functions in the function set for the first alternative interface that do not exist in the function set for the second interface to the remainder function list.

9. The apparatus of claim 1,

wherein the interface compatibility rules comprise the optional variability type for the second interface and the second interface further comprises a function set of an optional second interface.

10. The apparatus of claim 1,

wherein the interface compatibility rules comprise the selective variability type for the second interface and the second interface further comprises a function set of an additional second interface,

wherein the verifying further comprises merging the function set of the additional second interface with the function set of the second interface.

16. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the providing a function set for the first interface and the providing a function set for the second interface further comprises, listing each function set by parsing an Information Description Language file.

17. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the listing each function set by parsing an Information Description Language file further comprises verifying the list using a symbol description or a header mapping.

18. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the updating of the software platform comprising the first interface and the second interface further comprises maintaining a change history of the software platform.

11. A method for determining interface compatibility in component model-based software design, the method comprising:

parsing a function set for a first interface of a first component;

parsing a function set for a second interface of a second component;

applying interface variability to an interface for a component;

verifying, based on interface compatibility rules, existence of each function in the function set for the second interface in the function set for the first interface, wherein the interface compatibility rules comprise

(1) determining whether to select an interface according to an on state or off state of the interface for an optional variability type,

(2) determining whether to select one interface from a plurality of related interfaces for an alternative variability type, and

(3) determining whether to select any one or any two or more of interfaces for a selective variability type;

adding functions in the function set for the second interface that do not exist in the function set for the first interface to a remainder function list based on a result of the verify; and

upon a determination that a function exists in the remainder function list, submitting a notification of incompatibility,

wherein the parsing, applying, and verifying are performed by one or more processing devices to automatically determine the interface compatibility of the first interface and the second interface, and

wherein the optional variability type selects an interface according to an on state or off state of the interface, the alternative variability type selects one interface from a plurality of related interfaces, and the selective variability type selects any two or more of interfaces for a selective variability type.

12. The method of claim 11, further comprising connecting components or replacing one component with another based on the result of the one or more processing devices.

13. The method of claim 11, wherein the interface compatibility encompasses interface connectivity corresponding to the capability to connect components or interface substitutability corresponding to the capability to substitute a component.

14. The method of claim 13, wherein if an interface to be substituted is a provide interface, interface substitutability is determined by verifying whether functions in a function set in the existing interface are included in a function set of the interface to be substituted.

15. The method of claim 13, wherein if an interface to be substituted is a require interface, interface substitutability is determined by verifying whether functions in a function set of the interface to be substituted are included in a function set in the existing interface.

19. A method for automatically determining interface compatibility in component model-based software design, comprising:

determining a first function set and a second function set from a first interface and a second interface, respectively;

determining an interface type, wherein;

when the interface variability type is determined to be an optional variability type, compare functions in the first function set with functions in the second function set;

when the interface variability type is determined to be an alternative variability type, select and set configuration for the first interface, and compare functions in the first function set with functions in the second function set; and

when the interface variability type is determined to be a selective variability type, select and merge the first function set, and compare functions in the first function set with functions in the second function set; and

upon a determination that a function exists in a remainder function list based on the comparisons of functions in the first function set with functions in the second function set, submitting a notification of incompatibility,

wherein the optional variability type selects an interface according to an on state or off state of the interface, the alternative variability type selects one interface from a plurality of related interfaces, and the selective variability type selects any two or more of interfaces for a selective variability type.