Method for determining detection angle of optical particle sizer

• US 10,928,297 B2
• Filed: 01/08/2020
• Issued: 02/23/2021
• Est. Priority Date: 01/09/2019
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: University of Washington
• Original Assignee: University of Washington
• Inventors: Novosselov, Igor V., Njalsson, Tomas
• Primary Examiner(s): Ton, Tri T
• Application Number:
  US16/737,888
• Publication Number:
  US 20200217775A1
• Time in Patent Office: 412 Days
• Field of Search: 356335-343
• CPC Class Codes: G01N 15/0211 Investigating a scatter or diffraction pattern
• CPC Class Codes: G01N 15/1434 Optical arrangements
• CPC Class Codes: G01N 15/1459 the analysis being performed on a sample stream
• CPC Class Codes: G01N 2015/0046 in gas, e.g. smoke
• CPC Class Codes: G01N 2015/1029 Particle size
• CPC Class Codes: G01N 2015/1445 Three-dimensional imaging, imaging in different image planes, e.g. under different angles or at different depths, e.g. by a relative motion of sample and detector, for instance by tomography
• CPC Class Codes: G01N 2015/1493 Particle size
• CPC Class Codes: G01N 2021/4711 Multiangle measurement
• CPC Class Codes: G01N 21/47 Scattering, i.e. diffuse reflection G01N21/25, G01N21/41 take precedence G01N21/55 takes precedence

Abstract

A method includes receiving input indicating at least two of: (a) a coefficient of first sensitivity of an optical particle sizer (OPS) to a real part of a complex refractive index (CRI); (b) a coefficient of second sensitivity of the OPS to an imaginary part of the CRI; (c) a coefficient of a degree of monotonicity between intensity and particle size; (d) a coefficient of a dynamic range of the OPS; or (e) a coefficient of a limit of detection (LOD) of the OPS; determining ratings for the OPS using the at least two of (a)-(e) and at least two of (i) the first sensitivity, (ii) the second sensitivity, (iii) the degree of monotonicity, (iv) the dynamic range, or (v) the LOD; identifying an angle that corresponds to a maximum or minimum rating; and providing an OPS having a detection angle that is within 5 degrees of the identified angle.

Claims

1. A method comprising:

receiving input indicating at least two of;

(a) a first coefficient corresponding to a first sensitivity of an optical particle sizer (OPS) to a real part of a complex refractive index (CRI) of a particle under test, wherein the first sensitivity is dependent on a detection angle defined by a central axis of the OPS and a detection axis of a detector of the OPS;

(b) a second coefficient corresponding to a second sensitivity of the OPS to an imaginary part of the CRI, wherein the second sensitivity is dependent on the detection angle;

(c) a third coefficient corresponding to a degree of monotonicity between scattering intensity detected by the OPS and a size of the particle under test, wherein the degree of monotonicity is dependent on the detection angle;

(d) a fourth coefficient corresponding to a dynamic range of the OPS, wherein the dynamic range is dependent on the detection angle;

or

(e) a fifth coefficient corresponding to a limit of detection (LOD) of the OPS, wherein the LOD is dependent on the detection angle;

determining a plurality of ratings for the OPS using the at least two of (a)-(e) and at least two of (i) the first sensitivity, (ii) the second sensitivity, (iii) the degree of monotonicity, (iv) the dynamic range, or (v) the LOD, wherein the plurality of ratings correspond respectively to a plurality of detection angles;

identifying a detection angle of the plurality of detection angles that corresponds to a maximum rating of the plurality of ratings or a minimum rating of the plurality of ratings; and

providing an OPS having a detection angle that is within 5 degrees of the identified detection angle.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein providing the OPS comprises providing the OPS such that the detection angle of the OPS is substantially equal to the identified detection angle.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein each rating of the plurality of ratings is equal to a sum of at least two of (I) a first multiplicative product of the first coefficient and the first sensitivity, (II) a second multiplicative product of the second coefficient and the second sensitivity, (III) a third multiplicative product of the third coefficient and the degree of monotonicity, (IV) a fourth multiplicative product of the fourth coefficient and the dynamic range, or (V) a fifth multiplicative product of the fifth coefficient and the LOD.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein the at least two of (I)-(V) comprises three of (I)-(V).

5. The method of claim 3, wherein the at least two of (I)-(V) comprises four of (I)-(V).

6. The method of claim 3, wherein the at least two of (I)-(V) comprises each of (I)-(V).

7. The method of claim 3, wherein the first coefficient, the second coefficient, and the third coefficient are less than or equal to zero, and the fourth coefficient and the fifth coefficient are greater than or equal to zero.

8. The method of claim 3, wherein the first coefficient, the second coefficient, and the third coefficient are greater than or equal to zero, and the fourth coefficient and the fifth coefficient are less than or equal to zero.

9. The method of claim 1,

wherein the at least two of (a)-(e) comprises three of (a)-(e), and

wherein the at least two of (i)-(v) comprises three of (i)-(v).

10. The method of claim 1,

wherein the at least two of (a)-(e) comprises four of (a)-(e), and

wherein the at least two of (i)-(v) comprises four of (i)-(v).

11. The method of claim 1,

wherein the at least two of (a)-(e) comprises each of (a)-(e), and

wherein the at least two of (i)-(v) comprises each of (i)-(v).

12. The method of claim 1, wherein the first sensitivity is defined for real parts of the CRI that are greater than or equal to 1.3 and less than or equal to 2.0 and the second sensitivity is defined for imaginary parts of the CRI that are greater than or equal to 0 and less than or equal to 0.1.

13. The method of claim 1, wherein the first sensitivity is defined by a ratio of (1) a standard deviation of the scattering intensity over a finite range of the real part of the CRI to (2) a mean of the scattering intensity over the finite range of the real part of the CRI.

14. The method of claim 1, wherein the second sensitivity is defined by a ratio of (1) a standard deviation of the scattering intensity over a finite range of the imaginary part of the CRI to (2) a mean of the scattering intensity over the finite range of the imaginary part of the CRI.

15. The method of claim 1, wherein the degree of monotonicity is defined by a quantity of instances of non-monotonicity over a finite range of particle size.

16. The method of claim 1, wherein the dynamic range is defined by a ratio of a maximum of the scattering intensity to a minimum of the scattering intensity over a finite range of particle size, a finite range of the real part of the CRI, and a finite range of the imaginary part of the CRI.

17. The method of claim 16, wherein the finite range of particle size is 0.1 μ

m to 10 μ

m.

18. The method of claim 16, wherein the LOD is a minimum scattering intensity that corresponds to a minimum particle size of the finite range of particle size, over the finite range of the real part of the CRI and over the finite range of the imaginary part of the CRI.

19. A computing device comprising:

one or more processors; and

a computer readable medium storing instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the computing device to perform functions comprising;

receiving input indicating at least two of;

(a) a first coefficient corresponding to a first sensitivity of an optical particle sizer (OPS) to a real part of a complex refractive index (CRI) of a particle under test, wherein the first sensitivity is dependent on a detection angle defined by a central axis of the OPS and a detection axis of a detector of the OPS;

(b) a second coefficient corresponding to a second sensitivity of the OPS to an imaginary part of the CRI, wherein the second sensitivity is dependent on the detection angle;

(c) a third coefficient corresponding to a degree of monotonicity between scattering intensity detected by the OPS and a size of the particle under test, wherein the degree of monotonicity is dependent on the detection angle;

(d) a fourth coefficient corresponding to a dynamic range of the OPS, wherein the dynamic range is dependent on the detection angle;

or

(e) a fifth coefficient corresponding to a limit of detection (LOD) of the OPS, wherein the LOD is dependent on the detection angle;

determining a plurality of ratings for the OPS using the at least two of (a)-(e) and at least two of (i) the first sensitivity, (ii) the second sensitivity, (iii) the degree of monotonicity, (iv) the dynamic range, or (v) the LOD, wherein the plurality of ratings correspond respectively to a plurality of detection angles; and

identifying a detection angle of the plurality of detection angles that corresponds to a maximum rating of the plurality of ratings or a minimum rating of the plurality of ratings.

20. A non-transitory computer readable medium storing instructions that, when executed by a computing device, cause the computing device to perform functions comprising:

receiving input indicating at least two of;

(a) a first coefficient corresponding to a first sensitivity of an optical particle sizer (OPS) to a real part of a complex refractive index (CRI) of a particle under test, wherein the first sensitivity is dependent on a detection angle defined by a central axis of the OPS and a detection axis of a detector of the OPS;

(b) a second coefficient corresponding to a second sensitivity of the OPS to an imaginary part of the CRI, wherein the second sensitivity is dependent on the detection angle;

(c) a third coefficient corresponding to a degree of monotonicity between scattering intensity detected by the OPS and a size of the particle under test, wherein the degree of monotonicity is dependent on the detection angle;

(d) a fourth coefficient corresponding to a dynamic range of the OPS, wherein the dynamic range is dependent on the detection angle;

or

(e) a fifth coefficient corresponding to a limit of detection (LOD) of the OPS, wherein the LOD is dependent on the detection angle;

determining a plurality of ratings for the OPS using the at least two of (a)-(e) and at least two of (i) the first sensitivity, (ii) the second sensitivity, (iii) the degree of monotonicity, (iv) the dynamic range, or (v) the LOD, wherein the plurality of ratings correspond respectively to a plurality of detection angles; and

identifying a detection angle of the plurality of detection angles that corresponds to a maximum rating of the plurality of ratings or a minimum rating of the plurality of ratings.