Settlement of transactions subject to multiple pricing plans

• US 20030061137A1
• Filed: 08/21/2002
• Published: 03/27/2003
• Est. Priority Date: 08/21/2001
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Apogee Networks Incorporated
• Original Assignee: Apogee Networks Incorporated
• Inventors: Price, John Davis, Leung, Yiu Kau, Feinberg, Brion
• Application Number:
  US10/225,224
• Publication Number:
  US 20030061137A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/35
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/04 Billing or invoicing
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/06 Buying, selling or leasing transactions
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 40/00 Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
• CPC Class Codes: G07F 17/16 for devices exhibiting advertisements, announcements, pictures or the like

Abstract

The invention includes a method, system, and computer-readable medium having computer-executable instructions for rating a transaction. The inventive method includes processing a transaction, where the transaction is processed when a service is provided from a service provider to a service consumer, accessing via a computer network multiple pricing plans related to the transaction, and rating the transaction in accordance with the multiple pricing plans. The method further may include receiving output states from at least one pricing plan. The rating may be accomplished within one pricing plan, or within a group of pricing plans.

Claims

1. A method of rating a transaction, comprising:

processing a transaction, wherein the transaction is processed when a service is provided from a service provider to a service consumer;

accessing via a computer network multiple pricing plans related to the transaction; and

rating the transaction in accordance with the multiple pricing plans.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein at least one of the pricing plans includes at least one of the following:

revenue folds, revenue/usage pools, and commissions.

3. The method of claim 1, further comprising receiving output states from at least one pricing plan.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the rating is accomplished within one pricing plan.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the rating is accomplished within a group of pricing plans.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the accessing is accomplished via interconnected building blocks located within each of the pricing plans.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the building blocks perform at least one of the following functions:

data usage selection and filtering, data usage computation, data accumulation, rate computation, and presentation of required payment.

8. The method of claim 6, wherein the building blocks have customizable properties.

9. The method of claim 6, wherein the building blocks allow a first pricing plan to access states of another pricing plan.

10. The method of claim 9, wherein the states are usages and charges associated with one or more pricing plans.

11. The method of claim 6, wherein the building blocks allow a first pricing plan to access the states of a group of pricing plans.

12. The method of claim 11, wherein the states are usages and charges associated with one or more pricing plans.

13. The method of claim 1, further comprising a revenue fold, wherein the revenue fold summarizes the output of multiple pricing plans.

14. The method of claim 13, wherein the revenue fold summarizes child accounts and inputs the summary information to pricing plans of corresponding parent accounts.

15. The method of claim 13, wherein the value of the revenue fold is available to the pricing plan via a building block.

16. The method of claim 13, wherein the revenue fold is available to child and parent accounts.

17. The method of claim 13, further comprising selecting child accounts with end dates that are within a parent account'"'"'s time period.

18. The method of claim 1, further comprising pooling revenue/usage data as a function of billing cycles.

19. The method of claim 18, further comprising updating the pooled revenue/usage data by summing the values of data from selected account plan periods.

20. The method of claim 18, further comprising selecting the account plan period as a function of the end date of the account plan with respect to the pooled revenue/usage data.

21. The method of claim 18, further comprising accessing a value of the pooled revenue/usage data via a building block.

22. The method of claim 1, further comprising determining a commission, wherein the commission is a credit given to an account.

23. The method of claim 22, wherein the credit is a function of at least one of the following:

revenue, and states of another account.

24. The method of claim 22, wherein the determining of commission includes at least one of the following:

commissions going to multiple accounts, a commission based on total revenue, a commission based on a subset of the, a commission for a first predetermined number of billing periods, a recurring base commission, a promotional commission rate, and step commission rate.

25. The method of claim 1, further comprising determining the value of a pricing plan as a function of another pricing plan.

26. The method of claim 25, further comprising providing a configurable loop count.

27. A method for providing extensible ratings plans, comprising:

determining the nature of a transaction over a computer network;

accessing over a computer network one or more pricing plans, wherein the pricing plans designate payment required by a user; and

providing one or more payment plans, wherein the payment plans designate payment to a provider of data.

28. The method of claim 27, further comprising customizing the payment plan to a particular customer.

29. The method of claim 27, wherein the data has multiple owners.

30. The method of claim 27, further comprising varying the payment plan over time.

31. The method of claim 27, further comprising varying the price of the payment plan.

32. The method of claim 27, further comprising varying the payment plan as a function of usage of the data.

33. The method of claim 27, further comprising varying the pricing plan over time.

34. The method of claim 27, further comprising varying the price of the pricing plan.

35. The method of claim 27, further comprising varying the pricing plan as a function of usage of the data.

36. The method of claim 27, further comprising rating the transaction on a per usage basis for low volume, high value transactions.

37. The method of claim 27, further comprising rating the transaction on a billing cycle usage basis for low volume, high value transactions.

38. A computer system for rating a transaction, comprising:

an instrumentation layer for receiving raw data;

a content collection layer for processing the raw data and for providing information related to a transaction over a computer network;

a transaction layer for determining parties to the transaction and for determining the burdens and benefits of the transaction to the parties; and

a settlement layer for rating the transaction by accessing via the computer network multiple pricing plans related to the transaction, and rating the transaction in accordance with the multiple pricing plans.

39. A computer-readable medium having computer-executable instructions, comprising:

processing a transaction, wherein the transaction is processed when a service is provided from a service provider to a service consumer;

accessing via a computer network multiple pricing plans related to the transaction; and

rating the transaction in accordance with the multiple pricing plans.

40. The computer-readable medium of claim 39, having computer-executable instructions further comprising receiving output states from at least one pricing plan.

41. The computer-readable medium of claim 39, having computer-executable instructions further comprising a revenue fold, wherein the revenue fold summarizes the output of multiple pricing plans.

42. The computer-readable medium of claim 39, having computer-executable instructions further comprising selecting child accounts with end dates that are within a parent account'"'"'s time period.

43. The computer-readable medium of claim 39, having computer-executable instructions further comprising pooling revenue/usage data as a function of billing cycles.

44. The computer-readable medium of claim 43, having computer-executable instructions further comprising updating the pooled revenue/usage data by summing the values of data from selected account plan periods.

45. The computer-readable medium of claim 43, having computer-executable instructions further comprising selecting the account plan period as a function of the end date of the account plan with respect to the pooled revenue/usage data.

46. The computer-readable medium of claim 43, having computer-executable instructions further comprising accessing a value of the pooled revenue/usage data via a building block.

47. The computer-readable medium of claim 39, having computer-executable instructions further comprising determining a commission, wherein the commission is a credit given to an account.

48. The computer-readable medium of claim 39, having computer-executable instructions further comprising determining the value of a pricing plan as a function of another pricing plan.

49. The computer-readable medium of claim 48, having computer-executable instructions further comprising providing a configurable loop count.