MOBILE WEBSITE ANALYZER

• US 20070100653A1
• Filed: 10/27/2006
• Published: 05/03/2007
• Est. Priority Date: 11/01/2005
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Blue Hills Series 95 of Allied Security Trust I (Allied Security Trust)
• Original Assignee: Jumptap Incorporated (Apollo Global Management, Inc.)
• Inventors: Ramer, Jorey, Doughty, Dennis, Soroca, Adam
• Application Number:
  US11/553,626
• Publication Number:
  US 20070100653A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/1.100
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/68 Retrieval characterised by using metadata, e.g. metadata not derived from the content or metadata generated manually
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/9577 Optimising the visualization of content, e.g. distillation of HTML documents
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 20/16 Payments settled via telecommunication systems
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0282 Rating or review of business operators or products
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/06 Buying, selling or leasing transactions
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0641 Shopping interfaces

Abstract

In embodiments of the present invention improved capabilities are described for analyzing mobile content for compatibility with a criterion associated with a mobile communication facility type. The method further includes ranking the mobile content based at least in part on the compatibility such that the ranking may be used in a determination of delivery of the mobile content to the mobile communication facility, and/or presentation of the mobile content on the mobile communication facility. The ranking may be used to improve user experience with the mobile communication facility by avoiding incompatible or poorly compatible mobile content.

Claims

1. A method comprising:

analyzing a mobile content for compatibility with a criterion associated with a mobile communication facility type; and

rating the mobile content based at least in part on the compatibility.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the mobile content is a website.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the mobile content is an advertisement.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the mobile content is at least one of a video file, video download, video stream, audio file, audio download, audio stream, text file, and text information.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein compatibility is based at least in part on usability.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein the criterion associated with a mobile communication facility type is processing speed.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein the criterion associated with a mobile communication facility type is cache size.

11. The method of claim 1, wherein the criterion associated with a mobile communication facility type is resolution.

12. The method of claim 1, wherein the criterion associated with a mobile communication facility type is multimedia capability.

13. The method of claim 1, wherein the criterion associated with a mobile communication facility type is a manufacturer.

14. The method of claim 1, wherein the criterion associated with a mobile communication facility type is model type.

15. The method of claim 1, wherein the criterion associated with a mobile communication facility type is a display.

16. The method of claim 1, wherein the criterion associated with a mobile communication facility type is a CPU model.

17. The method of claim 1, wherein the criterion associated with a mobile communication facility type is an audio capability.

18. The method of claim 1, wherein the criterion associated with a mobile communication facility type is a phone client application.

23. The method of claim 1, wherein the criterion is associated with a mimetype.

26. The method of claim 1, wherein the criterion is associated with a mobile communication facility identifier.

27. The method of claim 26, wherein the mobile communication facility identifier is an user agent string.

39. The method of claim 1, wherein the criterion is associated with a Wireless Universal Resource File (WURFL) criterion.

40. The method of claim 1, wherein the criterion is associated with a on a browser.

41. The method of claim 1, wherein the criterion is associated with an operating system.

42. The method of claim 1, wherein the criterion is associated with an element of usability.

74. The method of claim 1, wherein the compatibility of the mobile content with the criterion is presented to an owner of the mobile content for review.

80. The method of claim 1, wherein the rating is a continuous score.

81. The method of claim 1, wherein the rating is a binary categorization.

83. The method of claim 1, wherein the rating is used at least in part to determine if the mobile content may be displayed on a mobile communication facility type.

84. The method of claim 1, wherein the rating is used to determine a rank for mobile content.

85. The method of claim 84, wherein a priority for presentation of the mobile content to the mobile communication facility type is based at least in part on the rank.

3. (canceled)

5-6. -6. (canceled)

19-22. -22. (canceled)

24-25. -25. (canceled)

28-38. -38. (canceled)

43-73. -73. (canceled)

75-79. -79. (canceled)

82. (canceled)

86. A system comprising:

an analysis facility adapted to analyze a mobile content for compatibility with a criterion associated with a mobile communication facility type; and

a rating facility adapted to rate the mobile content based at least in part on the compatibility.

87-170. -170. (canceled)