Method for Automated Examination Testing and Scoring

• US 20070160971A1
• Filed: 01/12/2006
• Published: 07/12/2007
• Est. Priority Date: 01/12/2006
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Carmen Reitano, Charles Ouellette, Geoffrey Cronin, Paul Caldera, Walter Cheney
• Original Assignee: Carmen Reitano, Charles Ouellette, Geoffrey Cronin, Paul Caldera, Walter Cheney
• Inventors: Reitano, Carmen, Cronin, Geoffrey, Caldera, Paul, Cheney, Walter, Ouellette, Charles
• Application Number:
  US11/306,849
• Publication Number:
  US 20070160971A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 434/353
• CPC Class Codes: G09B 7/00 Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers mechanically operated G09B3/00; computing arrangements G06F

Abstract

A software based method of automatically recording and scoring tests is practiced on a system including a computer, a digital pen and a sheet of digitized paper, the method first establishing a number of virtual fields on the digitized paper, each which may contain either one allowable mark, or a multiplicity of allowable marks, marking of the paper using the digital pen, and for each such mark determining the field in which the mark is made, if the field may contain only one allowable mark, then recording that mark, and if the field may contain more than one allowable mark, then using character recognition means to identify the mark, and then calculating a test result based on the marks made, the characters corresponding to each, and a scoring protocol.

Claims

1. A software based method of automatically recording and scoring tests, the method practiced on a system comprising a computer, a digital pen and a sheet of digitized paper, the method comprising the following steps:

(a) establishing a multiplicity of virtual fields, each identified by a location and extent on the digitized paper, and each which may contain either one allowable mark, or a multiplicity of allowable marks;

(b) marking of the paper by a tester using the digital pen;

(c) for each such mark;

(i) determining the field in which the mark is made;

(ii) if the field may contain only one allowable mark, then recording that mark;

(iii) if the field may contain more than one allowable mark, then determining which mark was made by character recognition means, and recording that mark;

(d) calculating a test result based on the marks made, the characters corresponding to each, and a scoring protocol.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the method further comprises the steps of:

(a) manually scoring of the test by the tester;

(b) viewing by the tester of the calculated test results on the computer monitor;

(b) comparing the manual scoring results with the calculated test results; and

(c) correcting by the tester of the calculated test results if they are found to be in error.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein the character recognition means further comprise optical character recognition of the entire alpha-numeric character set.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein the character recognition means further comprise determining whether the mark is substantially vertical, horizontal, or angled.

5. The method of claims 4, wherein the digitized paper comprises a form further comprising a multiplicity of lines, each line comprising a multiplicity of characters, the method further comprising the steps of:

(a) prompting by the tester of a response by a testee;

(b) speaking by the testee of the response;

(c) marking by the tester on the form indicating the testee'"'"'s response;

(d) calculation and storage of the number of incorrectly spoken responses; and

(e) generation of reports of test results.

6. The method of claim 5, further comprising the steps of repetition of the steps (a) through (d) of the previous claim during subsequent test periods;

and generation of reports showing the progress of the testee during all the test periods.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein the marks further comprise the group consisting of slashes, strike-throughs, checks, underlines, circles, and brackets, and wherein the character recognition does not comprise optical character recognition of the entire alphanumeric character set.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein the tester is a teacher and the testee is a student, and wherein each line on the form comprises one or more letters, the method further comprising the steps of:

(a) pointing by the student to a letter;

(b) speaking by the student of the letter;

(c) if any of the letters are incorrectly spoken then writing by the teacher of a slash through the corresponding letter;

(e) after the expiration of a test time limit the writing by the teacher of a bracket character at the end of the last letter spoken by the teacher;

(f) calculation and storage of the number of incorrectly spoken letters;

(h) generation and storage of a test score based on a test protocol.

9. The method of claim 7, wherein the tester is a teacher and the testee is a student, and wherein each line on the form comprises one or more words, and for each word one or more phonemes which make up the word, the method further comprising the following steps for each such word:

(a) speaking by the teacher of a word;

(b) speaking by the student of the phonemes making up the word;

(c) if any of the phonemes are incorrectly spoken then writing by the teacher of a slash through the corresponding phoneme;

(d) calculation and storage of the number of incorrectly spoken phonemes;

(e) generation and storage of a test score based on a test protocol.

10. The method of claim 7, wherein the tester is a teacher and the testee is a student, and wherein each line on the form comprises one or more nonsense words, and for each nonsense word one or more phonemes which make up the word, the method further comprising the following steps for each nonsense word:

(a) speaking by the student of the nonsense word;

(b) if any of the nonsense words are incorrectly spoken then writing by the teacher of a slash through the corresponding phoneme of the incorrectly spoken nonsense word;

(c) after the expiration of a test time limit the writing by the teacher of a bracket character at the end of the last word spoken by the teacher;

(d) calculation and storage of the number of incorrectly spoken phonemes;

(e) generation and storage of a test score based on a test protocol.

11. The method of claim 7, wherein the tester is a teacher and the testee is a student, and wherein each line on the form comprises one word, further comprising the steps of:

(a) for each line, the speaking by the teacher of the word;

(b) speaking by the student of a sentence using the word;

(c) writing by the teach of a line through a progressing number as each word in the sentence is spoken;

(d) for each word spoken by the teacher, calculation and storage of the number of words in the sentence using the word;

(e) generation and storage of a test score based on the number of words spoken and a test protocol.

12. The method of claim 7, wherein the tester is a teacher and the testee is a student, and wherein each line on the form comprises one or more words, the words forming sentences, the method further comprising the steps of:

(a) speaking by the student of a sentence;

(b) if the student does not know a particular word in the sentence, then drawing a slash through the word by the teacher;

(c) after the expiration of a test time limit the writing by the teacher of a bracket character at the end of the last word spoken by the student;

(d) calculation and storage of the number of words correctly spoken;

(e) generation and storage of a test score based on the number of words correctly spoken and on a test protocol.

13. The method of claims 8, or 9, or 10, or 11, or 12, the method further comprising:

(a) correcting by the student of her error within a time limit after the error was made, thereby comprising a self-correction;

(b) calculation and storage of the number of self-corrections;

(c) including said self-corrections in the calculation of the test score.