BUSINESS METHOD FOR ENABLING PERSONALIZED MEDICINE

• US 20080177608A1
• Filed: 01/19/2007
• Published: 07/24/2008
• Est. Priority Date: 01/19/2007
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Diaceutics Co.
• Original Assignee: Diaceutics Co.
• Inventors: Keeling, Peter
• Application Number:
  US11/625,242
• Publication Number:
  US 20080177608A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/8
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06 Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/0637 Strategic management or analysis, e.g. setting a goal or target of an organisation; Planning actions based on goals; Analysis or evaluation of effectiveness of goals
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06375 Prediction of business process outcome or impact based on a proposed change
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0201 Market modelling; Market analysis; Collecting market data

Abstract

A method of determining a theranostic plan for a pharmaceutical, the plan being optimized in terms of return on investment (ROI), the method comprising, determining a plurality of planning frameworks which take the pharmaceutical from a point of conception to a point of marketing and beyond, for the or each framework determining a plurality of planning steps which lead to the definition of a plurality of required decisions, effecting a plurality of decisions corresponding to the required decisions, carrying out the plurality of decisions in a predetermined order, based on the framework and planning steps, so as to put the theranostic plan into effect, wherein the carrying out the decisions is made so as to optimize the ROI of the theranostic plan.

Claims

1. A method of determining a theranostic plan for a pharmaceutical, the plan being optimized in terms of return on investment (ROI), the method comprising:

determining a plurality of planning frameworks which take the pharmaceutical from a point of conception to a point of marketing and beyond;

for the or each framework determining a plurality of planning steps which lead to the definition of a plurality of required decisions;

effecting a plurality of decisions corresponding to the required decisions;

carrying out the plurality of decisions in a predetermined order, based on the framework and planning steps, so as to put the theranostic plan into effect, wherein the carrying out the decisions is made so as to optimize the ROI of the theranostic plan.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of determining a plurality of planning frameworks comprises determining one or more of the following frameworks:

a strategic framework

a clinical framework

a regulatory framework

an access framework

a marketing framework

a selling framework

a lifecycle framework; and

a partner framework.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of determining a plurality of planning frameworks comprises determining a combination of the following frameworks:

a strategic framework

a clinical framework

a regulatory framework

an access framework

a marketing framework

a selling framework

a lifecycle framework; and

a partner framework.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of determining a plurality of planning frameworks comprises determining all of the following frameworks:

a strategic framework

a clinical framework

a regulatory framework

an access framework

a marketing framework

a selling framework

a lifecycle framework; and

a partner framework.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein determining a plurality of planning steps which lead to the definition of a plurality of required decisions comprising determining one or more of the following steps:

identifying one or more myths associated with a framework;

identifying one or more realities associated with a framework;

identifying one or more objectives associated with a framework;

identifying one or more required decisions associated with a framework.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein determining a plurality of planning steps which lead to the definition of a plurality of required decisions comprising determining a combination of the following steps:

identifying one or more myths associated with a framework;

identifying one or more realities associated with a framework;

identifying one or more objectives associated with a framework;

identifying one or more required decisions associated with a framework.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein determining a plurality of planning steps which lead to the definition of a plurality of required decisions comprising determining all of the following steps:

identifying one or more myths associated with a framework;

identifying one or more realities associated with a framework;

identifying one or more objectives associated with a framework;

identifying one or more required decisions associated with a framework.

8. The method of claim 2, wherein determining a plurality of planning steps which lead to the definition of a plurality of required decisions comprising determining one or more of the following steps:

identifying one or more myths associated with a framework;

identifying one or more realities associated with a framework;

identifying one or more objectives associated with a framework;

identifying one or more required decisions associated with a framework.

9. The method of claim 3, wherein determining a plurality of planning steps which lead to the definition of a plurality of required decisions comprising determining one or more of the following steps:

identifying one or more myths associated with a framework;

identifying one or more realities associated with a framework;

identifying one or more objectives associated with a framework;

identifying one or more required decisions associated with a framework.

10. The method of claim 4, wherein determining a plurality of planning steps which lead to the definition of a plurality of required decisions comprising determining one or more of the following steps:

identifying one or more myths associated with a framework;

identifying one or more realities associated with a framework;

identifying one or more objectives associated with a framework;

identifying one or more required decisions associated with a framework.

11. The method of claim 1, further comprising carrying out the decisions by determining the answers to one or more key questions for the or each framework.

12. The method of claim 1, further comprising translating the theranostic plan into a partner selection tool.

13. The method of claim 1, further comprising assessing the perception of the complexity of a new test by measuring one of more of the following attributes associated with the test:

reimbursement levels;

turnaround time for the test;

interpretations of results;

patient engagement; and

test administration.

14. A system for determining a theranostic plan for a pharmaceutical, the plan being optimized in terms of return on investment (ROI), the system comprising:

a plurality of planning frameworks which take the pharmaceutical from a point of conception to a point of marketing and beyond;

for the or each framework a plurality of planning steps which lead to the definition of a plurality of decisions;

wherein the plurality of decisions are carried out in a predetermined order, based on the framework and planning steps, so as to put the theranostic plan into effect, and wherein the carrying out the decisions is made so as to optimize the ROI of the theranostic plan.

15. A computer program comprising instructions for carrying out the steps of determining a theranostic plan for a pharmaceutical, the plan being optimized in terms of return on investment (ROI), comprising:

determining a plurality of planning frameworks which take the pharmaceutical from a point of conception to a point of marketing and beyond;

for the or each framework determining a plurality of planning steps which lead to the definition of a plurality of required decisions;

effecting a plurality of decisions corresponding to the required decisions;

carrying out the plurality of decisions in a predetermined order, based on the framework and planning steps, so as to put the theranostic plan into effect, wherein the carrying out the decisions is made so as to optimize the ROI of the theranostic plan,

the steps being effected when said computer program is executed on a computer system.