SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PREMISES MONITORING USING WEIGHT DETECTION

• US 20080218338A1
• Filed: 03/07/2007
• Published: 09/11/2008
• Est. Priority Date: 03/07/2007
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Optimal Innovations Incorporated
• Original Assignee: Optimal Licensing Corporating
• Inventors: Schoettle, Roland
• Application Number:
  US11/683,308
• Publication Number:
  US 20080218338A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 340/541
• CPC Class Codes: G08B 13/10 by pressure on floors, floor coverings, stair treads, counters, or tills
• CPC Class Codes: G08B 21/0202 Child monitoring systems using a transmitter-receiver system carried by the parent and the child
• CPC Class Codes: G08B 21/0469 Presence detectors to detect unsafe condition, e.g. infrared sensor, microphone G08B21/0476 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: G08B 29/188 Data fusion; cooperative systems, e.g. voting among different detectors

Abstract

The present invention is directed to systems and methods which monitor weights applied within a protected premises and, based on detected weight pressure patterns, serve to control operational aspects of the premises. In one embodiment, the pressure monitoring system is used in conjunction with a security system to resolve ambiguities in detected breach conditions. In one embodiment the pressure monitoring system learns and remembers how the premises is used. When a possible trouble condition is detected the system compares a detected pressure against known normal, known abnormal, and unexpected pressures to determine the action to be taken at that time.

Claims

1. A system comprising:

at least one pressure sensor; and

a processor for determining, based on signals received from said sensor and on other parameters associated with said signals, that a condition exists that warrants action to be taken.

2. The system of claim 1 wherein said other parameters are selected from the list of:

time of receipt of one or more readings, number of sensors sending signals, relative locations of various sensors sending signals, amount of weight being applied to a sensor, cyclical repetitions, impact strength, impact duration, path taken, expected path to be taken, speed, velocity, event duration, number of simultaneous readings.

3. The system of claim 1 further comprising:

a program for establishing a set of guidelines representative of anticipated sensor signals that fall within an expected focus of activity; and

wherein said determining is based on said established set of guidelines.

4. The system of claim 3 wherein said guidelines are established by a training process.

5. The system of claim 3 wherein said guidelines are established for control purposes.

6. The system of claim 3 wherein said guidelines are established for verification purposes.

7. The system of claim 3 wherein said guidelines are pre-established by a user based on said user'"'"'s preferences.

8. The system of claim 3 wherein said guidelines are based on predetermined normal conditions.

9. The system of claim 3 wherein said guidelines are based on predetermined abnormal conditions.

10. The system of claim 3 wherein said guidelines are based on unknown or unexpected conditions.

11. The system of claim 3 further comprising:

at least on power control switch; and

wherein said guidelines include therein the operation of said switch in relationship to the receipt of a signal from said sensor.

12. A method for detecting a trouble condition with respect to a protected premises, said method comprising:

receiving signals that correspond to forces being applied to certain positions pertaining to said premises; and

determining from said received signals in conjunction with other received parameters that a trouble condition exists.

13. The method of claim 12 wherein said sensors are located at various locations with respect to said premises and wherein said other received parameters comprise relative locations corresponding to the origins of received ones of said signals.

14. The method of claim 13 wherein said determining is based, at least in part, by a time of receipt of one or more received signals.

15. The method of claim 14 further comprising:

comparing received ones of said signals against an anticipated pattern of signals; and

wherein said determining is based in part on said anticipated signal patterns for particular times of day.

16. The method of claim 15 wherein said anticipated signals for a particular time are determined, at least in part, by pre-training.

17. The method of claim 15 wherein said anticipated signals for a particular time are determined, at least in part, from user supplied input instructions.

18. The method of claim 12 wherein said determining is based, at least in part, on the magnitude of said applied force.

19. The method of claim 12 wherein said determining is based, at least in part, on the comparison of said received weight application signals with receipt of signals representative of other actions occurring with respect to said premises.

20. The method of claim 19 wherein said other actions can be one or more of the actions selected from the list of:

power switch operation, motion sensor detection, premises physical breach detection, sound detection, vibration, light levels, CO2 levels, temperature, movement pattern detection.

21. The method of claim 12 wherein said determining is based, at least in part, on cyclical repetitions.

22. The method of claim 12 wherein said determining is based, at least in part, on impact strength of said force.

23. The method of claim 12 wherein said determining is based, at least in part, on high sensitivity shock patterns (low-g).

24. The method of claim 12 wherein said determining is based, at least in part, on low sensitivity shock patterns (high-g).

25. The method of claim 12 wherein said determining is based, at least in part, on impact duration of said force.

26. The method of claim 12 wherein said determining is based, at least in part, on a path taken by said force.

27. The method of claim 12 wherein said determining is based, at least in part, on expected path to be taken by said force.

28. The method of claim 12 wherein said determining is based, at least in part, on speed of movement of said force.

29. The method of claim 12 wherein said determining is based, at least in part, on a velocity of said force.

30. The method of claim 12 wherein said determining is based, at least in part, on the event duration.

31. The method of claim 12 wherein said determining is based, at least in part, on a number of simultaneous readings of said force.

32. An alarm system comprising;

means for detecting weight being applied to a specific location of a premises;

means for detecting the presence of possible premises trouble conditions; and

means for comparing each said detected application of weight to any detected possible trouble conditions so as to determine a possible alarm condition.

33. The alarm system of claim 32 wherein said comparing means compares actual weight being applied to a anticipated weights to assist in each determination.

34. The alarm system of claim 32 further comprising:

means for creating anticipation data to be used by said comparing means to assist in each determination.

35. The alarm system of claim 34 wherein said anticipation data comprises at least one type of data selected from the list of:

time data, anticipated weight magnitudes;

locations of anticipated weights;

direction of progression from one location to another of said anticipated weights;

number of sensors sending signals;

relative locations of various sensors sending signals;

amount of weight being applied to a sensor;

shock patterns;

cyclical repetitions;

impact strength;

impact duration;

path taken;

expected path to be taken;

speed;

velocity;

event duration;

number of simultaneous readings.

36. The alarm system of claim 32 wherein said comparing means uses a direction of movement as determined by sequentially detected weight applications to assist in each determination.

37. The alarm system of claim 32 wherein said comparing means uses velocity of movement as determined by sequentially detected weight applications to assist in each determination.

38. The alarm system of claim 32 wherein said comparing means uses impact and shock patterns of movement as determined by sequentially detected weight applications to assist in each determination.