APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR HELPING IN THE READING OF AN ELECTRONIC MESSAGE

• US 20090138791A1
• Filed: 10/20/2008
• Published: 05/28/2009
• Est. Priority Date: 11/28/2007
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Original Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Inventors: Kato, Shingo, Sato, Takayuki, Kamimura, Ryo, Kamada, Ryoju
• Granted Patent: US 8,549,394 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 715/230
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/337 Profile generation, learning or modification
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 40/263 Language identification
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 40/279 Recognition of textual entities
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 40/47 Machine-assisted translation, e.g. using translation memory
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/107 Computer-aided management of electronic mailing [e-mailing]
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 51/04 Real-time or near real-time messaging, e.g. instant messaging [IM]

Abstract

An apparatus and method for determining whether the meaning of a word included in an electronic message needs to be presented to a user, according to a dynamic determination whether the user currently knows the meaning of the word. In a client, a communication control unit receives a message sent from a user A to a user B, a morphological analysis unit extracts a word from the message, and a history acquisition unit acquires history information on viewing, usage, or the like of the word by the user B. A display determination unit determines whether the meaning of the word needs to be displayed, according to the acquired history information, the language level of the user B stored in a user level storage unit, and the difficulty level of the word stored in a dictionary storage unit. An input/output control unit performs control such that the meaning of the word is presented to the user B according to the determination result.

Claims

1. An apparatus for helping in a reading of an electronic message exchanged between multiple users, comprising:

an extraction unit for extracting a word from the electronic message sent to a particular user;

an acquisition unit for acquiring history information on at least one of viewing and usage of the word by the particular user, the word being extracted by the extraction unit; and

a determination unit for determining whether a meaning of the word extracted by the extraction unit needs to be presented to the particular user, according to the history information acquired by the acquisition unit.

2. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein

the acquisition unit acquires the history information on the viewing of the word, and

if the history information on the viewing of the word meets a criterion that is related to the viewing of the word and predetermined as a criterion for presuming that the particular user knows the meaning of the word, the determination unit determines that the meaning of the word need not be presented to the particular user.

3. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein

the acquisition unit acquires the history information on the viewing of the word, and

if the history information on the viewing of the word does not meet a criterion that is related to the viewing of the word and predetermined as a criterion for presuming that the particular user knows the meaning of the word, the determination unit determines that the meaning of the word needs to be presented to the particular user.

4. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein

the acquisition unit acquires the history information on the viewing of the word and the history information on the usage of the word, and

even if the history information on the viewing of the word does not meet a criterion that is related to the viewing of the word and predetermined as a criterion for presuming that the particular user knows the meaning of the word, the determination unit determines that the meaning of the word need not be presented to the particular user if the history information on the usage of the word meets a criterion that is related to the usage of the word and predetermined as a criterion for presuming that the particular user knows the meaning of the word.

5. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein

the acquisition unit acquires the history information on the viewing of the word and the history information on the usage of the word, and

if the history information on the viewing of the word does not meet a criterion that is related to the viewing of the word and predetermined as a criterion for presuming that the particular user knows the meaning of the word and if the history information on the usage of the word does not meet a criterion that is related to the usage of the word and predetermined as a criterion for presuming that the particular user knows the meaning of the word, the determination unit determines that the meaning of the word needs to be presented to the particular user.

6. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein

the acquisition unit acquires the history information on the usage of the word, and

if the history information on the usage of the word meets a criterion that is related to the usage of the word and predetermined as a criterion for presuming that the particular user knows the meaning of the word, the determination unit determines that the meaning of the word need not be presented to the particular user.

7. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein

the acquisition unit acquires the history information on the usage of the word, and

if the history information on the usage of the word does not meet a criterion that is related to the usage of the word and predetermined as a criterion for presuming that the particular user knows the meaning of the word, the determination unit determines that the meaning of the word needs to be presented to the particular user.

8. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein

the acquisition unit acquires the history information on the usage of the word and the history information on consultation of an electronic dictionary by the particular user for examining the meaning of the word, and

if the history information on the usage of the word does not meet a criterion that is related to the usage of the word and predetermined as a criterion for presuming that the particular user knows the meaning of the word and if the history information on the consultation does not meet a criterion that is related to the consultation of the electronic dictionary and predetermined as a criterion for presuming that the particular user knows the meaning of the word, the determination unit determines that the meaning of the word needs to be presented to the particular user.

9. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein

the acquisition unit acquires the history information on the usage of the word and the history information on consultation of an electronic dictionary by the particular user for examining the meaning of the word, and

even if the history information on the usage of the word does not meet a criterion that is related to the usage of the word and predetermined as a criterion for presuming that the particular user knows the meaning of the word, the determination unit determines that the meaning of the word need not be presented to the particular user if the history information on the consultation of the electronic dictionary meets a criterion that is related to the consultation of the electronic dictionary and predetermined as a criterion for presuming that the particular user knows the meaning of the word.

10. A method for helping in a reading of an electronic message exchanged between multiple users, the method comprising the steps of:

extracting a word from the electronic message sent to a particular user;

acquiring history information on at least one of viewing and usage of the extracted word by the particular user; and

determining whether a meaning of the extracted word needs to be presented to the particular user, according to the acquired history information.

11. The method according to claim 10, wherein

the acquiring step acquires the history information on the viewing of the word, and

if the history information on the viewing of the word meets a criterion that is related to the viewing of the word and predetermined as a criterion for presuming that the particular user knows the meaning of the word, the determining step determines that the meaning of the word need not be presented to the particular user.

12. The method according to claim 10, wherein

the acquiring step acquires the history information on the viewing of the word, and

if the history information on the viewing of the word does not meet a criterion that is related to the viewing of the word and predetermined as a criterion for presuming that the particular user knows the meaning of the word, the determining step determines that the meaning of the word needs to be presented to the particular user.

13. The method according to claim 10, wherein

the acquiring step acquires the history information on the viewing of the word and the history information on the usage of the word, and

even if the history information on the viewing of the word does not meet a criterion that is related to the viewing of the word and predetermined as a criterion for presuming that the particular user knows the meaning of the word, the determining step determines that the meaning of the word need not be presented to the particular user if the history information on the usage of the word meets a criterion that is related to the usage of the word and predetermined as a criterion for presuming that the particular user knows the meaning of the word.

14. The method according to claim 10, wherein

the acquiring step acquires the history information on the viewing of the word and the history information on the usage of the word, and

if the history information on the viewing of the word does not meet a criterion that is related to the viewing of the word and predetermined as a criterion for presuming that the particular user knows the meaning of the word and if the history information on the usage of the word does not meet a criterion that is related to the usage of the word and predetermined as a criterion for presuming that the particular user knows the meaning of the word, the determining step determines that the meaning of the word needs to be presented to the particular user.

15. The method according to claim 10, wherein

the acquiring step acquires the history information on the usage of the word, and

if the history information on the usage of the word meets a criterion that is related to the usage of the word and predetermined as a criterion for presuming that the particular user knows the meaning of the word, the determining step determines that the meaning of the word need not be presented to the particular user.

16. The method according to claim 10, wherein

the acquiring step acquires the history information on the usage of the word, and

if the history information on the usage of the word does not meet a criterion that is related to the usage of the word and predetermined as a criterion for presuming that the particular user knows the meaning of the word, the determining step determines that the meaning of the word needs to be presented to the particular user.

17. The method according to claim 10, wherein

the acquiring step acquires the history information on the usage of the word and the history information on consultation of an electronic dictionary by the particular user for examining the meaning of the word, and

if the history information on the usage of the word does not meet a criterion that is related to the usage of the word and predetermined as a criterion for presuming that the particular user knows the meaning of the word and if the history information on the consultation does not meet a criterion that is related to the consultation of the electronic dictionary and predetermined as a criterion for presuming that the particular user knows the meaning of the word, the determining step determines that the meaning of the word needs to be presented to the particular user.

18. The method according to claim 10, wherein

the acquiring step acquires the history information on the usage of the word and the history information on consultation of an electronic dictionary by the particular user for examining the meaning of the word, and

even if the history information on the usage of the word does not meet a criterion that is related to the usage of the word and predetermined as a criterion for presuming that the particular user knows the meaning of the word, the determining step determines that the meaning of the word need not be presented to the particular user if the history information on the consultation of the electronic dictionary meets a criterion that is related to the consultation of the electronic dictionary and predetermined as a criterion for presuming that the particular user knows the meaning of the word.

19. A program product for causing a computer to function as an apparatus for helping in a reading of an electronic message exchanged between multiple users, the program product, when executed by the computer, causing the computer to function as:

an extraction unit for extracting a word from the electronic message sent to a particular user;

an acquisition unit for acquiring history information on at least one of viewing and usage of the word by the particular user, the word being extracted by the extraction unit; and

a determination unit for determining whether a meaning of the word extracted by the extraction unit needs to be presented to the particular user, according to the history information acquired by the acquisition unit.