SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING REAL-TIME VIDEO COMPARISON

• US 20090319601A1
• Filed: 06/22/2008
• Published: 12/24/2009
• Est. Priority Date: 06/22/2008
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: F To The Z LLC
• Original Assignee: F To The Z LLC
• Inventors: Moore, Oliver C. III, Zvonaric, Frayne Raymond
• Application Number:
  US12/143,790
• Publication Number:
  US 20090319601A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 709/203
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/02 Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
• CPC Class Codes: H04N 21/4223 Cameras H04N23/00 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: H04N 21/4756 for rating content, e.g. scoring a recommended movie
• CPC Class Codes: H04N 21/4788 communicating with other users, e.g. chatting arrangements for providing for computer conferences, e.g. chat rooms, to substation in data switching networks H04L12/1813; distributed application using peer-to-peer [P2P] networks H04L67/104
• CPC Class Codes: H04N 21/6125 involving transmission via Internet transmission by internet of broadcast information H04H60/82
• CPC Class Codes: H04N 7/163 by receiver means only

Abstract

Two or more performers, contestants, or commentators each perform in separate geographical locations. The performances are captured in via media recording devices and are delivered to a website that manages collection and distribution of performance data. The website creates a webpage that is delivered back to each performer; a webpage is also made available to third party spectators who can see two or more performance. Such third party spectators can compare the multiple performances presented on a single webpage and provide feedback in the nature of ratings, votes, commentary, and other feedback, which feedback may be summarized, averaged, or otherwise analyzed, and presented in raw or summarized/analyzed form to other third party spectators, or to one or more performers. Performance and comparison data created by third party spectators may be archived for later review, further comparison or ratings, or for other uses.

Claims

1. A system for dynamically providing content for comparison, the system:

comprising;

a content recording system comprising

first content originating at a first location; and

second content originating at a second location; and

a computer device in a networked environment that is configured to receive the first and second content for display, wherein the display comprises;

the first content;

the second content; and

a comparison metric by which a comparison may be indicated between the first content and the second content recording.

2. The system of claim 1, further comprising a feedback display visible at the first location and comprising content derived from the second location.

3. The system of claim 1, wherein the comparison metric is made visible at the first location.

4. The system of claim 1, wherein the content recording system further comprises third content originating at a third location.

5. The system of claim 1, wherein the first content is received at the computer device as a real-time media stream.

6. The system of claim 1, wherein the first content and the second content are each derived from separate media recording devices capturing real-life activities occurring in real-time.

7. The system of claim 1, wherein computer device makes available within the visual display information derived from an analysis of the comparison metric.

8. The system of claim 1, wherein the first content and the second content are stored in an archival format for later access.

9. The system of claim 1, wherein the comparison metric is selected from one of:

(i) a yes-no vote, (ii) a multi-step rating, and (iii) a text-based descriptive comparison.

10. The system of claim 1, wherein the second content is additive to the first content.

11. A method for dynamically providing comparison of content, the method comprising:

providing a media recording set comprising (i) first content from a first location to a networked computer device, and (ii) second content from a second location to the networked computer device;

rendering a webpage comprising (i) the first content, (ii) the second content, and (iii) a comparison metric; and

providing the webpage to a user at a third location; and

receiving comparison input from the user at the third location relating to the comparison metric.

12. The method of claim 11, further comprising a rendering the comparison input at a feedback display visible at the first location.

13. The method of claim 11, further comprising rendering the second content at the first location.

14. The method of claim 11, wherein the media recording set further comprises a third content originating at a third location.

15. The method of claim 14, wherein the third content is based upon a moderator input relating to a comparison of the first and second content.

16. The method of claim 11, further comprising obtaining the first and second media from separate media recording devices, capturing real-life activities occurring in real-time.

18. The method of claim 11, wherein the first content and the second content are stored in an archival format for later access.

19. The method of claim 11, wherein at least one of (i) the first content and (ii) the second content is rendered on the webpage in real-time.

20. A computer program product for implementing within a computer system a method for dynamically providing comparison of content, the computer program product comprising:

a computer readable medium for providing computer program code means utilized to implement the method, wherein the computer program code means is comprised of executable code for implementing the steps for;

providing a media recording set comprising (i) first content from a first location to a networked computer device, and (ii) second content from a second location to the networked computer device;

rendering a webpage comprising (i) the first content, (ii) the second content, and (iii) a comparison metric; and

providing the webpage to a user at a third location; and

receiving comparison input from the user at the third location relating to the comparison metric.

21. A webpage rendered on a computer display, the webpage comprising:

first content from a first location;

second content from a second location for comparison with the first content;

a comparison metric; and

comparison input received from one or more users, wherein the comparison input is related to at least one of (i) the first content and (ii) the second content.

22. A webpage rendered on a computer display as recited in claim 21, wherein at least one of (i) the first content and (ii) the second content is displayed in real-time.