Dynamically controlling permissions

• US 20100023522A1
• Filed: 07/18/2008
• Published: 01/28/2010
• Est. Priority Date: 07/18/2008
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: George Madathilparambil George, Nikhil George
• Original Assignee: George Madathilparambil George, Nikhil George
• Inventors: George, Nikhil, Madathilparambil George, George
• Application Number:
  US12/218,741
• Publication Number:
  US 20100023522A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: N/A
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/10 File systems; File servers

Abstract

A high level of computer security can be achieved by controlling read/write/execute access to files, controlling incoming or outgoing network connections, controlling incoming or outgoing network traffic and controlling privileged operations based on states of Application Security Environments and/or based on states of users or groups of users and/or based on states of privilege objects. These states can be controlled dynamically by software or by one or more hardware devices.

Claims

1. A method of controlling file and/or directory operations and/or controlling network connections from a process or task running in an Application Security Environment (where an Application Security Environment is an environment in which one or more processes or tasks can be run and the privileges of the processes or tasks in the Application Security Environment can be a subset of the privileges of the user or the user-group who owns that Application Security Environment) which is owned by a user or a user-group (where a user-group is a group of users) based on:

i. The current state of that Application Security Environment and/or

ii. The current state of that user or user-group who owns that Application Security Environment and/or

iii. The current state of one or more privilege objects. A privilege object has one or more states such that these states can be mapped to permissions which processes or tasks have to perform operations on one or more objects.

6. The modules in the operating system such as file systems and networking stacks being capable of detecting states of claim (1).

7. A software which allows the states of claim (1) to be controlled dynamically. This software supporting one or more Application Security Environments and/or one or more users and/or one or more user-groups and/or one or more privilege objects. This software supporting none or one or more states for each supported Application Security Environment, for each supported user, for each supported user-group and for each supported privilege object such that these states can be used for controlling permissions which processes or tasks have to perform operations on different objects in the operating system and/or permissions for controlling access to the devices attached to the computer. Preferably, this software allows only an authenticated user to make state changes.

8. Optionally, privilege object states of claim (1) can be mapped to the states of the operating system and/or the computer partition and/or the computer and/or one or more devices attached to the computer;

9. A device which allows the states of claim (1) to be controlled. This device supporting one or more users and/or one or more user-groups and/or one or more Application Security Environments and/or one or more privilege objects. This device supporting none or one state for one or more supported users, none or one or more states for each supported user-group and none or one or more states for each supported privilege object such that these states can be used for controlling permissions which processes or tasks have to perform operations on different objects in the operating system and/or permissions for controlling access to the devices attached to the computer.

10. Preferably, the state change can be done only by an authenticated user by performing a manual action on the device of claim (9) or the state change can be completed only after the user performing the manual action on the device of claim (9) for the state change is authenticated. The mechanism used by the device for authenticating a user who performed a manual action to change the state on that device may be based on finger print and/or retina and/or password and/or user name and/or other current or future technologies for user authentication. The manual action for performing a state change may be pressing one or more buttons and/or toggling the position of one or more switches and/or turning a wheel and/or changing one or more jumper positions and/or any other manual action accepted by the device.

11. Preferably, the state change can be done only by an authenticated user by performing a manual action on a device which directly or indirectly controls state changes on the device of claim (9) or the state change can be completed only after the user performing the manual action for the state change on a device which directly or indirectly controls state changes on the device of claim (9) is authenticated.

21. Using the Application Security Environment states or user/user-group states or privilege object states of claim (1) for dynamically controlling the permissions to objects such as data structures containing permissions for files or directories in a directory.

2. A method of controlling file and/or directory operations and/or controlling network connections from a process or task which is owned by a user or a user-group based on:

i. The current state of that user or user-group and/or

ii. The current state of one or more privilege objects.

12. The modules in the operating system such as file systems and networking stacks being capable of detecting states of claim (2).

13. A software which allows the states of claim (2) to be controlled dynamically. This software supporting one or more users and/or one or more user-groups and/or one or more privilege objects. This software supporting none or one or more states for each supported user, for each supported user-group and for each supported privilege object such that these states can be used for controlling permissions which processes or tasks have to perform operations on different objects in the operating system and/or permissions for controlling access to the devices attached to the computer. Preferably, this software allows only an authenticated user to make state changes.

14. A device which allows the states of claim (2) to be controlled. This device supporting one or more users and/or one or more user-groups and/or one or more privilege objects. This device supporting none or one state for one or more supported users, none or one or more states for each supported user-group and none or one or more states for each supported privilege object such that these states can be used for controlling permissions which processes or tasks have to perform operations on different objects in the operating system and/or permissions for controlling access to the devices attached to the computer.

15. Preferably, the state change can be done only by an authenticated user by performing a manual action on the device of claim (14) or the state change can be completed only after the user performing the manual action on the device of claim (14) for the state change is authenticated.

16. Preferably, the state change can be done only by an authenticated user by performing a manual action on a device which directly or indirectly controls state changes on the device of claim (14) or the state change can be completed only after the user performing the manual action for the state change on a device which directly or indirectly controls state changes on the device of claim (14) is authenticated.

22. Using the user/user-group states or privilege object states of claim (2) for dynamically controlling permissions to objects such as data structures containing permissions for files or directories in a directory. Using the user/user-group states or privilege object states of claim (2) for controlling the execution of privileged operations.

3. When the states of the privilege objects and/or the state of the user or user-group and/or the state of the Application Security Environment are used to control the permissions which a process or a task has to perform an operation on an object as claimed in (1) then:

i. Preferably, the selection of the permissions should be based on the priority of those privilege objects and/or that user or user-group and/or that Application Security Environment.

ii. Optionally, the permissions can be obtained by performing AND or OR operations on the permissions corresponding to the current states of those privilege objects and/or that user or user-group and/or that Application Security Environment.

iii. Optionally, the permissions can be obtained by using a combination of;

a. The priority between privilege objects and/or that user or user-group and/or that Application Security Environment, and

b. Performing AND or OR operations on the permissions corresponding to the current states of those privilege objects and/or that user or user-group and/or that Application Security Environment.

4. When the states of the privilege objects and/or the state of the user or user-group are used to control the permissions which a process or a task has to perform an operation on an object as claimed in (2) then:

i. Preferably, the selection of the permissions should be based on the priority of those privilege objects and/or that user or user-group.

ii. Optionally, the permissions can be obtained by performing AND or OR operations on the permissions corresponding to the current states of those privilege objects and/or that user or user-group.

iii. Optionally, the permissions can be obtained by using a combination of;

a. The priority between privilege objects and/or that user or user-group, and

b. Performing AND or OR operations on the permissions corresponding to the current states of those privilege objects and/or that user or user-group.

5. The privileges of a user or a user-group or an Application Security Environment can be changed dynamically by changing the states as claimed in (1) even when the user or the user-group does-not have write access to the corresponding permission data structures.

17. A device supporting one or more users and/or one or more user-groups and/or one or more privilege objects. This device supporting none or one state for one or more supported users, none or one or more states for each supported user-group and none or one or more states for each supported privilege object such that these states can be used for controlling permissions which processes or tasks have to perform operations on different objects in the operating system and/or permissions for controlling access to the devices attached to the computer. Optionally, the privilege object states of the device can be mapped to the states of modules in the operating system and/or the states of the computer partition and/or the states of the computer and/or the states of one or more devices attached to the computer.

18. When the device of claim (17) can support only one privilege object, the selection of a privilege object not being required and the state of the privilege object being the same as the state of the device. This device supporting user authentication.

19. Preferably, the state change can be done only by an authenticated user by performing a manual action on the device of claim (17) or the state change can be completed only after the user performing the manual action on the device of claim (17) for the state change is authenticated.

20. Preferably, the state change can be done only by an authenticated user by performing a manual action on a device which directly or indirectly controls state changes on the device of claim (17) or the state change can be completed only after the user performing the manual action for the state change on a device which directly or indirectly controls state changes on the device of claim (17) is authenticated.