METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR AUTHENTICATING ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION

• US 20110010426A1
• Filed: 09/17/2010
• Published: 01/13/2011
• Est. Priority Date: 10/07/2002
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: eBay Inc.
• Original Assignee: eBay Inc.
• Inventors: Abbott, Marty, Sanford, Kirk, Lalonde, Chris, Isaacs, Greg
• Granted Patent: US 8,078,683 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 709/206
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/107 Computer-aided management of electronic mailing [e-mailing]
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 51/212 using filtering or selective blocking
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 51/48 Message addressing, e.g. address format or anonymous messages, aliases
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 61/4555 Directories for electronic mail or instant messaging
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/126 the source of the received data
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/1416 Event detection, e.g. attack signature detection
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/1466 Active attacks involving interception, injection, modification, spoofing of data unit addresses, e.g. hijacking, packet injection or TCP sequence number attacks
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/1483 service impersonation, e.g. phishing, pharming or web spoofing detection of rogue wireless access points H04W12/12

Abstract

One embodiment provides a method for authenticating an electronic communication. The method includes parsing a header of the electronic communication to identify actual domain name data included in the header at a server receiving the electronic communication from a communication client; parsing the header to obtain purported sender data included in the header of the electronic communication; comparing the actual domain name data and purported sender data; and generating in response to the comparison an authenticity indicator, to provide a recipient of the electronic communication with an indication of the likelihood that the electronic communication was sent from a purported sender of the electronic communication.

Claims

1. A method of authenticating an electronic communication, the method including:

parsing a header of the electronic communication to identify actual domain name data included in the header at a server receiving the electronic communication from a communication client;

parsing the header to obtain purported sender data included in the header of the electronic communication;

comparing the actual domain name data and purported sender data; and

generating in response to the comparison an authenticity indicator, to provide a recipient of the electronic communication with an indication of the likelihood that the electronic communication was sent from a purported sender of the electronic communication.

2. The method of claim 1, in which parsing the header to obtain purported sender data includes:

parsing the header to obtain purported sender domain name data in a “

FROM;

. . . ”

field populated at the communication client, the purported sender domain name data being visible to a recipient of the electronic communication.

3. The method of claim 1, in which parsing the header to obtain purported sender data includes:

parsing the header to obtain a purported IP Address of an originator of the electronic communication;

interrogating a Domain Name Server (DNS) with the actual domain name data to obtain an associated IP address of an actual domain name;

comparing the associated IP address with the purported IP address; and

generating the authenticity indicator in response to the comparison.

4. The method of claim 1, which is executed in conjunction with virus protection software.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the header of the electronic communication includes a visible communication header which is visible to the recipient when opening the electronic communication, and a transmission data communication header including received data included by at least one server via which the electronic communication is communicated, the method including investigating data in both the visible and transmission data communication headers.

6. The method of claim 1, in which parsing the header to obtain purported domain name data includes:

parsing the header to obtain domain name data of each server via which the electronic communication has been communicated;

comparing the domain name data of each server with reference domain name data; and

generating the authenticity indicator in response to the comparison.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein the reference domain name data includes domain names associated with spoofed electronic communication, the method including updating the reference domain name data in an automated fashion.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein the reference domain name data is stored on a client machine, the method including:

connecting the client machine to a remote database of reference domain name data;

downloading updated reference domain name data; and

storing the reference domain name data on the client machine.

9. A machine-readable medium embodying a sequence of instructions that, when executed by a machine, cause the machine execute a method of authenticating an electronic communication, the method including:

parsing a “

received”

field of a header of the electronic communication to identify actual domain name data included in the header at a server receiving the electronic communication from a communication client;

parsing the header to obtain purported sender data included in the header of the electronic communication;

comparing the actual domain name data and purported sender data; and

generating in response to the investigation an authenticity indicator, to provide a recipient of the electronic communication with an indication of the likelihood that the electronic communication was sent from a purported sender of the electronic communication.

10. The machine-readable medium of claim 9, wherein parsing the header to obtain purported sender data includes:

parsing the header to obtain purported sender domain name data in a “

FROM;

”

field populated at the communication client, the purported sender domain name data being visible to a recipient of the electronic communication.

11. The machine-readable medium of claim 9, wherein parsing the header to obtain purported sender data includes:

parsing the header to obtain a purported IP Address of an originator of the electronic communication;

interrogating a Domain Name Server (DNS) with the actual domain name data to obtain an associated IP address of an actual domain name;

comparing the associated IP address with the purported IP address; and

generating the authenticity indicator in response to the comparison.

12. The machine-readable medium of claim 9, wherein the instructions are executed in conjunction with virus protection software.

13. The machine-readable medium of claim 9, wherein the header of the electronic communication includes a visible communication header which is visible to the recipient when opening the electronic communication, and a transmission data communication header including received data included by at least one server via which the electronic communication is communicated, the method including investigating data in both the visible and transmission data communication headers.

14. The machine-readable medium of claim 9, wherein parsing in the header to obtain purported domain name data includes:

parsing the header to obtain domain name data of each server via which the electronic communication has been communicated;

comparing the domain name data of each server with reference domain name data; and

generating the authenticity indicator in response to the comparison.

15. The machine-readable medium of claim 14, wherein the reference domain name data includes domain names associated with spoofed electronic communication, the method including updating the reference domain name data in an automated fashion.

16. The machine-readable medium of claim 15, wherein the reference domain name data is stored on a client machine, the method including:

connecting the client machine to a remote database of reference domain name data;

downloading updated reference domain name data; and

storing the reference domain name data on the client machine.

17. A communication server for authenticating electronic communication communicated between the communication server and at least one client device, the communication server including:

a memory which includes a set of instructions which, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to;

parse a “

received”

field of a header of the electronic communication to identify actual domain name data included in the header at a server receiving the electronic communication from a communication client;

parse the header to obtain purported sender data included in the header of the electronic communication;

compare the actual domain name data and purported sender data; and

generate in response to the comparison an authenticity indicator, to provide a recipient of the electronic communication with an indication of the likelihood that the electronic communication was sent from a purported sender of the electronic communication.

18. The communication server of claim 17, in which the processor:

parses the header to obtain purported sender domain name data in a “

FROM;

”

field populated at a communication client, the purported sender domain name data being visible to a recipient of the electronic communication.

19. The communication server of claim 17, in which the processor:

parses the header to obtain a purported IP Address of an originator of the electronic communication;

interrogates a Domain Name Server (DNS) with the actual domain name data to obtain an associated IP address of the actual domain name;

compares the associated IP address with the purported IP address; and

generates the authenticity indicator in response to the comparison.

20. The communication server of claim 17, in which the processor:

parses the header to obtain domain name data of each server via which the electronic communication has been communicated;

compares the domain name data of each server with reference domain name data; and

generates the authenticity indicator in response to the comparison.