METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR ANALYZING LOCATE AND MARKING OPERATIONS BY COMPARING LOCATE INFORMATION AND MARKING INFORMATION

• US 20110046999A1
• Filed: 08/04/2010
• Published: 02/24/2011
• Est. Priority Date: 10/02/2008
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Certusview Technologies LLC (Dycom Industries Incorporated)
• Original Assignee: Certusview Technologies LLC (Dycom Industries Incorporated)
• Inventors: Nielsen, Steven, Chambers, Curtis, Farr, Jeffrey
• Granted Patent: US 8,620,726 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/7.39
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/063 Operations research, analysis or management
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06393 Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/02 Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising

Abstract

Methods, apparatus and systems including a computer comprising at least one hardware processor, at least one tangible storage medium (memory), and at least one input/output (I/O) interface for evaluating a quality of a locate and/or marking operation. First information relating to the marking operation (e.g., marking information) is compared to second information relating to the locate operation (e.g., locate information). In some examples, one or both of the marking information and the locate information may be filtered to improve data integrity in some manner. One or more indications of a quality assessment of the locate and/or marking operation is automatically generated based on such a comparison, and the one or more indications of the quality assessment are electronically stored on the at least one tangible storage medium, and/or electronically transmitted via the at least one I/O interface, so as to provide an electronic record of the quality assessment.

Claims

1. In a computer comprising at least one hardware processor, at least one tangible storage medium, and at least one input/output (I/O) interface, a method for evaluating a quality of a locate operation and/or a marking operation to identify a presence or an absence of at least one underground facility at a work site, the method comprising:

A) comparing marking information relating to the marking operation to locate information relating to the locate operation;

B) automatically generating, based on A), at least one indication of a quality assessment of the locate and/or marking operation; and

C) electronically storing on the at least one tangible storage medium, and/or electronically transmitting via the at least one I/O interface, the at least one indication of the quality assessment so as to provide an electronic record of the quality assessment.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein one of the locate operation and the marking operation is a current operation, and wherein the other of the locate operation and the marking operation is a historical operation.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the computer comprises at least one display device, and wherein the method further comprises:

displaying the at least one indication of the quality assessment on the at least one display device.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the locate and/or marking operation is performed by at least one technician, and wherein C) comprises:

transmitting at least one feedback message to the at least one technician prior to completion of the location and/or marking operation, the feedback message being generated based at least in part on the at least one indication of the quality assessment generated in B).

5. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

obtaining at least one of the marking information and the locate information from at least one historical ticket, at least one electronic manifest, and/or at least one electronic record generated by locate equipment used to perform the locate and/or marking information.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein at least one of the marking information and the locate information is generated by locating equipment used by the field-service technician to perform the locate and/or marking operation, wherein the locating equipment comprises at least one of a marking device, a locate device, and a combined locate and marking device, wherein the method further comprises:

prior to A), receiving at least one of the marking information and the locate information from the locating equipment.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein the at least one of the marking device, the locate device, and the combined locate and marking device includes the computer including the at least one hardware processor executing the method.

8. The method of claim 6, wherein A), B), and C) are performed during or immediately following the locate and/or marking operation, and wherein the method further comprises:

D) altering at least one operating characteristic of the locating equipment based on the at least one indication of the quality assessment.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein the at least one indication of the quality assessment comprises a numeric score indicative of the quality of the locate and/or marking operation, and wherein D) further comprises:

D1) altering the at least one operating characteristic of the locating equipment if the numeric score is below a predetermined threshold.

10. The method of claim 8, wherein D) comprises disabling the locating equipment if the at least one indication of the quality assessment is unsatisfactory.

11. The method of claim 1, wherein at least one of the marking information and the locate information includes at least one of:

at least one location at which the locating equipment was used to perform the locate and/or marking operation;

facility-type information identifying at least one underground facility for which the presence or the absence was detected and/or marked during the locate and/or marking operation;

facility location information identifying a location of the at least one underground facility for which the field-service technician detected and/or marked the presence or the absence during the locate and/or marking operation;

marking material type information identifying at least one characteristic of a marking material used to mark the presence or the absence of the at least one underground facility;

signal information identifying a signal strength measured by the locate device at the location of the at least one underground facility for which the field-service technician detected the presence or the absence during the locate and/or marking operation;

position information identifying an angle and/or acceleration of the locating equipment during the locate and/or marking operation;

environmental information describing at least one environmental condition present during the locate and/or marking operation;

service-related information including one or more identifiers for the field-service technician performing the locate and/or marking operation, the locating equipment and/or a locate contractor dispatching the field-service technician;

ticket information relating to a locate request ticket for the locate and/or marking operation; and

device health information about a status of one or more components of the locating equipment.

12. The method of claim 1, wherein at least one of the marking information and the locate information comprises an electronic manifest of the locate and/or marking operation, the electronic manifest comprising:

at least one image of the work site; and

at least one electronic marking on the image indicating the presence or the absence of the at least one underground facility.

13. The method of claim 12, wherein the electronic manifest further comprises first geographic information indicating the location of the at least one electronic marking.

14. The method of claim 13, wherein the method further comprises:

A1) prior to A), selecting for comparison at least some of the marking information and/or at least some of the locate information based at least in part on a dig area indicator that indicates a dig area of the work site on a digital image.

15. The method of claim 14, wherein A1) comprises:

receiving, via the at least one I/O interface, geographic coordinates for the dig area indicator; and

selecting the at least some of the marking information, and/or the at least some of the locate information, that relates only to a geographic area including the geographic coordinates for the dig area indicator.

16. The method of claim 15, wherein the geographic area is within a predetermined radius of the geographic coordinates for the dig area indicator.

17. The method of claim 14, wherein the dig area indicator delimits the dig area on the digital image, and wherein A1) comprises:

receiving, via the at least one I/O interface, dig area indicator geographic information including geographic coordinates for the dig area indicator; and

selecting the at least some of the marking information, and/or the at least some of the locate information, that relates only to a geographic area delimited by the dig area indicator geographic information.

18. The method of claim 1, wherein:

the marking information includes a first set of geo-location data points indicating first geographic locations at which at least one facility line of the at least one underground facility was marked during the locate and/or marking operation; and

the locate information includes a second set of geo-location data points indicating second geographic locations at which the at least one facility line of the at least one underground facility was detected during the locate and/or marking operation,

and wherein A) comprises;

A1) comparing the first set of geo-location data points with the second set of geo-location data points; and

A2) determining a distance between at least one point in the first set and a nearest point in the second set to generate at least one distance value.

19. The method of claim 18, wherein A2) comprises:

determining the distance between each point in the first set and the nearest point in the second set to generate a distance vector including a plurality of distance values.

20. The method of claim 18, wherein the first set of geo-location data points is expressed in a first reference frame and the second set of geo-location data points is expressed in a second reference frame different from the first reference frame, and wherein the processor transforms at least one of the first set of geo-location data points and the second set of geo-location data points to a common reference frame.

21. The method of claim 18, wherein B) comprises:

B1) generating the at least one indication of the quality assessment based, at least in part, on the at least one distance value generated in A2).

22. The method of claim 1, wherein B) further comprises:

B1) generating the at least one indication of the quality assessment as a score or grade having one of a plurality of possible values.

23. The method of claim 22, wherein B1) comprises:

providing at least one quality assessment criterion relating to at least one of the marking information and the locate information;

providing at least two scoring categories for the at least one quality assessment criterion, each scoring category associated with a scoring value or grade;

for each scoring category providing an expected data value or range of expected data values;

determining, for the at least one quality assessment criterion, into which of the at least two scoring categories the locate and/or marking operation falls by comparing the at least one of the marking information and the locate information to the expected data value or range of expected data values for at least one of the at least two scoring categories; and

assigning to the locate and/or marking operation the scoring value or grade associated with the scoring category into which the locate and/or marking operation falls.

24. An apparatus for evaluating a quality of a locate and/or marking operation to identify a presence or an absence of at least one underground facility at a work site, the apparatus comprising:

at least one input/output (I/O) interface;

at least one memory storing processor-executable instructions; and

a processor coupled to the memory and the at least one I/O interface, wherein upon execution of the processor-executable instructions by the processor, the processor;

A) compares marking information relating to the marking operation to locate information relating to the locate operation;

B) automatically generates, based on A), at least one indication of a quality assessment of the locate and/or marking operation; and

C) controls the at least one memory so as to electronically store, and/or controls the at least one I/O interface so as to electronically transmit, the at least one indication of the quality assessment so as to provide an electronic record of the quality assessment.

25. At least one computer-readable storage medium encoded with instructions that, when executed by a processor in a computer comprising at least one input/output (I/O) interface, perform a method for evaluating a quality of a locate and/or marking operation to identify a presence or an absence of at least one underground facility within a work site, the method comprising:

A) comparing marking information relating to the marking operation to locate information relating to the locate operation;

B) automatically generating, based on A), at least one indication of a quality assessment of the locate and marking operation; and

C) electronically storing on the at least one computer-readable storage medium, and/or electronically transmitting via the at least one I/O interface, the at least one indication of the quality assessment so as to provide an electronic record of the quality assessment.

26. An apparatus for automatically assessing a quality of a locate and/or marking operation, the apparatus comprising:

a memory storing processor-executable instructions;

at least one I/O interface; and

a processor coupled to the memory and the at least one I/O interface, wherein upon execution of the processor-executable instructions, the processor;

A) identifies at least one first geographic location at which at least one facility line of at least one underground facility was marked during the marking operation;

B) obtains marking geo-location data based on A);

C) identifies at least one first geographic location at which at least one facility line of at least one underground facility was detected during the locate operation;

D) obtains locate geo-location data based C);

E) determines a measure of distances between the marking geo-location data and the locate geo-location data;

F) assesses the quality of the locate and/or marking operation based at least in part on E); and

G) generates at least one indication of a quality assessment based on F).

27. The apparatus of claim 26, wherein in F), the processor statistically analyzes the measure of distances to assess the quality of the first locate and/or marking operation.

28. The apparatus of claim 26, wherein in G) the processor:

generates the at least one indication of the quality assessment based, at least in part, on a percentage of distances determined in E) that are less than a first threshold.