Self-Similar Processing Network

• US 20110072240A1
• Filed: 09/21/2010
• Published: 03/24/2011
• Est. Priority Date: 09/21/2009
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Theorem Synthetic intelligence, Inc.
• Original Assignee: Hilbert Technology Inc.
• Inventors: Gruenwald, Bjorn J.
• Granted Patent: US 8,504,800 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 712/30
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 15/17337 Direct connection machines, e.g. completely connected computers, point to point communication networks coupling between buses G06F13/4004
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 15/78 comprising a single central processing unit

Abstract

Self-similar processing by unit processing cells may together solve a problem. A unit processing cell may include a processor, a memory and a plurality of Input/Output (IO) channels coupled to the processor. The memory may include a dictionary having one or more instructions that configure the processor to perform at least one function. The plurality of IO channels may be used to communicably couple the unit processing cell with a plurality of other unit processing cells each including their own respective dictionary. The unit processing cell and the plurality of other unit processing cells may be independent of one another and may perform together without a centralized control. The processor may update the dictionary so that the unit processing cell builds a different dictionary from the plurality of other unit processing cells, thereby being self-similar to the plurality of other unit processing cells.

Claims

1. A unit processing cell, comprising:

at least one processor;

a memory comprising;

a dictionary comprising one or more instructions that configure the at least one processor to perform at least one function; and

a plurality of Input/Output (IO) channels communicably coupled to the at least one processor,

wherein the plurality of IO channels are configured to communicably couple the unit processing cell with a plurality of other unit processing cells, each of the plurality of other unit processing cells comprising their own respective dictionary,

wherein the unit processing cell and the plurality of other unit processing cells are independent of one another and configured to perform together without a centralized control,

wherein the at least one processor is configured to update the dictionary so that the unit processing cell is configured to build a different dictionary from the plurality of other unit processing cells, thereby being self-similar to the plurality of other unit processing cells.

2. The unit processing cell of claim 1, wherein the unit processing cell and the plurality of other unit processing cells are substantially the same as one another except for their respective dictionaries.

3. The unit processing cell of claim 1, wherein the plurality of IO channels comprise N−

1 IO channels that each couple the unit processing cell with at least one of the plurality of other unit processing cells, wherein N is a number representing the unit processing cell and the plurality of other unit processing cells coupled to the unit processing cell.

4. The unit processing cell of claim 1, wherein the unit processing cell and the plurality of other unit processing cells are frequency agnostic with respect to one another.

5. The unit processing cell of claim 1, wherein the unit processing cell and the plurality of other unit processing cells are configured to execute asynchronously with respect to one another.

6. The unit processing cell of claim 1, wherein the at least one processor is configured to limit the dictionary, wherein the dictionary is limited to a finite number of the one or more instructions.

7. The unit processing cell of claim 6, wherein the at least one processor is configured to limit the dictionary by one or more of:

learn a new instruction at the expense of an existing instruction;

refuse to learn a new instruction;

or receive a command that determines whether to learn a new instruction.

8. The unit processing cell of claim 1, wherein the at least one processor is configured to receive a command and make a decision to ignore or accept the command.

9. The unit processing cell of claim 8, wherein the decision whether to ignore or accept the command depends on one or more of:

a state of the unit processing cell, a recognition of the command in the dictionary, or a nature of the command.

10. A self-similar processing network, comprising:

a plurality of unit processing cells each communicably coupled to one another,

wherein each of the plurality of unit processing cells comprise;

at least one processor;

a memory comprising a dictionary comprising one or more instructions that configure the at least one processor to perform at least one function, and

a plurality of Input/Output (IO) channels communicably coupled to the at least one processor, wherein each of the plurality of IO channels is configured to communicably couple one of the plurality of unit processing cells with another one of the plurality of unit processing cells,

wherein each of the plurality of unit processing cells are configured to execute independently of one another so that the plurality of unit processing cells executes without a centralized control,

wherein each of the at least one processor is configured to update each respective dictionary so that each of the plurality of unit processing cells build different dictionaries from one another, thereby being self-similar to the plurality of other unit processing cells.

11. The self-similar processing network of claim 10, wherein the self-similar processing network is coupled to one or more other self-similar processing networks each comprising their own plurality of unit processing cells.

12. The self-similar processing network of claim 11, wherein the self-similar processing network is coupled to the one or more other self-similar processing networks via a coupling between a unit processing cell of the self-similar processing network and at least one unit processing cell of the one or more other self-similar processing networks.

13. A computer-implemented method of self-similar processing to solve a problem, comprising:

updating, by at least one of processor of a unit processing cell communicably coupled to a plurality of other unit processing cells, a dictionary of the unit processing cell, wherein the dictionary comprises one or more instructions configuring the at least one processor to perform at least one function used to at least partially solve the problem,

wherein the solution to the problem is attempted together by the unit processing cell and a plurality of other unit processing cells each comprising their own respective dictionaries,

wherein the updating causes the dictionary to be different from the respective dictionaries of the plurality of other unit processing cells, thereby causing the unit processing cell to be self-similar to the plurality of other unit processing cells;

processing, by the at least one processor, the at least one function independently from the plurality of other unit processing cells, the unit processing cell and each of the plurality of other unit processing cells processing their respective at least one function to solve the problem without a centralized control; and

communicating, by the at least one processor using a plurality of Input/Output (IO) channels, information based on the processing to the plurality of other unit processing cells to attempt to solve the problem based on their self-similarity.

14. The computer-implemented method of claim 13, wherein the unit processing cell and the plurality of other unit processing cells are substantially the same as one another except for their respective dictionaries.

15. The computer-implemented method of claim 13, wherein the plurality of IO channels comprise N−

1 IO channels that each couple the unit processing cell with at least one of the plurality of other unit processing cells, wherein N is a number representing the unit processing cell and the plurality of other unit processing cells coupled to the unit processing cell.

16. The computer-implemented method of claim 13, wherein the unit processing cell and the plurality of other unit processing cells are frequency agnostic with respect to one another.

17. The computer-implemented method of claim 13, further comprising:

executing, by the at least one processor, asynchronously with respect to the plurality of other unit processing cells.

18. The computer-implemented method of claim 13, further comprising:

limiting, by the at least one processor, the dictionary to a finite number of the one or more instructions.

19. The computer-implemented method of claim 18, wherein limiting the dictionary further comprises limiting the dictionary by one or more of:

learning a new instruction at the expense of an existing instruction;

refusing to learn a new instruction;

or receiving a command that determines whether to learn a new instruction.

20. The computer-implemented method of claim 13, further comprising:

receiving, by the at least one processor, a command and making a decision to ignore or accept the command.